No benefit from TMZ treatment in GB with truly unmethylated MGMT promoter: Reanalysis of the CE.6 and the pooled Nordic/NOA-08 trials in elderly GB patients.

MGMT promoter methylation elderly/frail GB patients stratified treatment

Journal

Neuro-oncology
ISSN: 1523-5866
Titre abrégé: Neuro Oncol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100887420

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
24 Jun 2024
Historique:
received: 01 03 2024
medline: 24 6 2024
pubmed: 24 6 2024
entrez: 24 6 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

The treatment of elderly/ frail patients with glioblastoma is a balance between avoiding undue toxicity, while not withholding effective treatment. It remains debated, whether these patients should receive combined chemo-radiotherapy with temozolomide (RT/TMZ➜TMZ) regardless of the O6-methylguanine DNA methyltransferase gene promoter (MGMTp) methylation status. MGMT is a well-known resistance factor blunting the treatment effect of TMZ, by repairing the most genotoxic lesion. Epigenetic silencing of the MGMTp sensitizes glioblastoma to TMZ. For risk adapted treatment, it is of utmost importance to accurately identify patients, who will not benefit from TMZ treatment. Here, we present a reanalysis of the clinical trials CE.6 and the pooled NOA-08 and Nordic trials in elderly glioblastoma patients that compared RT to RT/TMZ➜TMZ, or RT to TMZ, respectively. For 687 patients with available MGMTp methylation data, we applied a cutoff discerning truly unmethylated glioblastoma, established in a pooled analysis of four clinical trials for glioblastoma, with RT/TMZ➜TMZ treatment, using the same quantitative methylation specific MGMTp PCR assay. When applying this restricted cutoff to the elderly patient population, we confirmed that glioblastoma with truly unmethylated MGMTp derived no benefit from TMZ treatment. In the Nordic/NOA-08 trials RT was better than TMZ, suggesting little or no benefit from TMZ. For evidence-based treatment of glioblastoma patients validated MGMTp methylation assays should be used that accurately identify truly unmethylated patients. Respective stratified management of patients will reduce toxicity without compromising outcome and allow testing of more promising treatment options.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
The treatment of elderly/ frail patients with glioblastoma is a balance between avoiding undue toxicity, while not withholding effective treatment. It remains debated, whether these patients should receive combined chemo-radiotherapy with temozolomide (RT/TMZ➜TMZ) regardless of the O6-methylguanine DNA methyltransferase gene promoter (MGMTp) methylation status. MGMT is a well-known resistance factor blunting the treatment effect of TMZ, by repairing the most genotoxic lesion. Epigenetic silencing of the MGMTp sensitizes glioblastoma to TMZ. For risk adapted treatment, it is of utmost importance to accurately identify patients, who will not benefit from TMZ treatment.
METHODS METHODS
Here, we present a reanalysis of the clinical trials CE.6 and the pooled NOA-08 and Nordic trials in elderly glioblastoma patients that compared RT to RT/TMZ➜TMZ, or RT to TMZ, respectively. For 687 patients with available MGMTp methylation data, we applied a cutoff discerning truly unmethylated glioblastoma, established in a pooled analysis of four clinical trials for glioblastoma, with RT/TMZ➜TMZ treatment, using the same quantitative methylation specific MGMTp PCR assay.
RESULTS RESULTS
When applying this restricted cutoff to the elderly patient population, we confirmed that glioblastoma with truly unmethylated MGMTp derived no benefit from TMZ treatment. In the Nordic/NOA-08 trials RT was better than TMZ, suggesting little or no benefit from TMZ.
CONCLUSION CONCLUSIONS
For evidence-based treatment of glioblastoma patients validated MGMTp methylation assays should be used that accurately identify truly unmethylated patients. Respective stratified management of patients will reduce toxicity without compromising outcome and allow testing of more promising treatment options.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38912869
pii: 7697864
doi: 10.1093/neuonc/noae108
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Informations de copyright

© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Neuro-Oncology.

Auteurs

Monika E Hegi (ME)

Neurosurgery & Neuroscience Research Center, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.

Felix B Oppong (FB)

European Organisation for Treatment and Research of Cancer (EORTC), Brussels, Belgium.

James R Perry (JR)

Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Canada.

Wolfgang Wick (W)

Neurology Clinic and National Center for Tumor Diseases, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
DKTK and Clinical Cooperation Unit Neurooncology, DKFZ, Heidelberg, Germany.

Roger Henriksson (R)

Department of Radiation Sciences, Oncology, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.

Norman J Laperriere (NJ)

Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Canada.

Thierry Gorlia (T)

European Organisation for Treatment and Research of Cancer (EORTC), Brussels, Belgium.

Annika Malmström (A)

Department of Advanced Home Care in Linköping, and Division of Cellbiology, Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.

Michael Weller (M)

Department of Neurology & Brain Tumor Center, University Hospital and University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.

Classifications MeSH