High dose vitamin D supplementation does not improve outcome in a cutaneous melanoma population: results of a randomized double-blind, placebo-controlled study (ViDMe trial).


Journal

The British journal of dermatology
ISSN: 1365-2133
Titre abrégé: Br J Dermatol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 0004041

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
24 Jun 2024
Historique:
received: 02 04 2024
revised: 12 06 2024
accepted: 18 06 2024
medline: 24 6 2024
pubmed: 24 6 2024
entrez: 24 6 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

Observational studies in cutaneous melanoma have indicated an inverse relationship between levels of 25-hydroxy vitamin D and Breslow thickness, as well as a protective effect of high 25- hydroxy vitamin D levels on clinical outcome. To evaluate whether high dose vitamin D supplementation in curatively resected cutaneous melanoma reduces melanoma relapse. In a prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, 436 patients with resected cutaneous melanoma stage IA to III (8th American Joint Committee on Cancer staging) were randomized. Among them, 218 received a placebo while 218 received monthly 100,000 IU cholecalciferol for a minimum of 6 months and a maximum of 42 months (treatment arm). Following randomization, patients were followed for a median of 52 months, with a maximum follow-up of 116 months. The primary endpoint was relapse-free survival. Secondary endpoints were melanoma-related mortality, overall survival, and the evolution of 25-hydroxy vitamin D serum levels over time. In our population (mean age 55 years, 54% female) Vitamin D supplementation increased 25- hydroxy vitamin D serum levels after 6 months of supplementation in the treatment arm by a median 17 ng/ml (95%CI: 9; 26) compared to 0 ng/ml (95%CI: -6; 8) in the placebo arm (P < 0.001; Wilcoxon test) and remained at a steady state during the whole treatment period. The estimated event rate for relapse-free survival at 72 months after inclusion was 26.51% in the vitamin D supplemented arm (95% CI: 19.37; 35.64) versus 20.70% (95%CI: 14.26; 29.52) in the placebo arm, [hazard ratio 1.27 (95%CI 0.79; 2.03), P = 0.32]. After adjusting for confounding factors (including baseline stage, body mass index, age, gender, and baseline season), the hazard ratio was 1.20 (95% CI 0.74; 1.94, P = 0.46). Deaths from progression of cutaneous melanoma and non-melanoma related deaths were similar in both vitamin D supplemented and placebo group (n = 10 and 11 and n = 3 and 2, respectively). No major adverse events were observed during the study. In cutaneous melanoma patients, monthly high dose vitamin D supplementation was safe, resulted in a sustained increase in 25-hydroxy vitamin D levels during the treatment period, but did not improve relapse-free survival, melanoma-related death or overall survival.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Observational studies in cutaneous melanoma have indicated an inverse relationship between levels of 25-hydroxy vitamin D and Breslow thickness, as well as a protective effect of high 25- hydroxy vitamin D levels on clinical outcome.
OBJECTIVES OBJECTIVE
To evaluate whether high dose vitamin D supplementation in curatively resected cutaneous melanoma reduces melanoma relapse.
METHODS METHODS
In a prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, 436 patients with resected cutaneous melanoma stage IA to III (8th American Joint Committee on Cancer staging) were randomized. Among them, 218 received a placebo while 218 received monthly 100,000 IU cholecalciferol for a minimum of 6 months and a maximum of 42 months (treatment arm). Following randomization, patients were followed for a median of 52 months, with a maximum follow-up of 116 months. The primary endpoint was relapse-free survival. Secondary endpoints were melanoma-related mortality, overall survival, and the evolution of 25-hydroxy vitamin D serum levels over time.
RESULTS RESULTS
In our population (mean age 55 years, 54% female) Vitamin D supplementation increased 25- hydroxy vitamin D serum levels after 6 months of supplementation in the treatment arm by a median 17 ng/ml (95%CI: 9; 26) compared to 0 ng/ml (95%CI: -6; 8) in the placebo arm (P < 0.001; Wilcoxon test) and remained at a steady state during the whole treatment period. The estimated event rate for relapse-free survival at 72 months after inclusion was 26.51% in the vitamin D supplemented arm (95% CI: 19.37; 35.64) versus 20.70% (95%CI: 14.26; 29.52) in the placebo arm, [hazard ratio 1.27 (95%CI 0.79; 2.03), P = 0.32]. After adjusting for confounding factors (including baseline stage, body mass index, age, gender, and baseline season), the hazard ratio was 1.20 (95% CI 0.74; 1.94, P = 0.46). Deaths from progression of cutaneous melanoma and non-melanoma related deaths were similar in both vitamin D supplemented and placebo group (n = 10 and 11 and n = 3 and 2, respectively). No major adverse events were observed during the study.
CONCLUSION CONCLUSIONS
In cutaneous melanoma patients, monthly high dose vitamin D supplementation was safe, resulted in a sustained increase in 25-hydroxy vitamin D levels during the treatment period, but did not improve relapse-free survival, melanoma-related death or overall survival.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38913652
pii: 7697984
doi: 10.1093/bjd/ljae257
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Informations de copyright

© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of British Association of Dermatologists. All rights reserved. For commercial re-use, please contact reprints@oup.com for reprints and translation rights for reprints. All other permissions can be obtained through our RightsLink service via the Permissions link on the article page on our site—for further information please contact journals.permissions@oup.com.

Auteurs

Julie De Smedt (J)

Laboratory of Dermatology, Department of oncology, KU Leuven, UZLeuven, Leuven, Belgium.

Sofie Van Kelst (S)

Laboratory of Dermatology, Department of oncology, KU Leuven, UZLeuven, Leuven, Belgium.

Laudine Janssen (L)

Laboratory of Dermatology, Department of oncology, KU Leuven, UZLeuven, Leuven, Belgium.

Vivien Marasigan (V)

Department of Surgery, South Infirmary Victoria University Hospital, Cork, Ireland.

Veerle Boecxstaens (V)

Oncological and vascular access surgery, Department of Surgical Oncology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.

Kris Bogaerts (K)

Leuven Biostatistics and Statistical Bioinformatics Centre (L-BioStat), KULeuven, Leuven, Belgium.

Ann Belmans (A)

Leuven Biostatistics and Statistical Bioinformatics Centre (L-BioStat), KULeuven, Leuven, Belgium.

Dirk Vanderschueren (D)

Clinical and experimental Endocrinology, Department Chronical illness and Metabolism, KULeuven, UZLeuven, Leuven, Belgium.

Katleen Vandenberghe (K)

Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, KULeuven, Leuven, Belgium.

Oliver Bechter (O)

Laboratory of Experimental Oncology (LEO), Department of Oncology, KULeuven, UZLeuven, Leuven, Belgium.

Claudia Aura (C)

Conway Institute of Biomolecular and Biomedical Research, Pathology, University Collega Dublin, Ireland.

Diether Lambrechts (D)

Laboratory for Translational Genetics, Department of Oncology, Center for cancer Biology (VIB), Leuven, Belgium, KU Leuven, 3000 Leuven, Belgium.

Tinne Strobbe (T)

Department of Dermatology, Imelda ziekenhuis, Bonheiden, Belgium.

Gabriella Emri (G)

Department of Dermatology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Debrecen, Debrecen, Hungary.

Arjen Nikkels (A)

CHU Sart Tilman, University of Liège, Department of Dermatology, Liège, Belgium.

Marjan Garmyn (M)

Laboratory of Dermatology, Department of oncology, KU Leuven, UZLeuven, Leuven, Belgium.

Classifications MeSH