Effect of vertical implant position on marginal bone loss: a randomized clinical trial.
Marginal bone loss
Soft tissue thickness
Vertical implant position
Journal
BMC oral health
ISSN: 1472-6831
Titre abrégé: BMC Oral Health
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101088684
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
24 Jun 2024
24 Jun 2024
Historique:
received:
19
06
2023
accepted:
13
06
2024
medline:
25
6
2024
pubmed:
25
6
2024
entrez:
24
6
2024
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
One of the most important factors that has influence on dental implants success rate is marginal bone loss. The purpose of this study is to investigate the effect of the implant's vertical position and the soft tissue's thickness on the rate of marginal bone loss of the dental implant. In this single-blind randomized clinical trial study, 56 implants placed in the posterior region of mandible of 33 patients (19 women, 14 men) were divided into two groups. The group of crestal (28 implants) and subcrestal (28 implants) implants, each group was divided into two sub-groups with soft tissue thickness of 2 mm and less than 2 mm (14 implants) and more than 2 mm (14 implants). The amount of marginal bone loss was measured by Scanora 5.2 program with radiographs Digital parallelism based on the effect of the vertical position of the implant, soft tissue thickness, three months after placement, and three months after loading implants (six months after implant placement). The results showed that marginal bone loss in subcrestal implants is significantly more than crestal implants (p-value = 0.001), and also marginal bone loss in the soft tissue thickness group of 2 mm and less is significantly more than the group of soft tissue thickness more than 2 mm (p-value < 0.001). The amount of marginal bone loss three months after implant loading was significantly higher than three months after implant placement (p-value < 0.001). The implant's vertical position and the soft tissue's thickness around the implant are effective factors in the amount of marginal bone loss. Marginal bone loss is more in subcrestal implants and in cases with less soft tissue thickness. The time factor significantly affects the amount of marginal bone loss. this clinical trial was registered at Iranian Registry of Clinical Trials, registration number IRCT20120215009014N415, registration date 20,220,110, (https//en.irct.ir/trial/60,991).
Identifiants
pubmed: 38915016
doi: 10.1186/s12903-024-04480-7
pii: 10.1186/s12903-024-04480-7
doi:
Substances chimiques
Dental Implants
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Randomized Controlled Trial
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
727Subventions
Organisme : The Vice-Chancellor of Research and Technology of the Hamadan University of Medical Sciences
ID : 1400120310162
Informations de copyright
© 2024. The Author(s).
Références
Rajput R, Chouhan Z, Sindhu M, Sundararajan S, Chouhan RRS. A brief chronological review of dental implant history. Int Dent J Students Res. 2016;4(3):105–7.
Nam D-H, Kim P-J, Koo K-T, Seol Y-J, Lee Y-M, Ku Y, et al. The cumulative survival rate of dental implants with micro-threads: a long-term retrospective study. J Periodontal Implant Sci. 2024;54(1):53.
pubmed: 37336523
doi: 10.5051/jpis.2203240162
Hwang I, Kim T-I, Cho Y-D. Clinical evaluation of 3.0-mm narrow-diameter implants: a retrospective study with up to 5 years of observation. J Periodontal Implant Sci. 2024;54(1):44.
pubmed: 37336522
doi: 10.5051/jpis.2300820041
Yum H, Han H-s, Kim K, Kim S, Cho Y-D. The cumulative survival rate of sandblasted, large-grit, acid-etched dental implants: a retrospective analysis. J Periodontal Implant Sci. 2023;53.
Ryoo K-S, Kim P-J, Kim S, Cho Y-D, Ku Y. A retrospective study of the long-term survival of RESTORE® dental implants with resorbable blast media surface. J Periodontal Implant Sci. 2023;53(6):444.
pubmed: 37038831
pmcid: 10761285
doi: 10.5051/jpis.2203340167
Caricasulo R, Malchiodi L, Ghensi P, Fantozzi G, Cucchi A. The influence of implant-abutment connection to peri-implant bone loss: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2018;20(4):653–64.
pubmed: 29761902
doi: 10.1111/cid.12620
Akel MS. Dental Implant Failure Rate and Marginal Bone Loss in Smokers Compared to Non-Smokers: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. 2019.
Albrektsson T, Zarb G, Worthington P, Eriksson A. The long-term efficacy of currently used dental implants: a review and proposed criteria of success. Int j oral Maxillofac Implants. 1986;1(1):11–25.
pubmed: 3527955
Aimetti M, Ferrarotti F, Mariani GM, Ghelardoni C, Romano F. Soft tissue and crestal bone changes around implants with platform-switched abutments placed nonsubmerged at subcrestal position: a 2-year clinical and radiographic evaluation. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2015;30(6):1369–77.
pubmed: 26478966
doi: 10.11607/jomi.4017
Palaska I, Tsaousoglou P, Vouros I, Konstantinidis A, Menexes G. Influence of placement depth and abutment connection pattern on bone remodeling around 1-stage implants: a prospective randomized controlled clinical trial. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2016;27(2):e47–56.
pubmed: 25427964
doi: 10.1111/clr.12527
Patil YB, Asopa SJ, Deepa AG, Jyoti D, Somayaji NS, Sabharwal R. Influence of implant neck design on crestal bone loss: a comparative study. Nigerian J Surgery: Official Publication Nigerian Surg Res Soc. 2020;26(1):22.
doi: 10.4103/njs.NJS_28_19
Rocha S, Wagner W, Wiltfang J, Nicolau P, Moergel M, Messias A, et al. Effect of platform switching on crestal bone levels around implants in the posterior mandible: 3 years results from a multicentre randomized clinical trial. J Clin Periodontol. 2016;43(4):374–82.
pubmed: 26847169
pmcid: 5071662
doi: 10.1111/jcpe.12522
Gultekin BA, Gultekin P, Leblebicioglu B, Basegmez C, Yalcin S. Clinical evaluation of marginal bone loss and stability in two types of submerged dental implants. Int J Oral Maxillofacial Implants. 2013;28(3).
Kütan E, Bolukbasi N, Yildirim-Ondur E, Ozdemir T. Clinical and radiographic evaluation of marginal bone changes around platform‐switching implants placed in crestal or subcrestal positions: a randomized controlled clinical trial. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2015;17:e364–75.
pubmed: 25041252
doi: 10.1111/cid.12248
Goodson J, Haffajee A, Socransky S. The relationship between attachment level loss and alveolar bone loss. J Clin Periodontol. 1984;11(5):348–59.
pubmed: 6585374
doi: 10.1111/j.1600-051X.1984.tb01331.x
Misch CE, Perel ML, Wang H-L, Sammartino G, Galindo-Moreno P, Trisi P et al. Implant success, survival, and failure: the International Congress of Oral Implantologists (ICOI) pisa consensus conference. Implant dentistry. 2008;17(1):5–15.
Roos-Jansåker AM, Lindahl C, Renvert H, Renvert S. Nine‐to fourteen‐year follow‐up of implant treatment. Part II: presence of Peri‐implant lesions. J Clin Periodontol. 2006;33(4):290–5.
pubmed: 16553638
doi: 10.1111/j.1600-051X.2006.00906.x
Jemt T, Lekholm U. Single implants and buccal bone grafts in the anterior maxilla: measurements of buccal crestal contours in a 6-year prospective clinical study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2005;7(3):127–35.
pubmed: 16219242
doi: 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2005.tb00056.x
Chen ST, Buser D. Clinical and esthetic outcomes of implants placed in postextraction sites. Int J oral Maxillofacial Implants. 2009;24.
Oh J-H, Pyo S-W, Chang J-S, Kim S. Up to a 15-Year survival rate and marginal bone resorption of 1780 implants with or without microthreads: a Multi Center Retrospective Study. J Clin Med. 2023;12(6):2425.
pubmed: 36983425
pmcid: 10057595
doi: 10.3390/jcm12062425
Galindo-Moreno P, Catena A, Pérez‐Sayáns M, Fernández‐Barbero JE, O’Valle F, Padial‐Molina M. Early marginal bone loss around dental implants to define success in implant dentistry: a retrospective study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2022;24(5):630–42.
pubmed: 35831919
pmcid: 9796358
doi: 10.1111/cid.13122
Pellicer-Chover H, Díaz-Sanchez M, Soto-Peñaloza D, Peñarrocha-Diago M, Canullo L, Peñarrocha-Oltra D. Impact of crestal and subcrestal implant placement upon changes in marginal peri-implant bone level. A systematic review. Medicina oral, patologia oral y cirugia bucal. 2019;24(5):e673.
Moher D, Hopewell S, Schulz KF, Montori V, Gøtzsche PC, Devereaux PJ, et al. CONSORT 2010 explanation and elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. Int J Surg. 2012;10(1):28–55.
pubmed: 22036893
doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2011.10.001
Babbush CA, Hahn JD, Krauser JD, Rosenlicht JD. Dental implants: the art and science. Elsevier Health Sciences; 2010.
Duong HY, Roccuzzo A, Stähli A, Salvi GE, Lang NP, Sculean A. Oral health-related quality of life of patients rehabilitated with fixed and removable implant‐supported dental prostheses. Periodontol 2000. 2022;88(1):201–37.
pubmed: 35103325
pmcid: 9304161
doi: 10.1111/prd.12419
Sartoretto SC, Shibli JA, Javid K, Cotrim K, Canabarro A, Louro RS, et al. Comparing the long-term success rates of tooth preservation and dental implants: a critical review. J Funct Biomaterials. 2023;14(3):142.
doi: 10.3390/jfb14030142
Afshari Z, Yaghini J, Naseri R. LEVELS OF SMOKING AND PERI–IMPLANT MARGINAL BONE LOSS: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS. J Evid Based Dent Pract. 2022;22(3):101721.
pubmed: 36162899
doi: 10.1016/j.jebdp.2022.101721
Lombardi T, Berton F, Salgarello S, Barbalonga E, Rapani A, Piovesana F et al. Factors influencing early marginal bone loss around Dental implants Positioned Subcrestally: a multicenter prospective clinical study. J Clin Med. 2019;8(8).
Del Amo F, Romero-Bustillos M, Catena A, Galindo-Moreno P, Sánchez-Suárez JM, Garaicoa-Pazmino C. Effect of Abutment Height on marginal bone loss around Dental implants: a systematic review. Int J Prosthodont. 2022.
Bressan E, Guazzo R, Tomasi C, Peña TG, Galindo-Moreno P, Caponio VCA, et al. Influence of soft tissue thickness on marginal bone level around dental implants: a systematic review with meta‐analysis and trial‐sequential analysis. Clinical oral implants research; 2023.
Kim YT, Lim GH, Lee JH, Jeong SN. Marginal bone level changes in association with different vertical implant positions: a 3-year retrospective study. J Periodontal Implant Sci. 2017;47(4):231–9.
pubmed: 28861287
pmcid: 5577441
doi: 10.5051/jpis.2017.47.4.231
de Siqueira RAC, Fontão FNGK, Sartori IAM, Santos PGF, Bernardes SR, Tiossi R. Effect of different implant placement depths on crestal bone levels and soft tissue behavior: a randomized clinical trial. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2017;28(10):1227–33.
pubmed: 27480573
doi: 10.1111/clr.12946
Pellicer-Chover H, Peñarrocha-Diago M, Peñarrocha-Oltra D, Gomar-Vercher S, Agustín-Panadero R, Peñarrocha-Diago M. Impact of crestal and subcrestal implant placement in peri-implant bone: a prospective comparative study. Med oral Patologia oral y Cir Bucal. 2016;21(1):e103.
doi: 10.4317/medoral.20747
Cassetta M, Di Mambro A, Giansanti M, Brandetti G, Calasso S. A 36-month follow-up prospective cohort study on peri-implant bone loss of Morse Taper connection implants with platform switching. J Oral Sci. 2016;58(1):49–57.
pubmed: 27021540
doi: 10.2334/josnusd.58.49
Hermann JS, Schoolfield JD, Schenk RK, Buser D, Cochran DL. Influence of the size of the microgap on crestal bone changes around titanium implants. A histometric evaluation of unloaded non-submerged implants in the canine mandible. J Periodontol. 2001;72(10):1372–83.
pubmed: 11699479
doi: 10.1902/jop.2001.72.10.1372
Schwarz F, Hegewald A, Becker J. Impact of implant–abutment connection and positioning of the machined collar/microgap on crestal bone level changes: a systematic review. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2014;25(4):417–25.
pubmed: 23782338
pmcid: 4232321
doi: 10.1111/clr.12215
Piattelli A, Vrespa G, Petrone G, Iezzi G, Annibali S, Scarano A. Role of the microgap between implant and abutment: a retrospective histologic evaluation in monkeys. J Periodontol. 2003;74(3):346–52.
pubmed: 12710754
doi: 10.1902/jop.2003.74.3.346
Paolantoni G, Tatullo M, Miniello A, Sammartino G, Marenzi G. Influence of crestal and sub-crestal implant position on development of peri-implant diseases: a 5-year retrospective analysis. Clin Oral Invest. 2023;28(1):16.
doi: 10.1007/s00784-023-05413-4
Al Amri MD, Al-Johany SS, Al Baker AM, Al Rifaiy MQ, Abduljabbar TS, Al‐Kheraif AA. Soft tissue changes and crestal bone loss around platform‐switched implants placed at crestal and subcrestal levels: 36‐month results from a prospective split‐mouth clinical trial. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2017;28(11):1342–7.
pubmed: 27743396
doi: 10.1111/clr.12990
Palacios-Garzón N, Velasco-Ortega E, López-López J. Bone loss in implants placed at subcrestal and crestal level: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Materials. 2019;12(1):154.
pubmed: 30621286
pmcid: 6337530
doi: 10.3390/ma12010154
Mensi M, Scotti E, Calza S, Salgarello S, Sordillo A, Zola M, et al. Subcrestal versus Bone Level one stage implants: early bone and soft tissues modification. One Year Randomized Clinical Trial; 2024.
Kowalski J, Lapinska B, Nissan J, Lukomska-Szymanska M. Factors influencing marginal bone loss around dental implants: a narrative review. Coatings. 2021;11(7):865.
doi: 10.3390/coatings11070865
Rupp F, Liang L, Geis-Gerstorfer J, Scheideler L, Hüttig F. Surface characteristics of dental implants: a review. Dent Mater. 2018;34(1):40–57.
pubmed: 29029850
doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2017.09.007
El-Anwar MI, El-Mofty MS, Awad AH, El-Sheikh SA, El-Zawahry MM. The effect of using different crown and implant materials on bone stress distribution: a finite element study. Egypt J Oral Maxillofacial Surg. 2014;5(2):58–64.
doi: 10.1097/01.OMX.0000444266.10130.4c
Eftekhar Ashtiani R, Alam M, Tavakolizadeh S, Abbasi K. The role of biomaterials and biocompatible materials in implant-supported dental prosthesis. Evidence-based Complement Altern Med. 2021;2021:1–9.
doi: 10.1155/2021/3349433
Lindhe J, Meyle J, Periodontology, GDotEWo. Peri-implant diseases: consensus report of the sixth European workshop on periodontology. J Clin Periodontol. 2008;35:282–5.
pubmed: 18724855
doi: 10.1111/j.1600-051X.2008.01283.x
Malara P, Dobrzański L. Computer-aided design and manufacturing of dental surgical guides based on cone beam computed tomography. Archives Mater Sci Eng. 2015;76(2):140–9.
Lin GH, Chan HL, Bashutski JD, Oh TJ, Wang HL. The effect of flapless surgery on implant survival and marginal bone level: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Periodontol. 2014;85(5):e91–103.
pubmed: 24147846
doi: 10.1902/jop.2013.130481
Pardal-Peláez B, Flores-Fraile J, Pardal-Refoyo JL, Montero J. Implant loss and crestal bone loss in immediate versus delayed load in edentulous mandibles: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Prosthet Dent. 2021;125(3):437–44.
pubmed: 32276823
doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2020.01.032
Fickl S, Zuhr O, Stein JM, Hürzeler MB. Peri-implant bone level around implants with platform-switched abutments. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2010;25(3):577.
pubmed: 20556258
Puisys A, Linkevicius T. The influence of mucosal tissue thickening on crestal bone stability around bone-level implants. A prospective controlled clinical trial. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2015;26(2):123–9.
pubmed: 24313250
doi: 10.1111/clr.12301
Linkevicius T, Apse P, Grybauskas S, Puisys A. The influence of soft tissue thickness on crestal bone changes around implants: a 1-year prospective controlled clinical trial. Int J Oral Maxillofacial Implants. 2009;24(4).
Tan WC, Lang NP, Schmidlin K, Zwahlen M, Pjetursson BE. The effect of different implant neck configurations on soft and hard tissue healing: a randomized-controlled clinical trial. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2011;22(1):14–9.
pubmed: 21091792
doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.01982.x
Gargiulo AW, Wentz FM, Orban B. Dimensions and relations of the dentogingival junction in humans. J Periodontology. 1961;32(3):261–7.
doi: 10.1902/jop.1961.32.3.261
Lindhe J, Wennström J, Berglundh T. The mucosa at teeth and implants. Clin Periodontology Implant Dentistry. 2008;1:69–85.
Berglundh T, Abrahamsson I, Welander M, Lang NP, Lindhe J. Morphogenesis of the peri-implant mucosa: an experimental study in dogs. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2007;18(1):1–8.
pubmed: 17224016
doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2006.01380.x
Judgar R, Giro G, Zenobio E, Coelho PG, Feres M, Rodrigues JA et al. Biological width around one-and two-piece implants retrieved from human jaws. BioMed research international. 2014;2014.
Tomasi C, Tessarolo F, Caola I, Wennström J, Nollo G, Berglundh T. Morphogenesis of peri-implant mucosa revisited: an experimental study in humans. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2014;25(9):997–1003.
pubmed: 23799997
doi: 10.1111/clr.12223
Linkevicius T, Puisys A, Steigmann M, Vindasiute E, Linkeviciene L. Influence of vertical soft tissue thickness on crestal bone changes around implants with platform switching: a comparative clinical study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2015;17(6):1228–36.
pubmed: 24673875
doi: 10.1111/cid.12222
del Suárez-López F, Lin GH, Monje A, Galindo‐Moreno P, Wang HL. Influence of soft tissue thickness on peri‐implant marginal bone loss: a systematic review and meta‐analysis. J Periodontol. 2016;87(6):690–9.
doi: 10.1902/jop.2016.150571
Akcalı A, Trullenque-Eriksson A, Sun C, Petrie A, Nibali L, Donos N. What is the effect of soft tissue thickness on crestal bone loss around dental implants? A systematic review. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2017;28(9):1046–53.
pubmed: 27432592
doi: 10.1111/clr.12916