Mitigating Persistent Symptoms Following Rehabilitation in Musculoskeletal Disorders: A Scoping Review on after-discharge Strategies.

BACKGROUND

The majority of patients with musculoskeletal pain (62-64%) achieve their treatment goals upon completing rehabilitation. However, high re-consultation rate after discharge is frequently reported. Numerous authors have recognized the necessity of secondary prevention programs (after-discharge strategy), to ensure that the gains are maintained or further pursued after the completion of a rehabilitation program. Little is known about the different strategies currently in use, and a detailed review of the existing strategies is needed for future integration into the healthcare systems.

OBJECTIVE

This review systematically scope and synthesize the after-discharge strategies reported in the literature following rehabilitation for individuals experiencing musculoskeletal pain.

METHODS

Four databases (OVID MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Sciences, and OVID PsycInfo) were screened from their inception until 4th of May 2023. Literature search, screening and extraction was performed according to the PRISMA extension for scoping review guidelines.

RESULTS

Different after-discharge strategies were identified and grouped into two main categories: 1) in-person and 2) remote strategies. In-person strategies included: 1.1) in-person booster sessions and 1.2) the use of existing community programs after discharge. Remote strategies included: 2.1) remote strategies that involve a health-care professional service or 2.2) remote strategies that do not involve any health-care professional service.

DISCUSSION

Through this scoping review, we identified various after-discharge strategies designed to sustain gains and improve patients' self-management skills following the completion of a rehabilitation program. The existence of numerous promising strategies suggests their potential suitability for various contexts.

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2024 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

CONFLICTS OF INTEREST AND SOURCE OF FUNDING: The authors have no conflict of interest related to the research or the manuscript to declare. HMA and JSR are supported by research scholars from Fonds de recherche du Québec – Santé (281961, 281654). FD received a grant from the Cirris research centre and is supported by a scholarship from Canadian Institute of Health Research. The funder had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.