Exploring robotic total hysterectomies: a multi-site experience with the Senhance Surgical System.
Multi-site experience
Robotic surgery
Senhance surgical system
Total hysterectomy
Journal
Journal of robotic surgery
ISSN: 1863-2491
Titre abrégé: J Robot Surg
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101300401
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
26 Jun 2024
26 Jun 2024
Historique:
received:
13
02
2024
accepted:
06
04
2024
medline:
26
6
2024
pubmed:
26
6
2024
entrez:
26
6
2024
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Robotic-assisted surgery emerged as a technological advancement in the twentieth century, with gynaecology being a key adopter of this approach. The Senhance Surgical System has gained prominence for total hysterectomies from single-site experiences, but multi-site reporting are still lacking in present literature. This multi-site study, conducted at Klaipeda University Hospital and Academic Teaching Hospital Feldkirch, aimed to explore the safety and feasibility of total hysterectomies with the Senhance Surgical System. The study involved 295 cases, showcasing a well-established routine with minimal procedure times. The average age of the patients was 53.5 years (SD: 10.3 years), ranging from 18 to 80 years. The patients' BMI averaged 25.6 kg/m
Identifiants
pubmed: 38922454
doi: 10.1007/s11701-024-01944-4
pii: 10.1007/s11701-024-01944-4
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
268Informations de copyright
© 2024. The Author(s).
Références
Muaddi H, Hafid ME, Choi WJ et al (2021) Clinical outcomes of robotic surgery compared to conventional surgical approaches (laparoscopic or open): a systematic overview of reviews. Ann Surg 273:467–473. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000003915
doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000003915
pubmed: 32398482
Soomro N, Hashimoto D, Porteous A et al (2019) Systematic review of learning curves in robot-assisted surgery. BJS Open. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs5.50235
doi: 10.1002/bjs5.50235
pubmed: 32011823
pmcid: 6996634
Alemzadeh H, Raman J, Leveson N et al (2016) Adverse events in robotic surgery: a retrospective study of 14 years of FDA data. PLoS ONE 11:e0151470. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0151470
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0151470
pubmed: 27097160
pmcid: 4838256
College A, of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, Committee on Gynecologic Practice, (2020) Robot-assisted surgery for noncancerous gynecologic conditions: ACOG COMMITTEE OPINION, number 810. Obstet Gynecol 136:e22–e30
doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000004048
Diaz-Arrastia C, Jurnalov C, Gomez G et al (2002) Laparoscopic hysterectomy using a computer-enhanced surgical robot. Surg Endosc 16:1271–1273. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-002-8523-5
doi: 10.1007/s00464-002-8523-5
pubmed: 12085153
Coussons H, Feldstein J, McCarus S (2021) Senhance surgical system in benign hysterectomy: a real-world comparative assessment of case times and instrument costs versus da Vinci robotics and laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy procedures. Intern J Med Robot Comp Assist Surg 17:e2261
doi: 10.1002/rcs.2261
Fanfani F, Restaino S, Alletti SG et al (2015) TELELAP ALF-X robotic-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy: feasibility and perioperative outcomes. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 22:1011–1017
doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2015.05.004
pubmed: 25982854
Fanfani F, Monterossi G, Fagotti A et al (2016) The new robotic TELELAP ALF-X in gynecological surgery: single-center experience. Surg Endosc 30:215–221. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-015-4187-9
doi: 10.1007/s00464-015-4187-9
pubmed: 25840895
Rumolo V, Rosati A, Tropea A et al (2019) Senhance robotic platform for gynecologic surgery: a review of literature. Updat Surg 71:419–427. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13304-018-00620-1
doi: 10.1007/s13304-018-00620-1
Gueli Alletti S, Rossitto C, Cianci S et al (2018) The Senhance™ surgical robotic system (“senhance”) for total hysterectomy in obese patients: a pilot study. J Robot Surg 12:229–234. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-017-0718-9
doi: 10.1007/s11701-017-0718-9
pubmed: 28624984
Samalavicius NE, Janusonis V, Siaulys R et al (2020) Robotic surgery using Senhance® robotic platform: single center experience with first 100 cases. J Robot Surg 14:371–376. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-019-01000-6
doi: 10.1007/s11701-019-01000-6
pubmed: 31301021
Siaulys R, Klimasauskiene V, Janusonis V et al (2021) Robotic gynaecological surgery using Senhance® robotic platform: Single centre experience with 100 cases. J Gynecol Obs Human Reprod 50:102031. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jogoh.2020.102031
doi: 10.1016/j.jogoh.2020.102031
SAS Institute Inc (2013) SAS/ACCESS®: Interface to ADABAS. SAS Institute Inc, Cary, NC
McCarus SD (2021) Senhance robotic platform system for gynecological surgery. J Soc Laparosc Robot Surg. https://doi.org/10.4293/JSLS.2020.00075
doi: 10.4293/JSLS.2020.00075
Keurentjes JHM, Briët JM, de Bock GH et al (2018) Surgical volume and conversion rate in laparoscopic hysterectomy: does volume matter? a multicenter retrospective cohort study. Surg Endosc 32:1021–1026. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-017-5780-x
doi: 10.1007/s00464-017-5780-x
pubmed: 28842767
Tobias JD (2013) Pain management following laparoscopy: can we do better? Saudi J Anaesth 7:3–4. https://doi.org/10.4103/1658-354X.109553
doi: 10.4103/1658-354X.109553
pubmed: 23717221
pmcid: 3657920
Montlouis-Calixte J, Ripamonti B, Barabino G et al (2019) Senhance 3 mm robot-assisted surgery: experience on first 14 patients in France. J Robot Surg 13:643–647. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-019-00955-w
doi: 10.1007/s11701-019-00955-w
pubmed: 30953270