Retrospective analysis of hospitalization costs using two payment systems: the diagnosis related groups (DRG) and the Queralt system, a newly developed case-mix tool for hospitalized patients.
Case-mix tools
Diagnosis-related groups
Hospital costs
Queralt system
Journal
Health economics review
ISSN: 2191-1991
Titre abrégé: Health Econ Rev
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 101583209
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
26 Jun 2024
26 Jun 2024
Historique:
received:
18
07
2023
accepted:
14
06
2024
medline:
26
6
2024
pubmed:
26
6
2024
entrez:
26
6
2024
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Hospital services are typically reimbursed using case-mix tools that group patients according to diagnoses and procedures. We recently developed a case-mix tool (i.e., the Queralt system) aimed at supporting clinicians in patient management. In this study, we compared the performance of a broadly used tool (i.e., the APR-DRG) with the Queralt system. Retrospective analysis of all admissions occurred in any of the eight hospitals of the Catalan Institute of Health (i.e., approximately, 30% of all hospitalizations in Catalonia) during 2019. Costs were retrieved from a full cost accounting. Electronic health records were used to calculate the APR-DRG group and the Queralt index, and its different sub-indices for diagnoses (main diagnosis, comorbidities on admission, andcomplications occurred during hospital stay) and procedures (main and secondary procedures). The primary objective was the predictive capacity of the tools; we also investigated efficiency and within-group homogeneity. The analysis included 166,837 hospitalization episodes, with a mean cost of € 4,935 (median 2,616; interquartile range 1,011-5,543). The components of the Queralt system had higher efficiency (i.e., the percentage of costs and hospitalizations covered by increasing percentages of groups from each case-mix tool) and lower heterogeneity. The logistic model for predicting costs at pre-stablished thresholds (i.e., 80th, 90th, and 95th percentiles) showed better performance for the Queralt system, particularly when combining diagnoses and procedures (DP): the area under the receiver operating characteristics curve for the 80th, 90th, 95th cost percentiles were 0.904, 0.882, and 0.863 for the APR-DRG, and 0.958, 0.945, and 0.928 for the Queralt DP; the corresponding values of area under the precision-recall curve were 0.522, 0.604, and 0.699 for the APR-DRG, and 0.748, 0.7966, and 0.834 for the Queralt DP. Likewise, the linear model for predicting the actual cost fitted better in the case of the Queralt system. The Queralt system, originally developed to predict hospital outcomes, has good performance and efficiency for predicting hospitalization costs.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Hospital services are typically reimbursed using case-mix tools that group patients according to diagnoses and procedures. We recently developed a case-mix tool (i.e., the Queralt system) aimed at supporting clinicians in patient management. In this study, we compared the performance of a broadly used tool (i.e., the APR-DRG) with the Queralt system.
METHODS
METHODS
Retrospective analysis of all admissions occurred in any of the eight hospitals of the Catalan Institute of Health (i.e., approximately, 30% of all hospitalizations in Catalonia) during 2019. Costs were retrieved from a full cost accounting. Electronic health records were used to calculate the APR-DRG group and the Queralt index, and its different sub-indices for diagnoses (main diagnosis, comorbidities on admission, andcomplications occurred during hospital stay) and procedures (main and secondary procedures). The primary objective was the predictive capacity of the tools; we also investigated efficiency and within-group homogeneity.
RESULTS
RESULTS
The analysis included 166,837 hospitalization episodes, with a mean cost of € 4,935 (median 2,616; interquartile range 1,011-5,543). The components of the Queralt system had higher efficiency (i.e., the percentage of costs and hospitalizations covered by increasing percentages of groups from each case-mix tool) and lower heterogeneity. The logistic model for predicting costs at pre-stablished thresholds (i.e., 80th, 90th, and 95th percentiles) showed better performance for the Queralt system, particularly when combining diagnoses and procedures (DP): the area under the receiver operating characteristics curve for the 80th, 90th, 95th cost percentiles were 0.904, 0.882, and 0.863 for the APR-DRG, and 0.958, 0.945, and 0.928 for the Queralt DP; the corresponding values of area under the precision-recall curve were 0.522, 0.604, and 0.699 for the APR-DRG, and 0.748, 0.7966, and 0.834 for the Queralt DP. Likewise, the linear model for predicting the actual cost fitted better in the case of the Queralt system.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
The Queralt system, originally developed to predict hospital outcomes, has good performance and efficiency for predicting hospitalization costs.
Identifiants
pubmed: 38922476
doi: 10.1186/s13561-024-00522-6
pii: 10.1186/s13561-024-00522-6
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
45Informations de copyright
© 2024. The Author(s).
Références
Cylus J, Papanicolas I, Smith PC. Health system efficiency. How to make measurement matter for policy and management. European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies Series (WHO Partnership). 2016 [cited 2022 Oct 10]. https://www.euro.who.int/__data/assets/pdf_file/0004/324283/Health-System-Efficiency-How-make-measurement-matter-policy-management.pdf
Vela E, Clèries M, Vella VA, Adroher C, García-Altés A. Population-based analysis of the healthcare expenditure in Catalonia (Spain): what and who consumes more resources? Gac Sanit. 2019;33:24–31.
doi: 10.1016/j.gaceta.2017.05.017
pubmed: 29129491
Bredenkamp C, Bales S, Kahur K. Transition to diagnosis-related group payments for health: lessons from case studies. World Bank. 2020 [cited 2022 Sep 29]. https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/handle/10986/33034
Sharabiani MTA, Aylin P, Bottle A. Systematic review of comorbidity indices for administrative data. Med Care. 2012;50(12):1109–18.
doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e31825f64d0
pubmed: 22929993
Ash AS, Ellis RP, Pope GC, Ayanian JZ, Bates DW, Burstin H, et al. Using diagnoses to describe populations and predict costs. Health Care Financ Rev. 2000;21(3):7.
pubmed: 11481769
pmcid: 4194673
Huang X, Peterson S, Lavergne R, Ahuja M, Mcgrail K. Predicting the cost of health care services. Med Care. 2019;00(00):1–6.
Hammill BG, Hoffman MN, Clark AG, Bae JG, Shannon RP, Curtis LH. Incorporating acute conditions into risk- adjustment for provider profiling: the case of the US news and world report best hospitals rankings methodology. Am Coll Med Qual. 2024;39(2):69–77.
doi: 10.1097/JMQ.0000000000000171
Krabbe-alkemade Y, Groot T. Performance differences between the episode-based DBC and diagno- sis-related DRG case mix systems. Manag Acc. 2017;91:224–35.
Monterde D, Cainzos-Achirica M, Cossio-Gil Y, García-Eroles L, Pérez-Sust P, Arrufat M, et al. Performance of comprehensive risk adjustment for the prediction of in-hospital events using administrative healthcare data: the queralt indices. Risk Manag Healthc Policy. 2020;13:271–83.
doi: 10.2147/RMHP.S228415
pubmed: 32280290
pmcid: 7125405
Monterde D, Carot-Sans G, Cainzos-Achirica M, Abilleira S, Coca M, Vela E, et al. Performance of three measures of comorbidity in predicting critical covid-19: a retrospective analysis of 4607 hospitalized patients. Risk Manag Healthc Policy. 2021;14:4729–37.
doi: 10.2147/RMHP.S326132
pubmed: 34849041
pmcid: 8627311
Scheller-Kreinsen D, Geissler A, Busse R. The ABC of DRGs. Euro Observer. 2009.
Palmer G, Reid B. Evaluation of the performance of diagnosis-related groups and similar casemix systems: methodological issues. Heal Serv Manag Res. 2001;14(2):71–81.
doi: 10.1177/095148480101400201
Reid B, Palmer G, Aisbett C. The performance of Australian DRGs. Aust Heal Rev. 2000;23(2):20–31.
doi: 10.1071/AH000020
Lyons KW, Klare CM, Kunkel ST, Lemire JR, Bao M, McGuire KJ, et al. A 5-year review of hospital costs and reimbursement in the surgical management of degenerative spondylolisthesis. Int J Spine Surg. 2019;13(4):378–85.
doi: 10.14444/6052
pubmed: 31531288
pmcid: 6724750
Virk SS, Phillips FM, Moffatt-Bruce SD, Khan SN. What factors influence reimbursement for 1 to 2 level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion procedures? Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2019;44(1):E33–8.
doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000002766
pubmed: 29952881
Altman DG, Royston P. The cost of dichotomising continuous variables. Br Med J. 2006;332(7549):1080.
doi: 10.1136/bmj.332.7549.1080