Oncologic control and predictors of urologic reconstruction after Mohs micrographic surgery for low-risk penile malignancy.
Mohs surgery
Neoplasm recurrence
Oncologic outcomes
Penile neoplasms
Reconstruction
Journal
International urology and nephrology
ISSN: 1573-2584
Titre abrégé: Int Urol Nephrol
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 0262521
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
26 Jun 2024
26 Jun 2024
Historique:
received:
11
03
2024
accepted:
10
06
2024
medline:
26
6
2024
pubmed:
26
6
2024
entrez:
26
6
2024
Statut:
aheadofprint
Résumé
Mohs micrographic surgery (MMS) is a low-risk penile cancer management option. However, contemporary patients' short-term oncologic control and preoperative characteristics predicting reconstruction needs are undefined. This study assesses MMS's oncologic efficacy for low-risk penile cancer and identifies baseline predictors of post-resection reconstruction referral. We retrospectively reviewed 73 adult males with 78 penile cutaneous malignancies treated with MMS from 2005 to 2019. Patients underwent MMS with or without surgical reconstruction. Demographic information, MMS operative details, lesion pathology, and short-term outcomes were recorded. Descriptive statistics for all variables were calculated, and logistic regression identified predictive factors for urologic referral for complex reconstruction. Seventy-three men with 78 lesions, all staged ≤ cT1a prior to MMS, were identified. Twenty-one men were found to have invasive SCC. Median follow-up was 2.0 years (IQR 0.8-5.2 years). MMS was able to clear the disease in 90.4% of cases. One patient had disease related death following progression. Dermatology closed primarily in 68% of patients. Twenty percent of patients had a complication, most commonly poor wound healing. On univariate and multivariate linear regression analysis, lesion size > 3 cm and involvement of the glans independently predicted the need for referral to a reconstructive surgeon. MMS for penile cancer appears to provide sound oncologic control in the properly selected patient. Involvement of a reconstructive surgeon may be needed for glandular and large lesions, necessitating early referral to a comprehensive multidisciplinary care team.
Identifiants
pubmed: 38922534
doi: 10.1007/s11255-024-04121-6
pii: 10.1007/s11255-024-04121-6
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Informations de copyright
© 2024. The Author(s).
Références
Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A (2020) Cancer statistics, 2020. CA Cancer J Clin 70(1):7–30. https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21590 . (Epub 2020 Jan 8. PMID: 31912902)
doi: 10.3322/caac.21590
pubmed: 31912902
Babbar P, Yerram N, Crane A et al (2018) Penile-sparing modalities in the management of low-stage penile cancer. Urol Ann 10(1):1–6. https://doi.org/10.4103/UA.UA_93_17 . (PMID: 29416267; PMCID: PMC5791443)
doi: 10.4103/UA.UA_93_17
pubmed: 29416267
pmcid: 5791443
: National Comprehensive Cancer Network. Penile Cancer (Version 2.2020). https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/pdf/penile.pdf . Accessed Sep 2020
Shindel AW, Mann MW, Lev RY et al (2007) Mohs micrographic surgery for penile cancer: management and long-term followup. J Urol 178(5):1980–1985. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2007.07.039 . (Epub 2007 Sep 17. PMID: 17869306)
doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2007.07.039
pubmed: 17869306
Swanson NA (1983) Mohs surgery. Technique, indications, applications, and the future. Arch Dermatol 119(9):761–773. https://doi.org/10.1001/archderm.119.9.761 . (PMID: 6351758)
doi: 10.1001/archderm.119.9.761
pubmed: 6351758
Etzkorn JR, Sobanko JF, Elenitsas R et al (2015) Low recurrence rates for in situ and invasive melanomas using Mohs micrographic surgery with melanoma antigen recognized by T cells 1 (MART-1) immunostaining: tissue processing methodology to optimize pathologic staging and margin assessment. J Am Acad Dermatol 72(5):840–850. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaad.2015.01.007 . (Epub 2015 Mar 13. Erratum in: J Am Acad Dermatol. 2017 Nov 17;: PMID: 25774012)
doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2015.01.007
pubmed: 25774012
Clavien PA, Sanabria JR, Strasberg SM (1992) Proposed classification of complications of surgery with examples of utility in cholecystectomy. Surgery 111(5):518–526 (PMID: 1598671)
pubmed: 1598671
Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240(2):205–213. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.sla.0000133083.54934.ae . (PMID: 15273542; PMCID: PMC1360123)
doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000133083.54934.ae
pubmed: 15273542
pmcid: 1360123
Myatt A, Palit V, Burgess N et al (2012) The Uro-Clavien-Dindo system – Will the limitations of the Clavien-Dindo system for grading complications of urological surgery allow modification of the classification to encourage national adoption within the UK. Br J Med Surg Urol 5:54–60
doi: 10.1016/j.bjmsu.2011.05.001
Hossain D, Madaan S (2016) Use of Clavien-Dindo classification in urology part 1 – pelvic surgery. Urol News 20(3):1–3
Madaan S, Hossain D (2016) Use of Clavien-Dindo classification in urology part 2 – upper tract. Urol News 20(4):1–3
Mohs FE, Snow SN, Messing EM et al (1985) Microscopically controlled surgery in the treatment of carcinoma of the penis. J Urol 133(6):961–966. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-5347(17)49334-7 . (PMID: 3999220)
doi: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)49334-7
pubmed: 3999220
Brown MD, Zachary CB, Grekin RC et al (1987) Penile tumors: their management by Mohs micrographic surgery. J Dermatol Surg Oncol 13(11):1163–1167. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1524-4725.1987.tb02427.x . (PMID: 3668059)
doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4725.1987.tb02427.x
pubmed: 3668059
Machan M, Brodland D, Zitelli J (2016) Penile squamous cell carcinoma: penis-preserving treatment with mohs micrographic surgery. Dermatol Surg 42(8):936–944. https://doi.org/10.1097/DSS.0000000000000795 . (PMID: 27467227)
doi: 10.1097/DSS.0000000000000795
pubmed: 27467227
Pow-Sang MR et al (2010) Epidemiology and natural history of penile cancer. Urology 76(2 suppl 1):2–6
doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2010.03.003
Alnajjar HM, Lam W, Bolgeri M et al (2012) Treatment of carcinoma in situ of the glans penis with topical chemotherapy agents. Eur Urol 62:923–928
doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2012.02.052
pubmed: 22421082
Sri D, Sujenthiran A, Lam W et al (2018) A study into the association between local recurrence rates and surgical resection margins in organ-sparing surgery for penile squamous cell cancer. BJU Int 122(4):576–582
doi: 10.1111/bju.14222
pubmed: 29604228
Leone A, Inman B, Spiess PE (2017) Need for evidence and consensus on laser treatment for management of select primary penile tumors. Eur Urol 72:4–6
doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2017.01.024
pubmed: 28131464