Laparotomy-assisted endoscopic removal of gastrointestinal foreign bodies: Evaluation of this technique and postoperative recovery in dogs and cats.
Journal
Veterinary surgery : VS
ISSN: 1532-950X
Titre abrégé: Vet Surg
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 8113214
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
24 Jun 2024
24 Jun 2024
Historique:
revised:
16
04
2024
received:
19
09
2023
accepted:
31
05
2024
medline:
26
6
2024
pubmed:
26
6
2024
entrez:
26
6
2024
Statut:
aheadofprint
Résumé
To compare the outcome of the laparotomy-assisted endoscopic removal (LAER) of gastrointestinal foreign bodies (FBs) with traditional enterotomy, and to determine which factors affected the ability to remove FBs. Retrospective observational study. Dogs and cats (n = 81) with gastrointestinal FBs. Dogs and cats were divided into Group 1 (LAER, n = 40) and Group 2 (Enterotomy, n = 41). The localization and characteristics of the FBs (sharp or blunt; discrete or linear; single or multiple) were evaluated statistically to identify the factors that affected the ability of LAER to remove, partially or completely, the FBs (χ Laparotomy-assisted endoscopic removal allowed complete or partial removal of FBs in 35/40 dogs and cats, regardless of the characteristics or the localization of the FBs. The presence of intestinal wall damage (p = .043) was associated with the conversion to an enterotomy. Group 1 required a shorter postoperative hospital stay (p = .006), less need for analgesia (p < .001), and experienced a faster resumption of spontaneous feeding (p = .012), and similar complication rate to Group 2. Laparotomy-assisted endoscopic removal resulted in a faster postoperative recovery when compared with an enterotomy. The FBs' characteristics or localization did not affect the efficacy of the technique to remove FBs. Laparotomy-assisted endoscopic removal allows the removal of a variety of FBs, avoiding intestinal incision and resulting in a fast postoperative recovery.
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Informations de copyright
© 2024 The Author(s). Veterinary Surgery published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American College of Veterinary Surgeons.
Références
Gianella P, Pfammatter NS, Burgener IA. Oesophageal and gastric endoscopic foreign body removal: complications and follow‐up of 102 dogs. J Small Anim Pract. 2009;50:649‐654.
Hayes G. Gastrointestinal foreign bodies in dogs and cats: a retrospective study of 208 cases. J Small Anim Pract. 2009;50:576‐583.
Schwartz Z, Coolman BR. Disposable skin staplers for closure of linear gastrointestinal incisions in dogs. Vet Surg. 2018;47(2):285‐292.
Mishra NK, Appert HE, Howard JM. The effects of distention and obstruction on the accumulation of fluid in the lumen of small bowel of dogs. Ann Surg. 1974;180(5):791‐795.
Maxwell EA, Dugat DR, Waltenburg M, et al. Outcomes of dogs undergoing immediate or delayed surgical treatment for gastrointestinal foreign body obstruction: a retrospective study by the Society of Veterinary Soft Tissue Surgery. Vet Surg. 2021;50:177‐185.
Šmit I, Crnogaj M, Brkljačić M, et al. Endoscopic removal of esophageal and gastric foreign bodies in dogs: the prevalence, risk factors and efficacy of removal. Vet Arh. 2018;88:481‐496.
Di Palma C, Pasolini MP, Navas L, et al. Endoscopic and surgical removal of gastrointestinal foreign bodies in dogs: an analysis of 72 cases. Animals. 2022;12:1376.
Power AM, Diamond DW, Puetthoff C. Laparotomy‐assisted transoral foreign body retrieval in small animals: 10 cases (2018‐2020). Top Companion Anim Med. 2021;42:100504.
Demars C, Boland L, Minier K. Surgical removal of intestinal foreign bodies using a laparotomy‐assisted endoscopic approach in dogs and cats and comparison with enterotomy. J Small Anim Pract. 2023;64:43‐50.
Lee HJ, Kim HS, Jeon J, et al. Endoscopic foreign body removal in the upper gastrointestinal tract: risk factors predicting conversion to surgery. Surg Endosc. 2016;30:106‐113.
Shales CJ, Warren J, Anderson DM, Baines SJ, White RA. Complications following full‐thickness small intestinal biopsy in 66 dogs: a retrospective study. J Small Anim Pract. 2005;46(7):317‐321.
Strelchik A, Coleman MC, Scharf VF, Stoneburner RM, Thieman Mankin KM. Intestinal incisional dehiscence rate following enterotomy for foreign body removal in 247 dogs. J Am Vet Med Assoc. 2019;255:695‐699.
Lopez DJ, Holm SA, Korten B, Baum JI, Flanders JA, Sumner JP. Comparison of patient outcomes following enterotomy versus intestinal resection and anastomosis for treatment of intestinal foreign bodies in dogs. J Am Vet Med Assoc. 2021;258(12):1378‐1385.
LeBlanc AK, Atherton M, Bentley RT, et al. Veterinary cooperative oncology group—common terminology criteria for adverse events (VCOG‐CTCAE v2) following investigational therapy in dogs and cats. Vet Comp Oncol. 2021;19(2):311‐352.
Husnik R, Gaschen F. Gastric motility disorders in dogs and cats. Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract. 2021;51:43‐59.
McClave SA, Heyland DK. The physiologic response and associated clinical benefits from provision of early enteral nutrition. Nutr Clin Pract. 2009;24:305‐315.
Lewis SJ, Andersen HK, Thomas S. Early enteral nutrition within 24 h of intestinal surgery versus later commencement of feeding: a systematic review and meta‐analysis. J Gastrointest Surg. 2009;13:569‐575.
Ellison GW. Complications of gastrointestinal surgery in companion animals. Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract. 2011;41:915‐934.
Hoffberg JE, Koenigshof A. Evaluation of the safety of early compared to late enteral nutrition in canine septic peritonitis. J Am Anim Hosp Assoc. 2017;53:90‐95.
Corbee RJ, Van Kerkhoven WJ. Nutritional support of dogs and cats after surgery or illness. Open J Vet Med. 2014;4:44‐57.
Whitehead K, Cortes Y, Eirmann L. Gastrointestinal dysmotility disorders in critically ill dogs and cats. J Vet Emerg Crit Care. 2016;26:234‐253.
Wattchow D, Heitmann P, Smolilo D, et al. Postoperative ileus—an ongoing conundrum. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2021;33:e14046.
Allen DA, Smeak DD, Schertel ER. Prevalence of small intestinal dehiscence and associated clinical factors: a retrospective study of 121 dogs. J Am Anim Hosp Assoc. 1992;28:70‐76.
Wylie KB, Hosgood G. Mortality and morbidity of small and large intestinal surgery in dogs and cats: 74 cases (1980–1992). J Am Anim Hosp Assoc. 1994;30:469‐474.
Grimes JA, Schmiedt CW, Cornell KK, Radlinsky MAG. Identification of risk factors for septic peritonitis and failure to survive following gastrointestinal surgery in dogs. J Am Vet Med Assoc. 2011;238:486‐494.
Barry SL. Intestinal incision dehiscence. Clinician's Brief. 2016;71‐76.
Case JB, Ellison G. Single incision laparoscopic‐assisted intestinal surgery (SILAIS) in 7 dogs and 1 cat. Vet Surg. 2013;42:629‐634.