Functional diversity in archaeal Hsp60: a molecular mosaic of Group I and Group II chaperonin.
Hsp60
Sulfolobus acidocaldarius
archaea
nested cooperativity
protein folding
Journal
The FEBS journal
ISSN: 1742-4658
Titre abrégé: FEBS J
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101229646
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
26 Jun 2024
26 Jun 2024
Historique:
revised:
23
05
2024
received:
19
02
2024
accepted:
14
06
2024
medline:
26
6
2024
pubmed:
26
6
2024
entrez:
26
6
2024
Statut:
aheadofprint
Résumé
External stress disrupts the balance of protein homeostasis, necessitating the involvement of heat shock proteins (Hsps) in restoring equilibrium and ensuring cellular survival. The thermoacidophilic crenarchaeon Sulfolobus acidocaldarius, lacks the conventional Hsp100, Hsp90, and Hsp70, relying solely on a single ATP-dependent Group II chaperonin, Hsp60, comprising three distinct subunits (α, β, and γ) to refold unfolded substrates and maintain protein homeostasis. Hsp60 forms three different complexes, namely Hsp60αβγ, Hsp60αβ, and Hsp60β, at temperatures of 60 °C, 75 °C, and 90 °C, respectively. This study delves into the intricacies of Hsp60 complexes in S. acidocaldarius, uncovering their ability to form oligomeric structures in the presence of ATP. The recognition of substrates by Hsp60 involves hydrophobic interactions, and the subsequent refolding process occurs in an ATP-dependent manner through charge-driven interactions. Furthermore, the Hsp60β homo-oligomeric complex can protect the archaeal and eukaryotic membrane from stress-induced damage. Hsp60 demonstrates nested cooperativity in ATP hydrolysis activity, where MWC-type cooperativity is nested within KNF-type cooperativity. Remarkably, during ATP hydrolysis, Hsp60β, and Hsp60αβ complexes exhibit a mosaic behavior, aligning with characteristics observed in both Group I and Group II chaperonins, adding a layer of complexity to their functionality.
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Subventions
Organisme : Bose Institute
Informations de copyright
© 2024 Federation of European Biochemical Societies.
Références
Lopez T, Dalton K & Frydman J (2015) The mechanism and function of group II chaperonins. J Mol Biol 427, 2919–2930.
Saibil H (2013) Chaperone machines for protein folding, unfolding and disaggregation. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 14, 630–642.
Skjaerven L, Cuellar J, Martinez A & Valpuesta JM (2015) Dynamics, flexibility, and allostery in molecular chaperonins. FEBS Lett 589, 2522–2532.
Bigotti MG & Clarke AR (2008) Chaperonins: the hunt for the group II mechanism. Arch Biochem Biophys 474, 331–339.
Fei X, Yang D, LaRonde‐LeBlanc N & Lorimer GH (2013) Crystal structure of a GroEL‐ADP complex in the relaxed allosteric state at 2.7 A resolution. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 110, E2958–E2966.
Horovitz A & Willison KR (2005) Allosteric regulation of chaperonins. Curr Opin Struct Biol 15, 646–651.
Saibil HR, Fenton WA, Clare DK & Horwich AL (2013) Structure and allostery of the chaperonin GroEL. J Mol Biol 425, 1476–1487.
Braig K, Otwinowski Z, Hegde R, Boisvert DC, Joachimiak A, Horwich AL & Sigler PB (1994) The crystal structure of the bacterial chaperonin GroEL at 2.8 A. Nature 371, 578–586.
Braig K, Adams PD & Brunger AT (1995) Conformational variability in the refined structure of the chaperonin GroEL at 2.8 A resolution. Nat Struct Biol 2, 1083–1094.
Kusmierczyk AR & Martin J (2001) Chaperonins – keeping a lid on folding proteins. FEBS Lett 505, 343–347.
Levy‐Rimler G, Bell RE, Ben‐Tal N & Azem A (2002) Type I chaperonins: not all are created equal. FEBS Lett 529, 1–5.
Rye HS, Burston SG, Fenton WA, Beechem JM, Xu Z, Sigler PB & Horwich AL (1997) Distinct actions of cis and trans ATP within the double ring of the chaperonin GroEL. Nature 388, 792–798.
Xu Z, Horwich AL & Sigler PB (1997) The crystal structure of the asymmetric GroEL‐GroES‐(ADP)7 chaperonin complex. Nature 388, 741–750.
Klumpp M, Baumeister W & Essen LO (1997) Structure of the substrate binding domain of the thermosome, an archaeal group II chaperonin. Cell 91, 263–270.
Ditzel L, Lowe J, Stock D, Stetter KO, Huber H, Huber R & Steinbacher S (1998) Crystal structure of the thermosome, the archaeal chaperonin and homolog of CCT. Cell 93, 125–138.
Chaston JJ, Smits C, Aragao D, Wong AS, Ahsan B, Sandin S, Molugu SK, Molugu SK, Bernal RA, Stock D et al. (2016) Structural and functional insights into the evolution and stress adaptation of type II chaperonins. Structure 24, 364–374.
Large AT & Lund PA (2009) Archaeal chaperonins. Front Biosci (Landmark Ed) 14, 1304–1324.
Lund PA, Large AT & Kapatai G (2003) The chaperonins: perspectives from the archaea. Biochem Soc Trans 31, 681–685.
Reissmann S, Joachimiak LA, Chen B, Meyer AS, Nguyen A & Frydman J (2012) A gradient of ATP affinities generates an asymmetric power stroke driving the chaperonin TRIC/CCT folding cycle. Cell Rep 2, 866–877.
Yebenes H, Mesa P, Munoz IG, Montoya G & Valpuesta JM (2011) Chaperonins: two rings for folding. Trends Biochem Sci 36, 424–432.
Horwich AL, Fenton WA, Chapman E & Farr GW (2007) Two families of chaperonin: physiology and mechanism. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol 23, 115–145.
Trent JD, Nimmesgern E, Wall JS, Hartl FU & Horwich AL (1991) A molecular chaperone from a thermophilic archaebacterium is related to the eukaryotic protein t‐complex polypeptide‐1. Nature 354, 490–493.
Trent JD, Osipiuk J & Pinkau T (1990) Acquired thermotolerance and heat shock in the extremely thermophilic archaebacterium Sulfolobus sp. strain B12. J Bacteriol 172, 1478–1484.
Bhowmick A, Bhakta K, Roy M, Gupta S, Das J, Samanta S, Patranabis S & Ghosh A (2023) Heat shock response in Sulfolobus acidocaldarius and first implications for cross‐stress adaptation. Res Microbiol 174, 104106.
Knapp S, Schmidt‐Krey I, Hebert H, Bergman T, Jornvall H & Ladenstein R (1994) The molecular chaperonin TF55 from the Thermophilic archaeon Sulfolobus solfataricus. A biochemical and structural characterization. J Mol Biol 242, 397–407.
Marco S, Urena D, Carrascosa JL, Waldmann T, Peters J, Hegerl R, Pfeifer G, Sack‐Kongehl H & Baumeister W (1994) The molecular chaperone TF55. Assessment of symmetry. FEBS Lett 341, 152–155.
Kagawa HK, Yaoi T, Brocchieri L, McMillan RA, Alton T & Trent JD (2003) The composition, structure and stability of a group II chaperonin are temperature regulated in a hyperthermophilic archaeon. Mol Microbiol 48, 143–156.
Kapatai G, Large A, Benesch JL, Robinson CV, Carrascosa JL, Valpuesta JM, Gowrinathan P & Lund PA (2006) All three chaperonin genes in the archaeon Haloferax volcanii are individually dispensable. Mol Microbiol 61, 1583–1597.
Archibald JM, Logsdon JM & Doolittle WF (1999) Recurrent paralogy in the evolution of archaeal chaperonins. Curr Biol 9, 1053–1056.
Llorca O, Smyth MG, Carrascosa JL, Willison KR, Radermacher M, Steinbacher S & Valpuesta JM (1999) 3D reconstruction of the ATP‐bound form of CCT reveals the asymmetric folding conformation of a type II chaperonin. Nat Struct Biol 6, 639–642.
Llorca O, Smyth MG, Marco S, Carrascosa JL, Willison KR & Valpuesta JM (1998) ATP binding induces large conformational changes in the apical and equatorial domains of the eukaryotic chaperonin containing TCP‐1 complex. J Biol Chem 273, 10091–10094.
Schoehn G, Quaite‐Randall E, Jimenez JL, Joachimiak A & Saibil HR (2000) Three conformations of an archaeal chaperonin, TF55 from Sulfolobus shibatae. J Mol Biol 296, 813–819.
Trent JD, Kagawa HK, Yaoi T, Olle E & Zaluzec NJ (1997) Chaperonin filaments: the archaeal cytoskeleton? Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 94, 5383–5388.
Peng HL & Callender R (2018) Mechanism for fluorescence quenching of tryptophan by oxamate and pyruvate: conjugation and solvation‐induced photoinduced electron transfer. J Phys Chem B 122, 6483–6490.
Martin J, Langer T, Boteva R, Schramel A, Horwich AL & Hartl FU (1991) Chaperonin‐mediated protein folding at the surface of groEL through a ‘molten globule’‐like intermediate. Nature 352, 36–42.
Weber F, Keppel F, Georgopoulos C, Hayer‐Hartl MK & Hartl FU (1998) The oligomeric structure of GroEL/GroES is required for biologically significant chaperonin function in protein folding. Nat Struct Biol 5, 977–985.
White FH Jr (1982) Studies on the relationship of disulfide bonds to the formation and maintenance of secondary structure in chicken egg white lysozyme. Biochemistry 21, 967–977.
Cao A, Hu D & Lai L (2004) Formation of amyloid fibrils from fully reduced hen egg white lysozyme. Protein Sci 13, 319–324.
Knee KM, Goulet DR, Zhang J, Chen B, Chiu W & King JA (2011) The group II chaperonin Mm‐Cpn binds and refolds human gammaD crystallin. Protein Sci 20, 30–41.
Klunker D, Haas B, Hirtreiter A, Figueiredo L, Naylor DJ, Pfeifer G, Muller V, Deppenmeier U, Gottschalk G, Hartl FU et al. (2003) Coexistence of group I and group II chaperonins in the archaeon Methanosarcina mazei. J Biol Chem 278, 33256–33267.
Douglas NR, Reissmann S, Zhang J, Chen B, Jakana J, Kumar R, Chiu W & Frydman J (2011) Dual action of ATP hydrolysis couples lid closure to substrate release into the group II chaperonin chamber. Cell 144, 240–252.
Sledz P, Unverdorben P, Beck F, Pfeifer G, Schweitzer A, Forster F & Baumeister W (2013) Structure of the 26S proteasome with ATP‐gammaS bound provides insights into the mechanism of nucleotide‐dependent substrate translocation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 110, 7264–7269.
Luo H, Laksanalamai P & Robb FT (2009) An exceptionally stable group II chaperonin from the hyperthermophile Pyrococcus furiosus. Arch Biochem Biophys 486, 12–18.
Roy M, Fleisher RC, Alexandrov AI & Horovitz A (2023) Reduced ADP off‐rate by the yeast CCT2 double mutation T394P/R510H which causes Leber congenital amaurosis in humans. Commun Biol 6, 888.
Inobe T, Makio T, Takasu‐Ishikawa E, Terada TP & Kuwajima K (2001) Nucleotide binding to the chaperonin GroEL: non‐cooperative binding of ATP analogs and ADP, and cooperative effect of ATP. Biochim Biophys Acta 1545, 160–173.
Llorca O, Martin‐Benito J, Grantham J, Ritco‐Vonsovici M, Willison KR, Carrascosa JL & Valpuesta JM (2001) The ‘sequential allosteric ring’ mechanism in the eukaryotic chaperonin‐assisted folding of actin and tubulin. EMBO J 20, 4065–4075.
Meyer AS, Gillespie JR, Walther D, Millet IS, Doniach S & Frydman J (2003) Closing the folding chamber of the eukaryotic chaperonin requires the transition state of ATP hydrolysis. Cell 113, 369–381.
Iizuka R, Yoshida T, Shomura Y, Miki K, Maruyama T, Odaka M & Yohda M (2003) ATP binding is critical for the conformational change from an open to closed state in archaeal group II chaperonin. J Biol Chem 278, 44959–44965.
Gutsche I, Holzinger J, Rauh N, Baumeister W & May RP (2001) ATP‐induced structural change of the thermosome is temperature‐dependent. J Struct Biol 135, 139–146.
Stuart SF, Leatherbarrow RJ & Willison KR (2011) A two‐step mechanism for the folding of actin by the yeast cytosolic chaperonin. J Biol Chem 286, 178–184.
Todd MJ, Lorimer GH & Thirumalai D (1996) Chaperonin‐facilitated protein folding: optimization of rate and yield by an iterative annealing mechanism. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 93, 4030–4035.
Moll R & Schäfer GJ (1988) Chemiosmotic H+ cycling across the plasma membrane of the thermoacidophilic archaebacterium Sulfolobus acidocaldarius. FEBS Lett 232, 359–363.
Slonczewski JL, Fujisawa M, Dopson M & Krulwich TA (2009) Cytoplasmic pH measurement and homeostasis in bacteria and archaea. Adv Microb Physiol 55, 1–79, 317.
de Graff AM, Hazoglou MJ & Dill KA (2016) Highly charged proteins: the Achilles' heel of aging proteomes. Structure 24, 329–336.
Wilson CL, Hinman NW & Sheridan RP (2000) Hydrogen peroxide formation and decay in iron‐rich geothermal waters: the relative roles of abiotic and biotic mechanisms. Photochem Photobiol 71, 691–699.
Belles C, Kuhl A, Nosheny R & Carding SR (1999) Plasma membrane expression of heat shock protein 60 in vivo in response to infection. Infect Immun 67, 4191–4200.
Ellen AF, Albers SV, Huibers W, Pitcher A, Hobel CF, Schwarz H, Folea M, Schouten S, Boekema EJ, Poolman B et al. (2009) Proteomic analysis of secreted membrane vesicles of archaeal Sulfolobus species reveals the presence of endosome sorting complex components. Extremophiles 13, 67–79.
Dumitrascu L, Stanciuc N, Aprodu I, Ciuciu AM, Alexe P & Bahrim GE (2015) Monitoring the heat‐induced structural changes of alkaline phosphatase by molecular modeling, fluorescence spectroscopy and inactivation kinetics investigations. J Food Sci Technol 52, 6290–6300.
Roy M, Bhakta K, Bhowmick A, Gupta S, Ghosh A & Ghosh A (2022) Archaeal Hsp14 drives substrate shuttling between small heat shock proteins and thermosome: insights into a novel substrate transfer pathway. FEBS J 289, 1080–1104.
Monod J, Wyman J & Changeux JP (1965) On the nature of allosteric transitions: a plausible model. J Mol Biol 12, 88–118.
Koshland DE Jr, Nemethy G & Filmer D (1966) Comparison of experimental binding data and theoretical models in proteins containing subunits. Biochemistry 5, 365–385.
Wyman J Jr (1964) Linked functions and reciprocal effects in hemoglobin: a second look. Adv Protein Chem 19, 223–286.
Robert CH, Decker H, Richey B, Gill SJ & Wyman J (1987) Nesting: hierarchies of allosteric interactions. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 84, 1891–1895.
Decker H, Connelly PR, Robert CH & Gill SJ (1988) Nested allosteric interaction in tarantula hemocyanin revealed through the binding of oxygen and carbon monoxide. Biochemistry 27, 6901–6908.
Smith FR & Ackers GK (1985) Experimental resolution of cooperative free energies for the ten ligation states of human hemoglobin. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 82, 5347–5351.
Brunori M, Coletta M & Di Cera E (1986) A cooperative model for ligand binding to biological macromolecules as applied to oxygen carriers. Biophys Chem 23, 215–222.
Yifrach O & Horovitz A (1995) Nested cooperativity in the ATPase activity of the oligomeric chaperonin GroEL. Biochemistry 34, 5303–5308.
Kafri G, Willison KR & Horovitz A (2001) Nested allosteric interactions in the cytoplasmic chaperonin containing TCP‐1. Protein Sci 10, 445–449.
Todd MJ, Viitanen PV & Lorimer GH (1993) Hydrolysis of adenosine 5′‐triphosphate by Escherichia coli GroEL: effects of GroES and potassium ion. Biochemistry 32, 8560–8567.
Yifrach O & Horovitz A (1994) Two lines of allosteric communication in the oligomeric chaperonin GroEL are revealed by the single mutation Arg196→Ala. J Mol Biol 243, 397–401.
Danziger O, Shimon L & Horovitz A (2006) Glu257 in GroEL is a sensor involved in coupling polypeptide substrate binding to stimulation of ATP hydrolysis. Protein Sci 15, 1270–1276.
Greiner JV & Glonek T (2021) Intracellular ATP concentration and implication for cellular evolution. Biology (Basel) 10, 1166.
Kabir MA, Uddin W, Narayanan A, Reddy PK, Jairajpuri MA, Sherman F & Ahmad Z (2011) Functional subunits of eukaryotic chaperonin CCT/TRiC in protein folding. J Amino Acids 2011, 843206.
Bligh EG & Dyer WJ (1959) A rapid method of total lipid extraction and purification. Can J Biochem Physiol 37, 911–917.
Roy M, Gupta S, Patranabis S & Ghosh A (2018) The oligomeric plasticity of Hsp20 of Sulfolobus acidocaldarius protects environment‐induced protein aggregation and membrane destabilization. Biochim Biophys Acta Biomembr 1860, 2549–2565.
Stewart JC (1980) Colorimetric determination of phospholipids with ammonium ferrothiocyanate. Anal Biochem 104, 10–14.