Unveiling the impact of soil methane sink on atmospheric methane concentrations in 2020.

atmospheric methane methane sink methane source modelling terrestrial ecosystem

Journal

Global change biology
ISSN: 1365-2486
Titre abrégé: Glob Chang Biol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9888746

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Jun 2024
Historique:
revised: 15 02 2024
received: 14 11 2023
accepted: 15 05 2024
medline: 26 6 2024
pubmed: 26 6 2024
entrez: 26 6 2024
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

In 2020, anthropogenic methane (CH

Identifiants

pubmed: 38923235
doi: 10.1111/gcb.17381
doi:

Substances chimiques

Methane OP0UW79H66
Soil 0

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

e17381

Subventions

Organisme : National Natural Science Foundation of China
ID : 32171635
Organisme : New Zealand Ministry of Business, Innovation & Employment Strategic Science Investment Fund
Organisme : New Zealand Forest Growers Levy Trust
ID : C04X1703
Organisme : Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities

Informations de copyright

© 2024 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Références

Gatica, G., Fernández, M. E., Juliarena, M. P., & Gyenge, J. (2020). Environmental and anthropogenic drivers of soil methane fluxes in forests: Global patterns and among‐biomes differences. Global Change Biology, 26, 6604–6615.
Global Modeling and Assimilation Office (GMAO). (2015). MERRA‐2 tavg1_2d_flx_Nx: 2d,1‐hourly, time‐averaged, single‐level, assimilation, surface flux diagnostics V5.12.4. Goddard Space Flight Center Distributed Active Archive Center (GSFC DAAC). https://doi.org/10.5067/7MCPBJ41Y0K6
Harris, I., Osborn, T. J., Jones, P., & Lister, D. (2020). Version 4 of the CRU TS monthly high‐resolution gridded multivariate climate dataset. Scientific Data, 7(1), 109. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597‐020‐0453‐3
IPCC. (2022). Climate change 2022: Impacts, adaptation, and vulnerability. Contribution of Working Group II to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (H.‐O. Pörtner, D. C. Roberts, M. Tignor, E. S. Poloczanska, K. Mintenbeck, A. Alegría, M. Craig, S. Langsdorf, S. Löschke, V. Möller, A. Okem, & B. Rama, Eds.). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009325844
Kolb, S. (2009). The quest for atmospheric methane oxidizers in forest soils. Environmental Microbiology Reports, 1(5), 336–346. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1758‐2229.2009.00047.x
Lan, X., Thoning, K. W., & Dlugokencky, E. J. (2022). Trends in globally‐averaged CH4, N2O, and SF6 determined from NOAA Global Monitoring Laboratory measurements. Version 2023‐06. https://doi.org/10.15138/P8XG‐AA10
Lee, J., Oh, Y., Lee, S. T., Seo, Y. O., Yun, J., Yang, Y., Kim, J., Zhuang, Q., & Kang, H. (2023). Soil organic carbon is a key determinant of CH4 sink in global forest soils. Nature Communications, 14, 3110.
Li, L. M., Lei, L. P., Song, H., Zeng, Z. C., & He, Z. H. (2022). Spatiotemporal geostatistical analysis and global mapping of CH4 columns from GOSAT observations. Remote Sensing, 14(3), 654. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs14030654
Martens, B., Miralles, D. G., Lievens, H., van der Schalie, R., de Jeu, R. A. M., Fernández‐Prieto, D., Beck, H. E., Dorigo, W. A., & Verhoest, N. E. C. (2017). GLEAM v3: Satellite‐based land evaporation and root‐zone soil moisture. Geoscientific Model Development, 10(5), 1903–1925. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd‐10‐1903‐2017
Muñoz Sabater, J. (2019). ERA5‐land monthly averaged data from 1981 to present. Copernicus Climate Change Service (C3S) Climate Data Store (CDS). https://doi.org/10.24381/cds.68d2bb30
Murguia‐Flores, F., Arndt, S., Ganesan, A. L., Murray‐Tortarolo, G., & Hornibrook, E. R. C. (2018). Soil Methanotrophy Model (MeMo v1.0): A process‐based model to quantify global uptake of atmospheric methane by soil. Geoscientific Model Development, 11(6), 2009–2032. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd‐11‐2009‐2018
Murguia‐Flores, F., Ganesan, A. L., Arndt, S., & Hornibrook, E. R. C. (2021). Global uptake of atmospheric methane by soil from 1900 to 2100. Global Biogeochemical Cycles, 35(7), e2020GB006774. https://doi.org/10.1029/2020gb006774
Peng, S. S., Lin, X., Thompson, R. L., Xi, Y., Liu, G., Hauglustaine, D., Lan, X., Poulter, B., Ramonet, M., Saunois, M., Yin, Y., Zhang, Z., Zheng, B., & Ciais, P. (2022). Wetland emission and atmospheric sink changes explain methane growth in 2020. Nature, 612(7940), 477–482. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586‐022‐05447‐w
Preimesberger, W., Scanlon, T., Su, C. H., Gruber, A., & Dorigo, W. (2021). Homogenization of structural breaks in the global ESA CCI soil moisture multisatellite climate data record. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 59(4), 2845–2862. https://doi.org/10.1109/Tgrs.2020.3012896
R Development Core Team. (2022). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.r‐project.org/
Saunois, M., Stavert, A. R., Poulter, B., Bousquet, P., Canadell, J. G., Jackson, R. B., Raymond, P. A., Dlugokencky, E. J., Houweling, S., Patra, P. K., Ciais, P., Arora, V. K., Bastviken, D., Bergamaschi, P., Blake, D. R., Brailsford, G., Bruhwiler, L., Carlson, K. M., Carrol, M., … Zhuang, Q. L. (2020). The global methane budget 2000–2017. Earth System Science Data, 12(3), 1561–1623. https://doi.org/10.5194/essd‐12‐1561‐2020
Tate, K. R. (2015). Soil methane oxidation and land‐use change – from process to mitigation. Soil Biology & Biochemistry, 80, 260–272. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2014.10.010
Voigt, C., Virkkala, A. M., Gosselin, G. H., Bennett, K. A., Black, T. A., Detto, M. C., Chevrier‐Dion, C., Guggenberger, G., Hashmi, W., Kohl, L., Kou, D., Marquis, C., Marsh, P., Marushchak, M. E., Nesic, Z., Nykänen, H., Saarela, T., Sauheitl, L., Walker, B., … Sonnentag, O. (2023). Arctic soil methane sink increases with drier conditions and higher ecosystem respiration. Nature Climate Change, 13, 1095–1104. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558‐023‐01785‐3
Zhang, Z., Poulter, B., Feldman, A. F., Ying, Q., Ciais, P., Peng, S. S., & Li, X. (2023). Recent intensification of wetland methane feedback. Nature Climate Change, 13(5), 430–433. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558‐023‐01629‐0
Zhou, X., Dong, H., Chen, C., Smaill, S. J., & Clinton, P. W. (2014). Ethylene rather than dissolved organic carbon controls methane uptake in upland soils. Global Change Biology, 20, 2379–2380.
Zhou, X. Q., Smaill, S. J., & Clinton, P. W. (2013). Methane oxidation needs less stressed plants. Trends in Plant Science, 18, 657–659.
Zhou, X. Q., Zuo, H. L., & Smaill, S. J. (2021). Incorporation of NPP into forest CH4 efflux models. Trends in Plant Science, 26(12), 1210–1212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tplants.2021.09.007

Auteurs

Xiaoqi Zhou (X)

Zhejiang Tiantong Forest Ecosystem National Observation and Research Station, School of Ecological and Environmental Sciences, East China Normal University, Shanghai, China.

Wensheng Xiao (W)

Zhejiang Tiantong Forest Ecosystem National Observation and Research Station, School of Ecological and Environmental Sciences, East China Normal University, Shanghai, China.

Li Cheng (L)

Zhejiang Tiantong Forest Ecosystem National Observation and Research Station, School of Ecological and Environmental Sciences, East China Normal University, Shanghai, China.

Simeon J Smaill (SJ)

Scion, Christchurch, New Zealand.

Shushi Peng (S)

College of Urban and Environmental Sciences, Peking University, Beijing, China.

Articles similaires

Populus Soil Microbiology Soil Microbiota Fungi
Vancomycin Polyesters Anti-Bacterial Agents Models, Theoretical Drug Liberation
Lakes Salinity Archaea Bacteria Microbiota
Rivers Turkey Biodiversity Environmental Monitoring Animals

Classifications MeSH