Reliability parameters of the Timed 25-Foot-Walk (T25FW) in patients with Multiple Sclerosis: Lower walking speed is associated with greater Smallest Detectable Change.

Multiple sclerosis Reliability Smallest detectable change Test-retest Timed 25-foot walk

Journal

Multiple sclerosis and related disorders
ISSN: 2211-0356
Titre abrégé: Mult Scler Relat Disord
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 101580247

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
15 Jun 2024
Historique:
received: 16 02 2024
revised: 10 05 2024
accepted: 14 06 2024
medline: 27 6 2024
pubmed: 27 6 2024
entrez: 26 6 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

Reliability parameters of clinical measures should be sufficient in order to adequately monitor disease course and evaluate treatment in patients with Multiple Sclerosis (MS). The aim of this study was to assess the reliability of the Timed 25-Foot-Walk (T25FW) in patients with MS. MS patients performed the T25FW twice with approximately one year in between. After the second measurement, they answered an anchor question using a three-point Likert scale. Taking the non-normal distribution of the T25FW into account, intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC 118 MS patients (76.3 % females, mean age 48.2 years) were included. Of these patients, 73 reported no change on the anchor question. They completed the T25FW at baseline in 4.7s (IQR 4.3-5.4s, n = 72) and at follow-up in 4.9s (IQR 4.3-5.9s, n = 73). The ICC Overall, in patients with MS, the T25FW has a sufficient reliability as measured with the ICC, however the SDC of the T25FW increased when patients perform worse on the T25FW (i.e. have a lower walking speed). Because this test is often used in MS patients with limited walking ability, these findings are important to keep in mind when interpreting the re-test scores of the T25FW.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Reliability parameters of clinical measures should be sufficient in order to adequately monitor disease course and evaluate treatment in patients with Multiple Sclerosis (MS). The aim of this study was to assess the reliability of the Timed 25-Foot-Walk (T25FW) in patients with MS.
METHODS METHODS
MS patients performed the T25FW twice with approximately one year in between. After the second measurement, they answered an anchor question using a three-point Likert scale. Taking the non-normal distribution of the T25FW into account, intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC
RESULTS RESULTS
118 MS patients (76.3 % females, mean age 48.2 years) were included. Of these patients, 73 reported no change on the anchor question. They completed the T25FW at baseline in 4.7s (IQR 4.3-5.4s, n = 72) and at follow-up in 4.9s (IQR 4.3-5.9s, n = 73). The ICC
CONCLUSION CONCLUSIONS
Overall, in patients with MS, the T25FW has a sufficient reliability as measured with the ICC, however the SDC of the T25FW increased when patients perform worse on the T25FW (i.e. have a lower walking speed). Because this test is often used in MS patients with limited walking ability, these findings are important to keep in mind when interpreting the re-test scores of the T25FW.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38924934
pii: S2211-0348(24)00308-0
doi: 10.1016/j.msard.2024.105731
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

105731

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2024 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Declaration of competing interest The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Auteurs

Daniëlla M Oosterveer (DM)

Basalt, Leiden/The Hague, The Netherlands; Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Alrijne Hospital, Leiden, The Netherlands. Electronic address: d.oosterveer@basaltrevalidatie.nl.

Natasja C Wouda (NC)

Center of Excellence for Rehabilitation Medicine, University Medical Center Utrecht Brain Center, University Medical Center Utrecht and De Hoogstraat Rehabilitation, Utrecht, The Netherlands.

Gerard Volker (G)

Basalt, Leiden/The Hague, The Netherlands.

Christel van den Berg (C)

Basalt, Leiden/The Hague, The Netherlands.

Berend Terluin (B)

Department of General Practice, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Elske Hoitsma (E)

Department of Neurology, Alrijne Hospital, Leiden, The Netherlands.

Classifications MeSH