Video analysis of real-life shoulder dystocia to assess technical and non-technical performance.
checklist
communication
emergency treatment
obstetric labor complications
obstetrics
shoulder dystocia
situation awareness
video recording
Journal
Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica
ISSN: 1600-0412
Titre abrégé: Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0370343
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
24 Jun 2024
24 Jun 2024
Historique:
revised:
24
04
2024
received:
18
01
2024
accepted:
04
06
2024
medline:
27
6
2024
pubmed:
27
6
2024
entrez:
26
6
2024
Statut:
aheadofprint
Résumé
Managing obstetric shoulder dystocia requires swift action using correct maneuvers. However, knowledge of obstetric teams' performance during management of real-life shoulder dystocia is limited, and the impact of non-technical skills has not been adequately evaluated. We aimed to analyze videos of teams managing real-life shoulder dystocia to identify clinical challenges associated with correct management and particular non-technical skills correlated with high technical performance. We included 17 videos depicting teams managing shoulder dystocia in two Danish delivery wards, where deliveries were initially handled by midwives, and consultants were available for complications. Delivery rooms contained two or three cameras activated by Bluetooth upon obstetrician entry. Videos were captured 5 min before and after activation. Two obstetricians assessed the videos; technical performances were scored as low (0-59), average (60-84), or high (85-100). Two other assessors evaluated non-technical skills using the Global Assessment of Team Performance checklist, scoring 6 (poor) to 30 (excellent). We used a spline regression model to explore associations between these two score sets. Inter-rater agreement was assessed using interclass correlation coefficients. Interclass correlation coefficients were 0.71 (95% confidence interval 0.23-0.89) and 0.82 (95% confidence interval 0.52-0.94) for clinical and non-technical performances, respectively. Two teams had low technical performance scores; four teams achieved high scores. Teams adhered well to guidelines, demonstrating limited head traction, McRoberts maneuver, and internal rotation maneuvers. Several clinical skills posed challenges, notably recognizing shoulder impaction, applying suprapubic pressure, and discouraging women from pushing. Two non-technical skills were associated with high technical performance: effective patient communication, with teams calming the mother and guiding her collaboration during internal rotational maneuvers, and situation awareness, where teams promptly mobilized all essential personnel (senior midwife, consultant, pediatric team). Team communication, stress management, and task management skills were not associated with high technical performance. Videos capturing teams managing real-life shoulder dystocia are an effective tool to reveal challenges with certain technical and non-technical skills. Teams with high technical performance are associated with effective patient communication and situational awareness. Future training should include technical skills and non-technical skills, patient communication, and situation awareness.
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Subventions
Organisme : Regional Postgraduate Medical Education Administration Office North
Organisme : Regional Hospital in Horsens, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology
Organisme : TrygFonden
ID : 109507
Informations de copyright
© 2024 The Author(s). Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Nordic Federation of Societies of Obstetrics and Gynecology (NFOG).
Références
Crofts J, Draycott T, Montague I, Winter C, Fox R. Shoulder dystocia. Green–top Guideline No. 42. 2nd ed. 2012.
Practice bulletin No 178: shoulder dystocia. Obstet Gynecol. 2017;129:e123‐e133.
Gherman RB, Ouzounian JG, Goodwin TM. Obstetric maneuvers for shoulder dystocia and associated fetal morbidity. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1998;178:1126‐1130.
Gherman RB, Chauhan S, Ouzounian JG, Lerner H, Gonik B, Goodwin TM. Shoulder dystocia: the unpreventable obstetric emergency with empiric management guidelines. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2006;195:657‐672.
Draycott TJ, Crofts JF, Ash JP, et al. Improving neonatal outcome through practical shoulder dystocia training. Obstet Gynecol. 2008;112:14‐20.
Angelini DJ, Greenwald L. Closed claims analysis of 65 medical malpractice cases involving nurse‐midwives. J Midwifery Womens Health. 2005;50:454‐460.
Ten Years of Maternity Claims: An Analysis of NHS Litigation Authority Data. Accessed January 6, 2024. https://resolution.nhs.uk/wp‐content/uploads/2018/11/Ten‐years‐of‐Maternity‐Claims‐Final‐Report‐final‐2.pdf
Crofts J, Lenguerrand E, Bentham G, et al. Prevention of brachial plexus injury‐12 years of shoulder dystocia training: an interrupted time‐series study. BJOG. 2016;123:111‐118.
Su L, Waller M, Kaplan S, Watson A, Jones M, Wessel DL. Cardiac resuscitation events: one eyewitness is not enough. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2015;16:335‐342.
Heinonen K, Saisto T, Gissler M, Kaijomaa M, Sarvilinna N. Pitfalls in the diagnostics of shoulder dystocia: an analysis based on the scrutiny of 2274 deliveries. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2024;309:1401‐1409.
Brogaard L, Uldbjerg N. Filming for auditing of real‐life emergency teams: a systematic review. BMJ Open Qual. 2019;8:e000588.
Brogaard L, Hvidman L, Hinshaw K, et al. Development of the TeamOBS‐PPH ‐ targeting clinical performance in postpartum hemorrhage. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2018;97:677‐687.
Morgan PJ, Tregunno D, Pittini R, et al. Determination of the psychometric properties of a behavioural marking system for obstetrical team training using high‐fidelity simulation. BMJ Qual Saf. 2012;21:78‐82.
Morgan P, Tregunno D, Brydges R, et al. Using a situational awareness global assessment technique for interprofessional obstetrical team training with high fidelity simulation. J Interprof Care. 2015;29:13‐19.
Brogaard L, Kierkegaard O, Hvidman L, et al. The importance of non‐technical performance for teams managing postpartum haemorrhage: video review of 99 obstetric teams. BJOG. 2019;126:1015‐1023.
Brogaard L, Hvidman L, Esberg G, et al. Teamwork and adherence to guideline on newborn resuscitation—video review of neonatal interdisciplinary teams. Front Pediatr. 2022;10:828297.
Winter C, Draycott T, Muchatuta N, Crofts J, eds. PROMPT Course Manual. 3rd ed. Cambridge University Press; 2018.
Regehr G, Freeman R, Robb A, Missiha N, Heisey R. OSCE performance evaluations made by standardized patients: comparing checklist and global rating scores. Acad Med. 1999;74:S135‐S137.
Grobman WA, Miller D, Burke C, Hornbogen A, Tam K, Costello R. Outcomes associated with introduction of a shoulder dystocia protocol. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2011;205:513‐517.
Allen EG. Prescriptive and proscriptive lessons for managing shoulder dystocia: a technical and videographical tutorial. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2024;230:S1014‐S1026.
Siassakos D, Draycott T, Montague I, Harris M. Content analysis of team communication in an obstetric emergency scenario. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2009;29:499‐503.
Cornthwaite K, Edwards S, Siassakos D. Reducing risk in maternity by optimising teamwork and leadership: an evidence‐based approach to save mothers and babies. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2013;27:571‐581.
Hoffman MK, Bailit JL, Branch DW, et al. A comparison of obstetric maneuvers for the acute management of shoulder dystocia. Obstet Gynecol. 2011;117:1272‐1278.
Lau SL, Sin WTA, Wong L, Lee NMW, Hui SYA, Leung TY. A critical evaluation of the external and internal maneuvers for resolution of shoulder dystocia. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2024;230:S1027‐S1043.
Zheng L, Li H, Zhang H. Cohort study of use of the hands‐and knees‐position as the first approach to resolving shoulder dystocia and preventing neonatal birth trauma. Gynecol Obstet Clin Med. 2021;1:160‐163.
Bruner JP, Drummond SB, Meenan AL, Gaskin IM. All‐fours maneuver for reducing shoulder dystocia during labor. J Reprod Med. 1998;43:439‐443.
Flin R, O'Connor P, Crichton M. Situation awareness. In: Flin R, O'Connor P, eds. Safety at the Sharp End: A Guide to Non‐Technical Skills. 1st ed. CRC Press; 2008.
Flin R, Patey R. Improving patient safety through training in non‐technical skills. BMJ. 2009;339:b3595.
Gordon M, Darbyshire D, Baker P. Non‐technical skills training to enhance patient safety: a systematic review. Med Educ. 2012;46:1042‐1054.
Donaldson MS, Corrigan JM, Kohn LT. To Err Is Human. National Academies Press; 2000.
Haynes AB, Weiser TG, Berry WR, et al. Changes in safety attitude and relationship to decreased postoperative morbidity and mortality following implementation of a checklist‐based surgical safety intervention. BMJ Qual Saf. 2011;20:102‐107.
Xu X, Siefert KA, Jacobson PD, Lori JR, Ransom SB. The effects of medical liability on obstetric care supply in Michigan. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2008;198:205.e1‐205.e9.
Brogaard L, Boie S, Hjorth‐Hansen K, et al. Skulderdystoci; DSOG guideline, 1st ed. 2023.
Brogaard L, Glerup Lauridsen K, Løfgren B, et al. The effects of obstetric emergency team training on patient outcome: a systematic review and meta‐analysis. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2022;101:25‐36.
Gardner R, Raemer DB. Simulation in obstetrics and gynecology. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. 2008;35:97‐127.
Kha KS, Chien PFW. Evaluation of a clinical test. I: assessment of reliability. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 2001;108:562‐567.
Deering SH, Weeks L, Benedetti T. Evaluation of force applied during deliveries complicated by shoulder dystocia using simulation. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2011;204(234):e1‐e5.