The Surprise Question and clinician-predicted prognosis: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Palliative Care Prognosis

Journal

BMJ supportive & palliative care
ISSN: 2045-4368
Titre abrégé: BMJ Support Palliat Care
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101565123

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
26 Jun 2024
Historique:
received: 10 03 2024
accepted: 02 06 2024
medline: 27 6 2024
pubmed: 27 6 2024
entrez: 26 6 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

The Surprise Question, 'Would you be surprised if this person died within the next year?' is a simple tool that can be used by clinicians to identify people within the last year of life. This review aimed to determine the accuracy of this assessment, across different healthcare settings, specialties, follow-up periods and respondents. Searches were conducted of Medline, Embase, AMED, PubMed and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, from inception until 01 January 2024. Studies were included if they reported original data on the ability of the Surprise Question to predict survival. For each study (including subgroups), sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values and accuracy were determined. Our dataset comprised 56 distinct cohorts, including 68 829 patients. In a pooled analysis, the sensitivity of the Surprise Question was 0.69 ((0.64 to 0.74) I The Surprise Question demonstrated modest accuracy with considerable heterogeneity across the population to which it was applied and to whom it was posed. Prospective studies should test whether the prompt can facilitate timely access to palliative care services, as originally envisioned. CRD32022298236.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
The Surprise Question, 'Would you be surprised if this person died within the next year?' is a simple tool that can be used by clinicians to identify people within the last year of life. This review aimed to determine the accuracy of this assessment, across different healthcare settings, specialties, follow-up periods and respondents.
METHODS METHODS
Searches were conducted of Medline, Embase, AMED, PubMed and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, from inception until 01 January 2024. Studies were included if they reported original data on the ability of the Surprise Question to predict survival. For each study (including subgroups), sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values and accuracy were determined.
RESULTS RESULTS
Our dataset comprised 56 distinct cohorts, including 68 829 patients. In a pooled analysis, the sensitivity of the Surprise Question was 0.69 ((0.64 to 0.74) I
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
The Surprise Question demonstrated modest accuracy with considerable heterogeneity across the population to which it was applied and to whom it was posed. Prospective studies should test whether the prompt can facilitate timely access to palliative care services, as originally envisioned.
PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER UNASSIGNED
CRD32022298236.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38925876
pii: spcare-2024-004879
doi: 10.1136/spcare-2024-004879
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Informations de copyright

© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2024. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Competing interests: None declared.

Auteurs

Ankit Gupta (A)

Leeds Institute of Medical Education, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.

Ruth Burgess (R)

Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK.

Michael Drozd (M)

Leeds Institute of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.

John Gierula (J)

Leeds Institute of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.

Klaus Witte (K)

Leeds Institute of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.

Sam Straw (S)

Leeds Institute of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK s.straw@leeds.ac.uk.

Classifications MeSH