Understanding Compost-Bedded Pack Barn Systems in Regions with a Tropical Climate: A Review of the Current State of the Art.

animal welfare compost-bedded pack barns dairy cattle heat stress housing systems

Journal

Animals : an open access journal from MDPI
ISSN: 2076-2615
Titre abrégé: Animals (Basel)
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101635614

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
10 Jun 2024
Historique:
received: 24 04 2024
revised: 04 06 2024
accepted: 07 06 2024
medline: 27 6 2024
pubmed: 27 6 2024
entrez: 27 6 2024
Statut: epublish

Résumé

The main challenge in milk production has been to maintain a focus on efficient processes that enhance production outcomes while aligning with animal welfare and sustainability and being valued by society. As an alternative to improve cow welfare in production and provide better handling of the waste generated by the activity, the system called the compost-bedded pack barn (CBP) has been widely adopted in countries with temperate climates and higher milk production. This CBP has been attracting global interest, including from countries with tropical and subtropical climates, such as Brazil, where many producers have started to use it due to the response in terms of milk productivity. A CBP can be designed either in (a) an open facility with natural ventilation or a positive-pressure ventilation system or (b) totally closed facilities, equipped with negative-pressure ventilation systems and permanent thermal control. The latter system is being implemented in Brazil, despite insufficient knowledge about its efficiency. The objective of this study was, through a review, to gather and describe the most recent information on the use of open and closed CBP systems for dairy cattle housing, mainly covering how it is applied in tropical climate regions. To achieve the proposed objective, this review study included the following topics related to CBPs: (i) implementation, (ii) bedding, (iii) general construction and architectural characteristics, and (iv) ambient thermal conditioning. Knowledge gaps and directions for future research are also identified here.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38929374
pii: ani14121755
doi: 10.3390/ani14121755
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Review

Langues

eng

Auteurs

Rafaella Resende Andrade (RR)

Department of Biosystems Engineering, College of Agronomy, Federal University of Goiás, Goiânia 74690-900, GO, Brazil.

Ilda de Fátima Ferreira Tinôco (IFF)

Department of Agricultural Engineering, Federal University of Viçosa (UFV), Viçosa 36570-900, MG, Brazil.

Flávio Alves Damasceno (FA)

Department of Engineering, Federal University of Lavras (UFLA), Lavras 37200-900, MG, Brazil.

Carlos Eduardo Alves Oliveira (CEA)

Department of Agricultural Engineering, Federal University of Viçosa (UFV), Viçosa 36570-900, MG, Brazil.

Mariana Silva Concha (MS)

Department of Animal Science, School of Veterinary and Animal Science, Federal University of Goiás, Goiânia 74690-900, GO, Brazil.

Ozana de Fátima Zacaroni (OF)

Department of Animal Science, School of Veterinary and Animal Science, Federal University of Goiás, Goiânia 74690-900, GO, Brazil.

Gianluca Bambi (G)

Department of Agriculture, Food, Environment and Forestry, University of Firenze, 50145 Firenze, Italy.

Matteo Barbari (M)

Department of Agriculture, Food, Environment and Forestry, University of Firenze, 50145 Firenze, Italy.

Classifications MeSH