Accuracy of immediately placed implants using surgical guides from different 3-dimensional printers: An in vitro study.
3‐dimensional‐printed surgical guide
accuracy
dental implant
immediate
single tooth
Journal
Clinical implant dentistry and related research
ISSN: 1708-8208
Titre abrégé: Clin Implant Dent Relat Res
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 100888977
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
26 Jun 2024
26 Jun 2024
Historique:
revised:
15
04
2024
received:
16
11
2023
accepted:
29
05
2024
medline:
27
6
2024
pubmed:
27
6
2024
entrez:
27
6
2024
Statut:
aheadofprint
Résumé
The aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of 3-dimensional (3D)-printed surgical guides for fully guided immediate implants from different manufacturers. Eighteen 3D printed fully guided surgical guides (split into 3 groups [n = 6] according to their manufacturer: Company, Desktop, or Lab), were used to place 72 implants (n = 24) in identical maxillary models. After placement, the mean global, angular, mesiodistal, buccopalatal, and vertical deviation at the platform and apex of the placed implants, relative to their preoperatively planned positions, was calculated. Significant differences in global apex deviation, angular deviation, mesiodistal apex deviation, and vertical platform and apex deviation were found between the Lab and Desktop groups (p ≤ 0.007). Significant differences in mesiodistal platform and apex deviation and buccopalatal apex deviation were also found between the Company and Desktop groups (p ≤ 0.005). Finally, significant differences in buccopalatal apex deviation, and vertical platform and apex deviation were found between the Company and Lab groups (p ≤ 0.003). Mean differences between guide groups across all parameters never exceeded 0.5 mm or 1°. The choice of 3D printer has a significant effect on the accuracy of fully guided immediate implants. However, the clinical relevance of these differences may be considered limited.
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Subventions
Organisme : Straumann Belgium
Organisme : Labo Hoet Dental Lab
Organisme : Intellident
Informations de copyright
© 2024 Wiley Periodicals LLC.
Références
Canellas J, Medeiros PJD, Figueredo C, Fischer RG, Ritto FG. Which is the best choice after tooth extraction, immediate implant placement or delayed placement with alveolar ridge preservation? A systematic review and meta‐analysis. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2019;47(11):1793‐1802. doi:10.1016/j.jcms.2019.08.004
Cosyn J, Blanco J. Immediate implant placement: managing hard and soft tissue stability from diagnosis to prosthetic treatment. Int J Prosthodont. 2023;36:533‐545.
Seyssens L, Eghbali A, Cosyn J. A 10‐year prospective study on single immediate implants. J Clin Periodontol. 2020;47(10):1248‐1258. doi:10.1111/jcpe.13352
Pitman J, Christiaens V, Callens J, et al. Immediate implant placement with flap or flapless surgery: a systematic review and meta‐analysis. J Clin Periodontol. 2023;50(6):755‐764. doi:10.1111/jcpe.13795
Christiaens V, Pitman J, Glibert M, Hommez G, Atashkadeh M, De Bruyn H. Rationale for a reverse tapered body shift implant for immediate placement. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2020;49(12):1630‐1636. doi:10.1016/j.ijom.2020.04.007
Buser D, Martin W, Belser UC. Optimizing esthetics for implant restorations in the anterior maxilla: anatomic and surgical considerations. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2004;19(Suppl):43‐61.
Evans CD, Chen ST. Esthetic outcomes of immediate implant placements. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2008;19(1):73‐80. doi:10.1111/j.1600‐0501.2007.01413.x
Van Assche N, Vercruyssen M, Coucke W, Teughels W, Jacobs R, Quirynen M. Accuracy of computer‐aided implant placement. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2012;23(Suppl 6):112‐123. doi:10.1111/j.1600‐0501.2012.02552.x
Deeb GR, Allen RK, Hall VP, Whitley D 3rd, Laskin DM, Bencharit S. How accurate are Implant surgical guides produced with desktop stereolithographic 3‐dimensional printers? J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2017;75(12):2559.e1‐2559.e8. doi:10.1016/j.joms.2017.08.001
Ozan O, Turkyilmaz I, Ersoy AE, McGlumphy EA, Rosenstiel SF. Clinical accuracy of 3 different types of computed tomography‐derived stereolithographic surgical guides in implant placement. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2009;67(2):394‐401. doi:10.1016/j.joms.2008.09.033
Kessler A, Le V, Folwaczny M. Influence of the tooth position, guided sleeve height, supporting length, manufacturing methods, and resin E‐modulus on the in vitro accuracy of surgical implant guides in a free‐end situation. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2021;32(9):1097‐1104. doi:10.1111/clr.13804
Cuputo. Dental implant. The Noun Project. Accessed October 17. 2023. https://thenounproject.com/icon/dental-implant-4303577/
Tsolakis IA, Gizani S, Panayi N, Antonopoulos G, Tsolakis AI. Three‐dimensional printing Technology in Orthodontics for dental models: a systematic review. Children (Basel). 2022;9(8):1106. doi:10.3390/children9081106
Tsolakis IA, Papaioannou W, Papadopoulou E, Dalampira M, Tsolakis AI. Comparison in terms of accuracy between DLP and LCD printing Technology for Dental Model Printing. Dent J (Basel). 2022;10(10):181.
Moon W, Kim S, Lim BS, Park YS, Kim RJ, Chung SH. Dimensional accuracy evaluation of temporary dental restorations with different 3D printing systems. Materials (Basel). 2021;14(6):1487. doi:10.3390/ma14061487
Chandran KRS, Goyal M, Mittal N, George JS. Accuracy of freehand versus guided immediate implant placement: a randomized controlled trial. J Dent. 2023;136:104620. doi:10.1016/j.jdent.2023.104620
Chen Z, Li J, Sinjab K, Mendonca G, Yu H, Wang HL. Accuracy of flapless immediate implant placement in anterior maxilla using computer‐assisted versus freehand surgery: a cadaver study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2018;29(12):1186‐1194. doi:10.1111/clr.13382
Verhamme LM, Meijer GJ, Soehardi A, Bergé SJ, Xi T, Maal TJJ. An accuracy study of computer‐planned implant placement in the augmented maxilla using osteosynthesis screws. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2017;46(4):511‐517. doi:10.1016/j.ijom.2016.10.013