Long-term effects of a telemedically-assisted lifestyle intervention on glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes - A two-armed randomised controlled trial in Germany.

HbA1c Lifestyle modification Self-management Telemedicine Type 2 diabetes

Journal

Journal of diabetes and metabolic disorders
ISSN: 2251-6581
Titre abrégé: J Diabetes Metab Disord
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101590741

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Jun 2024
Historique:
received: 07 03 2023
accepted: 22 08 2023
medline: 27 6 2024
pubmed: 27 6 2024
entrez: 27 6 2024
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Diabetes is considered one of the fastest growing diseases worldwide. Especially in the treatment of type 2 diabetes, lifestyle interventions have proven to be effective. However, long-term studies in real-world contexts are rare, which is why further research is needed. The aim of the present study is to investigate whether effects achieved in the context of a long-term lifestyle intervention can be sustained by patients in the long term. In a two-arm randomized trial we compared diabetes care as usual to a lifestyle intervention combining telemedically support and individual needs-based telephone coaching. The study included 151 patients with type 2 diabetes randomized to either the intervention or control group. Intervention Group (IG; N = 86, 80.2% male, mean age: 59.7) received telemedical devices and telephone coaching over a period of 12 months, Control Group (CG; N = 65, 83.1% male, mean age: 58,8) received care as usual. The primary outcome was chance in Hb The intervention group showed significantly better HbA1c- values compared to the control group at both 12 and 24 months (12 M: - 0.52 (-0.73; - 0.32), p < .000; 24 M: - 0.38 (-0.61; - 0.15), p = .001). The strongest change was seen in the first three months, with the best value obtained at 6 months and stable thereafter. Combined telephone coaching with telemedicine support could lead to better long-term glycemic control in people with type 2 diabetes. In the future, more long-term studies should be conducted in real-world settings and lifestyle interventions should be offered more widely.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38932898
doi: 10.1007/s40200-023-01290-6
pii: 1290
pmc: PMC11196553
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

519-532

Informations de copyright

© The Author(s) 2023.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Conflict of interestThe authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Auteurs

Annalena Dunkel (A)

NRW Graduate School GROW - Gerontological Research on Well-Being, Faculty of Medicine, Faculty of Human Sciences, University of Cologne, Albertus-Magnus-Platz, 50923 Cologne, DE Germany.

Katja von Storch (K)

NRW Graduate School GROW - Gerontological Research on Well-Being, Faculty of Medicine, Faculty of Human Sciences, University of Cologne, Albertus-Magnus-Platz, 50923 Cologne, DE Germany.

Martin Hochheim (M)

Generali Health Solutions GmbH, Cologne, DE Germany.

Susanne Zank (S)

Rehabilitative Gerontology, Faculty of Human Sciences, University of Cologne, Cologne, DE Germany.

M Cristina Polidori (MC)

Ageing Clinical Research, Department II of Internal Medicine, Center for Molecular Medicine Cologne, Faculty of Medicine, University of Cologne, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, DE Germany.
Cologne Excellence Cluster on Cellular Stress- Responses in Aging- Associated Diseases (CECAD), Faculty of Medicine, University of Cologne, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, DE Germany.

Christiane Woopen (C)

Center for Life Ethics, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany.

Classifications MeSH