Concepts, core knowledge, and the rationalism-empiricism debate.


Journal

The Behavioral and brain sciences
ISSN: 1469-1825
Titre abrégé: Behav Brain Sci
Pays: England
ID NLM: 7808666

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
27 Jun 2024
Historique:
medline: 27 6 2024
pubmed: 27 6 2024
entrez: 27 6 2024
Statut: epublish

Résumé

While Spelke provides powerful support for concept nativism, her focus on understanding concept nativism through six innate core knowledge systems is too confining. There is also no reason to suppose that the

Identifiants

pubmed: 38934433
doi: 10.1017/S0140525X23003072
pii: S0140525X23003072
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

e137

Auteurs

Eric Margolis (E)

Department of Philosophy, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada eric.margolis@ubc.cahttps://philosophy.ubc.ca/profile/eric-margolis/.

Stephen Laurence (S)

Department of Philosophy and Hang Seng Centre for Cognitive Studies, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK S.Laurence@sheffield.ac.ukhttps://www.sheffield.ac.uk/philosophy/people/academic-staff/stephen-laurence.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH