Effectiveness of Plaque Removal Using Different Toothbrushes in Children - A Comparative Study.


Journal

Indian journal of dental research : official publication of Indian Society for Dental Research
ISSN: 1998-3603
Titre abrégé: Indian J Dent Res
Pays: India
ID NLM: 9202990

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
01 Jan 2024
Historique:
received: 26 04 2023
accepted: 14 11 2023
medline: 27 6 2024
pubmed: 27 6 2024
entrez: 27 6 2024
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Effective plaque control is essential for improved oral health. Advancements in mechanical plaque removal using toothbrushes still continue. One such sophisticated intervention is the app-based toothbrush, a new innovative technology that helps to track the child's brushing habits. The aim of this study is to evaluate the plaque removal efficacy of three different toothbrushes in children aged 6-8 years. A randomized controlled clinical trial was conducted among primary school children with decayed missing filled teeth (dmft) score of ≤2. Baseline plaque score was collected using Turesky modification of the Quigley and Hein Index 1 week after oral prophylaxis. Children were randomly divided into three groups. Group I received conventional toothbrush (n = 25), group II received powered toothbrush (n = 25), and group III received app-based toothbrush (n = 25). Post-intervention plaque score, toothbrush wear and bite mark scores were done at the 15th, 30th, 45th and 90th day. Participant's opinion on their toothbrushes was evaluated using a questionnaire. App-based toothbrush showed maximum plaque reduction followed by powered and conventional toothbrush. Significant reduction in plaque score was seen at 30th-, 45th- and 90th-day follow-up in group II (<0.001) and group III (<0.001). There was no appreciable difference in the toothbrush wear and bite mark score between the three groups. Children preferred app-based toothbrush in spite of the complex nature of using it.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Effective plaque control is essential for improved oral health. Advancements in mechanical plaque removal using toothbrushes still continue. One such sophisticated intervention is the app-based toothbrush, a new innovative technology that helps to track the child's brushing habits.
AIM OBJECTIVE
The aim of this study is to evaluate the plaque removal efficacy of three different toothbrushes in children aged 6-8 years.
METHODS METHODS
A randomized controlled clinical trial was conducted among primary school children with decayed missing filled teeth (dmft) score of ≤2. Baseline plaque score was collected using Turesky modification of the Quigley and Hein Index 1 week after oral prophylaxis. Children were randomly divided into three groups. Group I received conventional toothbrush (n = 25), group II received powered toothbrush (n = 25), and group III received app-based toothbrush (n = 25). Post-intervention plaque score, toothbrush wear and bite mark scores were done at the 15th, 30th, 45th and 90th day. Participant's opinion on their toothbrushes was evaluated using a questionnaire.
RESULTS AND CONCLUSION CONCLUSIONS
App-based toothbrush showed maximum plaque reduction followed by powered and conventional toothbrush. Significant reduction in plaque score was seen at 30th-, 45th- and 90th-day follow-up in group II (<0.001) and group III (<0.001). There was no appreciable difference in the toothbrush wear and bite mark score between the three groups. Children preferred app-based toothbrush in spite of the complex nature of using it.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38934752
doi: 10.4103/ijdr.ijdr_375_23
pii: 01363779-202435010-00014
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

65-69

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2024 Copyright: © 2024 Indian Journal of Dental Research.

Références

Mandal A, Singh KD, Siddiqui H, Das D, Dey KA New dimensions in mechanical plaque control: An overview. Indian J Dent Sci 2021; 9: 133–9.
Loitongbam M, Mohan R, Chowdhary Z, Mehrotra S Comparative evaluation of tooth surface roughness caused by three different powered toothbrushes and a novel manual toothbrush –An SEM and AFM study. Indian J Dent Res 2020; 31: 743–51.
Poli PP, Beretta M, Grossi GB, Maiorana C Risk indicators related to peri-implant disease: An observational retrospective cohort study. J Periodontal Implant Sci 2016; 46: 266–76.
Nayak PP, Pai JB, Singla N, Somayaji KS, Kalra D Geographic information systems in spatial epidemiology: Unveiling new horizons in dental public health. J Int Soc Prev Community Dent 2021; 11: 125–31.
Aggarwal N, Gupta S, Grover R, Sadana G, Bansal K Plaque removal efficacy of different toothbrushes: A comparative study. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2019; 12: 385–90.
Conforti NJ, Cordero RE, Liebman J, Bowman JP, Putt MS, Kuebler DS, et al. An investigation into the effect of three months clinical wear on toothbrush efficacy: results from two independent studies. J Clin Dent. 2003; 14: 29–33.
Fijacko N, Gosak L, Cilar L, Novsak A, Creber RM, Skok P, et al. The effects of gamification and oral self-care on oral hygiene in children: Systematic search in app stores and evaluation of apps. JMIR MHealth UHealth 2020; 8: e16365.
Toniazzo MP, Nodari D, Muniz FWMG, Weidlich P Effect of mHealth in improving oral hygiene: A systematic review with meta-analysis. J Clin Periodontol 2019; 46: 297–309.
Nithya K, Peedikayil FC, Chandru TP, Kottayi S, Ismail S, Aparna TP Caries prevalence and associated risk factors in school children at Kannur in Kerala, India: A cross-sectional study. J Indian Assoc Public Health Dent 2021; 19: 32–6.
American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry (AAPD). 2009. Healthy smiles family guide Available from: https://www.aapd.org/assets/1/7/HealthySmilesGuidebook.pdf.
Erbe C, Klees V, Ferrari-Peron P, Ccahuana-Vasquez RA, Timm H, Grender J, et al. A comparative assessment of plaque removal and tooth-brushing compliance between a manual and an interactive power toothbrush among adolescents: A single center, single blind randomized controlled trial. BMC Oral Health 2018; 18: 130.
Vandana KL, Tatuskar PV, Valavalkar NN A comparative evaluation of manual and powered brushing on oral health and microbial status of mentally challenged individuals. J Indian Soc Periodontol 2020; 24: 362–8.
Garbin CA, Garbin AJ, dos Santos KT, de Lourdes Carvalho M, Lima DC Evaluation of toothbrush bristles'deterioration used by preschool children. Int J Dent Hyg 2009; 7: 285–8.
Rawls HR, Mkwayi-Tulloch NJ, Casella R, Cosgrove R The measurement of toothbrush wear. J Dent Res 1989; 68: 1781–5.
Zhou N, Wong HM, McGrath C Toothbrush deterioration and parents'suggestions to improve the design of toothbrushes used by children with special care needs. BMC Pediatr 2020; 20: 443.

Auteurs

D Obukavitha (D)

Department of Pediatric and Preventive Dentistry, KSR Institute of Dental Science and Research, Tiruchengode, Tamil Nadu, India.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH