Patients with stage IV colorectal carcinoma selected for palliative primary tumor resection and systemic therapy survive longer compared with systemic therapy alone - A retrospective comparative cohort study.
Journal
International journal of surgery (London, England)
ISSN: 1743-9159
Titre abrégé: Int J Surg
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101228232
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
27 Jun 2024
27 Jun 2024
Historique:
received:
24
03
2024
accepted:
10
06
2024
medline:
27
6
2024
pubmed:
27
6
2024
entrez:
27
6
2024
Statut:
aheadofprint
Résumé
To compare the survival of palliative stage IV colorectal cancer patients selected for primary tumor resection and systemic treatment (PTR+SYST) to patients with systemic treatment only (SYST). About 20-25% of all colorectal cancer patients are diagnosed with stage IV disease. The benefit of primary tumor resection in the palliative situation is therefore of high concern. However, empirical evidence from randomized and observational studies is inconsistent. Mortality after PTR and systemic treatment was compared to systemic treatment alone in a retrospective observational cohort of patients diagnosed 2012-2020 from the cancer registry in the federal state of Brandenburg (Germany), excluding patients with rectal cancer of the lower two-thirds, emergency procedures, unknown ECOG status, ECOG >2, unknown metastatic status or unclear grading. Of 480 patients, 416 died during an average follow-up of 23 months in mean. 12-months survival was 75% after PTR+SYST compared with 49% after SYST (HR=0.39, 95% CI 0.29-0.53, P<0.001). The difference persisted to 36 months (28% vs. 13%, HR=0.53, 95% CI 0.43-0.66, P<0.001). Results were similar after multivariate adjustment, propensity score matching and delayed entry. Patients with stage IV colorectal carcinoma who are selected for primary tumor resection in combination with systemic therapy and who receive such treatment survive longer compared with patients who receive only systemic treatment. Whether the difference is due to selection of patients or PTR remains unclear. At present, current practice of selecting patients for PTR appears to do no harm.
Sections du résumé
OBJECTIVE
OBJECTIVE
To compare the survival of palliative stage IV colorectal cancer patients selected for primary tumor resection and systemic treatment (PTR+SYST) to patients with systemic treatment only (SYST).
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
About 20-25% of all colorectal cancer patients are diagnosed with stage IV disease. The benefit of primary tumor resection in the palliative situation is therefore of high concern. However, empirical evidence from randomized and observational studies is inconsistent.
METHODS
METHODS
Mortality after PTR and systemic treatment was compared to systemic treatment alone in a retrospective observational cohort of patients diagnosed 2012-2020 from the cancer registry in the federal state of Brandenburg (Germany), excluding patients with rectal cancer of the lower two-thirds, emergency procedures, unknown ECOG status, ECOG >2, unknown metastatic status or unclear grading.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Of 480 patients, 416 died during an average follow-up of 23 months in mean. 12-months survival was 75% after PTR+SYST compared with 49% after SYST (HR=0.39, 95% CI 0.29-0.53, P<0.001). The difference persisted to 36 months (28% vs. 13%, HR=0.53, 95% CI 0.43-0.66, P<0.001). Results were similar after multivariate adjustment, propensity score matching and delayed entry.
CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE
CONCLUSIONS
Patients with stage IV colorectal carcinoma who are selected for primary tumor resection in combination with systemic therapy and who receive such treatment survive longer compared with patients who receive only systemic treatment. Whether the difference is due to selection of patients or PTR remains unclear. At present, current practice of selecting patients for PTR appears to do no harm.
Identifiants
pubmed: 38935125
doi: 10.1097/JS9.0000000000001838
pii: 01279778-990000000-01742
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.