ALSTER-TAVR 2024: clinical results at one year following optimized self-expanding, transcatheter aortic valve peplacement employing the cusp-overlay technique.

TAVR conduction disturbances cusp-overlay technique left bundle branch block permanent pacemaker self-expandable transcatheter heart valve transcatheter aortic valve replacement

Journal

The Journal of invasive cardiology
ISSN: 1557-2501
Titre abrégé: J Invasive Cardiol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 8917477

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
18 06 2024
Historique:
medline: 27 6 2024
pubmed: 27 6 2024
entrez: 27 6 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

Atrioventricular (AV) conduction disturbances are still common following transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). The study evaluates the feasibility and clinical effect of self-expanding (SE)-TAVR employing an optimized cusp-overlay technique (COT) at 1 year in a German all-comers population. We analyzed 1-year clinical outcomes in patients who received a SE valve employing the optimized COT. Consecutive patients who underwent SE-TAVR (EvolutR, EvolutPRO) after introduction of the COT as the default implantation technique in 2020 were included (n = 101). Consecutive TAVR patients from the same operators using the conventional implantation technique (CIT) served as the control group (n = 116). The COT was successfully performed in more than 80% of the patients in the COT group. (81.2%, n = 82/101). At discharge, no difference regarding AV block of at least II (CIT 19.47% vs COT 21%; P = .86) and permanent pacemaker (PPM) implantation (CIT 17.5% vs COT 19%; P = .73) was observed between the cohorts. New left bundle branch block (LBBB) was significantly less frequent in the COT group (CIT 40.71% vs COT 26%; P = .029). Paravalvular leakage (PVL) greater than I° was reduced in the COT cohort (CIT 8.62% vs COT 0.99%; P = .012). There was no significant difference in mortality (CIT 18.27% vs COT 13.83%; P = .44), stroke (CIT 9.62% vs COT 15.96%; P = .16) or cardiovascular rehospitalization after 1 year (CIT 25.96% vs 24.47%; P = .92) between the groups. Implementation of COT-TAVR was feasible and safe, and it resulted in an improvement of TAVR outcomes regarding PVL greater than I° and new onset LBBB. However, with respect to PPM, no difference was observed 1-year post-TAVR.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38935444
doi: 10.25270/jic/24.00121
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Auteurs

Martin W Bergmann (MW)

Department of Cardiology and Intensive Care, AK Altona, Hamburg, Germany; Interventional Cardiology, Cardiologicum, Hamburg, Germany. Email: docbergmann@mac.com.

Janina Maren Krause (JM)

Department of Cardiology and Intensive Care, AK Altona, Hamburg, Germany.

Niklas Schofer (N)

University Heart and Vascular Center Hamburg, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany; German Center for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK), Partner Site Hamburg/Kiel/Lübeck, Hamburg, Germany.

Felix Meincke (F)

Department of Cardiology and Intensive Care, AK Altona, Hamburg, Germany.

Christina Paitazoglou (C)

Department of Cardiology, Universitätsklinik Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck, Germany.

Christian-Hendrik Heeger (CH)

Department of Cardiology and Intensive Care, AK Altona, Hamburg, Germany; University Heart Center Lübeck, Department of Rhythmology, University Hospital Schleswig- Holstein, Germany.

Stephan Willems (S)

Department of Cardiology, AK St. Georg, Hamburg, Germany.

Samer Hakmi (S)

Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, AK St. Georg, Hamburg, Germany.

Eike Tigges (E)

Department of Cardiology, AK St. Georg, Hamburg, Germany.

Classifications MeSH