Can the Administrative Loads of Physicians be Alleviated by AI-Facilitated Clinical Documentation?
Journal
Journal of general internal medicine
ISSN: 1525-1497
Titre abrégé: J Gen Intern Med
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 8605834
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
27 Jun 2024
27 Jun 2024
Historique:
received:
27
12
2023
accepted:
11
06
2024
medline:
28
6
2024
pubmed:
28
6
2024
entrez:
27
6
2024
Statut:
aheadofprint
Résumé
Champions of AI-facilitated clinical documentation have suggested that the emergent technology may decrease the administrative loads of physicians, thereby reducing cognitive burden and forestalling burnout. Explorations of physicians' experiences with automated documentation are critical in evaluating these claims. To evaluate physicians' experiences with DAX Copilot (DAXC), a generative AI-facilitated clinical documentation tool. Semi-structured interviews were conducted in August and September of 2023 with physician-users of DAXC. A purposive sample of 12 interviewees, selected from 116 primary care physicians, employed at a multi-site academic learning health system. After completing all 12 interviews, three study personnel independently analyzed and coded the transcripts. Reconciliation sessions were then held to merge the three analyses into one summary, eliminating redundant codes, and grouping findings into themes. For a majority of interviewees, DAXC reduced the amount of time spent documenting encounters, and alleviated anxieties of having to retain important clinical details until there was time to make notes. DAXC also allowed physicians to be more engaged during appointments, resulting in more personable provider-patient encounters. However, some physicians weighed these benefits against an uneasy feeling that interviewees might be asked to see more patients if DAXC was mandated. Physicians also noted that the tool would occasionally imagine or misgender patients, offer unsolicited and inappropriate diagnoses, and mistake critical details in transcription. The few physicians less enthusiastic about the generative technology portrayed themselves as creatures of habit who had cultivated long-standing workflows and particular notation practices that DAXC could neither improve upon nor reproduce. According to physician interviewees, automated AI-driven clinical documentation has the potential to significantly reduce the administrative burden associated with particular types of provider-patient encounters. Addressing the growing pains of the incipient technology, identified here, may allow for a broader applicability for clinical practice.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Champions of AI-facilitated clinical documentation have suggested that the emergent technology may decrease the administrative loads of physicians, thereby reducing cognitive burden and forestalling burnout. Explorations of physicians' experiences with automated documentation are critical in evaluating these claims.
OBJECTIVE
OBJECTIVE
To evaluate physicians' experiences with DAX Copilot (DAXC), a generative AI-facilitated clinical documentation tool.
DESIGN
METHODS
Semi-structured interviews were conducted in August and September of 2023 with physician-users of DAXC.
PARTICIPANTS
METHODS
A purposive sample of 12 interviewees, selected from 116 primary care physicians, employed at a multi-site academic learning health system.
APPROACH
METHODS
After completing all 12 interviews, three study personnel independently analyzed and coded the transcripts. Reconciliation sessions were then held to merge the three analyses into one summary, eliminating redundant codes, and grouping findings into themes.
KEY RESULTS
RESULTS
For a majority of interviewees, DAXC reduced the amount of time spent documenting encounters, and alleviated anxieties of having to retain important clinical details until there was time to make notes. DAXC also allowed physicians to be more engaged during appointments, resulting in more personable provider-patient encounters. However, some physicians weighed these benefits against an uneasy feeling that interviewees might be asked to see more patients if DAXC was mandated. Physicians also noted that the tool would occasionally imagine or misgender patients, offer unsolicited and inappropriate diagnoses, and mistake critical details in transcription. The few physicians less enthusiastic about the generative technology portrayed themselves as creatures of habit who had cultivated long-standing workflows and particular notation practices that DAXC could neither improve upon nor reproduce.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
According to physician interviewees, automated AI-driven clinical documentation has the potential to significantly reduce the administrative burden associated with particular types of provider-patient encounters. Addressing the growing pains of the incipient technology, identified here, may allow for a broader applicability for clinical practice.
Identifiants
pubmed: 38937369
doi: 10.1007/s11606-024-08870-z
pii: 10.1007/s11606-024-08870-z
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Subventions
Organisme : Wake Forest Health Sciences
ID : ClinicalTrials.gov number
Organisme : Wake Forest Health Sciences
ID : NCT06329427).
Informations de copyright
© 2024. The Author(s).
Références
Kocaballi AB, Ijaz K, Laranjo L, et al. Envisioning an artificial intelligence documentation assistant for future primary care consultations: A co-design study with general practitioners. J Amer Med Inform Assoc. 2020;27(11):1695-1704.
doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocaa131
Krittanawong C. The rise of artificial intelligence and the uncertain future for physicians. Eur J Intern Med. 2018;48:13-14.
doi: 10.1016/j.ejim.2017.06.017
Sarwar S, Dent A, Faust K, et al. Physician perspectives on integration of artificial intelligence into diagnostic pathology. NPJ Dig Med. 2019;2(1):28.
doi: 10.1038/s41746-019-0106-0
Agrawal M, Hegselmann S, Lang H, Kim Y, Sontag D. Large language models are few-shot clinical information extractors. In Proceedings of the 2022 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pp. 1998–2022. 2022.
Thirunavukarasu AJ, Shu Jeng Ting D, Elangovan K, et al. Large language models in medicine. Nat Med. 2023;29(8):1930–1940.
Nuance. Improving Clinician well-being and patient experience. Explore Nuance DAX for Clinicians. https://www.nuance.com/healthcare/ambient-clinical-intelligence/explore-dax-for-clinicians.html . Accessed 1 Dec 2023.
Rao SK, Kimball AB, Lehrhoff SR, et al. The impact of administrative burden on academic physicians: results of a hospital-wide physician survey. Acad Med. 2017;92(2):237-243.
doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000001461
pubmed: 28121687
West CP, Dyrbye LN, Shanafelt TD. Physician burnout: contributors, consequences and solutions. J Intern Med. 2018;283(6):516-529.
doi: 10.1111/joim.12752
pubmed: 29505159
Malterud K, Siersma VD, Guassora AD. Sample size in qualitative interview studies: guided by information power. Qual Health Res. 2016;26(13):1753-1760.
doi: 10.1177/1049732315617444
pubmed: 26613970
Chenail RJ. Conducting qualitative data analysis: Managing dynamic tensions within. Qual Report. 2012;17(4):(2012):1–6.