Multiple myeloma.
Multiple Myeloma
/ therapy
Humans
Dexamethasone
/ therapeutic use
Lenalidomide
/ therapeutic use
Antibodies, Monoclonal
/ therapeutic use
Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation
/ methods
Melphalan
/ therapeutic use
Thalidomide
/ therapeutic use
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols
/ therapeutic use
Journal
Nature reviews. Disease primers
ISSN: 2056-676X
Titre abrégé: Nat Rev Dis Primers
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101672103
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
27 Jun 2024
27 Jun 2024
Historique:
accepted:
16
05
2024
medline:
28
6
2024
pubmed:
28
6
2024
entrez:
27
6
2024
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Multiple myeloma (MM) is a haematological lymphoid malignancy involving tumoural plasma cells and is usually characterized by the presence of a monoclonal immunoglobulin protein. MM is the second most common haematological malignancy, with an increasing global incidence. It remains incurable because most patients relapse or become refractory to treatments. MM is a genetically complex disease with high heterogeneity that develops as a multistep process, involving acquisition of genetic alterations in the tumour cells and changes in the bone marrow microenvironment. Symptomatic MM is diagnosed using the International Myeloma Working Group criteria as a bone marrow infiltration of ≥10% clonal plasma cells, and the presence of at least one myeloma-defining event, either standard CRAB features (hypercalcaemia, renal failure, anaemia and/or lytic bone lesions) or biomarkers of imminent organ damage. Younger and fit patients are considered eligible for transplant. They receive an induction, followed by consolidation with high-dose melphalan and autologous haematopoietic cell transplantation, and maintenance therapy. In older adults (ineligible for transplant), the combination of daratumumab, lenalidomide and dexamethasone is the preferred option. If relapse occurs and requires further therapy, the choice of therapy will be based on previous treatment and response and now includes immunotherapies, such as bi-specific monoclonal antibodies and chimeric antigen receptor T cell therapy.
Identifiants
pubmed: 38937492
doi: 10.1038/s41572-024-00529-7
pii: 10.1038/s41572-024-00529-7
doi:
Substances chimiques
daratumumab
4Z63YK6E0E
Dexamethasone
7S5I7G3JQL
Lenalidomide
F0P408N6V4
Antibodies, Monoclonal
0
Melphalan
Q41OR9510P
Thalidomide
4Z8R6ORS6L
Types de publication
Journal Article
Review
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
45Informations de copyright
© 2024. Springer Nature Limited.
Références
Siegel, R. L., Miller, K. D., Wagle, N. S. & Jemal, A. Cancer statistics, 2023. CA Cancer J. Clin. 73, 17–48 (2023).
doi: 10.3322/caac.21763
pubmed: 36633525
Bladé, J. et al. Extramedullary disease in multiple myeloma: a systematic literature review. Blood Cancer J. 12, 45 (2022).
pubmed: 35314675
pmcid: 8938478
doi: 10.1038/s41408-022-00643-3
Kyle, R. A. et al. Review of 1027 patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. Mayo Clin. Proc. 78, 21–33 (2003).
pubmed: 12528874
doi: 10.4065/78.1.21
Alaggio, R. et al. The 5th edition of the World Health Organization classification of haematolymphoid tumours: lymphoid neoplasms. Leukemia 36, 1720–1748 (2022).
pubmed: 35732829
pmcid: 9214472
doi: 10.1038/s41375-022-01620-2
Wadhera, R. K. & Rajkumar, S. V. Prevalence of monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance: a systematic review. Mayo Clin. Proc. 85, 933–942 (2010).
pubmed: 20713974
pmcid: 2947966
doi: 10.4065/mcp.2010.0337
Han, J.-h et al. Prevalence of monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance in a large population with annual medical check-ups in China. Blood Cancer J. 10, 34 (2020).
pubmed: 32152278
pmcid: 7062721
doi: 10.1038/s41408-020-0303-8
Hungria, V. T. et al. Observational study of multiple myeloma in Latin America. Ann. Hematol. 96, 65–72 (2017).
pubmed: 27815724
doi: 10.1007/s00277-016-2866-9
Colunga-Pedraza, P. R., Gomez-Cruz, G. B., Colunga-Pedraza, J. E. & Ruiz-Argüelles, G. J. Geographic hematology: some observations in Mexico. Acta Haematol. 140, 114–120 (2018).
pubmed: 30227427
doi: 10.1159/000491989
Turesson, I. et al. Rapidly changing myeloma epidemiology in the general population: increased incidence, older patients, and longer survival. Eur. J. Haematol. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejh.13083 (2018).
doi: 10.1111/ejh.13083
pubmed: 29676004
pmcid: 6195866
Cowan, A. J. et al. Global burden of multiple myeloma: a systematic analysis for the global burden of disease study 2016. JAMA Oncol. 4, 1221–1227 (2018).
pubmed: 29800065
pmcid: 6143021
doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2018.2128
Padala, S. A. et al. Epidemiology, staging, and management of multiple myeloma. Med. Sci. 9, 3 (2021).
di Martino, E. et al. Incidence trends for twelve cancers in younger adults – a rapid review. Br. J. Cancer 126, 1374–1386 (2022).
pubmed: 35132237
pmcid: 9090760
doi: 10.1038/s41416-022-01704-x
Ludwig, H., Novis Durie, S., Meckl, A., Hinke, A. & Durie, B. Multiple myeloma incidence and mortality around the globe; interrelations between health access and quality, economic resources, and patient empowerment. Oncologist 25, e1406–e1413 (2020).
pubmed: 32335971
pmcid: 7485361
doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2020-0141
Zhou, L. et al. Measuring the global, regional, and national burden of multiple myeloma from 1990 to 2019. BMC Cancer 21, 606 (2021).
pubmed: 34034700
pmcid: 8152089
doi: 10.1186/s12885-021-08280-y
Huang, J. et al. The epidemiological landscape of multiple myeloma: a global cancer registry estimate of disease burden, risk factors, and temporal trends. Lancet Haematol. 9, e670–e677 (2022).
pubmed: 35843248
doi: 10.1016/S2352-3026(22)00165-X
Ibrahim, A. et al. Management of multiple myeloma in the Middle East: unmet needs, challenges and perspective. Clin. Hematol. Int. 4, 127–132 (2022).
pubmed: 36040650
pmcid: 9763519
doi: 10.1007/s44228-022-00017-3
Costa, L. J. et al. Recent trends in multiple myeloma incidence and survival by age, race, and ethnicity in the United States. Blood Adv. 1, 282–287 (2017).
pubmed: 29296944
pmcid: 5727774
doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2016002493
Blattner, W. A., Blair, A. & Mason, T. J. Multiple myeloma in the United States, 1950–1975. Cancer 48, 2547–2554 (1981).
pubmed: 7296505
doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(19811201)48:11<2547::AID-CNCR2820481134>3.0.CO;2-I
Mateos, M. V. et al. Global disparities in patients with multiple myeloma: a rapid evidence assessment. Blood Cancer J. 13, 109 (2023).
pubmed: 37460466
pmcid: 10352266
doi: 10.1038/s41408-023-00877-9
Davey Smith, G., Neaton, J. D., Wentworth, D., Stamler, R. & Stamler, J. Mortality differences between black and white men in the USA: contribution of income and other risk factors among men screened for the MRFIT. MRFIT Research Group. Multiple Risk Factor Intervention Trial. Lancet 351, 934–939 (1998).
pubmed: 9734939
doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)60603-4
Ailawadhi, S. et al. Disease and outcome disparities in multiple myeloma: exploring the role of race/ethnicity in the Cooperative Group clinical trials. Blood Cancer J. 8, 67 (2018).
pubmed: 29980678
pmcid: 6035273
doi: 10.1038/s41408-018-0102-7
Bhutani, M., Lonial, S. & Mikhael, J. Disparities in multiple myeloma among African Americans. J. Natl Med. Assoc. 115, S26–S31 (2023).
pubmed: 36566137
Ailawadhi, S. et al. Racial disparities in treatment patterns and outcomes among patients with multiple myeloma: a SEER-Medicare analysis. Blood Adv. 3, 2986–2994 (2019).
pubmed: 31648322
pmcid: 6849958
doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2019000308
Ailawadhi, S. et al. Outcome disparities in multiple myeloma: a SEER-based comparative analysis of ethnic subgroups. Br. J. Haematol. 158, 91–98 (2012).
pubmed: 22533740
doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2141.2012.09124.x
Waxman, A. J. et al. Racial disparities in incidence and outcome in multiple myeloma: a population-based study. Blood 116, 5501–5506 (2010).
pubmed: 20823456
pmcid: 3031400
doi: 10.1182/blood-2010-07-298760
Kirtane, K. & Lee, S. J. Racial and ethnic disparities in hematologic malignancies. Blood 130, 1699–1705 (2017).
pubmed: 28724539
pmcid: 5639484
doi: 10.1182/blood-2017-04-778225
Leukemia & Lymphoma Society. Facts 2022-2023. Updated Data on Blood Cancers. Leukemia & Lymphoma Society https://www.lls.org/booklet/facts-updated-data-blood-cancers (2023).
Sant, M. et al. Survival for haematological malignancies in Europe between 1997 and 2008 by region and age: results of EUROCARE-5, a population-based study. Lancet Oncol. 15, 931–942 (2014).
pubmed: 25030467
doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(14)70282-7
Chang-Chan, D. Y. et al. Trends of incidence, mortality and survival of multiple myeloma in Spain. A twenty-three-year population-based study. Clin. Transl. Oncol. 23, 1429–1439 (2021).
pubmed: 33433836
doi: 10.1007/s12094-020-02541-1
Ocias, L. F. et al. Trends in hematological cancer in the elderly in Denmark, 1980-2012. Acta Oncol. 55, 98–107 (2016).
pubmed: 26783877
doi: 10.3109/0284186X.2015.1115124
Canadian Cancer Statistics. A 2022 special report on cancer prevalence. Health Promot. Chronic Dis. Prev. Can. 43, 49 (2023).
doi: 10.24095/hpcdp.43.1.05
Sergentanis, T. N. et al. Risk factors for multiple myeloma: a systematic review of meta-analyses. Clin. Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk. 15, 563–577.e3 (2015).
pubmed: 26294217
doi: 10.1016/j.clml.2015.06.003
Lindqvist, E. K. et al. Personal and family history of immune-related conditions increase the risk of plasma cell disorders: a population-based study. Blood 118, 6284–6291 (2011).
pubmed: 21998210
pmcid: 3236117
doi: 10.1182/blood-2011-04-347559
Bertelsen, L. D. et al. Geographical and ecological analyses of multiple myeloma in Denmark: identification of potential hotspot areas and impact of urbanisation. Eur. J. Haematol. 110, 289–295 (2023).
pubmed: 36413106
doi: 10.1111/ejh.13904
McShane, C. M. et al. Prior autoimmune disease and risk of monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance and multiple myeloma: a systematic review. Cancer Epidemiol. Biomark. Prev. 23, 332–342 (2014).
doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-13-0695
Brown, L. M., Gridley, G., Check, D. & Landgren, O. Risk of multiple myeloma and monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance among white and black male United States veterans with prior autoimmune, infectious, inflammatory, and allergic disorders. Blood 111, 3388–3394 (2008).
pubmed: 18239085
pmcid: 2275008
doi: 10.1182/blood-2007-10-121285
Grulich, A. E., Wan, X., Law, M. G., Coates, M. & Kaldor, J. M. Risk of cancer in people with AIDS. AIDS 13, 839–843 (1999).
pubmed: 10357384
doi: 10.1097/00002030-199905070-00014
Dal Maso, L. & Franceschi, S. Hepatitis C virus and risk of lymphoma and other lymphoid neoplasms: a meta-analysis of epidemiologic studies. Cancer Epidemiol. Biomark. Prev. 15, 2078–2085 (2006).
doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-06-0308
De Roos, A. J. et al. Pooled study of occupational exposure to aromatic hydrocarbon solvents and risk of multiple myeloma. Occup. Env. Med. 75, 798–806 (2018).
doi: 10.1136/oemed-2018-105154
Blair, A., Zahm, S. H., Pearce, N. E., Heineman, E. F. & Fraumeni, J. F. Jr Clues to cancer etiology from studies of farmers. Scand. J. Work. Environ. Health 18, 209–215 (1992).
pubmed: 1411362
doi: 10.5271/sjweh.1578
Khuder, S. A. & Mutgi, A. B. Meta-analyses of multiple myeloma and farming. Am. J. Ind. Med. 32, 510–516 (1997).
pubmed: 9327075
doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0274(199711)32:5<510::AID-AJIM11>3.0.CO;2-5
Perrotta, C., Staines, A. & Cocco, P. Multiple myeloma and farming. A systematic review of 30 years of research. Where next? J. Occup. Med. Toxicol. 3, 27 (2008).
pubmed: 19014617
pmcid: 2628921
doi: 10.1186/1745-6673-3-27
Merhi, M. et al. Occupational exposure to pesticides and risk of hematopoietic cancers: meta-analysis of case-control studies. Cancer Causes Control. 18, 1209–1226 (2007).
pubmed: 17874193
doi: 10.1007/s10552-007-9061-1
Georgakopoulou, R. et al. Occupational exposure and multiple myeloma risk: an updated review of meta-analyses. J. Clin. Med. 10, 4179 (2021).
pubmed: 34575290
pmcid: 8469366
doi: 10.3390/jcm10184179
Jephcote, C., Brown, D., Verbeek, T. & Mah, A. A systematic review and meta-analysis of haematological malignancies in residents living near petrochemical facilities. Environ. Health 19, 53 (2020).
pubmed: 32430062
pmcid: 7236944
doi: 10.1186/s12940-020-00582-1
Ichimaru, M., Ishimaru, T., Mikami, M. & Matsunaga, M. Multiple myeloma among atomic bomb survivors in Hiroshima and Nagasaki, 1950-76: relationship to radiation dose absorbed by marrow. J. Natl Cancer Inst. 69, 323–328 (1982).
pubmed: 6955540
Wright, J. D. et al. Pelvic radiotherapy and the risk of secondary leukemia and multiple myeloma. Cancer 116, 2486–2492 (2010).
pubmed: 20209618
doi: 10.1002/cncr.25067
Preston, D. L. et al. Cancer incidence in atomic bomb survivors. Part III. Leukemia, lymphoma and multiple myeloma, 1950-1987. Radiat. Res. 137, S68–S97 (1994).
pubmed: 8127953
doi: 10.2307/3578893
Baris, D. et al. Socioeconomic status and multiple myeloma among US Blacks and Whites. Am. J. Public. Health 90, 1277–1281 (2000).
pubmed: 10937009
pmcid: 1446323
doi: 10.2105/AJPH.90.8.1277
Landgren, O. et al. Obesity is associated with an increased risk of monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance among Black and White women. Blood 116, 1056–1059 (2010).
pubmed: 20421448
pmcid: 2938127
doi: 10.1182/blood-2010-01-262394
Marinac, C. R. et al. Body mass index throughout adulthood, physical activity, and risk of multiple myeloma: a prospective analysis in three large cohorts. Br. J. Cancer 118, 1013–1019 (2018).
pubmed: 29527008
pmcid: 5931105
doi: 10.1038/s41416-018-0010-4
Birmann, B. M. et al. Young adult and usual adult body mass index and multiple myeloma risk: a pooled analysis in the International Multiple Myeloma Consortium (IMMC). Cancer Epidemiol. Biomark. Prev. 26, 876–885 (2017).
doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-16-0762-T
Choa, R., Panaroni, C., Bhatia, R. & Raje, N. It is worth the weight: obesity and the transition from monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance to multiple myeloma. Blood Adv. 7, 5510–5523 (2023).
pubmed: 37493975
pmcid: 10515310
doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2023010822
Tentolouris, A., Ntanasis-Stathopoulos, I. & Terpos, E. Obesity and multiple myeloma: emerging mechanisms and perspectives. Semin. Cancer Biol. 92, 45–60 (2023).
pubmed: 37030643
doi: 10.1016/j.semcancer.2023.04.003
Ragbourne, S. C., Maghsoodi, N., Streetly, M. & Crook, M. A. The association between metabolic syndrome and multiple myeloma. Acta Haematol. 144, 24–33 (2021).
pubmed: 32408305
doi: 10.1159/000505992
Renehan, A. G., Tyson, M., Egger, M., Heller, R. F. & Zwahlen, M. Body-mass index and incidence of cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective observational studies. Lancet 371, 569–578 (2008).
pubmed: 18280327
doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)60269-X
Wang, B. et al. Body mass index and overall survival of patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. Cancers 14, 5331 (2022).
pubmed: 36358748
pmcid: 9657446
doi: 10.3390/cancers14215331
Vogl, D. T. et al. Effect of obesity on outcomes after autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for multiple myeloma. Biol. Blood Marrow Transplant. 17, 1765–1774 (2011).
pubmed: 21624486
pmcid: 3175301
doi: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2011.05.005
Marinac, C. R., Ghobrial, I. M., Birmann, B. M., Soiffer, J. & Rebbeck, T. R. Dissecting racial disparities in multiple myeloma. Blood Cancer J. 10, 19 (2020).
pubmed: 32066732
pmcid: 7026439
doi: 10.1038/s41408-020-0284-7
Pertesi, M. et al. Genetic predisposition for multiple myeloma. Leukemia 34, 697–708 (2020).
pubmed: 31913320
doi: 10.1038/s41375-019-0703-6
VanValkenburg, M. E. et al. Family history of hematologic malignancies and risk of multiple myeloma: differences by race and clinical features. Cancer Causes Control. 27, 81–91 (2016).
pubmed: 26596855
doi: 10.1007/s10552-015-0685-2
Brown, L. M. et al. Multiple myeloma and family history of cancer among blacks and whites in the U.S. Cancer 85, 2385–2390 (1999).
pubmed: 10357409
doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0142(19990601)85:11<2385::AID-CNCR13>3.0.CO;2-A
Broderick, P. et al. Common variation at 3p22.1 and 7p15.3 influences multiple myeloma risk. Nat. Genet. 44, 58–61 (2011).
pubmed: 22120009
pmcid: 5108406
doi: 10.1038/ng.993
Mitchell, J. S. et al. Genome-wide association study identifies multiple susceptibility loci for multiple myeloma. Nat. Commun. 7, 12050 (2016).
pubmed: 27363682
pmcid: 4932178
doi: 10.1038/ncomms12050
Rand, K. A. et al. A meta-analysis of multiple myeloma risk regions in African and European ancestry populations identifies putatively functional loci. Cancer Epidemiol. Biomark. Prev. 25, 1609–1618 (2016).
doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-15-1193
Chubb, D. et al. Common variation at 3q26.2, 6p21.33, 17p11.2 and 22q13.1 influences multiple myeloma risk. Nat. Genet. 45, 1221–1225 (2013).
pubmed: 23955597
pmcid: 5053356
doi: 10.1038/ng.2733
Clavero, E. et al. Polymorphisms within autophagy-related genes as susceptibility biomarkers for multiple myeloma: a meta-analysis of three large cohorts and functional characterization. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 24, 8500 (2023).
pubmed: 37239846
pmcid: 10218542
doi: 10.3390/ijms24108500
Went, M. et al. Identification of multiple risk loci and regulatory mechanisms influencing susceptibility to multiple myeloma. Nat. Commun. 9, 3707 (2018).
pubmed: 30213928
pmcid: 6137048
doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-04989-w
Du, Z. et al. A meta-analysis of genome-wide association studies of multiple myeloma among men and women of African ancestry. Blood Adv. 4, 181–190 (2020).
pubmed: 31935283
pmcid: 6960456
doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2019000491
Macauda, A. et al. Identification of novel genetic loci for risk of multiple myeloma by functional annotation. Leukemia 37, 2326–2329 (2023).
pubmed: 37723249
pmcid: 10624610
doi: 10.1038/s41375-023-02022-8
Magrangeas, F. et al. A genome-wide association study identifies a novel locus for bortezomib-induced peripheral neuropathy in European patients with multiple myeloma. Clin. Cancer Res. 22, 4350–4355 (2016).
pubmed: 27060151
pmcid: 5010494
doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-15-3163
Johnson, D. C. et al. Genome-wide association study identifies variation at 6q25.1 associated with survival in multiple myeloma. Nat. Commun. 7, 10290 (2016).
pubmed: 26743840
pmcid: 4729868
doi: 10.1038/ncomms10290
Macauda, A. et al. Expression quantitative trait loci of genes predicting outcome are associated with survival of multiple myeloma patients. Int. J. Cancer 149, 327–336 (2021).
pubmed: 33675538
pmcid: 8770990
doi: 10.1002/ijc.33547
Gonzalez, D. et al. Immunoglobulin gene rearrangements and the pathogenesis of multiple myeloma. Blood 110, 3112–3121 (2007).
pubmed: 17634408
doi: 10.1182/blood-2007-02-069625
Corre, J., Munshi, N. & Avet-Loiseau, H. Genetics of multiple myeloma: another heterogeneity level? Blood 125, 1870–1876 (2015).
pubmed: 25628468
pmcid: 4366624
doi: 10.1182/blood-2014-10-567370
Bergsagel, P. L. & Kuehl, W. M. Molecular pathogenesis and a consequent classification of multiple myeloma. J. Clin. Oncol. 23, 6333–6338 (2005).
pubmed: 16155016
doi: 10.1200/JCO.2005.05.021
Barwick, B. G., Gupta, V. A., Vertino, P. M. & Boise, L. H. Cell of origin and genetic alterations in the pathogenesis of multiple myeloma. Front. Immunol. 10, 1121 (2019).
pubmed: 31231360
pmcid: 6558388
doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2019.01121
Bustoros, M. et al. Genomic profiling of smoldering multiple myeloma identifies patients at a high risk of disease progression. J. Clin. Oncol. 38, 2380–2389 (2020).
pubmed: 32442065
pmcid: 7367550
doi: 10.1200/JCO.20.00437
Barwick, B. G. et al. Multiple myeloma immunoglobulin lambda translocations portend poor prognosis. Nat. Commun. 10, 1911 (2019).
pubmed: 31015454
pmcid: 6478743
doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-09555-6
Rustad, E. H. et al. Revealing the impact of structural variants in multiple myeloma. Blood Cancer Discov. 1, 258–273 (2020).
pubmed: 33392515
pmcid: 7774871
doi: 10.1158/2643-3230.BCD-20-0132
Kalkat, M. et al. MYC deregulation in primary human cancers. Genes 8, 151 (2017).
pubmed: 28587062
pmcid: 5485515
doi: 10.3390/genes8060151
Avet-Loiseau, H. et al. Rearrangements of the c-myc oncogene are present in 15% of primary human multiple myeloma tumors. Blood 98, 3082–3086 (2001).
pubmed: 11698294
doi: 10.1182/blood.V98.10.3082
Walker, B. A. et al. Translocations at 8q24 juxtapose MYC with genes that harbor superenhancers resulting in overexpression and poor prognosis in myeloma patients. Blood Cancer J. 4, e191 (2014).
pubmed: 24632883
pmcid: 3972699
doi: 10.1038/bcj.2014.13
Misund, K. et al. MYC dysregulation in the progression of multiple myeloma. Leukemia 34, 322–326 (2020).
pubmed: 31439946
doi: 10.1038/s41375-019-0543-4
Chapman, M. A. et al. Initial genome sequencing and analysis of multiple myeloma. Nature 471, 467–472 (2011).
pubmed: 21430775
pmcid: 3560292
doi: 10.1038/nature09837
Walker, B. A. et al. Mutational spectrum, copy number changes, and outcome: results of a sequencing study of patients with newly diagnosed myeloma. J. Clin. Oncol. 33, 3911–3920 (2015).
pubmed: 26282654
doi: 10.1200/JCO.2014.59.1503
Bergsagel, P. L. & Kuehl, W. M. Chromosome translocations in multiple myeloma. Oncogene 20, 5611–5622 (2001).
pubmed: 11607813
doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1204641
Walker, B. A. et al. A high-risk, double-hit, group of newly diagnosed myeloma identified by genomic analysis. Leukemia 33, 159–170 (2019).
pubmed: 29967379
doi: 10.1038/s41375-018-0196-8
Wang, Y. et al. The prognostic role of 1q21 gain/amplification in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: the faster, the worse. Cancer 129, 1005–1016 (2023).
pubmed: 36704927
doi: 10.1002/cncr.34641
Misund, K. et al. Clonal evolution after treatment pressure in multiple myeloma: heterogenous genomic aberrations and transcriptomic convergence. Leukemia 36, 1887–1897 (2022).
pubmed: 35643867
pmcid: 9252918
doi: 10.1038/s41375-022-01597-y
Walker, B. A. et al. APOBEC family mutational signatures are associated with poor prognosis translocations in multiple myeloma. Nat. Commun. 6, 6997 (2015).
pubmed: 25904160
doi: 10.1038/ncomms7997
Maura, F. et al. Role of AID in the temporal pattern of acquisition of driver mutations in multiple myeloma. Leukemia 34, 1476–1480 (2020).
pubmed: 31836853
doi: 10.1038/s41375-019-0689-0
Hoang, P. H., Cornish, A. J., Dobbins, S. E., Kaiser, M. & Houlston, R. S. Mutational processes contributing to the development of multiple myeloma. Blood Cancer J. 9, 60 (2019).
pubmed: 31387987
pmcid: 6684612
doi: 10.1038/s41408-019-0221-9
Maura, F. et al. Biological and prognostic impact of APOBEC-induced mutations in the spectrum of plasma cell dyscrasias and multiple myeloma cell lines. Leukemia 32, 1044–1048 (2018).
pubmed: 29209044
pmcid: 5886048
doi: 10.1038/leu.2017.345
Maura, F. et al. Genomic landscape and chronological reconstruction of driver events in multiple myeloma. Nat. Commun. 10, 3835 (2019).
pubmed: 31444325
pmcid: 6707220
doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-11680-1
Bolli, N. et al. Genomic patterns of progression in smoldering multiple myeloma. Nat. Commun. 9, 3363 (2018).
pubmed: 30135448
pmcid: 6105687
doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-05058-y
Oben, B. et al. Whole-genome sequencing reveals progressive versus stable myeloma precursor conditions as two distinct entities. Nat. Commun. 12, 1861 (2021).
pubmed: 33767199
pmcid: 7994386
doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-22140-0
Aktas Samur, A. et al. In-depth analysis of alternative splicing landscape in multiple myeloma and potential role of dysregulated splicing factors. Blood Cancer J. 12, 171 (2022).
pubmed: 36535935
pmcid: 9763261
doi: 10.1038/s41408-022-00759-6
Kawano, Y. et al. Targeting the bone marrow microenvironment in multiple myeloma. Immunol. Rev. 263, 160–172 (2015).
pubmed: 25510276
doi: 10.1111/imr.12233
Giannakoulas, N., Ntanasis-Stathopoulos, I. & Terpos, E. The role of marrow microenvironment in the growth and development of malignant plasma cells in multiple myeloma. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 22, 4462 (2021).
pubmed: 33923357
pmcid: 8123209
doi: 10.3390/ijms22094462
de Jong, M. M. E. et al. The multiple myeloma microenvironment is defined by an inflammatory stromal cell landscape. Nat. Immunol. 22, 769–780 (2021).
pubmed: 34017122
doi: 10.1038/s41590-021-00931-3
Hideshima, T. & Anderson, K. C. Signaling pathway mediating myeloma cell growth and survival. Cancers 13, 216 (2021).
pubmed: 33435632
pmcid: 7827005
doi: 10.3390/cancers13020216
Hideshima, T., Mitsiades, C., Tonon, G., Richardson, P. G. & Anderson, K. C. Understanding multiple myeloma pathogenesis in the bone marrow to identify new therapeutic targets. Nat. Rev. Cancer 7, 585–598 (2007).
pubmed: 17646864
doi: 10.1038/nrc2189
Neri, P. & Bahlis, N. J. Targeting of adhesion molecules as a therapeutic strategy in multiple myeloma. Curr. Cancer Drug. Targets 12, 776–796 (2012).
pubmed: 22671924
doi: 10.2174/156800912802429337
Bou Zerdan, M. et al. Adhesion molecules in multiple myeloma oncogenesis and targeted therapy. Int. J. Hematol. Oncol. 11, IJH39 (2022).
pubmed: 35663420
pmcid: 9136637
doi: 10.2217/ijh-2021-0017
Prabhala, R. H. et al. Elevated IL-17 produced by TH17 cells promotes myeloma cell growth and inhibits immune function in multiple myeloma. Blood 115, 5385–5392 (2010).
pubmed: 20395418
pmcid: 2902136
doi: 10.1182/blood-2009-10-246660
Noonan, K. et al. A novel role of IL-17-producing lymphocytes in mediating lytic bone disease in multiple myeloma. Blood 116, 3554–3563 (2010).
pubmed: 20664052
pmcid: 4017298
doi: 10.1182/blood-2010-05-283895
Bailur, J. K. et al. Early alterations in stem-like/resident T cells, innate and myeloid cells in the bone marrow in preneoplastic gammopathy. JCI Insight 4, e127807 (2019).
pmcid: 6629164
doi: 10.1172/jci.insight.127807
Schinke, C. et al. Characterizing the role of the immune microenvironment in multiple myeloma progression at a single-cell level. Blood Adv. 6, 5873–5883 (2022).
pubmed: 35977111
pmcid: 9647426
doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2022007217
Zelle-Rieser, C. et al. T cells in multiple myeloma display features of exhaustion and senescence at the tumor site. J. Hematol. Oncol. 9, 116 (2016).
pubmed: 27809856
pmcid: 5093947
doi: 10.1186/s13045-016-0345-3
Friedrich, M. J. et al. The pre-existing T cell landscape determines the response to bispecific T cell engagers in multiple myeloma patients. Cancer Cell 41, 711–725.e6 (2023).
pubmed: 36898378
doi: 10.1016/j.ccell.2023.02.008
Beyer, M. et al. In vivo peripheral expansion of naive CD4
pubmed: 16410445
doi: 10.1182/blood-2005-09-3671
Favaloro, J. et al. Myeloma skews regulatory T and pro-inflammatory T helper 17 cell balance in favor of a suppressive state. Leuk. Lymphoma 55, 1090–1098 (2014).
pubmed: 23865833
doi: 10.3109/10428194.2013.825905
Gorgun, G. T. et al. Tumor-promoting immune-suppressive myeloid-derived suppressor cells in the multiple myeloma microenvironment in humans. Blood 121, 2975–2987 (2013).
pubmed: 23321256
pmcid: 3624943
doi: 10.1182/blood-2012-08-448548
Malek, E. et al. Myeloid-derived suppressor cells: the green light for myeloma immune escape. Blood Rev. 30, 341–348 (2016).
pubmed: 27132116
pmcid: 6411302
doi: 10.1016/j.blre.2016.04.002
Berardi, S. et al. Multiple myeloma macrophages: pivotal players in the tumor microenvironment. J. Oncol. 2013, 183602 (2013).
pubmed: 23431298
pmcid: 3570938
doi: 10.1155/2013/183602
Beider, K. et al. Multiple myeloma cells recruit tumor-supportive macrophages through the CXCR4/CXCL12 axis and promote their polarization toward the M2 phenotype. Oncotarget 5, 11283–11296 (2014).
pubmed: 25526031
pmcid: 4294328
doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.2207
John, L. et al. Resolving the spatial architecture of myeloma and its microenvironment at the single-cell level. Nat. Commun. 14, 5011 (2023).
pubmed: 37591845
pmcid: 10435504
doi: 10.1038/s41467-023-40584-4
Pazina, T. et al. Alterations of NK cell phenotype in the disease course of multiple myeloma. Cancer 13, 226 (2021).
doi: 10.3390/cancers13020226
Ratta, M. et al. Dendritic cells are functionally defective in multiple myeloma: the role of interleukin-6. Blood 100, 230–237 (2002).
pubmed: 12070032
doi: 10.1182/blood.V100.1.230
Leone, P. et al. Dendritic cells accumulate in the bone marrow of myeloma patients where they protect tumor plasma cells from CD8
pubmed: 26185130
pmcid: 4592278
doi: 10.1182/blood-2015-01-623975
Chauhan, D. et al. Functional interaction of plasmacytoid dendritic cells with multiple myeloma cells: a therapeutic target. Cancer Cell 16, 309–323 (2009).
pubmed: 19800576
pmcid: 2762396
doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2009.08.019
Baryawno, N. et al. A cellular taxonomy of the bone marrow stroma in homeostasis and leukemia. Cell 177, 1915–1932.e6 (2019).
pubmed: 31130381
pmcid: 6570562
doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2019.04.040
Chesi, M. et al. AID-dependent activation of a MYC transgene induces multiple myeloma in a conditional mouse model of post-germinal center malignancies. Cancer Cell 13, 167–180 (2008).
pubmed: 18242516
pmcid: 2255064
doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2008.01.007
Larrayoz, M. et al. Preclinical models for prediction of immunotherapy outcomes and immune evasion mechanisms in genetically heterogeneous multiple myeloma. Nat. Med. 29, 632–645 (2023).
pubmed: 36928817
pmcid: 10033443
doi: 10.1038/s41591-022-02178-3
Chahin, M., Branham, Z., Fox, A., Leurinda, C. & Keruakous, A. R. Clinical considerations for immunoparesis in multiple myeloma. Cancers 14, 2278 (2022).
pubmed: 35565407
pmcid: 9104750
doi: 10.3390/cancers14092278
Bernstein, Z. S., Kim, E. B. & Raje, N. Bone disease in multiple myeloma: biologic and clinical implications. Cells 11, 2308 (2022).
pubmed: 35954151
pmcid: 9367243
doi: 10.3390/cells11152308
Terpos, E., Ntanasis-Stathopoulos, I., Gavriatopoulou, M. & Dimopoulos, M. A. Pathogenesis of bone disease in multiple myeloma: from bench to bedside. Blood Cancer J. 8, 7 (2018).
pubmed: 29330358
pmcid: 5802524
doi: 10.1038/s41408-017-0037-4
Roodman, G. D. Pathogenesis of myeloma bone disease. Blood Cell Mol. Dis. 32, 290–292 (2004).
doi: 10.1016/j.bcmd.2004.01.001
Zhou, F., Meng, S., Song, H. & Claret, F. X. Dickkopf-1 is a key regulator of myeloma bone disease: opportunities and challenges for therapeutic intervention. Blood Rev. 27, 261–267 (2013).
pubmed: 24054128
pmcid: 4133945
doi: 10.1016/j.blre.2013.08.002
Groen, R. W. et al. N-cadherin-mediated interaction with multiple myeloma cells inhibits osteoblast differentiation. Haematologica 96, 1653–1661 (2011).
pubmed: 21828122
pmcid: 3208683
doi: 10.3324/haematol.2010.038133
Colombo, M. et al. Notch-directed microenvironment reprogramming in myeloma: a single path to multiple outcomes. Leukemia 27, 1009–1018 (2013).
pubmed: 23307030
doi: 10.1038/leu.2013.6
Hay, E. et al. N-cadherin interacts with axin and LRP5 to negatively regulate Wnt/β-catenin signaling, osteoblast function, and bone formation. Mol. Cell Biol. 29, 953–964 (2009).
pubmed: 19075000
doi: 10.1128/MCB.00349-08
Noll, J. E. et al. Myeloma plasma cells alter the bone marrow microenvironment by stimulating the proliferation of mesenchymal stromal cells. Haematologica 99, 163–171 (2014).
pubmed: 23935020
pmcid: 4007935
doi: 10.3324/haematol.2013.090977
Qiang, Y. W., Barlogie, B., Rudikoff, S. & Shaughnessy, J. D. Jr Dkk1-induced inhibition of Wnt signaling in osteoblast differentiation is an underlying mechanism of bone loss in multiple myeloma. Bone 42, 669–680 (2008).
pubmed: 18294945
doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2007.12.006
Winkler, D. G. et al. Osteocyte control of bone formation via sclerostin, a novel BMP antagonist. EMBO J. 22, 6267–6276 (2003).
pubmed: 14633986
pmcid: 291840
doi: 10.1093/emboj/cdg599
Terpos, E., Berenson, J., Cook, R. J., Lipton, A. & Coleman, R. E. Prognostic variables for survival and skeletal complications in patients with multiple myeloma osteolytic bone disease. Leukemia 24, 1043–1049 (2010).
pubmed: 20376081
doi: 10.1038/leu.2010.62
Silbermann, R. & Roodman, G. D. Myeloma bone disease: pathophysiology and management. J. Bone Oncol. 2, 59–69 (2013).
pubmed: 26909272
pmcid: 4723362
doi: 10.1016/j.jbo.2013.04.001
Blade, J. et al. Renal failure in multiple myeloma: presenting features and predictors of outcome in 94 patients from a single institution. Arch. Intern. Med. 158, 1889–1893 (1998).
pubmed: 9759684
doi: 10.1001/archinte.158.17.1889
Courant, M. et al. Incidence, prognostic impact and clinical outcomes of renal impairment in patients with multiple myeloma: a population-based registry. Nephrol. Dial. Transplant. 36, 482–490 (2021).
pubmed: 31773154
doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfz211
Dimopoulos, M. A., Kastritis, E., Rosinol, L., Blade, J. & Ludwig, H. Pathogenesis and treatment of renal failure in multiple myeloma. Leukemia 22, 1485–1493 (2008).
pubmed: 18528426
doi: 10.1038/leu.2008.131
Sanders, P. W. Mechanisms of light chain injury along the tubular nephron. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 23, 1777–1781 (2012).
pubmed: 22997259
doi: 10.1681/ASN.2012040388
Ying, W. Z. et al. Immunoglobulin light chains generate proinflammatory and profibrotic kidney injury. J. Clin. Invest. 129, 2792–2806 (2019).
pubmed: 31205024
pmcid: 6597222
doi: 10.1172/JCI125517
Burnette, B. L., Leung, N. & Rajkumar, S. V. Renal improvement in myeloma with bortezomib plus plasma exchange. N. Engl. J. Med. 364, 2365–2366 (2011).
pubmed: 21675906
doi: 10.1056/NEJMc1101834
Kastritis, E. et al. Daratumumab-based treatment for immunoglobulin light-chain amyloidosis. N. Engl. J. Med. 385, 46–58 (2021).
pubmed: 34192431
doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2028631
Bhutani, M., Foureau, D. M., Atrash, S., Voorhees, P. M. & Usmani, S. Z. Extramedullary multiple myeloma. Leukemia 34, 1–20 (2020).
pubmed: 31776467
doi: 10.1038/s41375-019-0660-0
Xia, Y. et al. Characteristics and prognostic value of extramedullary chromosomal abnormalities in extramedullary myeloma. Chin. Med. J. 135, 2500–2502 (2022).
pubmed: 36583869
pmcid: 9945484
doi: 10.1097/CM9.0000000000002351
Dahl, I. M., Rasmussen, T., Kauric, G. & Husebekk, A. Differential expression of CD56 and CD44 in the evolution of extramedullary myeloma. Br. J. Haematol. 116, 273–277 (2002).
pubmed: 11841427
doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2141.2002.03258.x
Blimark, C. et al. Multiple myeloma and infections: a population-based study on 9253 multiple myeloma patients. Haematologica 100, 107–113 (2015).
pubmed: 25344526
pmcid: 4281323
doi: 10.3324/haematol.2014.107714
Augustson, B. M. et al. Early mortality after diagnosis of multiple myeloma: analysis of patients entered onto the United Kingdom Medical Research Council trials between 1980 and 2002 – Medical Research Council Adult Leukaemia Working Party. J. Clin. Oncol. 23, 9219–9226 (2005).
pubmed: 16275935
doi: 10.1200/JCO.2005.03.2086
Ludwig, H. et al. Recommendations for vaccination in multiple myeloma: a consensus of the European Myeloma Network. Leukemia 35, 31–44 (2021).
pubmed: 32814840
doi: 10.1038/s41375-020-01016-0
Terpos, E. et al. Low neutralizing antibody responses against SARS-CoV-2 in older patients with myeloma after the first BNT162b2 vaccine dose. Blood 137, 3674–3676 (2021).
pubmed: 33861315
pmcid: 8061093
doi: 10.1182/blood.2021011904
Blade, J. & Rosinol, L. Complications of multiple myeloma. Hematol. Oncol. Clin. North. Am. 21, 1231–1246 (2007).
pubmed: 17996596
doi: 10.1016/j.hoc.2007.08.006
Liu, L. et al. Multiple myeloma hinders erythropoiesis and causes anaemia owing to high levels of CCL3 in the bone marrow microenvironment. Sci. Rep. 10, 20508 (2020).
pubmed: 33239656
pmcid: 7689499
doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-77450-y
Eby, C. Pathogenesis and management of bleeding and thrombosis in plasma cell dyscrasias. Br. J. Haematol. 145, 151–163 (2009).
pubmed: 19210509
doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2141.2008.07577.x
Rajkumar, S. V. et al. International Myeloma Working Group updated criteria for the diagnosis of multiple myeloma. Lancet Oncol. 15, e538–e548 (2014). This article provides the criteria for the diagnosis of multiple myeloma.
pubmed: 25439696
doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(14)70442-5
Dimopoulos, M. et al. Consensus recommendations for standard investigative workup: report of the International Myeloma Workshop Consensus Panel 3. Blood 117, 4701–4705 (2011).
pubmed: 21292778
doi: 10.1182/blood-2010-10-299529
Fernández de Larrea, C. et al. Primary plasma cell leukemia: consensus definition by the International Myeloma Working Group according to peripheral blood plasma cell percentage. Blood Cancer J. 11, 192 (2021).
pubmed: 34857730
pmcid: 8640034
doi: 10.1038/s41408-021-00587-0
Dejoie, T. et al. Serum free light chains, not urine specimens, should be used to evaluate response in light-chain multiple myeloma. Blood 128, 2941–2948 (2016).
pubmed: 27729323
pmcid: 5179336
doi: 10.1182/blood-2016-07-726778
Dimopoulos, M. A. et al. Multiple myeloma: EHA-ESMO clinical practice guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann. Oncol. 32, 309–322 (2021).
pubmed: 33549387
doi: 10.1016/j.annonc.2020.11.014
Hillengass, J. et al. International Myeloma Working Group consensus recommendations on imaging in monoclonal plasma cell disorders. Lancet Oncol. 20, e302–e312 (2019).
pubmed: 31162104
doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(19)30309-2
Terpos, E. et al. Treatment of multiple myeloma-related bone disease: recommendations from the Bone Working Group of the International Myeloma Working Group. Lancet Oncol. 22, e119–e130 (2021).
pubmed: 33545067
doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(20)30559-3
Dimopoulos, M. A. et al. Management of multiple myeloma-related renal impairment: recommendations from the International Myeloma Working Group. Lancet Oncol. 24, e293–e311 (2023).
pubmed: 37414019
doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(23)00223-1
Fermand, J. P. et al. Monoclonal gammopathy of clinical significance: a novel concept with therapeutic implications. Blood 132, 1478–1485 (2018).
pubmed: 30012636
doi: 10.1182/blood-2018-04-839480
Theodorakakou, F. et al. Prevalence of MGCS among patients with monoclonal gammopathies. Hemasphere 7, e908 (2023).
pubmed: 37275739
pmcid: 10234460
doi: 10.1097/HS9.0000000000000908
Greipp, P. R. et al. International staging system for multiple myeloma. J. Clin. Oncol. 23, 3412–3420 (2005).
pubmed: 15809451
doi: 10.1200/JCO.2005.04.242
Palumbo, A. et al. Revised international staging system for multiple myeloma: a report from International Myeloma Working Group. J. Clin. Oncol. 33, 2863–2869 (2015).
pubmed: 26240224
pmcid: 4846284
doi: 10.1200/JCO.2015.61.2267
D’Agostino, M. et al. Second Revision of the International Staging System (R2-ISS) for overall survival in multiple myeloma: a European Myeloma Network (EMN) report within the HARMONY project. J. Clin. Oncol. 40, 3406–3418 (2022). A refined international staging system that allows better evaluation of MM prognosis.
pubmed: 35605179
doi: 10.1200/JCO.21.02614
Hofste Op Bruinink, D. et al. Identification of high-risk multiple myeloma with a plasma cell leukemia-like transcriptomic profile. J. Clin. Oncol. 40, 3132–3150 (2022).
pubmed: 35357885
pmcid: 9509081
doi: 10.1200/JCO.21.01217
van Beers, E. H. et al. Analytical validation of SKY92 for the identification of high-risk multiple myeloma. J. Mol. Diagn. 23, 120–129 (2021).
pubmed: 33152501
doi: 10.1016/j.jmoldx.2020.10.010
Sonneveld, P. et al. Treatment of multiple myeloma with high-risk cytogenetics: a consensus of the International Myeloma Working Group. Blood 127, 2955–2962 (2016).
pubmed: 27002115
pmcid: 4920674
doi: 10.1182/blood-2016-01-631200
Facon, T., Leleu, X. & Manier, S. How I treat multiple myeloma in geriatric patients. Blood 143, 224–232 (2024).
pubmed: 36693134
doi: 10.1182/blood.2022017635
Kostopoulos, I. V. et al. Circulating plasma cells in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: prognostic and more. J. Clin. Oncol. 41, 708–710 (2023).
pubmed: 36179274
doi: 10.1200/JCO.22.01606
Garces, J. J. et al. Circulating tumor cells for the staging of patients with newly diagnosed transplant-eligible multiple myeloma. J. Clin. Oncol. 40, 3151–3161 (2022).
pubmed: 35666958
doi: 10.1200/JCO.21.01365
Kumar, S. et al. International Myeloma Working Group consensus criteria for response and minimal residual disease assessment in multiple myeloma. Lancet Oncol. 17, e328–e346 (2016).
pubmed: 27511158
doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(16)30206-6
Cavo, M. et al. Role of
pubmed: 28368259
doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(17)30189-4
Bianchi, G. et al. Impact of optimal follow-up of monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance on early diagnosis and prevention of myeloma-related complications. Blood 116, 2019–2025 (2010).
pubmed: 20495076
pmcid: 2951852
doi: 10.1182/blood-2010-04-277566
Sigurdardottir, E. E. et al. The role of diagnosis and clinical follow-up of monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance on survival in multiple myeloma. JAMA Oncol. 1, 168–174 (2015).
pubmed: 26181017
doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2015.23
Goyal, G. et al. Impact of prior diagnosis of monoclonal gammopathy on outcomes in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. Leukemia 33, 1273–1277 (2019).
pubmed: 30787429
pmcid: 7372537
doi: 10.1038/s41375-019-0419-7
Kyle, R. A. et al. A long-term study of prognosis in monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance. N. Engl. J. Med. 346, 564–569 (2002).
pubmed: 11856795
doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa01133202
Kyle, R. A. et al. Clinical course and prognosis of smoldering (asymptomatic) multiple myeloma. N. Engl. J. Med. 356, 2582–2590 (2007).
pubmed: 17582068
doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa070389
Mateos, M. V. et al. International Myeloma Working Group risk stratification model for smoldering multiple myeloma (SMM). Blood Cancer J. 10, 102 (2020).
pubmed: 33067414
pmcid: 7567803
doi: 10.1038/s41408-020-00366-3
Cowan, A. et al. Personalised progression prediction in patients with monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance or smouldering multiple myeloma (PANGEA): a retrospective, multicohort study. Lancet Haematol. 10, e203–e212 (2023).
pubmed: 36858677
pmcid: 9991855
doi: 10.1016/S2352-3026(22)00386-6
Lakshman, A. et al. Risk stratification of smoldering multiple myeloma incorporating revised IMWG diagnostic criteria. Blood Cancer J. 8, 59 (2018).
pubmed: 29895887
pmcid: 5997745
doi: 10.1038/s41408-018-0077-4
Termini, R. et al. Circulating tumor and immune cells for minimally invasive risk stratification of smoldering multiple myeloma. Clin. Cancer Res. 28, 4771–4781 (2022).
pubmed: 36074126
doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-22-1594
Visram, A. et al. Assessing the prognostic utility of smoldering multiple myeloma risk stratification scores applied serially post diagnosis. Blood Cancer J. 11, 186 (2021).
pubmed: 34836942
pmcid: 8626440
doi: 10.1038/s41408-021-00569-2
Mateos, M. V. et al. Lenalidomide plus dexamethasone for high-risk smoldering multiple myeloma. N. Engl. J. Med. 369, 438–447 (2013).
pubmed: 23902483
doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1300439
Mateos, M. V. et al. Lenalidomide plus dexamethasone versus observation in patients with high-risk smouldering multiple myeloma (QuiRedex): long-term follow-up of a randomised, controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 17, 1127–1136 (2016).
pubmed: 27402145
doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(16)30124-3
Lonial, S. et al. Randomized trial of lenalidomide versus observation in smoldering multiple myeloma. J. Clin. Oncol. 38, 1126–1137 (2020).
pubmed: 31652094
doi: 10.1200/JCO.19.01740
Chen, L. Y., Drayson, M., Bunce, C. & Ramasamy, K. Monoclonal gammopathy of increasing significance: time to screen? Haematologica 108, 1476–1486 (2023).
pubmed: 36373250
doi: 10.3324/haematol.2022.281802
El-Khoury, H. et al. Prevalence of monoclonal gammopathies and clinical outcomes in a high-risk US population screened by mass spectrometry: a multicentre cohort study. Lancet Haematol. 9, e340–e349 (2022).
pubmed: 35344689
pmcid: 9067621
doi: 10.1016/S2352-3026(22)00069-2
Hallen, J. Frequency of “abnormal” serum globulins (M-components) in the aged. Acta Med. Scand. 173, 737–744 (1963).
pubmed: 13952159
doi: 10.1111/j.0954-6820.1963.tb17460.x
Kyle, R. A. et al. Prevalence of monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance. N. Engl. J. Med. 354, 1362–1369 (2006).
pubmed: 16571879
doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa054494
Lee, D. J. et al. Mass spectrometry-detected MGUS is associated with obesity and other novel modifiable risk factors in a high-risk population. Blood Adv. 8, 1737–1746 (2024).
pubmed: 38212245
pmcid: 10997907
doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2023010843
Rognvaldsson, S. et al. Iceland screens, treats, or prevents multiple myeloma (iStopMM): a population-based screening study for monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance and randomized controlled trial of follow-up strategies. Blood Cancer J. 11, 94 (2021).
pubmed: 34001889
pmcid: 8128921
doi: 10.1038/s41408-021-00480-w
Thorsteinsdottir, S. et al. Prevalence of smoldering multiple myeloma based on nationwide screening. Nat. Med. 29, 467–472 (2023).
pubmed: 36747117
pmcid: 11099842
doi: 10.1038/s41591-022-02183-6
Ludwig, H., Kainz, S., Schreder, M., Zojer, N. & Hinke, A. SLiM CRAB criteria revisited: temporal trends in prognosis of patients with smoldering multiple myeloma who meet the definition of ‘biomarker-defined early multiple myeloma’ – a systematic review with meta-analysis. EClinicalMedicine 58, 101910 (2023).
pubmed: 36969337
pmcid: 10033724
doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2023.101910
Sonneveld, P. et al. Daratumumab, bortezomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone for multiple myeloma. N. Engl. J. Med. 390, 301–313 (2023).
pubmed: 38084760
doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2312054
Moreau, P. et al. Bortezomib, thalidomide, and dexamethasone with or without daratumumab before and after autologous stem-cell transplantation for newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (CASSIOPEIA): a randomised, open-label, phase 3 study. Lancet 394, 29–38 (2019). This study established the quadruplet D-VTd combination for induction and consolidation chemotherapy in transplant-eligible patients.
pubmed: 31171419
doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)31240-1
Voorhees, P. M. et al. Daratumumab, lenalidomide, bortezomib, and dexamethasone for transplant-eligible newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: the GRIFFIN trial. Blood 136, 936–945 (2020).
pubmed: 32325490
pmcid: 7441167
doi: 10.1182/blood.2020005288
Gay, F. et al. Results of the phase III randomized IsKia trial: isatuximab-carfilzomib-lenalidomide-dexamethasone vs carfilzomib-lenalidomide-dexamethasone as pre-transplant induction and post-transplant consolidation in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma patients [abstract]. Blood 142 (Suppl. 1), 4 (2023).
doi: 10.1182/blood-2023-177546
Cavo, M. et al. Bortezomib with thalidomide plus dexamethasone compared with thalidomide plus dexamethasone as induction therapy before, and consolidation therapy after, double autologous stem-cell transplantation in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: a randomised phase 3 study. Lancet 376, 2075–2085 (2010).
pubmed: 21146205
doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)61424-9
Durie, B. G. M. et al. Bortezomib with lenalidomide and dexamethasone versus lenalidomide and dexamethasone alone in patients with newly diagnosed myeloma without intent for immediate autologous stem-cell transplant (SWOG S0777): a randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial. Lancet 389, 519–527 (2017).
pubmed: 28017406
doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31594-X
Moreau, P. et al. VTD is superior to VCD prior to intensive therapy in multiple myeloma: results of the prospective IFM2013-04 trial. Blood 127, 2569–2574 (2016).
pubmed: 27002117
doi: 10.1182/blood-2016-01-693580
Attal, M. et al. Lenalidomide, bortezomib, and dexamethasone with transplantation for myeloma. N. Engl. J. Med. 376, 1311–1320 (2017).
pubmed: 28379796
pmcid: 6201242
doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1611750
Richardson, P. G. et al. Triplet therapy, transplantation, and maintenance until progression in myeloma. N. Engl. J. Med. 387, 132–147 (2022). This study confirmed that AHCT remains a standard front-line treatment for transplant-eligible patients in the triplet era.
pubmed: 35660812
pmcid: 10040899
doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2204925
Perrot, A. et al. Minimal residual disease negativity using deep sequencing is a major prognostic factor in multiple myeloma. Blood 132, 2456–2464 (2018).
pubmed: 30249784
pmcid: 6284215
doi: 10.1182/blood-2018-06-858613
Cavo, M. et al. Autologous haematopoietic stem-cell transplantation versus bortezomib-melphalan-prednisone, with or without bortezomib-lenalidomide-dexamethasone consolidation therapy, and lenalidomide maintenance for newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (EMN02/HO95): a multicentre, randomised, open-label, phase 3 study. Lancet Haematol. 7, e456–e468 (2020).
pubmed: 32359506
doi: 10.1016/S2352-3026(20)30099-5
Hari, P. et al. Long-term follow-up of BMT CTN 0702 (STaMINA) of postautologous hematopoietic cell transplantation (autoHCT) strategies in the upfront treatment of multiple myeloma (MM) [abstract]. J. Clin. Oncol. 38 (Suppl. 15), 8506 (2020).
doi: 10.1200/JCO.2020.38.15_suppl.8506
McCarthy, P. L. et al. Lenalidomide maintenance after autologous stem-cell transplantation in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: a meta-analysis. J. Clin. Oncol. 35, 3279–3289 (2017).
pubmed: 28742454
pmcid: 5652871
doi: 10.1200/JCO.2017.72.6679
Gay, F. et al. Efficacy of carfilzomib lenalidomide dexamethasone (KRd) with or without transplantation in newly diagnosed myeloma according to risk status: results from the FORTE trial [abstract]. J. Clin. Oncol. 37 (Suppl. 15), 8002 (2019).
doi: 10.1200/JCO.2019.37.15_suppl.8002
Kaiser, M. F. et al. Daratumumab, cyclophosphamide, bortezomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone as induction and extended consolidation improves outcome in ultra-high-risk multiple myeloma. J. Clin. Oncol. 41, 3945–3955 (2023).
pubmed: 37315268
doi: 10.1200/JCO.22.02567
Palumbo, A. et al. Geriatric assessment predicts survival and toxicities in elderly myeloma patients: an International Myeloma Working Group report. Blood 125, 2068–2074 (2015).
pubmed: 25628469
pmcid: 4375104
doi: 10.1182/blood-2014-12-615187
Facon, T. et al. A simplified frailty scale predicts outcomes in transplant-ineligible patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma treated in the FIRST (MM-020) trial. Leukemia 34, 224–233 (2020).
pubmed: 31427722
doi: 10.1038/s41375-019-0539-0
Facon, T. et al. Daratumumab plus lenalidomide and dexamethasone for untreated myeloma. N. Engl. J. Med. 380, 2104–2115 (2019). This study led to the approval of DRd, which is considered the preferred option for transplant-ineligible patients.
pubmed: 31141632
pmcid: 10045721
doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1817249
Kumar, S. K. et al. Daratumumab plus lenalidomide and dexamethasone (D-Rd) versus lenalidomide and dexamethasone (Rd) alone in transplant-ineligible patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM): updated analysis of the phase 3 MAIA study [abstract]. Blood 140 (Suppl. 1), 10150–10153 (2022).
doi: 10.1182/blood-2022-163335
Munshi, N. C. et al. Association of minimal residual disease with superior survival outcomes in patients with multiple myeloma: a meta-analysis. JAMA Oncol. 3, 28–35 (2017).
pubmed: 27632282
pmcid: 5943640
doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2016.3160
Avet-Loiseau, H. et al. Evaluation of sustained minimal residual disease negativity with daratumumab-combination regimens in relapsed and/or refractory multiple myeloma: analysis of POLLUX and CASTOR. J. Clin. Oncol. 39, 1139–1149 (2021).
pubmed: 33513030
pmcid: 8078259
doi: 10.1200/JCO.20.01814
Manier, S. et al. A dexamethasone sparing-regimen with daratumumab and lenalidomide in frail patients with newly-diagnosed multiple myeloma: efficacy and safety analysis of the phase 3 IFM2017-03 trial. Blood 140, 1369–1370 (2022).
doi: 10.1182/blood-2022-159933
Benboubker, L. et al. Lenalidomide and dexamethasone in transplant-ineligible patients with myeloma. N. Engl. J. Med. 371, 906–917 (2014).
pubmed: 25184863
doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1402551
Manier, S. et al. Genomic complexity of multiple myeloma and its clinical implications. Nat. Rev. Clin. Oncol. 14, 100–113 (2017).
pubmed: 27531699
doi: 10.1038/nrclinonc.2016.122
Dimopoulos, M. A. et al. Daratumumab, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone for multiple myeloma. N. Engl. J. Med. 375, 1319–1331 (2016).
pubmed: 27705267
doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1607751
Dimopoulos, M. et al. Carfilzomib, dexamethasone, and daratumumab versus carfilzomib and dexamethasone for patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (CANDOR): results from a randomised, multicentre, open-label, phase 3 study. Lancet 396, 186–197 (2020).
pubmed: 32682484
doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30734-0
Moreau, P. et al. Isatuximab, carfilzomib, and dexamethasone in relapsed multiple myeloma (IKEMA): a multicentre, open-label, randomised phase 3 trial. Lancet 397, 2361–2371 (2021).
pubmed: 34097854
doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)00592-4
Dimopoulos, M. A. et al. Daratumumab plus pomalidomide and dexamethasone versus pomalidomide and dexamethasone alone in previously treated multiple myeloma (APOLLO): an open-label, randomised, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 22, 801–812 (2021).
pubmed: 34087126
doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(21)00128-5
Attal, M. et al. Isatuximab plus pomalidomide and low-dose dexamethasone versus pomalidomide and low-dose dexamethasone in patients with relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma (ICARIA-MM): a randomised, multicentre, open-label, phase 3 study. Lancet 394, 2096–2107 (2019).
pubmed: 31735560
doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)32556-5
Richardson, P. G. et al. Pomalidomide, bortezomib, and dexamethasone for patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma previously treated with lenalidomide (OPTIMISMM): a randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 20, 781–794 (2019).
pubmed: 31097405
doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(19)30152-4
Dimopoulos, M. A. et al. Carfilzomib and dexamethasone versus bortezomib and dexamethasone for patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (ENDEAVOR): a randomised, phase 3, open-label, multicentre study. Lancet Oncol. 17, 27–38 (2016).
pubmed: 26671818
doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(15)00464-7
Yong, K. L. et al. Carfilzomib or bortezomib in combination with cyclophosphamide and dexamethasone followed by carfilzomib maintenance for patients with multiple myeloma after one prior therapy: results from a multicenter, phase II, randomized, controlled trial (MUK five). Haematologica 106, 2694–2706 (2021).
pubmed: 33910333
pmcid: 8485692
doi: 10.3324/haematol.2021.278399
Garderet, L. et al. Pomalidomide, cyclophosphamide, and dexamethasone for relapsed multiple myeloma. Blood 132, 2555–2563 (2018).
pubmed: 30282798
doi: 10.1182/blood-2018-07-863829
Dimopoulos, M. A. et al. Elotuzumab plus pomalidomide and dexamethasone for relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma: final overall survival analysis from the randomized phase II ELOQUENT-3 trial. J. Clin. Oncol. 41, 568–578 (2023).
pubmed: 35960908
doi: 10.1200/JCO.21.02815
Grosicki, S. et al. Once-per-week selinexor, bortezomib, and dexamethasone versus twice-per-week bortezomib and dexamethasone in patients with multiple myeloma (BOSTON): a randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial. Lancet 396, 1563–1573 (2020).
pubmed: 33189178
doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)32292-3
Rodriguez-Otero, P. et al. Ide-cel or standard regimens in relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma. N. Engl. J. Med. 388, 1002–1014 (2023).
pubmed: 36762851
doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2213614
San-Miguel, J. et al. Cilta-cel or standard care in lenalidomide-refractory multiple myeloma. N. Engl. J. Med. 389, 335–347 (2023).
pubmed: 37272512
doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2303379
Mateos, M. V. et al. LocoMMotion: a prospective, non-interventional, multinational study of real-life current standards of care in patients with relapsed and/or refractory multiple myeloma. Leukemia 36, 1371–1376 (2022).
pubmed: 35332278
pmcid: 9061296
doi: 10.1038/s41375-022-01531-2
Gandhi, U. H. et al. Outcomes of patients with multiple myeloma refractory to CD38-targeted monoclonal antibody therapy. Leukemia 33, 2266–2275 (2019).
pubmed: 30858549
pmcid: 6820050
doi: 10.1038/s41375-019-0435-7
Lonial, S. et al. Belantamab mafodotin for relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (DREAMM-2): a two-arm, randomised, open-label, phase 2 study. Lancet Oncol. 21, 207–221 (2020).
pubmed: 31859245
doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(19)30788-0
Moreau, P. et al. Updated results from MajesTEC-1: phase 1/2 study of teclistamab, a B-cell maturation antigen x CD3 bispecific antibody, in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma. Blood 138, 896–896 (2021).
doi: 10.1182/blood-2021-147915
Lesokhin, A. M. et al. Initial safety results for MagnetisMM-3: a phase 2 trial of elranatamab, a B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA)-CD3 bispecific antibody, in patients (pts) with relapsed/refractory (R/R) multiple myeloma (MM) [abstract]. J. Clin. Oncol. 40 (Suppl. 16), 8006 (2022).
doi: 10.1200/JCO.2022.40.16_suppl.8006
Munshi, N. C. et al. Idecabtagene vicleucel (ide-cel; bb2121), a BCMA-targeted CAR T-cell therapy, in patients with relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM): initial KarMMa results [abstract]. J. Clin. Oncol. 38 (Suppl. 15), 8503 (2020).
doi: 10.1200/JCO.2020.38.15_suppl.8503
Madduri, D. et al. Results from CARTITUDE-1: a phase 1b/2 study of JNJ-4528, a CAR-T cell therapy directed against B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA), in patients with relapsed and/or refractory multiple myeloma (R/R MM) [abstract]. Blood 134 (Suppl. 1), 577 (2019).
doi: 10.1182/blood-2019-121731
Chari, A. et al. Talquetamab, a T-cell-redirecting GPRC5D bispecific antibody for multiple myeloma. N. Engl. J. Med. 387, 2232–2244 (2022).
pubmed: 36507686
doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2204591
Chari, A. et al. Oral selinexor–dexamethasone for triple-class refractory multiple myeloma. N. Engl. J. Med. 381, 727–738 (2019).
pubmed: 31433920
doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1903455
Harrison, S. et al. T(11;14) and high BCL2 expression are predictive biomarkers of response to venetoclax in combination with bortezomib and dexamethasone in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma: biomarker analyses from the phase 3 Bellini study [abstract]. Blood 134 (Suppl. 1), 142 (2019).
doi: 10.1182/blood-2019-126094
Lin, Y. et al. Idecabtagene vicleucel for relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma: post hoc 18-month follow-up of a phase 1 trial. Nat. Med. 29, 2286–2294 (2023).
pubmed: 37592106
pmcid: 10504071
doi: 10.1038/s41591-023-02496-0
Giesen, N. et al. A phase 2 clinical trial of combined BRAF/MEK inhibition for BRAF
pubmed: 36608320
doi: 10.1182/blood.2022017789
Terpos, E. et al. European Myeloma Network guidelines for the management of multiple myeloma-related complications. Haematologica 100, 1254–1266 (2015).
pubmed: 26432383
pmcid: 4591757
doi: 10.3324/haematol.2014.117176
Berenson, J. et al. Balloon kyphoplasty versus non-surgical fracture management for treatment of painful vertebral body compression fractures in patients with cancer: a multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol. 12, 225–235 (2011).
pubmed: 21333599
doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(11)70008-0
Leigh, B. R., Kurtts, T. A., Mack, C. F., Matzner, M. B. & Shimm, D. S. Radiation therapy for the palliation of multiple myeloma. Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 25, 801–804 (1993).
pubmed: 7683017
doi: 10.1016/0360-3016(93)90308-I
Zhang, X., Donnan, P., Bell, S. & Guthrie, B. Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug induced acute kidney injury in the community dwelling general population and people with chronic kidney disease: Systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Nephrol. 18, 256 (2017).
pubmed: 28764659
pmcid: 5540416
doi: 10.1186/s12882-017-0673-8
Stacul, F. et al. Iodine-based contrast media, multiple myeloma and monoclonal gammopathies: literature review and ESUR Contrast Media Safety Committee guidelines. Eur. Radiol. 28, 683–691 (2018).
pubmed: 28856420
doi: 10.1007/s00330-017-5023-5
Ebrahim, S. Clinical and public health perspectives and applications of health-related quality of life measurement. Soc. Sci. Med. 41, 1383–1394 (1995).
pubmed: 8560306
doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(95)00116-O
Johnsen, A. T., Tholstrup, D., Petersen, M. A., Pedersen, L. & Groenvold, M. Health related quality of life in a nationally representative sample of haematological patients. Eur. J. Haematol. 83, 139–148 (2009).
pubmed: 19284418
pmcid: 2730555
doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0609.2009.01250.x
Fischer, J. et al. The influence of baseline characteristics, treatment and depression on health-related quality of life in patients with multiple myeloma: a prospective observational study. BMC Cancer 22, 1032 (2022).
pubmed: 36192719
pmcid: 9528097
doi: 10.1186/s12885-022-10101-9
Osborne, T. R. et al. What issues matter most to people with multiple myeloma and how well are we measuring them? A systematic review of quality of life tools. Eur. J. Haematol. 89, 437–457 (2012).
pubmed: 22985406
doi: 10.1111/ejh.12012
Cocks, K. et al. An international field study of the reliability and validity of a disease-specific questionnaire module (the QLQ-MY20) in assessing the quality of life of patients with multiple myeloma. Eur. J. Cancer 43, 1670–1678 (2007).
pubmed: 17574838
doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2007.04.022
Herdman, M. et al. Development and preliminary testing of the new five-level version of EQ-5D (EQ-5D-5L). Qual. Life Res. 20, 1727–1736 (2011).
pubmed: 21479777
pmcid: 3220807
doi: 10.1007/s11136-011-9903-x
LeBlanc, M. R., Hirschey, R., Leak Bryant, A., LeBlanc, T. W. & Smith, S. K. How are patient-reported outcomes and symptoms being measured in adults with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma? A systematic review. Qual. Life Res. 29, 1419–1431 (2020).
pubmed: 31848847
doi: 10.1007/s11136-019-02392-6
Salek, S. et al. The reporting, use, and validity of patient-reported outcomes in multiple myeloma in clinical trials: a systematic literature review. Cancers 14, 6007 (2022).
pubmed: 36497488
pmcid: 9741479
doi: 10.3390/cancers14236007
Fragola, M. Patient-reported outcomes and assessment of quality of life: a focus on multiple myeloma. J. Adv. Pract. Oncol. 11, 513–520 (2020).
pubmed: 32974075
pmcid: 7508254
Engelhardt, M. et al. Real-world evaluation of health-related quality of life in patients with multiple myeloma from Germany. Clin. Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk. 21, e160–e175 (2021).
pubmed: 33218965
doi: 10.1016/j.clml.2020.10.002
Chakraborty, R., Hamilton, B. K., Hashmi, S. K., Kumar, S. K. & Majhail, N. S. Health-related quality of life after autologous stem cell transplantation for multiple myeloma. Biol. Blood Marrow Transplant. 24, 1546–1553 (2018).
pubmed: 29626515
pmcid: 6108907
doi: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2018.03.027
Abonour, R. et al. Impact of post-transplantation maintenance therapy on health-related quality of life in patients with multiple myeloma: data from the Connect® MM Registry. Ann. Hematol. 97, 2425–2436 (2018).
pubmed: 30056582
pmcid: 6208675
doi: 10.1007/s00277-018-3446-y
Martin, T. G. et al. Teclistamab improves patient-reported symptoms and health-related quality of life in relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma: results from the phase II MajesTEC-1 study. Clin. Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk. 24, 194–202 (2024).
pubmed: 38052709
doi: 10.1016/j.clml.2023.11.001
Delforge, M. et al. Health-related quality of life with idecabtagene vicleucel in relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma. Blood Adv. 6, 1309–1318 (2022).
pubmed: 34933328
pmcid: 8864645
doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2021005913
Visram, A. et al. Comparison of the efficacy in clinical trials versus effectiveness in the real-world of treatments for multiple myeloma: a population-based cohort study [abstract]. Blood 142 (Suppl. 1), 541 (2023).
doi: 10.1182/blood-2023-189506
Mian, H. et al. The prevalence and outcomes of frail older adults in clinical trials in multiple myeloma: a systematic review. Blood Cancer J. 13, 6 (2023).
pubmed: 36599867
pmcid: 9813365
doi: 10.1038/s41408-022-00779-2
Cook, G. et al. Dynamic frailty assessment in transplant non-eligible newly diagnosed myeloma patients: initial data from UK Myeloma Research Alliance (UK-MRA) Myeloma XIV (FiTNEss): a frailty-adjusted therapy study [abstract]. Blood 142 (Suppl. 1), 4748 (2023).
doi: 10.1182/blood-2023-188672
Mian, H. et al. Dynamic frailty risk assessment among older adults with multiple myeloma: a population-based cohort study. Blood Cancer J. 13, 76 (2023).
pubmed: 37164972
pmcid: 10172354
doi: 10.1038/s41408-023-00843-5
Marcon, C. et al. Experts’ consensus on the definition and management of high risk multiple myeloma. Front. Oncol. 12, 1096852 (2023).
pubmed: 36755858
pmcid: 9899889
doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.1096852
Hagen, P., Zhang, J. & Barton, K. High-risk disease in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: beyond the R-ISS and IMWG definitions. Blood Cancer J. 12, 83 (2022).
pubmed: 35637223
pmcid: 9151761
doi: 10.1038/s41408-022-00679-5
Rajkumar, S. V. & Harousseau, J. L. Next-generation multiple myeloma treatment: a pharmacoeconomic perspective. Blood 128, 2757–2764 (2016).
pubmed: 27742709
pmcid: 5159700
doi: 10.1182/blood-2016-09-692947
Gormley, N. et al. Recommendations on eliminating racial disparities in multiple myeloma therapies: a step toward achieving equity in healthcare. Blood Cancer Discov. 2, 119–124 (2021).
pubmed: 34179821
pmcid: 8224821
doi: 10.1158/2643-3230.BCD-20-0123
International Myeloma Foundation. Diversity in Clinical Trials. International Myeloma Foundation www.myeloma.org/clinical-trials/diversity-clinical-trials (2024).
Argyriou, A. A., Iconomou, G. & Kalofonos, H. P. Bortezomib-induced peripheral neuropathy in multiple myeloma: a comprehensive review of the literature. Blood 112, 1593–1599 (2008).
pubmed: 18574024
doi: 10.1182/blood-2008-04-149385
Frenzel, L. et al. Venous thromboembolism prophylaxis and multiple myeloma patients in real-life: results of a large survey and clinical guidance recommendations from the IFM group. Thromb. Res. 233, 153–164 (2024).
pubmed: 38064842
doi: 10.1016/j.thromres.2023.11.021
Lecat, C. S. Y. et al. High patient satisfaction and increased physical activity following a remote multidisciplinary team multiple myeloma clinic. Support. Care Cancer 31, 127 (2023).
pubmed: 36680643
pmcid: 9860216
doi: 10.1007/s00520-023-07587-9
Hillengass, M., Joseph, J., McCarthy, J. & Hillengass, J. Physical activity in multiple myeloma: a review of the current literature. J. Adv. Pract. Oncol. 14, 153–158 (2023).
pubmed: 37009406
pmcid: 10062531
doi: 10.6004/jadpro.2023.14.2.5
Cella, D., Kallich, J., McDermott, A. & Xu, X. The longitudinal relationship of hemoglobin, fatigue and quality of life in anemic cancer patients: results from five randomized clinical trials. Ann. Oncol. 15, 979–986 (2004).
pubmed: 15151958
doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdh235
Raje, N. S. et al. Consensus guidelines and recommendations for infection prevention in multiple myeloma: a report from the International Myeloma Working Group. Lancet Haematol. 9, e143–e161 (2022).
pubmed: 35114152
doi: 10.1016/S2352-3026(21)00283-0
Cordonnier, C. et al. Vaccination of haemopoietic stem cell transplant recipients: guidelines of the 2017 European Conference on Infections in Leukaemia (ECIL 7). Lancet Infect. Dis. 19, e200–e212 (2019).
pubmed: 30744963
doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(18)30600-5
Winston, D. J. et al. Inactivated varicella zoster vaccine in autologous haemopoietic stem-cell transplant recipients: an international, multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet 391, 2116–2127 (2018).
pubmed: 29856344
doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)30631-7
El Chaer, F. et al. American Society of Transplantation and Cellular Therapy Series: #7 – management of respiratory syncytial virus infections in hematopoietic cell transplant recipients. Transplant. Cell. Ther. 29, 730–738 (2023).
pubmed: 37783338
doi: 10.1016/j.jtct.2023.09.018
Terpos, E. et al. Management of patients with multiple myeloma and COVID-19 in the post pandemic era: a consensus paper from the European Myeloma Network (EMN). Leukemia 37, 1175–1185 (2023).
pubmed: 37142661
pmcid: 10157596
doi: 10.1038/s41375-023-01920-1
Lee, D. W. et al. ASTCT consensus grading for cytokine release syndrome and neurologic toxicity associated with immune effector cells. Biol. Blood Marrow Transplant. 25, 625–638 (2019).
pubmed: 30592986
doi: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2018.12.758
Rejeski, K. et al. The CAR-HEMATOTOX score as a prognostic model of toxicity and response in patients receiving BCMA-directed CAR-T for relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma. J. Hematol. Oncol. 16, 88 (2023).
pubmed: 37525244
pmcid: 10391746
doi: 10.1186/s13045-023-01465-x
Reynolds, G. et al. Infections following bispecific antibodies in myeloma: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Blood Adv. 7, 5898–5903 (2023).
pubmed: 37467036
pmcid: 10558589
doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2023010539