Open- vs. closed-chest pig models of donation after circulatory death.

Background

During donation after circulatory death (DCD), cardiac grafts are exposed to potentially damaging conditions that can impact their quality and post-transplantation outcomes. In a clinical DCD setting, patients have closed chests in most cases, while many experimental models have used open-chest conditions. We therefore aimed to investigate and characterize differences in open- vs. closed-chest porcine models.

Methods

Withdrawal of life-sustaining therapy (WLST) was simulated in anesthetized juvenile male pigs by stopping mechanical ventilation following the administration of a neuromuscular block. Functional warm ischemic time (fWIT) was defined to start when systolic arterial pressure was <50 mmHg. Hemodynamic changes and blood chemistry were analyzed. Two experimental groups were compared: (i) an open-chest group with sternotomy prior to WLST and (ii) a closed-chest group with sternotomy after fWIT.

Results

Hemodynamic changes during the progression from WLST to fWIT were initiated by a rapid decline in blood oxygen saturation and a subsequent cardiovascular hyperdynamic (HD) period characterized by temporary elevations in heart rates and arterial pressures in both groups. Subsequently, heart rate and systolic arterial pressure decreased until fWIT was reached. Pigs in the open-chest group displayed a more rapid transition to the HD phase after WLST, with peak heart rate and peak rate-pressure product occurring significantly earlier. Furthermore, the HD phase duration tended to be shorter and less intense (lower peak rate-pressure product) in the open-chest group than in the closed-chest group.

Discussion

Progression from WLST to fWIT was more rapid, and the hemodynamic changes tended to be less pronounced in the open-chest group than in the closed-chest group. Our findings support clear differences between open- and closed-chest models of DCD. Therefore, recommendations for clinical DCD protocols based on findings in open-chest models must be interpreted with care.

Informations de copyright

© 2024 Hubacher, Egle, Graf, Arnold, Segiser, Sanz, Casoni, Garcia Casalta, Nettelbeck, Mihalj, Siepe, Kadner and Longnus.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest. The authors declared that they were an editorial board member of Frontiers at the time of submission. This had no impact on the peer review process and the final decision.