Coronary Plaque in People With HIV vs Non-HIV Asymptomatic Community and Symptomatic Higher-Risk Populations.
asymptomatic community cohort
cardiovascular disease
coronary CT angiography
coronary plaque
people with HIV
stable chest pain
Journal
JACC. Advances
ISSN: 2772-963X
Titre abrégé: JACC Adv
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9918419284106676
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Jun 2024
Jun 2024
Historique:
received:
30
11
2023
revised:
27
02
2024
accepted:
13
03
2024
medline:
28
6
2024
pubmed:
28
6
2024
entrez:
28
6
2024
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
People with HIV (PWH) have a high burden of coronary plaques; however, the comparison to people without known HIV (PwoH) needs clarification. The purpose of this study was to determine coronary plaque burden/phenotype in PWH vs PwoH. Nonstatin using participants from 3 contemporary populations without known coronary plaques with coronary CT were compared: the REPRIEVE (Randomized Trial to Prevent Vascular Events in HIV) studying PWH without cardiovascular symptoms at low-to-moderate risk (n = 755); the SCAPIS (Swedish Cardiopulmonary Bioimage Study) of asymptomatic community PwoH at low-to-intermediate cardiovascular risk (n = 23,558); and the PROMISE (Prospective Multicenter Imaging Study for Evaluation of Chest Pain) of stable chest pain PwoH (n = 2,291). The coronary plaque prevalence on coronary CT was compared, and comparisons were stratified by 10-year atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) risk, age, and coronary artery calcium (CAC) presence. Compared to SCAPIS and PROMISE PwoH, REPRIEVE PWH were younger (50.8 ± 5.8 vs 57.3 ± 4.3 and 60.0 ± 8.0 years; Asymptomatic PWH in REPRIEVE had more plaque than asymptomatic PwoH in SCAPIS but had similar prevalence to a higher-risk stable chest pain cohort in PROMISE. In PWH, CAC = 0 does not reliably exclude plaque.
Sections du résumé
Background
UNASSIGNED
People with HIV (PWH) have a high burden of coronary plaques; however, the comparison to people without known HIV (PwoH) needs clarification.
Objectives
UNASSIGNED
The purpose of this study was to determine coronary plaque burden/phenotype in PWH vs PwoH.
Methods
UNASSIGNED
Nonstatin using participants from 3 contemporary populations without known coronary plaques with coronary CT were compared: the REPRIEVE (Randomized Trial to Prevent Vascular Events in HIV) studying PWH without cardiovascular symptoms at low-to-moderate risk (n = 755); the SCAPIS (Swedish Cardiopulmonary Bioimage Study) of asymptomatic community PwoH at low-to-intermediate cardiovascular risk (n = 23,558); and the PROMISE (Prospective Multicenter Imaging Study for Evaluation of Chest Pain) of stable chest pain PwoH (n = 2,291). The coronary plaque prevalence on coronary CT was compared, and comparisons were stratified by 10-year atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) risk, age, and coronary artery calcium (CAC) presence.
Results
UNASSIGNED
Compared to SCAPIS and PROMISE PwoH, REPRIEVE PWH were younger (50.8 ± 5.8 vs 57.3 ± 4.3 and 60.0 ± 8.0 years;
Conclusions
UNASSIGNED
Asymptomatic PWH in REPRIEVE had more plaque than asymptomatic PwoH in SCAPIS but had similar prevalence to a higher-risk stable chest pain cohort in PROMISE. In PWH, CAC = 0 does not reliably exclude plaque.
Identifiants
pubmed: 38938873
doi: 10.1016/j.jacadv.2024.100968
pii: S2772-963X(24)00153-4
pmc: PMC11198107
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
100968Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
10.13039/100000002This paper received NIH grants U01HL123336 to the REPRIEVE Clinical Coordinating Center and U01HL123339 to the REPRIEVE Data Coordinating Center, as well as funding from Kowa Pharmaceuticals, Gilead Sciences, and ViiV Healthcare. The 10.13039/100000060National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) supported this study through grants UM1 AI068636, which supports the AIDS Clinical Trials Group (ACTG) Leadership and Operations Center, and UM1 AI106701, which supports the ACTG Laboratory Center. The PROMISE trial was supported by the 10.13039/100000050National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (R01HL098237, R01HL098236, R01HL98305, and R01HL098235). The SCAPIS trial received funding from the Swedish Heart-Lung Foundation, Knut and Alice Wallenberg Foundation, Swedish Research Council and Vinnova (Sweden’s Innovation Agency), University of Gothenburg and Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Karolinska Institutet and Stockholm County Council, Linköping University and University Hospital, Lund University and Skåne University Hospital, Umeå University and University Hospital, and Uppsala University and University Hospital. The content of this manuscript is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily reflect the views of any of the funding agencies. Dr Lu has received funding to his institution from Kowa, AstraZeneca/MedImmune, Johnson & Johnson Innovation, Ionis, and the American Heart Association unrelated to this research. Dr Taron has received funding by Deutsche Forschungsgesellschaft (DFG, German Research Foundation) (TA 1438/1-2); is on Speakers Bureau for Siemens Healthcare GmbH and Bayer AG; and has received consulting fees from Universimed Cross Media Content GmbH and Core Lab Black Forrest GmbH, unrelated to this work. Dr Foldyna has received funding to his institution from AstraZeneca/MedImmune, MedTrace, and Eli Lilly unrelated to this research. Dr Currier served as an advisor to Merck. Dr Elvstam has received grants to his institution from Pfizer; and has received honoraria as a speaker from Gilead Sciences, unrelated to this research. Dr Dubé has received funding to his institution from Gilead Sciences unrelated to this research. Dr Fichtenbaum has received funding to the institution from ViiV Healthcare, Gilead Sciences, Merck, Cytodyn, and Moderna unrelated to this work and serves on the advisory board for ViiV Healthcare. Dr Malvestutto has received funding to his institution from Lilly; and has received consulting fees from Viiv Healthcare and Gilead Sciences unrelated to this work. Dr Zanni reports being PI on research grants from the NIH (NHLBI and NIAID) and Gilead Sciences to her institution. Dr Ribaudo has received grants from Kowa Pharmaceuticals during the conduct of the study, as well as grants from NIH/NIAID, NIH/NHLBI, NIH/NIDDK, and NIH/NIA, outside the submitted work. Dr Grinspoon reports being a part of the Scientific Advisory Board for Marathon Asset Management and consultant Theratechnologies is unrelated to this report; research funds come from Gilead, Viiv, and Kowa through his institution. All other authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose.