Targeted Investigational Treatment Analysis of Novel Anti-androgen (TITAN) study: ultralow prostate-specific antigen decline with apalutamide plus androgen-deprivation therapy.
Androgen‐deprivation therapy
androgen receptor inhibition
hormone treatment
metastatic castration‐sensitive prostate cancer
prostate‐specific antigen
Journal
BJU international
ISSN: 1464-410X
Titre abrégé: BJU Int
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100886721
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
28 Jun 2024
28 Jun 2024
Historique:
medline:
28
6
2024
pubmed:
28
6
2024
entrez:
28
6
2024
Statut:
aheadofprint
Résumé
To assess the association between achievement of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels ≤0.2 ng/mL (henceforth 'ultralow') and clinical outcomes in patients in the 'Targeted Investigational Treatment Analysis of Novel Anti-androgen' (TITAN) study (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT02489318) with metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer (mCSPC). Patients in the TITAN study with mCSPC were randomised to 240 mg/day apalutamide (n = 525) or placebo (n = 527) plus androgen-deprivation therapy. This post hoc analysis assessed the achievement of a PSA level of 0.2->0.02 ng/mL ('ultralow one' [UL1]) and ≤0.02 ng/mL ('ultralow two' [UL2]) vs >0.2 ng/mL with apalutamide treatment and its association with radiographic progression-free survival (rPFS), overall survival (OS), time to castration-resistant PC (TTCRPC), and time to PSA progression (TTPP). The landmark analysis and Kaplan-Meier methods were used. By 3 months, more patients achieved UL1 and UL2 with apalutamide (38% and 23%) vs placebo (15% and 5%). In the apalutamide-treated patients, UL2 vs PSA >0.2 ng/mL at landmark 3 months was associated with significantly longer rPFS (hazard ratio [HR] 0.28, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.14-0.54), OS (HR 0.24, 95% CI 0.13-0.43), TTCRPC (HR 0.2, 95% CI 0.11-0.38), and TTPP (HR 0.11, 95% CI 0.04-0.27; nominal P values all <0.001); this association was also observed but less pronounced for UL1. Similar findings were observed at 6 months. Early onset of decline to UL2 by 3 months was associated with improved survival vs PSA >0.2 ng/mL anytime (HR 0.12, 95% CI 0.06-0.22; P < 0.001) in apalutamide-treated patients. In this post hoc analysis of TITAN, patients with the deepest PSA decline derived the greatest benefit. These results extend our findings of apalutamide efficacy in the overall TITAN population, underscoring the clinical value of PSA kinetics as a marker for treatment efficacy. Patients with metastatic prostate cancer that is sensitive to ongoing hormonal treatment benefited significantly from the addition of apalutamide compared with placebo. Those who achieved rapid and deep PSA reduction had the greatest survival benefit.
Banques de données
ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT02489318']
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Subventions
Organisme : Janssen Research and Development
Informations de copyright
© 2024 The Author(s). BJU International published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of BJU International.
Références
Chi KN, Agarwal N, Bjartell A et al. Apalutamide for metastatic, castration‐sensitive prostate cancer. N Engl J Med 2019; 381: 13–24
Chi KN, Chowdhury S, Bjartell A et al. Apalutamide in patients with metastatic castration‐sensitive prostate cancer: final survival analysis of the randomized, double‐blind, phase III TITAN study. J Clin Oncol 2021; 39: 2294–2303
Merseburger AS, Agarwal N, Bhaumik A et al. Apalutamide plus androgen deprivation therapy in clinical subgroups of patients with metastatic castration‐sensitive prostate cancer: a subgroup analysis of the randomised clinical TITAN study. Eur J Cancer 2023; 193: 113290
Agarwal N, McQuarrie K, Bjartell A et al. Health‐related quality of life after apalutamide treatment in patients with metastatic castration‐sensitive prostate cancer (TITAN): a randomised, placebo‐controlled, phase 3 study. Lancet Oncol 2019; 20: 1518–1530
Oudard S, Hadaschik B, Saad F et al. Health‐related quality of life at the SPARTAN final analysis of apalutamide for nonmetastatic castration‐resistant prostate cancer patients receiving androgen deprivation therapy. Eur Urol Focus 2022; 8: 958–967
Smith MR, Saad F, Chowdhury S et al. Apalutamide and overall survival in prostate cancer. Eur Urol 2021; 79: 150–158
Smith MR, Saad F, Chowdhury S et al. Apalutamide treatment and metastasis‐free survival in prostate cancer. N Engl J Med 2018; 378: 1408–1418
Mottet N, Cornford P, van den Bergh RCN, Eberli D, De Meerleer G, De Santis M. EAU‐EANM‐ESTRO‐ESUR‐ISUP‐SIOG guidelines on prostate cancer. Available at: https://uroweb.org/guidelines/prostate‐cancer. Accessed 19 June 2024
National Comprehensive Cancer Network. Prostate cancer. Version 4.2023‐September 7, 2023. Available at: https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/pdf/prostate.pdf. Accessed 18 February 2024
Chowdhury S, Bjartell A, Agarwal N et al. Deep, rapid, and durable prostate‐specific antigen decline with apalutamide plus androgen deprivation therapy is associated with longer survival and improved clinical outcomes in TITAN patients with metastatic castration‐sensitive prostate cancer. Ann Oncol 2023; 34: 477–485
Small EJ, Chi KN, Chowdhury S et al. Post hoc analysis of rapid and deep prostate‐specific antigen decline and patient‐reported health‐related quality of life in SPARTAN and TITAN patients with advanced prostate cancer. Eur Urol Oncol 2023 (online ahead of print). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euo.2023.11.015
Grivas N, de Bruin D, Barwari K et al. Ultrasensitive prostate‐specific antigen level as a predictor of biochemical progression after robot‐assisted radical prostatectomy: towards risk adapted follow‐up. J Clin Lab Anal 2019; 33: e22693
Shen S, Lepor H, Yaffee R, Taneja SS. Ultrasensitive serum prostate specific antigen nadir accurately predicts the risk of early relapse after radical prostatectomy. J Urol 2005; 173: 777–780
Sokoll LJ, Zhang Z, Chan DW et al. Do ultrasensitive prostate specific antigen measurements have a role in predicting long‐term biochemical recurrence‐free survival in men after radical prostatectomy? J Urol 2016; 195: 330–336
Scher HI, Halabi S, Tannock I et al. Design and end points of clinical trials for patients with progressive prostate cancer and castrate levels of testosterone: recommendations of the Prostate Cancer Clinical Trials Working Group. J Clin Oncol 2008; 26: 1148–1159
Cella D, Nichol MB, Eton D, Nelson JB, Mulani P. Estimating clinically meaningful changes for the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy‐‐Prostate: results from a clinical trial of patients with metastatic hormone‐refractory prostate cancer. Value Health 2009; 12: 124–129
Mendoza TR, Wang XS, Cleeland CS et al. The rapid assessment of fatigue severity in cancer patients: use of the Brief Fatigue Inventory. Cancer 1999; 85: 1186–1196
Wong K, Zeng L, Zhang L et al. Minimal clinically important differences in the Brief Pain Inventory in patients with bone metastases. Support Care Cancer 2013; 21: 1893–1899
Francini E, Gray KP, Xie W et al. Time of metastatic disease presentation and volume of disease are prognostic for metastatic hormone sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC). Prostate 2018; 78: 889–895
Gravis G, Boher JM, Chen YH et al. Burden of metastatic castrate naive prostate cancer patients, to identify men more likely to benefit from early docetaxel: further analyses of CHAARTED and GETUG‐AFU15 studies. Eur Urol 2018; 73: 847–855
Zhou Y, Lin C, Hu Z et al. Differeces in survival of prostate cancer Gleason 8‐10 disease and the establishment of a new Gleason survival grading system. Cancer Med 2021; 10: 87–97