Statistical optimal parameters obtained by using clinical human ocular aberrations for high-precision aberration measurement.
Aberration measurement
Ocular aberrations
Optimal parameter
Statistical analysis
Virtual Shack-Hartmann wavefront sensor
Journal
International ophthalmology
ISSN: 1573-2630
Titre abrégé: Int Ophthalmol
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 7904294
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
28 Jun 2024
28 Jun 2024
Historique:
received:
13
06
2023
accepted:
15
06
2024
medline:
28
6
2024
pubmed:
28
6
2024
entrez:
28
6
2024
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Compared to Shack-Hartmann wavefront sensor (SHWS), the parameters of virtual SHWS (vSHWS) can be easily adjusted to obtain the optimal performance of aberration measurement. Its current optimal parameters are obtained with only a set of statistical aberrations and not statistically significant. Whether the above parameters are consistent with the statistical results of the optimal parameters corresponding to each set of aberrations, and which performance is better if not? The purpose of this study was to answer these questions. The optimal parameters to reconstruct 624 sets of clinical ocular aberrations in the highest accuracy, including the numbers of sub-apertures (NSAs) and the expansion ratios (ERs) of electric field zero-padding, were determined sequentially in this work. By using wavefront-reconstruction accuracy as an evaluation index, the statistical optimal parameter configuration was selected from some possible configurations determined by the optimal NSAs and ERs. The statistical optimal parameters are consistent for normal and abnormal eyes. They are different from the optimal parameters obtained with a set of statistical aberrations from the same 624 sets of aberrations, and the performance using the former is better than that using the latter. The performance using a fixed set of statistical optimal parameters is even close to that using the respective optimal parameters corresponding to each set of aberrations. The vSHWS configured with a fixed set of statistical optimal parameters can be used for high-precision aberration measurement of both normal and abnormal eyes. The statistical optimal parameters are more suitable for vSHWS than the parameters obtained with a set of statistical aberrations. These conclusions are significant for the designs of vSHWS and also SHWS.
Identifiants
pubmed: 38940969
doi: 10.1007/s10792-024-03176-9
pii: 10.1007/s10792-024-03176-9
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
292Subventions
Organisme : National Natural Science Foundation of China
ID : 61575205
Informations de copyright
© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature B.V.
Références
Liang J, Williams DR (1997) Supernormal vision and high-resolution retinal imaging through adaptive optics. J Opt Soc Am A 14(11):2884–2892. https://doi.org/10.1364/josaa.14.002884
doi: 10.1364/josaa.14.002884
Merino D, Dainty C (2006) Adaptive optics enhanced simultaneous en-face optical coherence tomography and scanning laser ophthalmoscopy. Opt Exp 14(8):3345–3353. https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.14.003345
doi: 10.1364/OE.14.003345
Pircher M, Zawadzki RJ (2017) Review of adaptive optics OCT (AO-OCT): principles and applications for retinal imaging. Biomed Opt Express 8(5):2536–2562. https://doi.org/10.1364/BOE.8.002536
doi: 10.1364/BOE.8.002536
pubmed: 28663890
pmcid: 5480497
Hammer DX, Ferguson RD, Bigelow CE, Iftimia NV, Ustun TE, Burns SA (2006) Adaptive optics scanning laser ophthalmoscope for stabilized retinal imaging. Opt Exp 14(8):3354–3367. https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.14.003354
doi: 10.1364/OE.14.003354
Zhang Y, Poonja S, Roorda A (2006) MEMS-based adaptive optics scanning laser ophthalmoscopy. Opt Lett 31(9):1268–1270. https://doi.org/10.1364/OL.31.001268
doi: 10.1364/OL.31.001268
pubmed: 16642081
Hoshi S, Wang XL, Kadomoto S, Liu RX, Ip MS, Sarraf D, Sadda SR, Zhang YH (2022) Adaptive optics scanning laser ophthalmoscopy of photoreceptor structure perturbation by acquired vitelliform lesions. Invest Ophth Vis Sci 63(7):2583–466
Alexopoulos P, Madu C, Wollstein G, Schuman JS (2022) The development and clinical application of innovative optical ophthalmic imaging techniques. Front Med 30(9):891369. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2022.891369
doi: 10.3389/fmed.2022.891369
Li Y, Xia X, Paulus YM (2018) Advances in retinal optical imaging. Photonics 5(2):9. https://doi.org/10.3390/photonics5020009
doi: 10.3390/photonics5020009
pubmed: 31321222
pmcid: 6639094
Frings A, Hassan H, Allan BD (2020) Pyramidal aberrometry in wavefront-guided myopic LASIK. J Refract 36(7):442–448. https://doi.org/10.3928/1081597X-20200519-03
doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20200519-03
Zlatanović M, Živković M, Hristov A, Stojković V, Novak S, Zlatanović N, Brzaković M (2019) Central corneal thickness measured by the Oculyzer, BioGraph, and ultrasound pachymetry. Acta Medica Mediterr 58(2):33–37. https://doi.org/10.5633/amm.2019.0206
doi: 10.5633/amm.2019.0206
Sun MS, Zhang L, Guo N, Song YZ, Zhang FJ (2018) Consistent comparison of angle Kappa adjustment between Oculyzer and Topolyzer Vario topography guided LASIK for myopia by EX500 excimer laser. Int J Ophthalmol 11(4):662. https://doi.org/10.18240/ijo.2018.04.21
doi: 10.18240/ijo.2018.04.21
pubmed: 29675388
pmcid: 5902374
Faria-Correia F, Ambrósio JR (2016) Clinical applications of the Scheimpflug principle in ophthalmology. Rev Bras Oftalmol 75:160–165. https://doi.org/10.5935/0034-7280.20160035
doi: 10.5935/0034-7280.20160035
Tuohy S, Podoleanu AG (2010) Depth-resolved wavefront aberrations using a coherence-gated Shack-Hartmann wavefront sensor. Opt Exp 18(4):3458–3476. https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.18.003458
doi: 10.1364/OE.18.003458
Schwiegerling J (2014) History of the Shack Hartmann wavefront sensor and its impact in ophthalmic optics. Proc SPIE 9186:291–298. https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2064536
doi: 10.1117/12.2064536
Shack RV, Platt BC (1971) Production and use of a lenticular Hartmann screen. J Opt Soc Am 61(5):648–697. https://doi.org/10.1364/JOSA.61.000648
doi: 10.1364/JOSA.61.000648
Gu D, Liu X (2022) Shack-Hartmann wavefront sensor based on Kalman filter. Opt Eng 61(9):093106. https://doi.org/10.1117/1.OE.61.9.093106
doi: 10.1117/1.OE.61.9.093106
Valdivieso-González LG, Muñoz-Potosi AF, Tepichin-Rodriguez E (2022) Design and characterization of a safe Shack-Hartmann type aberrometer for making in-vivo measurements: heuristic approximation. Opt Commun 454:124500. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optcom.2019.124500
doi: 10.1016/j.optcom.2019.124500
Feierabend M, Rückel M, Denk W (2004) Coherence-gated wave-front sensing in strongly scattering samples. Opt Lett 29(19):2255–2257. https://doi.org/10.1364/OL.29.002255
doi: 10.1364/OL.29.002255
pubmed: 15524372
Dufour ML, Lamouche G, Detalle V, Gauthier B, Sammut P (2005) Low-coherence interferometry—an advanced technique for optical metrology in industry. Insight 47(4):216–219. https://doi.org/10.1784/insi.47.4.216.63149
doi: 10.1784/insi.47.4.216.63149
Rueckel M, Denk W (2007) Properties of coherence-gated wavefront sensing. J Opt Soc Am A 24(11):3517–3529. https://doi.org/10.1364/JOSAA.24.003517
doi: 10.1364/JOSAA.24.003517
Akondi V, Falldrof C, Marcos S, Vohnsen B (2015) Phase unwrapping with a virtual Hartmann-Shack wavefront sensor. Opt Exp 23(20):25425–25439. https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.23.025425
doi: 10.1364/OE.23.025425
Binding J (2013) Ruckel M (2013) Coherence-gated wavefront sensing. In: Kubby JA (ed) Adaptive optics for biological imaging. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 253–270
doi: 10.1201/b14898-19
Wang J, Gh Podoleanu A (2015) Demonstration of depth-resolved wavefront sensing using a swept-source coherence-gated Shack-Hartmann wavefront sensor. Proc SPIE 9312:61–65. https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2079253
doi: 10.1117/12.2079253
Akondi V, Steven S, Dubra A (2019) Centroid error due to non-uniform lenslet illumination in the Shack-Hartmann wavefront sensor. Opt Lett 44(17):4167–4170. https://doi.org/10.1364/OL.44.004167
doi: 10.1364/OL.44.004167
pubmed: 31465354
pmcid: 7535117
Akondi V, Dubra A (2019) Accounting for focal shift in the Shack-Hartmann wavefront sensor. Opt Lett 44(17):4151–4154. https://doi.org/10.1364/OL.44.004151
doi: 10.1364/OL.44.004151
pubmed: 31465350
pmcid: 7535119
Rueckel M, Mack-Bucher JA, Denk W (2006) Adaptive wavefront correction in two-photon microscopy using coherence-gated wavefront sensing. Proc Natl Acad Sci 103(46):17137–17142. https://doi.org/10.1073/pNSA.0604791103
doi: 10.1073/pNSA.0604791103
pubmed: 17088565
pmcid: 1634839
Wang J, Léger JF, Binding J, Boccara AC, Gigan S, Bourdieu L (2012) Measuring aberrations in the rat brain by coherence-gated wavefront sensing using a Linnik interferometer. Biomed Opt Exp 3(10):2510–2525. https://doi.org/10.1364/BOE.3.002510
doi: 10.1364/BOE.3.002510
van Werkhoven TIM, Antonello J, Truong HH, Verhaegen M, Gerritsen HC, Keller CU (2014) Snapshot coherence-gated wavefront sensing for multi-photon microscopy. Opt Exp 22(8):9715–9733. https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.22.009715
doi: 10.1364/OE.22.009715
Cua M, Wahl DJ, Zhao Y, Lee S, Bonora S, Zawadzki RJ, Jian Y, Sarunic MV (2015) Coherence-gated sensorless adaptive optics multi-photon retinal imaging. Sci Rep 6:32223. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep32223
doi: 10.1038/srep32223
Yue X, Yang Y, Xiao F, Dai H, Geng C, Zhang Y (2021) Optimization of virtual Shack-Hartmann wavefront sensing. Sensors 21(14):4698. https://doi.org/10.3390/s21144698
doi: 10.3390/s21144698
pubmed: 34300438
pmcid: 8309488
Thibos LN, Bradley A, Hong X (2002) A statistical model of the aberration structure of normal, well-corrected eyes. Ophthal Physiol Opt 22(5):427–433. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1475-1313.2002.00059.x
doi: 10.1046/j.1475-1313.2002.00059.x
Aldebasi HI, Fawzy SM, Alsaleh AA (2013) Ocular aberrations in amblyopic children. Saudi J Ophthalmol 27(4):253–258. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sjopt.2013.07.007
doi: 10.1016/j.sjopt.2013.07.007
pubmed: 24371420
pmcid: 3841256
Zhao J, Xiao F, Kang J, Zhao H, Dai Y, Zhang Y (2017) Statistical analysis of ocular monochromatic aberrations in Chinese population for adaptive optics ophthalmoscope design. J Innov Opt Heal Sci 10(1):1650038. https://doi.org/10.1142/S1793545816500383
doi: 10.1142/S1793545816500383
Kim J, Lim T, Kim MJ, Tchah H (2009) Changes of higher-order aberrations with the use of various mydriatics. Ophthal Physiol Opt 29(6):602–605. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-1313.2009.00675.x
doi: 10.1111/j.1475-1313.2009.00675.x
Thibos LN (2009) Retinal image quality for virtual eyes generated by a statistical model of ocular wavefront aberrations. Ophthal Physiol Opt 29(3):288–291. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-1313.2009.00662.x
doi: 10.1111/j.1475-1313.2009.00662.x
Cagigal MP, Canales VF (2002) Statistical description of wave-front aberration in the human eye. Opt Lett 27(1):37–39. https://doi.org/10.1364/OL.27.000037
doi: 10.1364/OL.27.000037
pubmed: 18007708
Gifford P, Cannon T, Lee C, Lee D, Lee HF, Swarbrick HA (2013) Ocular aberrations and visual function with multifocal single vision soft contact lenses. Cont Lens Anterior Eye 36(2):66–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clae.2012.10.078
doi: 10.1016/j.clae.2012.10.078
pubmed: 23146418
Thibos LN, Applegate RA, Schwiegerling JT, Webb R (2002) Standards for reporting the optical aberrations of eyes. J Refract Surg 18(5):S652–S660. https://doi.org/10.3928/1081-597X-20020901-30
doi: 10.3928/1081-597X-20020901-30
pubmed: 12361175