Individual Patient Data Meta-Analysis Estimates the Minimal Detectable Change of the Geriatric Depression Scale-15.
GDS-15
Minimal detectable change
individual participant data meta-analysis
Journal
Journal of clinical epidemiology
ISSN: 1878-5921
Titre abrégé: J Clin Epidemiol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 8801383
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
26 Jun 2024
26 Jun 2024
Historique:
received:
23
01
2024
revised:
18
06
2024
accepted:
23
06
2024
medline:
29
6
2024
pubmed:
29
6
2024
entrez:
28
6
2024
Statut:
aheadofprint
Résumé
To use individual participant data meta-analysis (IPDMA) to estimate the minimal detectable change (MDC) of the Geriatric Depression Scale-15 (GDS-15) and to examine whether MDC may differ based on participant characteristics and study-level variables. This was a secondary analysis of data from an IPDMA on the depression screening accuracy of the GDS. Datasets from studies published in any language were eligible for the present study if they included GDS-15 scores for participants aged 60 or older. MDC of the GDS-15 was estimated via random-effects meta-analysis using 2.77 (MDC95) and 1.41 (MDC67) standard errors of measurement (SEM). Subgroup analyses were used to evaluate differences in MDC by participant age and sex. Meta-regression was conducted to assess for differences based on study-level variables, including mean age, proportion male, proportion with major depression, and recruitment setting. 5,876 participants (mean age 76 years, 40% male, 11% with major depression) from 21 studies were included. The MDC95 was 3.81 points (95% confidence interval [CI] 3.59, 4.04), and MDC67 was 1.95 (95% CI 1.83, 2.03). The difference in MDC95 was 0.26 points (95% CI 0.04, 0.48) between ≥ 80-year-olds and < 80-year-olds; MDC95 was similar for females and males (0.05, 95% CI -0.12, 0.22). The MDC95 increased by 0.29 points (95% CI 0.17, 0.41) per 10% increase in proportion of participants with major depression; mean age had a small association (0.04 points, 95% CI 0.00 to 0.09) with MDC95, but sex and recruitment setting were not significantly associated. The MDC95 was 3.81 points and MDC67 was 1.95 points. MDC95 increased with the proportion of participants with major depression. Results can be used to evaluate individual changes in depression symptoms and as a threshold for assessing minimal clinical important difference estimates.
Identifiants
pubmed: 38942179
pii: S0895-4356(24)00199-9
doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2024.111443
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
111443Investigateurs
Ankur Krishnan
(A)
Chen He
(C)
Tiffany Dal Santo
(TD)
Dipika Neupane
(D)
Eliana Brehaut
(E)
Parash M Bhandari
(PM)
Xia Qiu
(X)
Letong Li
(L)
Mahrukh Imran
(M)
Elsa-Lynn Nassar
(EL)
Kathryn Betts Adams
(KB)
Sarah F Baillon
(SF)
Paulo Caramelli
(P)
Erico Castro-Costa
(E)
Marcos H N Chagas
(MHN)
Filipi Lc Dias
(FL)
Ahmet Turan Isik
(AT)
Nathalie Jetté
(N)
Patricia Katz
(P)
Wonhyoung Kim
(W)
Hans-Helmut König
(HH)
Maria Fernanda Lima-Costa
(MF)
Margrit Löbner
(M)
Seyed Kazem Malakouti
(SK)
Laura Marsh
(L)
Heehyul E Moon
(HE)
Antonis A Mougias
(AA)
Christian J Nelson
(CJ)
Alexander Pabst
(A)
Terence J Quinn
(TJ)
Steffi G Riedel-Heller
(SG)
Rebecca Saracino
(R)
Martin Scherer
(M)
Matthias Volz
(M)
Michael Wagner
(M)
Siegfried B Weyerer
(SB)
Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Inc.