Confirmatory validation of the Mesothelioma Psychological Distress Tool-Patients: A brief patient-reported outcome measure assessing psychological distress in malignant mesothelioma patients.
Humans
Mesothelioma, Malignant
/ psychology
Female
Male
Psychometrics
Psychological Distress
Patient Reported Outcome Measures
Middle Aged
Aged
Factor Analysis, Statistical
Bayes Theorem
Mesothelioma
/ psychology
Lung Neoplasms
/ psychology
Surveys and Questionnaires
Stress, Psychological
/ psychology
Adult
Reproducibility of Results
Quality of Life
/ psychology
anxieties about the future
cancer
claim for justice
dysfunctional emotions
mesothelioma
occupational cancer
oncology
patient‐reported outcome measures
psychological distress
psycho‐oncology
Journal
Psycho-oncology
ISSN: 1099-1611
Titre abrégé: Psychooncology
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9214524
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Jul 2024
Jul 2024
Historique:
revised:
14
06
2024
received:
04
03
2024
accepted:
20
06
2024
medline:
29
6
2024
pubmed:
29
6
2024
entrez:
28
6
2024
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Psychological suffering in patients with Malignant Mesothelioma (MM) is different from the one experienced by patients with other cancers due to its occupational or environmental etiology and its peculiar symptomatology and prognosis (i.e., poor prognosis, reduced effectiveness of the therapies, poor quality of residual life, and advanced age at the time of diagnosis). Therefore, the Mesothelioma Psychological Distress Tool-Patients (MPDT-P) has been developed to evaluate the specific profile of psychological suffering in this population. This paper describes the item selection, factor analysis, and psychometric evaluation of the revised MPDT-P. The analyses of the current work aimed to confirm the factorial structure found in the first version of the MPDT-P. In the case of nonfit, it aimed to find an alternative structure and causes of nonfit in the model. The search for the fit of the factorial model was conducted using a Bayesian approach. The two-factor model reported in the first version of the instrument did not fit the data. Confirmatory Bayesian analyses showed adequate fit for the three-factor solution. Based on the content of the items, we labeled the factors as dysfunctional emotions, claims for justice, and anxieties about the future. Integrating the MPDT-P into clinical practice could help clinicians gain insight into the specific suffering related to MM and investigate potential differences related to different occupational and environmental exposure contexts.
Types de publication
Journal Article
Validation Study
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e6371Subventions
Organisme : Istituto Nazionale per l'Assicurazione Contro Gli Infortuni sul Lavoro
Informations de copyright
© 2024 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Références
Wilk E, Krówczyńska M. Malignant mesothelioma and asbestos exposure in Europe: evidence of spatial clustering. Geospat Health. 2021;16(1). PMID: 34000787. https://doi.org/10.4081/gh.2021.951
Furuya S, Chimed‐Ochir O, Takahashi K, David A, Takala J. Global asbestos disaster. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018;15(5):1000. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15051000
Zona A, Fazzo L, Benedetti M, et al. Gruppo di lavoro SENTIERI 2019‐2022. SENTIERI ‐ Studio epidemiologico nazionale dei territori e degli insediamenti esposti a rischio da inquinamento. Sesto Rapporto [SENTIERI ‐ Epidemiological Study of Residents in National Priority Contaminated Sites. Sixth Report]. Epidemiol Prev. 2023;47(1‐2 suppl 1):1‐286. PMID: 36825373. https://doi.org/10.19191/EP23.1‐2‐S1.003
Marinaccio A, Binazzi A, Bonafede M, Di Marzio D, Scarselli A. Regional Operating Centres. Epidemiology of malignant mesothelioma in Italy: surveillance systems, territorial clusters and occupations involved. J Thorac Dis. 2018;10(suppl 2):S221‐S227. PMID: 29507789; PMCID: PMC5830562. https://doi.org/10.21037/jtd.2017.12.146
INAIL. Il registro nazionale dei mesoteliomi. Settimo rapporto. Collana Ricerche; 2021.
Demirjian CC, Saracino RM, Napolitano S, et al. Psychosocial well‐being among patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma. Palliat Support Care. 2024;22(1):57‐61. PMID: 36655492; PMCID: PMC10354217. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1478951522001596
Nagamatsu Y, Sakyo Y, Barroga E, Koni R, Natori Y, Miyashita M. Depression and complicated grief, and associated factors, of bereaved family members of patients who died of malignant pleural mesothelioma in Japan. J Clin Med. 2022;11(12):3380. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11123380
Bonafede M, Granieri A, Binazzi A, et al. Psychological distress after a diagnosis of malignant mesothelioma in a group of patients and caregivers at the national priority contaminated site of Casale Monferrato. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17(12):4353. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17124353
Warby A, Dhillon HM, Kao S, Vardy JL. A survey of patient and caregiver experience with malignant pleural mesothelioma. Support Care Cancer. 2019;27(12):4675‐4686. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520‐019‐04760‐x
Bonafede M, Chiorri C, Azzolina D, et al. Preliminary validation of a questionnaire assessing psychological distress in caregivers of patients with malignant mesothelioma: mesothelioma Psychological Distress Tool‐Caregivers. Psycho Oncol. 2022;31(1):122‐129. https://doi.org/10.1002/pon.5789
Kao SC, Vardy J, Harvie R, et al. Health‐related quality of life and inflammatory markers in malignant pleural mesothelioma. Support Care Cancer. 2013;21(3):697‐705. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520‐012‐1569‐6
Bonafede M, Ghelli M, Corfiati M, et al. The psychological distress and care needs of mesothelioma patients and asbestos‐exposed subjects: a systematic review of published studies. Am J Ind Med. 2018;61(5):400‐412. Epub 2018 Mar 25. PMID: 29575036. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajim.22831
Noonan CW. Environmental asbestos exposure and risk of mesothelioma. Ann Transl Med. 2017;5(11):234. https://doi.org/10.21037/atm.2017.03.74
Granieri A, Bonafede M, Marinaccio A, Iavarone I, Marsili D, Franzoi IG. SARS‐CoV‐2 and asbestos exposure: can our experience with mesothelioma patients help us understand the psychological consequences of COVID‐19 and develop interventions? Front Psychol. 2020;11:584320. PMID: 33414743; PMCID: PMC7782241. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.584320
Granieri A. The drive for self‐assertion and the reality principle in A patient with malignant pleural mesothelioma: the history of Giulia. Am J Psychoanal. 2017;77(3):285‐294. PMID: 28740198. https://doi.org/10.1057/s11231‐017‐9099‐0
Hollen PJ, Gralla RJ, Liepa AM, Symanowski JT, Rusthoven JJ. Adapting the lung cancer symptom scale (LCSS) to mesothelioma: using the LCSS‐Meso conceptual model for validation. Cancer. 2004;101(3):587‐595. PubMed: 15274072. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.20315
Koller M, Shamieh O, Hjermstad MJ, et al. Psychometric properties of the updated EORTC module for assessing quality of life in patients with lung cancer (QLQ‐LC29): an international, observational field study. Lancet Oncol. 2020;21(5):723‐732. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470‐2045(20)30093‐0
Quaife SL, Waller J, Dickson JL, et al. Psychological targets for lung cancer screening uptake: a prospective longitudinal cohort study. J Thorac Oncol. 2021;16(12):2016‐2028. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtho.2021.07.025
Guglielmucci F, Bonafede M, Azzolina D, et al. Preliminary validation of a brief PROM assessing psychological distress in patients with malignant mesothelioma: the mesothelioma psychological distress tool‐Patients. Front Psychol. 2022;13:974982. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.974982
Ware JE, Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36‐item short‐form health survey (SF‐36): I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care. 1992;30(6):473‐483. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005650‐199206000‐00002
Apolone G, Mosconi P. The Italian SF‐36 Health Survey: translation, validation and norming. J Clin Epidemiol. 1998;51(11):1025‐1036. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0895‐4356(98)00094‐8
Spielberger CD, Sydeman SJ, Owen AE, Marsh BJ. Measuring anxiety and anger with the state–trait anxiety inventory (STAI) and the state–trait anger expression inventory (STAXI). In: Maruish ME, ed. The Use of Psychological Testing for Treatment Planning and Outcomes Assessment. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers; 1999:993‐1021.
Muthén L, Muthén BO. Mplus Users Guide. 6th ed. Muthén and Muthén; 1998–2010.
Golino H, Shi D, Christensen AP, et al. Investigating the performance of exploratory graph analysis and traditional techniques to identify the number of latent factors: a simulation and tutorial. Psychol Methods. 2020;25(3):292‐320. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000255
Christensen AP, Golino H. Estimating the stability of psychological dimensions via bootstrap exploratory graph analysis: a Monte Carlo simulation and tutorial. Psych. 2021;3:479‐500. https://doi.org/10.3390/psych3030032
Pons P, Latapy M. Computing communities in large networks using random walks. In: Comput Inf Sci‐ISCIS. Proceedings 20: 20th International Symposium, Istanbul, Turkey, October 26 to 28, 2005. Vol 2005. Springer; 2005:284‐293. https://doi.org/10.1007/11569596_31
Taylor JM. Overview and illustration of Bayesian confirmatory factor Analysis with ordinal indicators. Pract Assess Res Eval. 2019;24:4.
Muthén B, Asparouhov T. Bayesian structural equation modeling: a more flexible representation of substantive theory. Psychol Methods. 2012;17(3):313‐335. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0026802
Pfadt JM, Bergh DVD, Sijtsma K, Wagenmakers EJ. A tutorial on Bayesian single‐test reliability analysis with JASP. Behav Res Methods. 2023;55(3):1069‐1078. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428‐021‐01778‐0
Granieri A, Tamburello S, Tamburello A, et al. Quality of life and personality traits in patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma and their first‐degree caregivers. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2013;9:1193‐1202. https://doi.org/10.2147/NDT.S48965
Varvin S. Psychoanalysis with the traumatised patient: helping to survive extreme experiences and complicated loss. Seitschrift Klin Theor Prax Forum der Psychoanalyse. 2013;29:372‐389.
Rosenbaum B, Varvin S. The influence of extreme traumatization on body, mind and social relations. Int J Psychoanal. 2007;88(6):1527‐1542. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745‐8315.2007.tb00758.x
Testoni I, Mauchigna L, Marinoni GL, Zamperini A, Bucuță M, Dima G. Solastalgia's mourning and the slowly evolving effect of asbestos pollution: a qualitative study in Italy. Heliyon. 2019;5(12):e03024. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e03024
Pillayre H. Compensation funds, trials and the meaning of claims: the example of asbestos‐related illness compensation in France. Soc Leg Stud. 2021;30(2):180‐202. https://doi.org/10.1177/0964663920934187
Rachman S. Betrayal: a psychological analysis. Behav Res Ther. 2010;48(4):304‐311. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brat.2009.12.002
Sherborne V, Seymour J, Taylor B, Tod A. What are the psychological effects of mesothelioma on patients and their carers? A scoping review. Psycho Oncol. 2020;29(10):1464‐1473. https://doi.org/10.1002/pon.5454
Granieri A. Extreme trauma in a polluted area: bonds and relational transformations in an Italian community. Int Forum Psychoanal. 2016;25(2):94‐103. https://doi.org/10.1080/0803706X.2015.1101488
Wood H, Connors S, Dogan S, Peel T. Individual experiences and impacts of a physiotherapist‐led, non‐pharmacological breathlessness programme for patients with intrathoracic malignancy: a qualitative study. Palliat Med. 2013;27(6):499‐507. https://doi.org/10.1177/0269216312464093
Franzoi IG, Granieri A, Sauta MD, et al. The psychological impact of sarcoma on affected patients. Psycho Oncol. 2023;32(12):1787‐1797. Epub 2023 Nov 6. PMID: 37930090. https://doi.org/10.1002/pon.6240
Van de Mortel TF. Faking it: social desirability response bias in self‐report research. Aust J Adv Nurs. 2008;25:40‐48.