Identifying factors associated with locomotive syndrome using machine learning methods: The third survey of the research on osteoarthritis/osteoporosis against disability study.
associated factor
cohort study
locomotive syndrome
machine learning
prevalence
Journal
Geriatrics & gerontology international
ISSN: 1447-0594
Titre abrégé: Geriatr Gerontol Int
Pays: Japan
ID NLM: 101135738
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
29 Jun 2024
29 Jun 2024
Historique:
revised:
01
05
2024
received:
25
01
2024
accepted:
31
05
2024
medline:
29
6
2024
pubmed:
29
6
2024
entrez:
29
6
2024
Statut:
aheadofprint
Résumé
To identify factors associated with locomotive syndrome (LS) using medical questionnaire data and machine learning. A total of 1575 participants underwent the LS risk tests from the third survey of the research on osteoarthritis/osteoporosis against disability study (ROAD) study. LS was defined as stage 1 or higher based on clinical decision limits of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association. A total of 1335 items of medical questionnaire data came from this study. The number of medical questionnaire items was reduced from 1335 to 331 in data cleaning. From the 331 items, identify factors associated with LS use by light gradient boosting machine-based recursive feature elimination with cross-validation. The performance of each set was evaluated using an average of seven performance metrics, including 95% confidence intervals, using a bootstrapping method. The smallest set of items is determined with the highest average of receiver operating characteristic area under the curve (ROC-AUC) under 20 items as association factors of LS. Additionally, the performance of the selected items was compared with the LS risk tests and Loco-check. The nine items have the best average ROC-AUC under 20 items. The nine items show an average ROC-AUC of 0.858 (95% confidence interval 0.816-0.898). Age and back pain during walking were strongly associated with the prevalence of LS. The ROC-AUC of nine items is higher than that of existing questionnaire-based LS assessments, including the 25-question Geriatric Locomotor Scale and Loco-check. The identified nine items could aid early LS detection, enhancing understanding and prevention. Geriatr Gerontol Int 2024; ••: ••-••.
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Subventions
Organisme : the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare
ID : H23-Choujyu-002
Organisme : the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare
ID : 19FA0701
Organisme : the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare
ID : 19FA1401
Organisme : the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare
ID : 19FA1901
Organisme : the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare
ID : 19FB1001
Organisme : the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare
ID : 20JA1001
Organisme : the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare
ID : H17-Men-eki-009
Organisme : the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare
ID : H20-Choujyu-009
Organisme : the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare
ID : H25-Choujyu-007
Organisme : the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare
ID : H25-Nanchitou (Men)-005
Organisme : the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare
ID : 21FA1006
Organisme : the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare
ID : 22FA1009
Organisme : the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare
ID : 24FA1006
Organisme : Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development
ID : 17dk0110028h0001
Organisme : Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development
ID : 17gk0210007h0003
Organisme : Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development
ID : 19gk0210018h0002
Organisme : Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development
ID : 22dk0110047h0001
Organisme : Japan Society for the Promotion of Science
ID : A18689031
Organisme : Japan Society for the Promotion of Science
ID : C18K09122
Organisme : Japan Society for the Promotion of Science
ID : 08033011-00262
Organisme : Japan Society for the Promotion of Science
ID : 15K15219
Organisme : Japan Society for the Promotion of Science
ID : 18K18447
Organisme : Japan Society for the Promotion of Science
ID : 21659349
Organisme : Japan Society for the Promotion of Science
ID : 21K19291
Organisme : Japan Society for the Promotion of Science
ID : 23659580
Organisme : Japan Society for the Promotion of Science
ID : 24659317
Organisme : Japan Society for the Promotion of Science
ID : 24659666
Organisme : Japan Society for the Promotion of Science
ID : 25670293
Organisme : Japan Society for the Promotion of Science
ID : 26670307
Organisme : Japan Society for the Promotion of Science
ID : B18H03164
Organisme : Japan Society for the Promotion of Science
ID : B19H03895
Organisme : Japan Society for the Promotion of Science
ID : B20390182
Organisme : Japan Society for the Promotion of Science
ID : B23390172
Organisme : Japan Society for the Promotion of Science
ID : B23390356
Organisme : Japan Society for the Promotion of Science
ID : B23390357
Organisme : Japan Society for the Promotion of Science
ID : B26293139
Organisme : Japan Society for the Promotion of Science
ID : B26293329
Organisme : Japan Society for the Promotion of Science
ID : B26293331
Organisme : Japan Society for the Promotion of Science
ID : C20591737
Organisme : Japan Society for the Promotion of Science
ID : C20591774
Organisme : Japan Society for the Promotion of Science
ID : S50282661
Informations de copyright
© 2024 The Author(s). Geriatrics & Gerontology International published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Japan Geriatrics Society.
Références
Ministry of Health L, Welfare. National livelihood survey, causes of need for long‐term care (tables 22–25), https://www.e‐stat.go.jp/stat‐search/files?page=1&layout=datalist&toukei=00450061&tstat=000001206248&cycle=7&tclass1=000001206252&stat_infid=000040071923&tclass2val=0&metadata=1&data=1 2022.
Nakamura KA. “Super‐aged” society and the “locomotive syndrome”. J Orthop Sci 2008; 13: 1–2.
Yoshimura N, Iidaka T, Horii C et al. Epidemiology of locomotive syndrome using updated clinical decision limits: 6‐year follow‐ups of the ROAD study. J Bone Miner Metab 2022; 40: 623–635.
Bone and Joint Japan. Survey on the degree of familiarity with locomotive syndrome (in Japanese), Bone and Joint Japan official web site 2023. https://www.bjd-jp.org/wp/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/2023.pdf (accessed 20 March 2024).
Takahashi S, Nonomiya Y, Terai H et al. Artificial intelligence model to identify elderly patients with locomotive syndrome: a cross‐section study. J Orthop Sci 2022; 28: 656–661.
Das S, Sakoda W, Ramasamy P, Tadayon R, Ramirez AV, Kurita Y. Feature selection and validation of a machine learning‐based lower limb risk assessment tool: a feasibility study. Sensors 2021; 21: 6459.
Guyon I, Weston J, Barnhill S. Gene selection for cancer classification using support vector machines. Mach Learn 2002; 46: 389–422.
Yoshimura N, Muraki S, Oka H, Kawaguchi H, Nakamura K, Akune T. Cohort profile: research on osteoarthritis/osteoporosis against disability study. Int J Epidemiol 2010; 39: 988–995.
Yoshimura N, Muraki S, Oka H et al. Prevalence of knee osteoarthritis, lumbar spondylosis, and osteoporosis in japanese men and women: the research on osteoarthritis/osteoporosis against disability study. J Bone Miner Metab 2009; 27: 620–628.
Seichi A, Hoshino Y, Doi T, Akai M, Tobimatsu Y, Iwaya T. Development of a screening tool for risk of locomotive syndrome in the elderly: the 25‐question geriatric locomotive function scale. J Orthop Sci 2012; 17: 163–172.
Japanese orthopaedic association, Loco‐ motive Challenge Council. Locomotive syndrome pamphlet, https://locomo-joa.jp/assets/pdf/index_japanese.pdf 2020.
Orwoll E, Blank JB, Barrett‐Connor E et al. Design and baseline characteristics of the osteoporotic fractures in men (MrOS) study–a large observational study of the determinants of fracture in older men. Contemp Clin Trials 2005; 26: 569–585.
Hasan MM, Young GJ, Patel MR, Modestino AS, Sanchez LD, Noor‐E‐Alam M. A machine learning framework to predict the risk of opioid use disorder. Mach Learn Appl 2021; 6: 100144.
Washburn RA, Smith KW, Jette AM, Janney CA. The physical activity scale for the elderly (PASE): development and evaluation. J Clin Epidemiol 1993; 46: 153–162.
Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare. Concept of the basic checklist (in Japanese), https://www.mhlw.go.jp/topics/2007/03/dl/tp0313-1a-11.pdf 2006.
Johnson JA, Coons SJ, Ergo A, Szava‐Kovats G. Valuation of EuroQOL (EQ‐5D) health states in an adult US sample. Pharmacoeconomics 1998; 13: 421–433.
Yiengprugsawan V, Kelly M, Tawatsupa B. SF‐8TM health survey. In: Michalos AC, ed. Encyclopedia of Quality of Life and Well‐Being Research. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, 2014; 5940–5942.
Fairbank JC, Pynsent PB. The oswestry disability index. Spine 2000; 25: 2940–2952 discussion 2952.
Bellamy N, Buchanan WW, Goldsmith CH, Campbell J, Stitt LW. Validation study of WOMAC: a health status instrument for measuring clinically important patient relevant outcomes to antirheumatic drug therapy in patients with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee. J Rheumatol 1988; 15: 1833–1840.
Ke G, Meng Q, Finley T et al. LightGBM: A highly efficient gradient boosting decision tree. In: Proceedings of the 31st international conference on neural information processing systems. Red Hook, NY, USA: Curran Associates Inc, 2017; 3149–3157 (NIPS'17).
Turimov Mustapoevich D, Kim W. Machine learning applications in sarcopenia detection and management: a comprehensive survey. Healthcare (Basel) 2023; 11: 2483.
Yamada K, Ito YM, Akagi M et al. Reference values for the locomotive syndrome risk test quantifying mobility of 8681 adults aged 20‐89 years: a cross‐sectional nationwide study in Japan. J Orthop Sci 2020; 25: 1084–1092.
Lundberg S, Lee S‐I. A unified approach to interpreting model predictions, NIPS2017 2017.
Kubat M. Addressing the curse of imbalanced training sets: one‐sided selection. Proc Fourteenth Intl Conf Machine Learn 1997; 1997: 179–186.
Akiba T, Sano S, Yanase T, Ohta T, Koyama M. Optuna: A next‐generation hyperparameter optimization framework, 2019.
Pedregosa F, Varoquaux G, Gramfort A et al. Scikit‐learn: machine learning in python. J Mach Learn Res 2011; 12: 2825–2830.
Efron B. Bootstrap methods: another look at the jackknife. Ann Stat 1979; 7: 1–26.
Muramoto A, Imagama S, Ito Z, Hirano K, Ishiguro N, Hasegawa Y. Physical performance tests are useful for evaluating and monitoring the severity of locomotive syndrome. J Orthop Sci 2012; 17: 782–788.
Imagama S, Hasegawa Y, Ando K et al. Staged decrease of physical ability on the locomotive syndrome risk test is related to neuropathic pain, nociceptive pain, shoulder complaints, and quality of life in middle‐aged and elderly people ‐ the utility of the locomotive syndrome risk test. Mod Rheumatol 2017; 27: 1051–1056.
Nishimura A, Ohtsuki M, Kato T et al. Locomotive syndrome testing in young and middle adulthood. Mod Rheumatol 2020; 30: 178–183.
Kobayashi T, Morimoto T, Otani K, Mawatari M. Locomotive syndrome and lumbar spine disease: a systematic review. J Clin Med Res 2022; 11: 1304.
Tashi H, Watanabe K, Yahata M et al. Low back pain significantly influences locomotive syndrome in older people: evaluation using the 3‐stage categories. J Orthop Sci 2023; 28: 662–668.
Yamada Y, Tada M, Mandai K, Hidaka N. AB0373 analysis of risk factor for locomotive syndrome in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: Data from chikara study. In: Abstracts accepted for publication BMJ Publishing Group Ltd; European League Against Rheumatism. England: BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.; 2017; 1178–1179.
Sobue Y, Kojima T, Funahashi K et al. Relationship between rheumatoid arthritis and locomotive syndrome: validation of the 25‐question geriatric locomotive function scale in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Nagoya J Med Sci 2019; 81: 453–462.
PostgreSQL. https://www.postgresql.org/, 2023.
Little RJA, Rubin DB. Statistical Analysis with Missing Data, 3rd edn. Nashville, TN: John Wiley & Sons, 2019.
Carroll JD, Green P. In: Chaturvedi A, ed. Mathematical Tools for Applied Multivariate Analysis, 2nd edn. San Diego, CA: Academic Press, 1997.
Kobayashi S, Honda S, Murakami K et al. Both comprehensive and brief self‐administered diet history questionnaires satisfactorily rank nutrient intakes in Japanese adults. J Epidemiol 2012; 22: 151–159.
Folstein MF, Folstein SE, McHugh PR. Mini‐mental state examination. United states: American Psychological Association (APA), 2014.