Optimal untwisting of the orbital bandeau in unicoronal craniosynostosis correction: A finite element analysis.

Finite element analysis Frontoorbital advancement Inner cortical bone layer osteotomy Orbital bandeau Unicoronal craniosynostosis

Journal

Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials
ISSN: 1878-0180
Titre abrégé: J Mech Behav Biomed Mater
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 101322406

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
18 Jun 2024
Historique:
received: 08 01 2024
revised: 27 05 2024
accepted: 18 06 2024
medline: 30 6 2024
pubmed: 30 6 2024
entrez: 29 6 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

Surgical correction of unicoronal craniosynostosis (UCS) is highly complex due to its asymmetric appearance. Although fronto-orbital advancement (FOA) is a versatile technique for craniosynostosis correction, harmonization of the orbital bandeau in UCS is difficult to predict. This study evaluates the biomechanics of the orbital bandeau using different patterns and varying characteristics of inner cortical bone layer osteotomies in a finite element (FE) analysis. An FE model was created using the computed tomography (CT) scan of a 6.5-month-old male infant with a right-sided UCS. The unaffected side of the orbital bandeau was virtually mirrored, and anatomical correction of the orbital bandeau was simulated. Different combinations of osteotomy patterns, numbers, depths, and widths were examined (n = 48) and compared to an uncut model. Reaction forces and maximum stress values differed significantly (p < 0.01) among osteotomy patterns and between each osteotomy characteristic. Regardless of the osteotomy pattern, higher numbers of osteotomies significantly (p < 0.05) correlated with reductions in reaction force and maximum stress. An X-shaped configuration with three osteotomies deep and wide to the bone was biomechanically the most favorable model. Inner cortical bone layer osteotomy might be an effective modification to the conventional FOA approach in terms of predictable shaping of the orbital bandeau.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Surgical correction of unicoronal craniosynostosis (UCS) is highly complex due to its asymmetric appearance. Although fronto-orbital advancement (FOA) is a versatile technique for craniosynostosis correction, harmonization of the orbital bandeau in UCS is difficult to predict. This study evaluates the biomechanics of the orbital bandeau using different patterns and varying characteristics of inner cortical bone layer osteotomies in a finite element (FE) analysis.
METHOD METHODS
An FE model was created using the computed tomography (CT) scan of a 6.5-month-old male infant with a right-sided UCS. The unaffected side of the orbital bandeau was virtually mirrored, and anatomical correction of the orbital bandeau was simulated. Different combinations of osteotomy patterns, numbers, depths, and widths were examined (n = 48) and compared to an uncut model.
RESULTS RESULTS
Reaction forces and maximum stress values differed significantly (p < 0.01) among osteotomy patterns and between each osteotomy characteristic. Regardless of the osteotomy pattern, higher numbers of osteotomies significantly (p < 0.05) correlated with reductions in reaction force and maximum stress. An X-shaped configuration with three osteotomies deep and wide to the bone was biomechanically the most favorable model.
CONCLUSION CONCLUSIONS
Inner cortical bone layer osteotomy might be an effective modification to the conventional FOA approach in terms of predictable shaping of the orbital bandeau.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38943904
pii: S1751-6161(24)00267-4
doi: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2024.106635
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

106635

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Auteurs

Philipp Winnand (P)

Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Pauwelsstraße 30, D-52074, Aachen, Germany. Electronic address: pwinnand@ukaachen.de.

Ezgi Cevik (E)

Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Pauwelsstraße 30, D-52074, Aachen, Germany. Electronic address: ezgi.cevik@rwth-aachen.de.

Mark Ooms (M)

Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Pauwelsstraße 30, D-52074, Aachen, Germany. Electronic address: mooms@ukaachen.de.

Marius Heitzer (M)

Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Pauwelsstraße 30, D-52074, Aachen, Germany. Electronic address: mheitzer@ukaachen.de.

Anna Bock (A)

Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Pauwelsstraße 30, D-52074, Aachen, Germany. Electronic address: abock@ukaachen.de.

Frank Hölzle (F)

Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Pauwelsstraße 30, D-52074, Aachen, Germany. Electronic address: fhoelzle@ukaachen.de.

Ali Modabber (A)

Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Pauwelsstraße 30, D-52074, Aachen, Germany. Electronic address: amodabber@ukaachen.de.

Stefan Raith (S)

Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Pauwelsstraße 30, D-52074, Aachen, Germany. Electronic address: sraith@ukaachen.de.

Classifications MeSH