Comparison of sucrose and maltose as reinforcers in an operant choice paradigmṅ.

concentration/effect relation maltose multiplicative hyperbolic model reinforcer value sucrose

Journal

Behavioural processes
ISSN: 1872-8308
Titre abrégé: Behav Processes
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 7703854

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
27 Jun 2024
Historique:
received: 10 05 2024
accepted: 24 06 2024
medline: 30 6 2024
pubmed: 30 6 2024
entrez: 29 6 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

Two experiments compared the reinforcing effects of sucrose and maltose across a range of concentrations. The results were interpreted using the Multiplicative Hyperbolic Model of reinforcer value (MHM). In Experiment 1, rats were exposed to a discrete-trials schedule in which they chose between the test compound (sucrose or maltose) and a standard sucrose solution (0.4M, delivered after a 4-s delay). Percentage choice of each test compound increased as a function of concentration. The maximum percentage choice of maltose was significantly less than that of sucrose; the concentration corresponding to the half-maximal selection of the test compound was lower for maltose than for sucrose. In Experiment 2 the preference function for sucrose alone was compared with the preference function for a sucrose solution to which a fixed concentration of maltose had been added. The presence of maltose elevated the function and shifted it leftwards (i.e. towards lower concentrations). The results were interpreted in terms of MHM using two alterntive models 'borrowed' from classical pharmacological receptor theory. It was concluded that maltose and sucrose are not fully substitutable reinforcers and that the reinforcing effect of maltose may be mediated by an action at more than one species of sweet taste receptor. (200 words).

Identifiants

pubmed: 38944130
pii: S0376-6357(24)00090-1
doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2024.105075
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

105075

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier B.V.

Auteurs

C M Bradshaw (CM)

Division of Psychiatry and Applied Psychology, University of Nottingham, UK. Electronic address: c.m.bradshaw@hotmail.co.uk.

Classifications MeSH