Clinical impact of an Enhanced Recovery Protocol implementation for nephrectomy and radical prostatectomy.
Durée moyenne de séjour
Enhanced recovery after surgery
Length of stay
Nephrectomy
Néphrectomie
Prostatectomie
Radical prostatectomy
Réhabilitation accélérée après chirurgie
Journal
The French journal of urology
ISSN: 2950-3930
Titre abrégé: Fr J Urol
Pays: France
ID NLM: 9918752079106676
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
27 Jun 2024
27 Jun 2024
Historique:
received:
19
01
2024
revised:
19
06
2024
accepted:
20
06
2024
medline:
30
6
2024
pubmed:
30
6
2024
entrez:
29
6
2024
Statut:
aheadofprint
Résumé
Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) is a combination of multimodal pathways to improve surgical outcomes. Recommendations for radical cystectomy have been published by the ERAS society for the cystectomy but a lack of evidence is observed for urological procedures such as nephrectomy (Ne) and radical prostatectomy (RP). The aim of our study was to evaluate the impact of enhanced recovery protocol implementation for Ne ad RP at our academic institution. We performed a retrospective, monocentric, comparative analysis, pre and post implementation of an enhanced recovery protocol for patients undergoing robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy or nephrectomy (partial or total) for cancer. The primary endpoint was the mean length of stay (LOS). Secondary endpoints included 30-days readmission, postoperative complications, 90 days survival, and oncologic outcome at 6 months. We included 264 patients between January, 2019, and December, 2020. Statistical analysis was performed separately by type of surgery. The LOS of patients included in the ERP protocol was decreased on average by 1,3 days IC95% [ -2.50; -0.08], p<0.001 for nephrectomies and by 2.2 days IC95% [-3.72; -0.62] p<0.001 for prostatectomies, compared to non-ERP patients. There were no more re-admisson, death or oncologic recurrence. In our experience, ERP for oncological nephrectomy and prostatectomy reduced the length of stay, without increasing postoperative complications and readmission.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) is a combination of multimodal pathways to improve surgical outcomes. Recommendations for radical cystectomy have been published by the ERAS society for the cystectomy but a lack of evidence is observed for urological procedures such as nephrectomy (Ne) and radical prostatectomy (RP). The aim of our study was to evaluate the impact of enhanced recovery protocol implementation for Ne ad RP at our academic institution.
METHODS
METHODS
We performed a retrospective, monocentric, comparative analysis, pre and post implementation of an enhanced recovery protocol for patients undergoing robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy or nephrectomy (partial or total) for cancer. The primary endpoint was the mean length of stay (LOS). Secondary endpoints included 30-days readmission, postoperative complications, 90 days survival, and oncologic outcome at 6 months.
RESULTS
RESULTS
We included 264 patients between January, 2019, and December, 2020. Statistical analysis was performed separately by type of surgery. The LOS of patients included in the ERP protocol was decreased on average by 1,3 days IC95% [ -2.50; -0.08], p<0.001 for nephrectomies and by 2.2 days IC95% [-3.72; -0.62] p<0.001 for prostatectomies, compared to non-ERP patients. There were no more re-admisson, death or oncologic recurrence.
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
In our experience, ERP for oncological nephrectomy and prostatectomy reduced the length of stay, without increasing postoperative complications and readmission.
Identifiants
pubmed: 38944244
pii: S2950-3930(24)00131-1
doi: 10.1016/j.fjurol.2024.102674
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
102674Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS.