The role of length of oral resection margin and survival in esophageal cancer surgery after neoadjuvant therapy: A retrospective propensity score-matched study.


Journal

Surgery
ISSN: 1532-7361
Titre abrégé: Surgery
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0417347

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
28 Jun 2024
Historique:
received: 07 03 2024
revised: 05 04 2024
accepted: 27 04 2024
medline: 30 6 2024
pubmed: 30 6 2024
entrez: 29 6 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

Multimodal therapy regimens became the standard of care for patients with esophageal cancer, whereas surgical resection remains at the center of curative treatment modalities. Current guidelines provide no recommendations on the extent of the oral resection margin, especially in the era of neoadjuvant therapy. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the relationship between the oral tumor-free resection margin and overall survival. Retrospective study with 382 1:1 propensity-matched patients out of 660 patients, operated between 2013 and 2019, with an Ivor-Lewis-esophagectomy for adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus or esophagogastric junction after neoadjuvant therapy. Independent pathologists measured the oral resection margin after formalin fixation. The mean oral tumor-free resection margin was 37.2 ± 0.6 mm. The ideal cut-off for survival differences was determined for 33 mm. Patients with an oral resection margin of more than 33 mm had a better median overall survival (≤33 mm: 45.0 months, 95% confidence interval: 22.4-67.6 months, >33 mm: not reached, P = .005). An oral resection margin of more than 33 mm proved to be an independent favorable prognostic factor for patients' overall survival in multivariate Cox regression analyses (P = .049). This study analyzed a patient cohort retrospectively after curative intended Ivor-Lewis-esophagectomy after neoadjuvant therapy. An oral resection margin of more than 33 mm is a factor for improved overall survival. Therefore, a minimum resection margin of 34 mm after fixation could be suggested.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Multimodal therapy regimens became the standard of care for patients with esophageal cancer, whereas surgical resection remains at the center of curative treatment modalities. Current guidelines provide no recommendations on the extent of the oral resection margin, especially in the era of neoadjuvant therapy. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the relationship between the oral tumor-free resection margin and overall survival.
METHODS METHODS
Retrospective study with 382 1:1 propensity-matched patients out of 660 patients, operated between 2013 and 2019, with an Ivor-Lewis-esophagectomy for adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus or esophagogastric junction after neoadjuvant therapy. Independent pathologists measured the oral resection margin after formalin fixation.
RESULTS RESULTS
The mean oral tumor-free resection margin was 37.2 ± 0.6 mm. The ideal cut-off for survival differences was determined for 33 mm. Patients with an oral resection margin of more than 33 mm had a better median overall survival (≤33 mm: 45.0 months, 95% confidence interval: 22.4-67.6 months, >33 mm: not reached, P = .005). An oral resection margin of more than 33 mm proved to be an independent favorable prognostic factor for patients' overall survival in multivariate Cox regression analyses (P = .049).
CONCLUSION CONCLUSIONS
This study analyzed a patient cohort retrospectively after curative intended Ivor-Lewis-esophagectomy after neoadjuvant therapy. An oral resection margin of more than 33 mm is a factor for improved overall survival. Therefore, a minimum resection margin of 34 mm after fixation could be suggested.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38944588
pii: S0039-6060(24)00292-7
doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2024.04.037
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Auteurs

Karl Knipper (K)

Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital of Cologne, Department of General, Visceral and Cancer Surgery, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.

Jin-On Jung (JO)

Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital of Cologne, Department of General, Visceral and Cancer Surgery, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.

Jennifer Straatman (J)

Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital of Cologne, Department of General, Visceral and Cancer Surgery, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.

Stefanie Brunner (S)

Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital of Cologne, Department of General, Visceral and Cancer Surgery, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.

Naita M Wirsik (NM)

Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital of Cologne, Department of General, Visceral and Cancer Surgery, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.

Su Ir Lyu (SI)

Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital of Cologne, Institute of Pathology, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.

Hans F Fuchs (HF)

Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital of Cologne, Department of General, Visceral and Cancer Surgery, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.

Florian Gebauer (F)

Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital of Cologne, Department of General, Visceral and Cancer Surgery, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.

Wolfgang Schröder (W)

Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital of Cologne, Department of General, Visceral and Cancer Surgery, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.

Hans A Schlößer (HA)

Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital of Cologne, Department of General, Visceral and Cancer Surgery, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.

Alexander Quaas (A)

Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital of Cologne, Institute of Pathology, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.

Christiane J Bruns (CJ)

Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital of Cologne, Department of General, Visceral and Cancer Surgery, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.

Thomas Schmidt (T)

Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital of Cologne, Department of General, Visceral and Cancer Surgery, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany. Electronic address: thomas.schmidt1@uk-koeln.de.

Classifications MeSH