An evaluation of antagonist enamel wear opposing full-coverage zirconia crowns versus other ceramics full-coverage crowns and natural enamel - An umbrella review.
Journal
Journal of Indian Prosthodontic Society
ISSN: 1998-4057
Titre abrégé: J Indian Prosthodont Soc
Pays: India
ID NLM: 101255941
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 Jul 2024
01 Jul 2024
Historique:
received:
31
01
2024
accepted:
09
04
2024
medline:
1
7
2024
pubmed:
1
7
2024
entrez:
1
7
2024
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The aim of this umbrella review was to systematically review the systematic reviews on antagonist enamel wear opposing zirconia crowns compared to other ceramics and natural enamel. This was an umbrella review following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. An electronic search of PubMed, Cochrane Central, EBSCOhost, and Google Scholar search engines for articles published from January 1, 2013, to January 1, 2023, was conducted using keywords "enamel wear," "zirconia," "feldspathic," "dental ceramics," and "Y-TZP" to identify systematic reviews on antagonist enamel wear opposing zirconia crowns compared to other ceramics and natural enamel. Qualitative analysis. A total of 86 articles were obtained through electronic search, of which four articles were selected after abstract screening that met the inclusion criteria for evaluating antagonist enamel wear. As compared to feldspathic groups, zirconia had substantially less antagonist wear, while surface polishing exhibited less enamel wear than glazing. Because of the heterogeneity in study design, measurement methods, and outcome variables, a meta-analysis was not possible. Over time, the opposing enamel wear caused by polished monolithic zirconia will be either equal to or less than that of natural enamel wear. Polished monolithic zirconia also maintains lower values of enamel wear compared to metal ceramics, feldspathic porcelains, and lithium disilicate.
Identifiants
pubmed: 38946503
doi: 10.4103/jips.jips_32_24
pii: 00660762-202424030-00002
doi:
Substances chimiques
Zirconium
C6V6S92N3C
zirconium oxide
S38N85C5G0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Systematic Review
Review
Comparative Study
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
217-224Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2024 Copyright: © 2024 The Journal of Indian Prosthodontic Society.
Références
Mahalick JA, Knap FJ, Weiter EJ. Occusal wear in prosthodontics. J Am Dent Assoc 1971;82:154-9.
Lambrechts P, Braem M, Vuylsteke-Wauters M, Vanherle G. Quantitative in vivo wear of human enamel. J Dent Res 1989;68:1752-4.
Lambrechts P, Braem M, Vanherle G. Buonocore memorial lecture. Evaluation of clinical performance for posterior composite resins and dentin adhesives. Oper Dent 1987;12:53-78.
Monasky GE, Taylor DF. Studies on the wear of porcelain, enamel, and gold. J Prosthet Dent 1971;25:299-306.
Jacobi R, Shillingburg HT Jr., Duncanson MG Jr. A comparison of the abrasiveness of six ceramic surfaces and gold. J Prosthet Dent 1991;66:303-9.
Silva NR, Thompson VP, Valverde GB, Coelho PG, Powers JM, Farah JW, et al. Comparative reliability analyses of zirconium oxide and lithium disilicate restorations in vitro and in vivo . J Am Dent Assoc 2011;142 Suppl 2:4S-9S.
DeLong R, Sasik C, Pintado MR, Douglas WH. The wear of enamel when opposed by ceramic systems. Dent Mater 1989;5:266-71.
Schuh C, Kinast EJ, Mezzomo E, Kapczinski MP. Effect of glazed and polished surface finishes on the friction coefficient of two low-fusing ceramics. J Prosthet Dent 2005;93:245-52.
Albakry M, Guazzato M, Swain MV. Fracture toughness and hardness evaluation of three pressable all-ceramic dental materials. J Dent 2003;31:181-8.
Chen YM, Smales RJ, Yip KH, Sung WJ. Translucency and biaxial flexural strength of four ceramic core materials. Dent Mater 2008;24:1506-11.
Beuer F, Schweiger J, Eichberger M, Kappert HF, Gernet W, Edelhoff D. High-strength CAD/CAM-fabricated veneering material sintered to zirconia copings – A new fabrication mode for all-ceramic restorations. Dent Mater 2009;25:121-8.
Nazirkar GS, Patil SV, Shelke PP, Mahagaonkar P. Comparative evaluation of natural enamel wear against polished yitrium tetragonal zirconia and polished lithium disilicate – An in vivo study. J Indian Prosthodont Soc 2020;20:83-9.
Esquivel-Upshaw JF, Kim MJ, Hsu SM, Abdulhameed N, Jenkins R, Neal D, et al. Randomized clinical study of wear of enamel antagonists against polished monolithic zirconia crowns. J Dent 2018;68:19-27.
Mundhe K, Jain V, Pruthi G, Shah N. Clinical study to evaluate the wear of natural enamel antagonist to zirconia and metal ceramic crowns. J Prosthet Dent 2015;114:358-63.
Rupawala A, Musani SI, Madanshetty P, Dugal R, Shah UD, Sheth EJ. A study on the wear of enamel caused by monolithic zirconia and the subsequent phase transformation compared to two other ceramic systems. J Indian Prosthodont Soc 2017;17:8-14.
Lee A, Swain M, He L, Lyons K. Wear behavior of human enamel against lithium disilicate glass ceramic and type III gold. J Prosthet Dent 2014;112:1399-405.
Solá-Ruíz MF, Baima-Moscardó A, Selva-Otaolaurruchi E, Montiel-Company JM, Agustín-Panadero R, Fons-Badal C, et al. Wear in antagonist teeth produced by monolithic zirconia crowns: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Med 2020;9:997.
León Velastegui M, Montiel-Company JM, Agustín-Panadero R, Fons-Badal C, Solá-Ruíz MF. Enamel wear of antagonist tooth caused by dental ceramics: Systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Med 2022;11:6547.
Hmaidouch R, Weigl P. Tooth wear against ceramic crowns in posterior region: A systematic literature review. Int J Oral Sci 2013;5:183-90.
Gou M, Chen H, Kang J, Wang H. Antagonist enamel wear of tooth-supported monolithic zirconia posterior crowns in vivo : A systematic review. J Prosthet Dent 2019;121:598-603.
McHugh ML. Interrater reliability: The kappa statistic. Biochem Med (Zagreb) 2012;22:276-82.
Shea BJ, Reeves BC, Wells G, Thuku M, Hamel C, Moran J, et al. AMSTAR 2: A critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both. BMJ 2017;358:j4008.
Passos SP, Torrealba Y, Major P, Linke B, Flores-Mir C, Nychka JA. In vitro wear behavior of zirconia opposing enamel: A systematic review. J Prosthodont 2014;23:593-601.
Aljomard YR, Altunok EÇ, Kara HB. Enamel wear against monolithic zirconia restorations: A meta-analysis and systematic review of in vitro studies. J Esthet Restor Dent 2022;34:473-89.
Ghaffari T, Rad FH, Goftari A, Pashazadeh F, Ataei K. Natural teeth wear opposite to glazed and polished ceramic crowns: A systematic review. Dent Res J (Isfahan) 2022;19:108.