Do Birth Outcomes Predicted by Occipital Position Inform Definitions of Occiput Posterior and Occiput Transverse?

adverse birth outcomes birth injuries fetal and obstetric outcomes fetal head position forceps-assisted birth human birth labour and delivery spontaneous vaginal birth vaginal birth ventouse-assisted birth

Journal

Cureus
ISSN: 2168-8184
Titre abrégé: Cureus
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101596737

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
May 2024
Historique:
accepted: 30 05 2024
medline: 1 7 2024
pubmed: 1 7 2024
entrez: 1 7 2024
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Fetal head position significantly influences birth outcomes, with higher rates of complications observed when the fetal head is in the Occiput Posterior (OP) position compared to Occiput Transverse (OT) or Occiput Anterior (OA) positions. There is no consensus in the current literature on the precise rotational point at which the fetal occiput shifts from posterior to transverse, reducing clarity in both scientific and clinical communication. Different studies employ varying definitions of these positions, which affects management decisions. This study aims to determine if a definable threshold exists between the directly posterior and directly transverse positions that correlates with different birth outcomes, thereby proposing a consistent and clinically useful definition for OP versus OT. We analyzed ultrasound data from 570 patients at full dilatation from five previous studies, correlating the angle of the fetal occiput (noted on a clock-face) with birth outcomes. Adverse outcomes were defined as cesarean delivery, instrumental vaginal delivery, significant postpartum hemorrhage (500 ml or more), obstetric anal sphincter injury, five-minute Apgar scores <7, arterial cord pH <7, base excess less than -12, or neonatal intensive care unit admission. The analysis was conducted using SAS version 9.4. The study found a continuous relationship between the fetal occipital angle and adverse birth outcomes without a distinct threshold separating OP from OT positions. No clear inflection point was demonstrated in pregnancy outcomes between OT and OP. The relationship between the angle of occiput position and pregnancy outcomes was continuous: the closer the fetal head was to directly OP, the higher the likelihood of adverse outcomes. Given the lack of a clear cut-off and to improve consistency in future research, we recommend dividing the occiput position into four quadrants of 90 degrees each. This classification could standardize reporting and potentially improve clinical decision-making regarding fetal position during labor.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38947718
doi: 10.7759/cureus.61358
pmc: PMC11214332
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Review

Langues

eng

Pagination

e61358

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2024, Pardey et al.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Conflicts of interest: In compliance with the ICMJE uniform disclosure form, all authors declare the following: Payment/services info: All authors have declared that no financial support was received from any organization for the submitted work. Financial relationships: All authors have declared that they have no financial relationships at present or within the previous three years with any organizations that might have an interest in the submitted work. Other relationships: All authors have declared that there are no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work.

Auteurs

Angela J Pardey (AJ)

Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, AUS.

Hala Phipps (H)

Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Sydney Institute for Women, Children and Their Families, Sydney Local Health District, Sydney, AUS.

Amanda Eames (A)

Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Tweed Valley Hospital, Northern New South Wales (NSW) Local Health District, Cudgen, AUS.

Jon Hyett (J)

Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Sydney Institute for Women, Children and Their Families, Sydney Local Health District, Sydney, AUS.
Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Western Sydney University, Sydney, AUS.

Sabrina Kuah (S)

Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, The Women's and Children's Hospital, Adelaide, AUS.

Bradley De Vries (B)

Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney Central Clinical School, Sydney, AUS.

Classifications MeSH