Does an untreated peri-implant dehiscence defect affect the progression of peri-implantitis?: A preclinical in vivo experimental study.
animal experiment
dehiscence defect
dental implant
histology
micro‐computed tomography
peri‐implantitis
Journal
Clinical oral implants research
ISSN: 1600-0501
Titre abrégé: Clin Oral Implants Res
Pays: Denmark
ID NLM: 9105713
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 Jul 2024
01 Jul 2024
Historique:
revised:
18
05
2024
received:
01
12
2023
accepted:
18
06
2024
medline:
1
7
2024
pubmed:
1
7
2024
entrez:
1
7
2024
Statut:
aheadofprint
Résumé
To investigate the early impact of plaque accumulation in a buccal dehiscence defect on peri-implant marginal bone resorption. In six male Mongrel dogs, four dental implants were placed in the posterior maxilla on both sides (two implants per side). Based on the group allocation, each implant was randomly assigned to one of the following four groups to decide whether buccal dehiscence defect was prepared and whether silk ligation was applied at 8 weeks post-implant placement for peri-implantitis induction: UC (no defect without ligation); UD (defect without ligation); LC (no defect with ligation); and LD (defect with ligation) groups. Eight weeks after disease induction, the outcomes from radiographic and histologic analyses were statistically analyzed (p < .05). Based on radiographs, the exposed area of implant threads was smallest in group UC (p < .0083). Based on histology, both the distances from the implant platform to the first bone-to-implant contact point and to the bone crest were significantly longer in the LD group (p < .0083). In the UD group, some spontaneous bone fill occurred from the base of the defect at 8 weeks after implant placement. The apical extension of inflammatory cell infiltrate was significantly more prominent in the LD and LC groups compared to the UC group (p < .0083). Plaque accumulated on the exposed implant surface had a negative impact on maintaining the peri-implant marginal bone level, especially when there was a dehiscence defect around the implant.
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Informations de copyright
© 2024 The Author(s). Clinical Oral Implants Research published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Références
Abrahamsson, I., Berglundh, T., Linder, E., Lang, N. P., & Lindhe, J. (2004). Early bone formation adjacent to rough and turned endosseous implant surfaces. An experimental study in the dog. Clinical Oral Implants Research, 15(4), 381–392. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600‐0501.2004.01082.x
Adell, R., Lekholm, U., Brånemark, P. I., Lindhe, J., Rockler, B., Eriksson, B., Lindvall, A. M. Yoneyama, T., & Sbordone, L. (1985). Marginal tissue reactions at osseointegrated titanium fixtures. Swedish Dental Journal, 28, 175–181.
Adell, R., Lekholm, U., Rockler, B., & Brånemark, P. I. (1981). A 15‐year study of osseointegrated implants in the treatment of the edentulous jaw. International Journal of Oral Surgery, 10(6), 387–416. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0300‐9785(81)80077‐4
Albrektsson, T., Zarb, G., Worthington, P., & Eriksson, A. R. (1986). The long‐term efficacy of currently used dental implants: A review and proposed criteria of success. The International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants, 1(1), 11–25.
Benic, G. I., Bienz, S. P., Song, Y. W., Cha, J. K., Hämmerle, C. H. F., Jung, U. W., & Jung, R. E. (2022). Randomized controlled clinical trial comparing guided bone regeneration of peri‐implant defects with soft‐type block versus particulate bone substitutes: Six‐month results of hard‐tissue changes. Journal of Clinical Periodontology, 49, 480–495. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpe.13606
Benic, G. I., & Hämmerle, C. H. (2014). Horizontal bone augmentation by means of guided bone regeneration. Periodontology 2000, 66(1), 13–40. https://doi.org/10.1111/prd.12039
Carcuac, O., Abrahamsson, I., Derks, J., Petzold, M., & Berglundh, T. (2020). Spontaneous progression of experimental peri‐implantitis in augmented and pristine bone: A pre‐clinical in vivo study. Clinical Oral Implants Research, 31(2), 192–200. https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.13564
Chiapasco, M., & Casentini, P. (2018). Horizontal bone‐augmentation procedures in implant dentistry: Prosthetically guided regeneration. Periodontology 2000, 77(1), 213–240. https://doi.org/10.1111/prd.12219
Coli, P., & Jemt, T. (2021). On marginal bone level changes around dental implants. Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research, 23(2), 159–169. https://doi.org/10.1111/cid.12970
Fickl, S., Kebschull, M., Calvo‐Guirado, J. L., Hürzeler, M., & Zuhr, O. (2015). Experimental Peri‐Implantitis around different types of implants – a clinical and radiographic study in dogs. Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research, 17(Suppl 2), e661–e669. https://doi.org/10.1111/cid.12303
Galindo‐Moreno, P., León‐Cano, A., Ortega‐Oller, I., Monje, A., & Catena, A. (2015). Marginal bone loss as success criterion in implant dentistry: Beyond 2 mm. Clinical Oral Implants Research, 26(4), e28–e34. https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.12324
Hämmerle, C. H., & Karring, T. (1998). Guided bone regeneration at oral implant sites. Periodontology 2000, 2000(17), 151–175. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600‐0757.1998.tb00132.x
Ivanovski, S., & Lee, R. (2018). Comparison of peri‐implant and periodontal marginal soft tissues in health and disease. Periodontology 2000, 76(1), 116–130. https://doi.org/10.1111/prd.12150
Jensen, S. S., Aghaloo, T., Jung, R. E., Bertl, K., Buser, D., Chappuis, V., de Stavola, L., Monje, A., Pispero, A., Roccuzzo, A., Shahdad, S., Stefanini, M., Tavelli, L., Wang, H.L., & Zucchelli, G. (2023). Group 1 ITI consensus report: The role of bone dimensions and soft tissue augmentation procedures on the stability of clinical, radiographic, and patient‐reported outcomes of implant treatment. Clinical Oral Implants Research, 34(Suppl 26), 43–49. https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.14154
Jung, R. E., Herzog, M., Wolleb, K., Ramel, C. F., Thoma, D. S., & Hämmerle, C. H. (2017). A randomized controlled clinical trial comparing small buccal dehiscence defects around dental implants treated with guided bone regeneration or left for spontaneous healing. Clinical Oral Implants Research, 28(3), 348–354. https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.12806
Kilkenny, C., Browne, W., Cuthill, I. C., Emerson, M., & Altman, D. G. (2010). Animal research: Reporting in vivo experiments: The ARRIVE guidelines. British Journal of Pharmacology, 160(7), 1577–1579. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1476‐5381.2010.00872.x
Lindhe, J., Berglundh, T., Ericsson, I., Liljenberg, B., & Marinello, C. (1992). Experimental breakdown of peri‐implant and periodontal tissues. A study in the beagle dog. Clinical Oral Implants Research, 3(1), 9–16. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600‐0501.1992.030102.x
Merheb, J., Quirynen, M., & Teughels, W. (2014). Critical buccal bone dimensions along implants. Periodontology 2000, 66(1), 97–105. https://doi.org/10.1111/prd.12042
Misch, C. E., Perel, M. L., Wang, H. L., Sammartino, G., Galindo‐Moreno, P., Trisi, P., Steigmann, M., Rebaudi, A., Palti, A., Pikos, M.A., Schwartz‐Arad, D., Choukroun, J., Gutierrez‐Perez, J.L., Marenzi, G., & Valavanis, D. K. (2008). Implant success, survival, and failure: The international congress of Oral Implantologists (ICOI) Pisa Consensus conference. Implant Dentistry, 17(1), 5–15. https://doi.org/10.1097/ID.0b013e3181676059
Monje, A., Chappuis, V., Monje, F., Muñoz, F., Wang, H. L., Urban, I. A., & Buser, D. (2019). The critical Peri‐implant buccal Bone Wall thickness revisited: An experimental study in the beagle dog. The International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants, 34(6), 1328–1336. https://doi.org/10.11607/jomi.7657
Monje, A., Galindo‐Moreno, P., Tözüm, T. F., Suárez‐López del Amo, F., & Wang, H. L. (2016). Into the paradigm of local factors as contributors for Peri‐implant disease: Short communication. The International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants, 31(2), 288–292. https://doi.org/10.11607/jomi.4265
Monje, A., Roccuzzo, A., Buser, D., & Wang, H. L. (2023). Influence of buccal bone wall thickness on the peri‐implant hard and soft tissue dimensional changes: A systematic review. Clinical Oral Implants Research, 34(3), 157–176. https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.14029
Palmer, R. M., Floyd, P. D., Palmer, P. J., Smith, B. J., Johansson, C. B., & Albrektsson, T. (1994). Healing of implant dehiscence defects with and without expanded polytetrafluoroethylene membranes: A controlled clinical and histological study. Clinical Oral Implants Research, 5(2), 98–104. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600‐0501.1994.050206.x
Papaspyridakos, P., Chen, C. J., Singh, M., Weber, H. P., & Gallucci, G. O. (2012). Success criteria in implant dentistry: A systematic review. Journal of Dental Research, 91(3), 242–248. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022034511431252
Park, S. Y., Kim, K. H., Rhee, S. H., Lee, J. C., Shin, S. Y., Lee, Y. M., & Seol, Y. J. (2017). An immediate peri‐implantitis induction model to study regenerative peri‐implantitis treatments. Clinical Oral Implants Research, 28(1), 36–42. https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.12611
Rasmusson, L., Meredith, N., & Sennerby, L. (1997). Measurements of stability changes of titanium implants with exposed threads subjected to barrier membrane induced bone augmentation. An experimental study in the rabbit tibia. Clinical Oral Implants Research, 8(4), 316–322. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600‐0501.1997.080410.x
Schwarz, F., Herten, M., Sager, M., Wieland, M., Dard, M., & Becker, J. (2007). Bone regeneration in dehiscence‐type defects at chemically modified (SLActive) and conventional SLA titanium implants: A pilot study in dogs. Journal of Clinical Periodontology, 34(1), 78–86. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600‐051X.2006.01008.x
Schwarz, F., Sager, M., Ferrari, D., Herten, M., Wieland, M., & Becker, J. (2008). Bone regeneration in dehiscence‐type defects at non‐submerged and submerged chemically modified (SLActive) and conventional SLA titanium implants: An immunohistochemical study in dogs. Journal of Clinical Periodontology, 35(1), 64–75. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600‐051X.2007.01159.x
Schwarz, F., Sahm, N., & Becker, J. (2012). Impact of the outcome of guided bone regeneration in dehiscence‐type defects on the long‐term stability of peri‐implant health: Clinical observations at 4 years. Clinical Oral Implants Research, 23(2), 191–196. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600‐0501.2011.02214.x
Sculean, A., Stavropoulos, A., & Bosshardt, D. D. (2019). Self‐regenerative capacity of intra‐oral bone defects. Journal of Clinical Periodontology, 46(Suppl 21), 70–81. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpe.13075
Song, Y. W., Jung, H. J., An, Y. Z., Jung, U. W., & Lee, J. S. (2021). Addition of autogenous bone chips to deproteinized bovine bone mineral does not have additional benefit in lateral ridge augmentation‐a preclinical in vivo experimental study. Clinical Oral Implants Research, 32(9), 1105–1114. https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.13805
Song, Y. W., Maekawa, S., Sasaki, K., Yoshida, D., Nagai, M., Ishikawa‐Nagai, S., Da Silva, J., Kim, D. M., & Chen, C. Y. (2023). Microscopic in‐situ analysis of the mucosal healing around implants treated by protease activated receptor 4‐agonist peptide or perpendicularly protruded type I collagen in rats. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research. Part B, Applied Biomaterials, 112, e35330. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.b.35330
Song, Y. W., Paeng, K. W., Kim, M. J., Cha, J. K., Jung, U. W., Jung, R. E., & Thoma, D. S. (2021). Secondary stability achieved in dental implants with a calcium‐coated sandblasted, large‐grit, acid‐etched (SLA) surface and a chemically modified SLA surface placed without mechanical engagement: A preclinical study. Clinical Oral Implants Research, 32(12), 1474–1483. https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.13848
Spray, J. R., Black, C. G., Morris, H. F., & Ochi, S. (2000). The influence of bone thickness on facial marginal bone response: Stage 1 placement through stage 2 uncovering. Annals of Periodontology, 5(1), 119–128. https://doi.org/10.1902/annals.2000.5.1.119
Waller, T., Herzog, M., Thoma, D. S., Hüsler, J., Hämmerle, C. H. F., & Jung, R. E. (2020). Long‐term clinical and radiographic results after treatment or no treatment of small buccal bone dehiscences at posterior dental implants: A randomized, controlled clinical trial. Clinical Oral Implants Research, 31(6), 517–525. https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.13588
Yoon, S. W., Kim, M. J., Paeng, K. W., Yu, K. A., Lee, C. K., Song, Y. W., Cha, J. K., & Jung, U. W. (2020a). Efficacy of local minocycline agents in treating Peri‐Implantitis: An experimental in vivo study in beagle dogs. Pharmaceutics, 12(11), 1016. https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics12111016
Yoon, S. W., Kim, M. J., Paeng, K. W., Yu, K. A., Lee, C. K., Song, Y. W., Cha, J.K., Sanz, M., & Jung, U. W. (2020b). Locally applied slow‐release of minocycline microspheres in the treatment of Peri‐implant Mucositis: An experimental in vivo study. Pharmaceutics, 12(7), 668. https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics12070668
Zuercher, A. N., Strauss, F. J., Paqué, P. N., Bienz, S. P., Jung, R. E., & Thoma, D. S. (2023). Randomized controlled pilot study comparing small buccal defects around dental implants treated with a subepithelial connective tissue graft or with guided bone regeneration. Clinical Oral Implants Research, 34, 1094–1105. https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.14140