Biomechanical characterization of cadaveric brachial plexus regions using uniaxial tensile tests.

Biomechanics Brachial plexus Peripheral nerves Stretch injury Tensile test

Journal

Hand surgery & rehabilitation
ISSN: 2468-1210
Titre abrégé: Hand Surg Rehabil
Pays: France
ID NLM: 101681801

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
29 Jun 2024
Historique:
received: 02 04 2024
revised: 03 06 2024
accepted: 04 06 2024
medline: 2 7 2024
pubmed: 2 7 2024
entrez: 1 7 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

The proximal regions of the brachial plexus (roots, trunks) are more susceptible to permanent damage due to stretch injuries than the distal regions (cords, terminal branches). A better description of brachial plexus mechanical behavior is necessary to better understand deformation mechanisms in stretch injury. The purpose of this study was to model the biomechanical behavior of each portion of the brachial plexus (roots, trunks, cords, peripheral nerves) in a cadaveric model and report differences in elastic modulus, maximum stress and maximum strain. Eight cadaveric plexi, divided into 47 segments according to regions of interest, underwent cyclical uniaxial tensile tests, using a BOSE® Electroforce® 3330 and INSTRON® 5969 material testing machines, to obtain the stress and strain histories of each specimen. Maximum stress, maximum strain and elastic modulus were extracted from the load-displacement and stress-strain curves. Statistical analyses used 1-way ANOVA with post-hoc Tukey HSD (Honestly Significant Difference) and Mann-Whitney tests. Mean elastic modulus was 8.65 MPa for roots, 8.82 MPa for trunks, 22.44 MPa for cords, and 26.43 MPa for peripheral nerves. Differences in elastic modulus and in maximum stress were statistically significant (p < 0.001) between proximal (roots, trunks) and distal (cords, peripheral nerves) specimens. Proximal structures demonstrated significantly smaller elastic modulus and maximum stress than distal structures. These data confirm the greater fragility of proximal regions of the brachial plexus.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38950883
pii: S2468-1229(24)00162-2
doi: 10.1016/j.hansur.2024.101747
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

101747

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS.

Auteurs

Anne C Perruisseau-Carrier (AC)

ICube, Université de Strasbourg, UMR CNRS 7357, 67000 Strasbourg, France; Hand Surgery, Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery, Grenoble University Hospital, 38000 Grenoble, France. Electronic address: aperruisseau@gmail.com.

Yann Marco (Y)

IRDL (Institut de Recherche Dupuy de Lôme), UMR CNRS 6027, ENSTA Bretagne, Brest, France.

Vadim Fleury (V)

IRDL (Institut de Recherche Dupuy de Lôme), UMR CNRS 6027, ENSTA Bretagne, Brest, France.

Hamdi Jmal (H)

ICube, Université de Strasbourg, UMR CNRS 7357, 67000 Strasbourg, France.

David M Brogan (DM)

Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, United States.

Alexandra Forli (A)

Hand Surgery, Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery, Grenoble University Hospital, 38000 Grenoble, France.

Nadia Bahlouli (N)

ICube, Université de Strasbourg, UMR CNRS 7357, 67000 Strasbourg, France.

Classifications MeSH