Accuracy of a novel method for IOP measurement without applying pressure on the cornea.
Device
Intraocular pressure
Non touch
Journal
International ophthalmology
ISSN: 1573-2630
Titre abrégé: Int Ophthalmol
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 7904294
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 Jul 2024
01 Jul 2024
Historique:
received:
29
01
2023
accepted:
16
06
2024
medline:
2
7
2024
pubmed:
2
7
2024
entrez:
1
7
2024
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
To assess the accuracy of a prototype novel instrument for intra ocular pressure (IOP) measurements not involving corneal pressure application. Prospective case control study. An institutional study including 16 healthy volunteers without ocular pathology. IOP in both eyes of the participants was measured four times in different body positions with the novel prototype and reference instrument (Goldmann applanation tonometer (GAT) or iCare (iCare Finland OY, Vantaa, Finland)). IOP results were compared between the prototype and the reference instruments in 116 pairs of measurement. Overall no statistically significant difference was found between the presented prototype and the reference instrument. Stratifying measurements by instrument used revealed no significant difference for GAT and statistical significant (yet clinically insignificant) difference for iCare. The presented prototype demonstrates good clinical agreement of IOP measuring results with reference instruments Further large-scale studies assessing this instrument in glaucoma patients are warranted.
Identifiants
pubmed: 38951418
doi: 10.1007/s10792-024-03213-7
pii: 10.1007/s10792-024-03213-7
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
300Informations de copyright
© 2024. The Author(s).
Références
Leske MC, Heijl A, Hyman L, Bengtsson B, Dong L, Yang Z (2007) EMGT group. Predictors of long-term progression in the early manifest glaucoma trial. Ophthalmology 114(11):1965–1972
doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2007.03.016
pubmed: 17628686
American academy of ophthalmology vision rehabilitation committee, hoskins center for quality eye care. preferred practice pattern® Guidelines. Vision Rehabilitation—2017.American Academy of Ophthalmology; 2017.
Collaborative Normal-Tension Glaucoma Study Group (1998) The effectiveness of intraocular pressure reduction in the treatment of normal-tension glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol 126(4):498–505
doi: 10.1016/S0002-9394(98)00272-4
Basic and clinical science course—American academy of ophthalmology. Section 10- glaucoma chap 2 Intra ocular pressure and aqueous humor dynamics–pp. 26–28.
Liu JH, Zhang X, Kripke DF, Weinreb RN (2003) Twenty-four-Hours intraocular pressure pattern associated with early glaucomatous changes. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 44(4):1586–1590
doi: 10.1167/iovs.02-0666
pubmed: 12657596
Nau CB, Malihi M, McLaren JW, Hodge DO, Sit AJ (2013) Circadian variation of aqueous humor dynamics in older healthy adults. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 54(12):7623–7629
pubmed: 24243986
pmcid: 3832219
Basic and clinical science course—American academy of ophthalmology. Section 10- glaucoma chap 2 Intra ocular pressure and aqueous humor dynamics–pp. 30–33.
Basic and clinical science course—American academy of ophthalmology. Section 10- glaucoma chap 2 intra ocular pressure and aqueous humor dynamics—p. 32
Da Silva F, Lira M (2022) Intraocular pressure measurement: a review. Surv Ophthalmol 67:1319–1331
doi: 10.1016/j.survophthal.2022.03.001
pubmed: 35248558
Demirci G, Karaman Erdur S, Tanriverdi C et al (2019) comparison of rebound tonometry and non contact air puff tonometry. Ther Adv Ophthalmol 11:1–7
Cho P, Lui T (1997) comparison of the performance of the Nidek NT-2000 noncontact tonometer with the Keeler pulsair 2000 and the Goldmann applanation tonometer. Optom Vis Sci 74(1):51–8
doi: 10.1097/00006324-199701000-00020
pubmed: 9148267
Parker VA, Herrtage J, Sarkies NJ (2001) Clinical comparison of the Keeler pulsair 3000 with Goldmann applanation tonometry. Br J Ophthalmol 85(11):1303–1304
doi: 10.1136/bjo.85.11.1303
pubmed: 11673293
pmcid: 1723760
Basic and clinical science course—American academy of ophthalmology. Section 10- glaucoma chap 2 intra ocular pressure and aqueous humor dynamics—pp. 26–33
Qin X, Yu M, Zhang H et al (2019) the mechanical interpretation ocular response analyzer parameters. Biomed Res Int 16:5701236
Adhikari P, Zele AJ, Feigl B (2015) The post- illumination pupil response (PIPR). Investigative ophthalmology and visual sciences 56:3838–3849
doi: 10.1167/iovs.14-16233
AlMubrad TM, Ogbuehi KC (2008) the effect of repeated applanation on subsequent IOP measurements. Clin Exp Optom. 91(6):524–9
doi: 10.1111/j.1444-0938.2008.00298.x
pubmed: 18651843
Armstrong RA (2013) Statistical guidelines for the analysis of data obtained from one or both eyes. Opthalmic Physiol Opt 33:7–14
doi: 10.1111/opo.12009