Efficacy of Cerebellar Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in Treating Essential Tremor: A Randomized, Sham-Controlled Trial.

cerebellum essential tremors randomized controlled trial transcranial magnetic stimulation

Journal

Journal of clinical neurology (Seoul, Korea)
ISSN: 1738-6586
Titre abrégé: J Clin Neurol
Pays: Korea (South)
ID NLM: 101252374

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Jul 2024
Historique:
received: 05 09 2023
revised: 09 11 2023
accepted: 22 11 2023
medline: 2 7 2024
pubmed: 2 7 2024
entrez: 2 7 2024
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) of the cerebellar hemisphere represents a new option in treating essential tremor (ET) patients. We aimed to determine the efficacy of cerebellar rTMS in treating ET using different protocols regarding the number of sessions, exposure duration, and follow-up duration. A randomized sham-controlled trial was conducted, in which 45 recruit patients were randomly allocated to 2 groups. The first (active group) comprised 23 patients who were exposed to 12 sessions of active rTMS with 900 pulses of 1-Hz rTMS at 90% of the resting motor threshold daily on each side of the cerebellar hemispheres over 4 weeks. The second group (sham group) comprised 22 patients who were exposed to 12 sessions of sham rTMS. Both groups were reassessed at baseline and after 1 day, 1 month, 2 months, and 3 months using the Fahn-Tolosa-Marin tremor-rating scale (FTM). Demographic characteristics did no differ between the two groups. There were significant reductions both in FTM subscores A and B and in the FTM total score in the active-rTMS group during the period of assessment and after 3 months ( Low-frequency rTMS over the cerebellar cortex for 1 month showed relative safety and long-lasting efficacy in patients with ET. Further large-sample clinical trials are needed that include different sites of stimulation and longer follow-ups.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE OBJECTIVE
Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) of the cerebellar hemisphere represents a new option in treating essential tremor (ET) patients. We aimed to determine the efficacy of cerebellar rTMS in treating ET using different protocols regarding the number of sessions, exposure duration, and follow-up duration.
METHODS METHODS
A randomized sham-controlled trial was conducted, in which 45 recruit patients were randomly allocated to 2 groups. The first (active group) comprised 23 patients who were exposed to 12 sessions of active rTMS with 900 pulses of 1-Hz rTMS at 90% of the resting motor threshold daily on each side of the cerebellar hemispheres over 4 weeks. The second group (sham group) comprised 22 patients who were exposed to 12 sessions of sham rTMS. Both groups were reassessed at baseline and after 1 day, 1 month, 2 months, and 3 months using the Fahn-Tolosa-Marin tremor-rating scale (FTM).
RESULTS RESULTS
Demographic characteristics did no differ between the two groups. There were significant reductions both in FTM subscores A and B and in the FTM total score in the active-rTMS group during the period of assessment and after 3 months (
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
Low-frequency rTMS over the cerebellar cortex for 1 month showed relative safety and long-lasting efficacy in patients with ET. Further large-sample clinical trials are needed that include different sites of stimulation and longer follow-ups.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38951972
pii: 20.378
doi: 10.3988/jcn.2023.0348
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

378-384

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2024 Korean Neurological Association.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors have no potential conflicts of interest to disclose.

Auteurs

Ahmad Farag Ibrahim El-Adawy (AFI)

Department of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine, Al-Azhar University, Cairo, Egypt. ahmadfarag291076@yahoo.com.

Mohamed Al-Bahay M G Reda (MAMG)

Department of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine, Al-Azhar University, Cairo, Egypt.

Ali Mahmoud Ahmed (AM)

Department of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine, Al-Azhar University, Cairo, Egypt.
Department of Neurology, The Royal Wolverhampton NHS Trust, Wolverhampton, UK. alimahmoud.ahmed@nhs.net.

Mohamed Hamed Rashad (MH)

Department of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine, Al-Azhar University, Cairo, Egypt.

Mohamed Ahmed Zaki (MA)

Department of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine, Al-Azhar University, Cairo, Egypt.

Mohie-Eldin Tharwat Mohamed (MT)

Department of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine, Al-Azhar University, Cairo, Egypt.

Mohammad Ali Saeed Hassan (MAS)

Department of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine, Al-Azhar University, Cairo, Egypt.

Mohammad Fathi Abdulsalam (MF)

Department of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine, Al-Azhar University, Cairo, Egypt.

Abdelmonem M Hassan (AM)

Department of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine, Al-Azhar University, Cairo, Egypt.

Ahmed Fathy Mohamed (AF)

Department of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine, Al-Azhar University, Cairo, Egypt.

Abdel-Ghaffar Ismail Fayed (AI)

Department of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine, Al-Azhar University, Cairo, Egypt.

Mostafa Meshref (M)

Department of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine, Al-Azhar University, Cairo, Egypt.

Fathy Mahmoud Mansour (FM)

Department of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine, Al-Azhar University, Cairo, Egypt.

Ahmed E Sarhan (AE)

Department of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine, Al-Azhar University, Cairo, Egypt.

Ahmed Hassan Elsheshiny (AH)

Department of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine, Al-Azhar University, Cairo, Egypt.

Elsayed Abed (E)

Department of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine, Al-Azhar University, Cairo, Egypt.

Classifications MeSH