Efficacy of Ustekinumab and Vedolizumab Among Postoperative Crohn's Disease Patients as Postoperative Prophylaxis and Rescue Therapy: Real-world Data.

Rutgeerts score UST VDZ: postoperative Crohn’s recurrence

Journal

Inflammatory bowel diseases
ISSN: 1536-4844
Titre abrégé: Inflamm Bowel Dis
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9508162

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
02 Jul 2024
Historique:
received: 20 11 2023
medline: 2 7 2024
pubmed: 2 7 2024
entrez: 2 7 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

Almost half of patients with Crohn's disease (CD) require bowel surgeries in their lifetime. Due to the high risk of postoperative disease recurrence and high rate of previous antitumor necrosis factor (anti-TNF) failure, often alternative therapy options such as ustekinumab (UST) and vedolizumab (VDZ) are used. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy of UST and VDZ among postoperative CD patients as postoperative prophylaxis and rescue therapy. Consented CD patients who underwent initial ileocecal resection and were treated with UST and VDZ were included in this study. Demographics, clinical characteristics, health care utilization, endoscopy scores, and surgery outcomes were collected. Postoperative early CD recurrence was defined as a Rutgeerts endoscopic score ≥i2 within the first 2 years. The rescue therapy group was defined as patients who received either UST or VDZ after having Rutgeerts endoscopic score ≥i2 postoperatively. During 2009 to 2019, 98 CD patients were treated with UST or VDZ postoperatively. Postoperative early recurrence rates were 5% (n = 1 out of 20) and 6% (1 out of 15) for the UST and VDZ groups, respectively. Two patients from the UST group and 1 patient from the VDZ group required bowel surgery during follow-up with median drug exposure of 51 (95% confidence interval [CI], 29-61) and 30 (95% CI, 14-63) months, respectively; 55% and 69% of patients had at least 1 point of improvement on postoperative endoscopic Rutgeerts score, respectively, for UST and VDZ. Only 3 out of 40 and 1 out of 23 patients required bowel surgery during follow-up while receiving UST and VDZ as rescue therapy. Both UST and VDZ were effective as postoperative therapies either as prophylaxis or rescue therapy. This retrospective 11-year data examines the efficacy of ustekinumab and vedolizumab among postoperative Crohn’s disease patients. When utilizing postoperative Rutgeerts score, this study confirms that both ustekinumab and vedolizumab were effective as postoperative therapies either as prophylaxis or rescue therapy.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Almost half of patients with Crohn's disease (CD) require bowel surgeries in their lifetime. Due to the high risk of postoperative disease recurrence and high rate of previous antitumor necrosis factor (anti-TNF) failure, often alternative therapy options such as ustekinumab (UST) and vedolizumab (VDZ) are used. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy of UST and VDZ among postoperative CD patients as postoperative prophylaxis and rescue therapy.
METHODS METHODS
Consented CD patients who underwent initial ileocecal resection and were treated with UST and VDZ were included in this study. Demographics, clinical characteristics, health care utilization, endoscopy scores, and surgery outcomes were collected. Postoperative early CD recurrence was defined as a Rutgeerts endoscopic score ≥i2 within the first 2 years. The rescue therapy group was defined as patients who received either UST or VDZ after having Rutgeerts endoscopic score ≥i2 postoperatively.
RESULTS RESULTS
During 2009 to 2019, 98 CD patients were treated with UST or VDZ postoperatively. Postoperative early recurrence rates were 5% (n = 1 out of 20) and 6% (1 out of 15) for the UST and VDZ groups, respectively. Two patients from the UST group and 1 patient from the VDZ group required bowel surgery during follow-up with median drug exposure of 51 (95% confidence interval [CI], 29-61) and 30 (95% CI, 14-63) months, respectively; 55% and 69% of patients had at least 1 point of improvement on postoperative endoscopic Rutgeerts score, respectively, for UST and VDZ. Only 3 out of 40 and 1 out of 23 patients required bowel surgery during follow-up while receiving UST and VDZ as rescue therapy.
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
Both UST and VDZ were effective as postoperative therapies either as prophylaxis or rescue therapy.
This retrospective 11-year data examines the efficacy of ustekinumab and vedolizumab among postoperative Crohn’s disease patients. When utilizing postoperative Rutgeerts score, this study confirms that both ustekinumab and vedolizumab were effective as postoperative therapies either as prophylaxis or rescue therapy.

Autres résumés

Type: plain-language-summary (eng)
This retrospective 11-year data examines the efficacy of ustekinumab and vedolizumab among postoperative Crohn’s disease patients. When utilizing postoperative Rutgeerts score, this study confirms that both ustekinumab and vedolizumab were effective as postoperative therapies either as prophylaxis or rescue therapy.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38953641
pii: 7702722
doi: 10.1093/ibd/izae137
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Subventions

Organisme : Department of Defense
ID : W81XWH-17-1-0556

Informations de copyright

© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Crohn’s & Colitis Foundation. All rights reserved. For commercial re-use, please contact reprints@oup.com for reprints and translation rights for reprints. All other permissions can be obtained through our RightsLink service via the Permissions link on the article page on our site—for further information please contact journals.permissions@oup.com.

Auteurs

Furkan U Ertem (FU)

Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Medical Group of Carolinas, Gastroenterology, Spartanburg Regional Health System, Spartanburg, SC, USA.

Claudia Ramos Rivers (CR)

Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.

Amir Ali Ghaffari (AA)

Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.

Andrew R Watson (AR)

Division of Colorectal Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.

Gong Tang (G)

University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.

Marc Schwartz (M)

Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.

Elyse Johnston (E)

Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.

Arthur Barrie (A)

University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.

Janet Harrison (J)

University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.

Jeffrey M Dueker (JM)

Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.

Doug Hartman (D)

Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.

David G Binion (DG)

Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.

Classifications MeSH