Engagement With Stop Smoking Services After Referral or Signposting: A Mixed Methods Study.


Journal

Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco
ISSN: 1469-994X
Titre abrégé: Nicotine Tob Res
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9815751

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
03 Jul 2024
Historique:
received: 31 01 2024
medline: 3 7 2024
pubmed: 3 7 2024
entrez: 2 7 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

Screening for smoking when people interact with healthcare services and referral of those who smoke to stop smoking services (SSSs) is a key component of efforts to tackle tobacco use. However, little is known about what happens after someone is referred or signposted to SSSs. As part of the Cessation of Smoking Trial in the Emergency Department (NCT04854616), those randomised to intervention (n= 505) were referred to local SSSs (along with receiving brief advice and an e-cigarette starter kit) and those randomised to control (n= 502) were given contact details for the same services (signposted). SSS engagement data was collected: 1) directly from participants and 2) from SSS, additional qualitative data came from 33 participant interviews. Engagement with SSSs was very low. 3.2% (n=16) of those in the intervention group and 2.4% (n=12) in the control group reported attending a one-to-one support session. From SSS data, engagement was also low with 8.9% (n=43) of those referred engaging and 3.1% (n=15) going on to quit with SSS support. The majority of the 24 intervention participants interviewed did not recall being contacted by an SSS. Referral or signposting to stop smoking services within an Emergency Department based trial resulted in very low levels of engagement. Barriers to engagement identified included participants not being contacted by SSSs and the support offered not meeting their needs. Referral or signposting of those who smoke to Stop smoking services from the Emergency Department resulted in low rates of engagement in this large multi-centre randomised controlled trial. In order to better support those who smoke it may be more effective for smoking cessation advice to be offered 'in the moment' within clinical settings, and follow-up to be proactively offered rather than relying on people being motivated to contact the services themselves or engaging when contacted.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38955669
pii: 7704471
doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntae159
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Informations de copyright

© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco.

Auteurs

Ian Pope (I)

Norwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK.

Simrun Rashid (S)

Norwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK.

Hassan Iqbal (H)

Norwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK.

Pippa Belderson (P)

Norwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK.

Emma Ward (E)

Norwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK.

Lucy Clark (L)

Norwich Clinical Trials Unit, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK.

Tom Conway (T)

Norwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK.

Susan Stirling (S)

Norwich Clinical Trials Unit, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK.

Allan Clark (A)

Norwich Clinical Trials Unit, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK.

Sanjay Agrawal (S)

University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trusts, Leicester, UK.

Linda Bauld (L)

Usher Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.

Caitlin Notley (C)

Norwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK.

Classifications MeSH