Sex differences in physical functioning among older adults: cross-sectional results from the OUTDOOR ACTIVE study.
Aged
Healthy ageing
Physical functional performance
Sex differences
Journal
BMC public health
ISSN: 1471-2458
Titre abrégé: BMC Public Health
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100968562
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
02 Jul 2024
02 Jul 2024
Historique:
received:
11
03
2024
accepted:
20
06
2024
medline:
3
7
2024
pubmed:
3
7
2024
entrez:
3
7
2024
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Maintaining good functional ability is a key component of healthy ageing and a basic requirement for carrying out activities of daily living, staying independent, and delaying admission to a nursing home. Even though women have a higher life expectancy and slower age-related muscle mass loss than men, they often show a higher prevalence of limitations in physical functioning. However, the reasons behind these sex differences are still unclear. Therefore, the aims of this study were to investigate sex differences among older adults regarding physical functioning and to study which factors are explaining these sex differences. Cross-sectional data from participants of the OUTDOOR ACTIVE study residing in Bremen, Germany, aged 65 to 75 years, were included in the analyses. Physical functioning was assessed via a self-administered questionnaire using the SF-36 10-item Physical Functioning Scale. Social, lifestyle, and health-related factors were also assessed using the questionnaire. Physical activity was measured objectively using wrist-worn accelerometers over seven consecutive days. Descriptive analyses with absolute and relative frequencies, means and standard deviations, as well as T-tests and chi-square tests were carried out. To test for associations between sex, physical functioning, and several individual factors, linear regressions were performed. Data of 2 141 participants (52.1% female) were included in the study. Women and men showed statistically significant differences in physical functioning, with men perceiving fewer limitations than women. On average, women had a physical functioning score of 81.4 ± 19.3 and men 86.7 ± 17.0. Linear regression showed a statistically significant negative association between physical functioning score and sex (β: -0.15, 95% CL: -0.19, -0.10). The association remained statistically significant when adding individual factors to the model. All factors together were only able to explain 51% of the physical functioning-sex association with health indicators and the presence of chronic diseases being the most influential factors. We found sex differences in physical functioning, with older women having more limitations than older men. The results showed that health-related factors and chronic diseases played the biggest roles in the different physical functioning scores of women and men. These findings contribute to future longitudinal, more in-depth research. German Clinical Trials Register DRKS00015117 (Date of registration 17-07-2018).
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Maintaining good functional ability is a key component of healthy ageing and a basic requirement for carrying out activities of daily living, staying independent, and delaying admission to a nursing home. Even though women have a higher life expectancy and slower age-related muscle mass loss than men, they often show a higher prevalence of limitations in physical functioning. However, the reasons behind these sex differences are still unclear. Therefore, the aims of this study were to investigate sex differences among older adults regarding physical functioning and to study which factors are explaining these sex differences.
METHODS
METHODS
Cross-sectional data from participants of the OUTDOOR ACTIVE study residing in Bremen, Germany, aged 65 to 75 years, were included in the analyses. Physical functioning was assessed via a self-administered questionnaire using the SF-36 10-item Physical Functioning Scale. Social, lifestyle, and health-related factors were also assessed using the questionnaire. Physical activity was measured objectively using wrist-worn accelerometers over seven consecutive days. Descriptive analyses with absolute and relative frequencies, means and standard deviations, as well as T-tests and chi-square tests were carried out. To test for associations between sex, physical functioning, and several individual factors, linear regressions were performed.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Data of 2 141 participants (52.1% female) were included in the study. Women and men showed statistically significant differences in physical functioning, with men perceiving fewer limitations than women. On average, women had a physical functioning score of 81.4 ± 19.3 and men 86.7 ± 17.0. Linear regression showed a statistically significant negative association between physical functioning score and sex (β: -0.15, 95% CL: -0.19, -0.10). The association remained statistically significant when adding individual factors to the model. All factors together were only able to explain 51% of the physical functioning-sex association with health indicators and the presence of chronic diseases being the most influential factors.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
We found sex differences in physical functioning, with older women having more limitations than older men. The results showed that health-related factors and chronic diseases played the biggest roles in the different physical functioning scores of women and men. These findings contribute to future longitudinal, more in-depth research.
TRIAL REGISTRATION
BACKGROUND
German Clinical Trials Register DRKS00015117 (Date of registration 17-07-2018).
Identifiants
pubmed: 38956507
doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-19218-x
pii: 10.1186/s12889-024-19218-x
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1766Informations de copyright
© 2024. The Author(s).
Références
Guralnik JM, LaCroix AZ, Abbott RD, Berkman LF, Satterfield S, Evans DA, et al. Maintaining mobility in late life. I. demographic characteristics and chronic conditions. Am J Epidemiol. 1993;137(8):845–57.
pubmed: 8484376
doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a116746
Ayis S, Gooberman-Hill R, Bowling A, Ebrahim S. Predicting catastrophic decline in mobility among older people. Age Ageing. 2006;35(4):382–7.
pubmed: 16638760
doi: 10.1093/ageing/afl004
Luppa M, Luck T, Weyerer S, König H-H, Brähler E, Riedel-Heller SG. Prediction of institutionalization in the elderly. A systematic review. Age Ageing. 2010;39(1):31–8.
pubmed: 19934075
doi: 10.1093/ageing/afp202
Rechel B, Grundy E, Robine J-M, Cylus J, Mackenbach JP, Knai C, et al. Ageing in the European union. Lancet. 2013;381(9874):1312–22.
pubmed: 23541057
doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)62087-X
Rudnicka E, Napierała P, Podfigurna A, Męczekalski B, Smolarczyk R, Grymowicz M. The world health organization (WHO) approach to healthy ageing. Maturitas. 2020;139:6–11.
pubmed: 32747042
pmcid: 7250103
doi: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2020.05.018
Bjerk M, Brovold T, Skelton DA, Bergland A. Associations between health-related quality of life, physical function and fear of falling in older fallers receiving home care. BMC Geriatr. 2018;18(1):253.
pubmed: 30348098
pmcid: 6198355
doi: 10.1186/s12877-018-0945-6
Fisher S, Ottenbacher KJ, Goodwin JS, Graham JE, Ostir GV. Short physical performance battery in hospitalized older adults. Aging Clin Exp Res. 2009;21(6):445–52.
pubmed: 20154514
pmcid: 2822997
doi: 10.1007/BF03327444
Penninx BW, Ferrucci L, Leveille SG, Rantanen T, Pahor M, Guralnik JM. Lower extremity performance in nondisabled older persons as a predictor of subsequent hospitalization. J Gerontol Biol Sci Med Sci. 2000;55(11):M691–7.
doi: 10.1093/gerona/55.11.M691
Minneci C, Mello AM, Mossello E, Baldasseroni S, Macchi L, Cipolletti S, et al. Comparative study of four physical performance measures as predictors of death, incident disability, and falls in unselected older persons: the insufficienza Cardiaca Negli Anziani Residenti a Dicomano Study. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2015;63(1):136–41.
pubmed: 25597564
doi: 10.1111/jgs.13195
Veronese N, Stubbs B, Fontana L, Trevisan C, Bolzetta F, Rui M, de, et al. A comparison of objective physical performance tests and future mortality in the elderly people. J Gerontol Biol Sci Med Sci. 2017;72(3):362–8.
Okabe T, Suzuki M, Goto H, Iso N, Cho K, Hirata K et al. Sex differences in age-related physical changes among Community-Dwelling adults. J Clin Med 2021; 10(20).
Koukouli S, Vlachonikolis IG, Philalithis A. Socio-demographic factors and self-reported functional status: the significance of social support. BMC Health Serv Res. 2002;2(1):20.
pubmed: 12361478
doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-2-20
Noppert GA, Brown CS, Chanti-Ketterl M, Hall KS, Newby LK, Cohen HJ, et al. The impact of multiple dimensions of socioeconomic status on physical functioning across the life course. Gerontol Geriatr Med. 2018;4:2333721418794021.
pubmed: 30186891
pmcid: 6113730
Jyväkorpi SK, Urtamo A, Pitkälä KH, Strandberg TE, Nutrition. Daily walking and resilience are Associated with physical function in the oldest old men. J Nutr Health Aging. 2018;22(10):1176–82.
pubmed: 30498823
doi: 10.1007/s12603-018-1136-z
Kostadinovic M, Nikolic D, Petronic I, Cirovic D, Grajic M, Santric Milicevic M. Sociodemographic predictors of physical functioning in the elderly: a national health survey. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2018; 16(1).
Hu Y, Malyutina S, Pikhart H, Peasey A, Holmes MV, Hubacek J, et al. The relationship between body Mass Index and 10-Year trajectories of physical functioning in middle-aged and older russians: prospective results of the Russian HAPIEE study. J Nutr Health Aging. 2017;21(4):381–8.
pubmed: 28346564
doi: 10.1007/s12603-016-0769-z
Imamura K, Kamide N, Ando M, Sato H, Sakamoto M, Shiba Y. Social isolation is associated with future decline of physical performance in community-dwelling older adults: a 1-year longitudinal study. Aging Clin Exp Res. 2022;34(6):1391–8.
pubmed: 35060108
doi: 10.1007/s40520-021-02050-3
Peeters G, Beard JR, Deeg DJH, Tooth LR, Brown WJ, Dobson AJ. Longitudinal associations between lifestyle, socio-economic position and physical functioning in women at different life stages. Eur J Ageing. 2019;16(2):167–79.
pubmed: 31139031
doi: 10.1007/s10433-018-0484-1
Robert Koch-Institut. [Health in Germany. Federal Health Monitoring.] Gemeinsam getragen von RKI und Destatis. Berlin. 2015 [cited 2023 Sep 14]. Available from: https://www.rki.de/DE/Content/Gesundheitsmonitoring/Gesundheitsberichterstattung/GesInDtld/gesundheit_in_deutschland_2015.pdf?__blob=publicationFile .
Gallagher D, Visser M, de Meersman RE, Sepúlveda D, Baumgartner RN, Pierson RN, et al. Appendicular skeletal muscle mass: effects of age, gender, and ethnicity. J Appl Physiol. 1997;83(1):229–39.
pubmed: 9216968
doi: 10.1152/jappl.1997.83.1.229
Mitchell WK, Williams J, Atherton P, Larvin M, Lund J, Narici M. Sarcopenia, dynapenia, and the impact of advancing age on human skeletal muscle size and strength; a quantitative review. Front Physiol. 2012;3:260.
pubmed: 22934016
pmcid: 3429036
doi: 10.3389/fphys.2012.00260
Hansen J, Hansen H, Nilsson C, Ekholm O, Molsted S. Association between educational level and self-reported musculoskeletal pain and physical functioning in Danes 60–70 years old from 2010 to 2017: a longitudinal analysis of trends over time on data from the Danish health and morbidity survey. BMJ Open. 2023;13(11):e073523.
pubmed: 37914297
pmcid: 10626833
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-073523
Dugan SA, Gabriel KP, Lange-Maia BS, Karvonen-Gutierrez C. Physical activity and physical function: moving and aging. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. 2018;45(4):723–36.
pubmed: 30401553
pmcid: 6226270
doi: 10.1016/j.ogc.2018.07.009
Sekine M, Chandola T, Martikainen P, Marmot M, Kagamimori S. Sex differences in physical and mental functioning of Japanese civil servants: Explanations from work and family characteristics. Soc Sci Med. 2010; 71(12):2091–9. Available from: URL: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277953610006957 .
Sialino LD, Picavet HSJ, Wijnhoven HAH, Loyen A, Verschuren WMM, Visser M, et al. Exploring the difference between men and women in physical functioning: how do sociodemographic, lifestyle- and health-related determinants contribute? BMC Geriatr. 2022;22(1):610.
pubmed: 35864451
pmcid: 9306105
doi: 10.1186/s12877-022-03216-y
Verbrugge LM. Gender and health: an update on hypotheses and evidence. J Health Soc Behav. 1985;26(3):156.
pubmed: 3905939
doi: 10.2307/2136750
Park S-M, Jang S-N, Kim D-H. Gender differences as factors in successful ageing: a focus on socioeconomic status. J Biosoc Sci. 2010;42(1):99–111.
pubmed: 19703332
doi: 10.1017/S0021932009990204
Avis NE, Colvin A, Bromberger JT, Hess R, Matthews KA, Ory M, et al. Change in health-related quality of life over the menopausal transition in a multiethnic cohort of middle-aged women: study of women’s Health across the Nation. Menopause. 2009;16(5):860–9.
pubmed: 19436224
pmcid: 2743857
doi: 10.1097/gme.0b013e3181a3cdaf
Louie GH, Ward MM. Sex disparities in self-reported physical functioning: true differences, reporting bias, or incomplete adjustment for confounding? J Am Geriatr Soc. 2010;58(6):1117–22.
pubmed: 20487076
doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2010.02858.x
Forberger S, Bammann K, Bauer J, Boll S, Bolte G, Brand T et al. How to Tackle Key challenges in the Promotion of Physical Activity among older adults (65+): the AEQUIPA Network Approach. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2017; 14(4).
Bammann K, Drell C, Lübs LL, Stalling I. Cluster-randomised trial on participatory community-based outdoor physical activity promotion programs in adults aged 65–75 years in Germany: protocol of the OUTDOOR ACTIVE intervention trial. BMC Public Health. 2018;18(1):1197.
pubmed: 30352580
pmcid: 6199784
doi: 10.1186/s12889-018-6124-z
Stalling I, Albrecht BM, Foettinger L, Recke C, Bammann K. Associations between socioeconomic status and physical activity among older adults: cross-sectional results from the OUTDOOR ACTIVE study. BMC Geriatr. 2022;22(1):396.
pubmed: 35524170
pmcid: 9074343
doi: 10.1186/s12877-022-03075-7
Dalgard OS, Dowrick C, Lehtinen V, Vazquez-Barquero JL, Casey P, Wilkinson G, et al. Negative life events, social support and gender difference in depression: a multinational community survey with data from the ODIN study. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2006;41(6):444–51.
pubmed: 16572275
doi: 10.1007/s00127-006-0051-5
Robert Koch-Institut. [Health questionnaire 65 + years. German Health Interview and Examination Survey]; 2009. [cited 2022 Feb 23].
Ware JE, Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care. 1992;30(6):473–83.
pubmed: 1593914
doi: 10.1097/00005650-199206000-00002
World Health Organization. Obesity: preventing and managing the global epidemic. Report of a WHO consultation; 2000.
Ndahimana D, Kim E-K. Measurement methods for physical activity and energy expenditure: a review. Clin Nutr Res. 2017;6(2):68–80.
pubmed: 28503503
pmcid: 5426207
doi: 10.7762/cnr.2017.6.2.68
Choi L, Liu Z, Matthews CE, Buchowski MS. Validation of accelerometer wear and nonwear time classification algorithm. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2011;43(2):357–64.
pubmed: 20581716
pmcid: 3184184
doi: 10.1249/MSS.0b013e3181ed61a3
Saelens BE, Sallis JF, Black JB, Chen D. Neighborhood-based differences in physical activity: an environment scale evaluation. Am J Public Health. 2003;93(9):1552–8.
pubmed: 12948979
pmcid: 1448009
doi: 10.2105/AJPH.93.9.1552
Stalling I, Albrecht BM, Doerwald F, Bammann K. Time allocation to active domains, physical activity, and health indicators in older adults: cross-sectional results from the OUTDOOR ACTIVE study. BMC Public Health. 2020;20(1):1580.
pubmed: 33081732
pmcid: 7576691
doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-09708-z
Kuh D, Bassey EJ, Butterworth S, Hardy R, Wadsworth MEJ. Grip strength, postural control, and functional leg power in a representative cohort of British men and women: associations with physical activity, health status, and socioeconomic conditions. J Gerontol Biol Sci Med Sci. 2005;60(2):224–31.
doi: 10.1093/gerona/60.2.224
Mosallanezhad Z, Hörder H, Salavati M, Nilsson-Wikmar L, Frändin K. Physical activity and physical functioning in Swedish and Iranian 75-year-olds - a comparison. Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2012;55(2):422–30.
pubmed: 22425242
doi: 10.1016/j.archger.2012.02.007
von Bonsdorff MB, Rantanen T, Sipilä S, Salonen MK, Kajantie E, Osmond C, et al. Birth size and childhood growth as determinants of physical functioning in older age: the Helsinki Birth Cohort Study. Am J Epidemiol. 2011;174(12):1336–44.
doi: 10.1093/aje/kwr270
Hansen ÅM, Andersen LL, Skotte J, Christensen U, Mortensen OS, Molbo D, et al. Social class differences in physical functions in middle-aged men and women. J Aging Health. 2014;26(1):88–105.
pubmed: 24584262
doi: 10.1177/0898264313508188
Katz S, Ford AB, Moskowitz RW, Jackson BA, Jaffe MW. Studies of illness in the aged: the Index of ADL: a standardized measure of biological and psychosocial function. JAMA. 1963;185:914–9.
pubmed: 14044222
doi: 10.1001/jama.1963.03060120024016
Lawton MP, Brody EM. Assessment of Older people: self-maintaining and instrumental activities of Daily Living. Gerontologist. 1969;9(3 Part 1):179–86.
pubmed: 5349366
doi: 10.1093/geront/9.3_Part_1.179
Pająk A, Polak M, Kozela M, Doryńska A, Bobak M. Trajectories in physical functioning at older age in relation to childhood and adulthood SES and social mobility: a population-based cohort study. Front Public Health. 2023;11:1228920.
pubmed: 37744505
pmcid: 10513394
doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1228920
Danneskiold-Samsøe B, Bartels EM, Bülow PM, Lund H, Stockmarr A, Holm CC, et al. Isokinetic and isometric muscle strength in a healthy population with special reference to age and gender. Acta Physiol. 2009;197(Suppl 673):1–68.
doi: 10.1111/j.1748-1716.2009.02022.x
Stenholm S, Westerlund H, Salo P, Hyde M, Pentti J, Head J, et al. Age-related trajectories of physical functioning in work and retirement: the role of sociodemographic factors, lifestyle and disease. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2014;68(6):503–9.
pubmed: 24534071
doi: 10.1136/jech-2013-203555
Bleijenberg N, Zuithoff NPA, Smith AK, de Wit NJ, Schuurmans MJ. Disability in the Individual ADL, IADL, and mobility among older adults: a prospective cohort study. J Nutr Health Aging. 2017;21(8):897–903.
pubmed: 28972242
doi: 10.1007/s12603-017-0891-6
Heidemann C, Scheidt-Nave C, Beyer A-K, Baumert J, Thamm R, Maier B et al. Gesundheitliche Lage von Erwachsenen in Deutschland – Ergebnisse zu ausgewählten Indikatoren der Studie GEDA 2019/2020-EHIS; 2021.
Avedano MMJ. Changes in Physical Health among older europeans. In: Boersch-Supan A, Alcser KH, editors. Health, ageing and retirement in Europe: first results from the survey of health, ageing and retirement in Europe (2004–2007): starting the longitudinal dimension. Mannheim: MEA; 2008. pp. 118–24.
Crimmins EM, Kim JK, Solé-Auró A. Gender differences in health: results from SHARE, ELSA and HRS. Eur J Public Health. 2011;21(1):81–91.
pubmed: 20237171
doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckq022
Veen J, Edholm P, Rodriguez-Zamora L, Folkesson M, Kadi F, Nilsson A. Adherence to the physical activity guideline beyond the recommended minimum weekly amount: impacts on indicators of physical function in older adults. Front Public Health. 2023;11:1197025.
pubmed: 37383268
pmcid: 10294421
doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1197025
Sun F, Norman IJ, While AE. Physical activity in older people: a systematic review. BMC Public Health. 2013;13:449.
pubmed: 23648225
pmcid: 3651278
doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-13-449
Dyrstad SM, Hansen BH, Holme IM, Anderssen SA. Comparison of self-reported versus accelerometer-measured physical activity. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2014;46(1):99–106.
pubmed: 23793232
doi: 10.1249/MSS.0b013e3182a0595f
Câmara SMA, Falvey JR, Orwig D, Gruber-Baldini AL, Auais M, Feng Z et al. Associations between living alone, social interactions, and physical performance differ by sex: results from the Baltimore Hip studies. J Am Geriatr Soc 2023.
Gale CR, Westbury L, Cooper C. Social isolation and loneliness as risk factors for the progression of frailty: the English Longitudinal Study of Ageing. Age Ageing. 2018;47(3):392–7.
pubmed: 29309502
doi: 10.1093/ageing/afx188
Cabello M, Caballero FF, Chatterji S, Cieza A, Ayuso-Mateos JL. Risk factors for incidence and persistence of disability in chronic major depression and alcohol use disorders: longitudinal analyses of a population-based study. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2014;12:186.
pubmed: 25516069
pmcid: 4287194
doi: 10.1186/s12955-014-0186-0
Mauvais-Jarvis F, Bairey Merz N, Barnes PJ, Brinton RD, Carrero J-J, DeMeo DL et al. Sex and gender: modifiers of health, disease, and medicine. Lancet. 2020; 396(10250):565–82. Available from: URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32828189/ .
Wiley E, Noguchi KS, Moncion K, Stratford PW, Tang A. Sex differences in functional capacity in older adults with stroke: an Analysis of Data from the National Health and Aging trends Study. Phys Ther 2022; 102(8).
Xu F, Cohen SA, Greaney ML, Earp JE, Delmonico MJ. Longitudinal sex-specific physical function trends by Age, Race/Ethnicity, and Weight Status. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2020;68(10):2270–8.
pubmed: 32568430
doi: 10.1111/jgs.16638
Ylitalo KR, Karvonen-Gutierrez CA, Fitzgerald N, Zheng H, Sternfeld B, El Khoudary SR et al. Relationship of race-ethnicity, body mass index, and economic strain with longitudinal self-report of physical functioning: the Study of Women’s Health Across the Nation. Ann Epidemiol. 2013; 23(7):401–8. Available from: URL: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1047279713000987 .
Toyama M, Fuller HR, Owino J. Longitudinal Implications of Social Integration for age and gender differences in late-life physical functioning. Int J Aging Hum Dev. 2022;94(2):169–92.
pubmed: 33307713
doi: 10.1177/0091415020980755
Lai ETC, Ho HC, Ho SC, Woo J, Socioeconomic, Status. Physical functioning and mortality: results from a Cohort Study of older adults in Hong Kong. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2022;23(5):858–e8645.
pubmed: 34555338
doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2021.08.034
Yang L, Konttinen H, Martikainen P, Silventoinen K. Socioeconomic status and physical functioning: a longitudinal study of older Chinese people. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2018;73(7):1315–29.
pubmed: 28329825
doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbx010
Ylitalo KR, Karvonen-Gutierrez CA, Sternfeld B, Pettee Gabriel K. Association of Physical Activity and physical functioning phenotypes with fall risk among women. J Aging Health. 2021;33(5–6):409–17.
pubmed: 33517822
pmcid: 8356562
doi: 10.1177/0898264320988405
van Dyck D, Cardon G, Deforche B, de Bourdeaudhuij I. The contribution of former work-related activity levels to predict physical activity and sedentary time during early retirement: moderating role of educational level and physical functioning. PLoS ONE. 2015;10(3):e0122522.
pubmed: 25826218
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0122522