Evaluation of child's behavior during the pit and fissure sealant administration using the rubber dam and MiniDam: A randomized clinical trial.
Journal
Journal of the Indian Society of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry
ISSN: 1998-3905
Titre abrégé: J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent
Pays: India
ID NLM: 8710631
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 Apr 2024
01 Apr 2024
Historique:
received:
06
04
2024
accepted:
24
05
2024
medline:
3
7
2024
pubmed:
3
7
2024
entrez:
3
7
2024
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Dental caries is a multifactorial disease that manifests itself in primary and permanent dentitions. Pit and fissure sealants have become the most effective noninvasive treatment for addressing teeth with deep pits and fissures in children. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the behavior of the child when administering the pit and fissure sealant using the rubber dam and MiniDam. Fifty-two children in the age range of 9-12 years were randomly allocated into two groups: Group I, rubber dam and Group II, MiniDam. The children were randomly assigned into two groups with 26 members in Group 1 (rubber dam isolation) and 26 members in Group 2 (MiniDam isolation). Children's anxiety was assessed using the modified Venham scale and heart rate. The children's pain intensity was assessed using Memojis Pain Scale. The data collected were tabulated and statistically analyzed using SPSS software. The level of significance was established at 0.05. Intergroup comparison of heart rates showed a statistically significant difference for both the groups at various intervals (P value 0.05), that is, before placing the dam, with the dam, and during treatment. Pain and anxiety scores showed a statistically significant difference in both the groups before and after the procedure (P < 0.05). The use of MiniDam can offer a better option for the pit/fissure sealant procedure due to its unique qualities, including simplicity of placement, improved behavior management, and less chair time in children.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Dental caries is a multifactorial disease that manifests itself in primary and permanent dentitions. Pit and fissure sealants have become the most effective noninvasive treatment for addressing teeth with deep pits and fissures in children. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the behavior of the child when administering the pit and fissure sealant using the rubber dam and MiniDam.
METHODOLOGY
METHODS
Fifty-two children in the age range of 9-12 years were randomly allocated into two groups: Group I, rubber dam and Group II, MiniDam. The children were randomly assigned into two groups with 26 members in Group 1 (rubber dam isolation) and 26 members in Group 2 (MiniDam isolation). Children's anxiety was assessed using the modified Venham scale and heart rate. The children's pain intensity was assessed using Memojis Pain Scale. The data collected were tabulated and statistically analyzed using SPSS software. The level of significance was established at 0.05.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Intergroup comparison of heart rates showed a statistically significant difference for both the groups at various intervals (P value 0.05), that is, before placing the dam, with the dam, and during treatment. Pain and anxiety scores showed a statistically significant difference in both the groups before and after the procedure (P < 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
The use of MiniDam can offer a better option for the pit/fissure sealant procedure due to its unique qualities, including simplicity of placement, improved behavior management, and less chair time in children.
Identifiants
pubmed: 38957909
doi: 10.4103/jisppd.jisppd_127_24
pii: 00005097-202404000-00008
doi:
Substances chimiques
Pit and Fissure Sealants
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Randomized Controlled Trial
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
119-125Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2024 Copyright: © 2024 Journal of Indian Society of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry.
Références
Corrêa-Faria P, Viana KA, Raggio DP, Hosey MT, Costa LR. Recommended procedures for the management of early childhood caries lesions –A scoping review by the Children Experiencing Dental Anxiety:Collaboration on Research and Education (CEDACORE). BMC Oral Health 2020;20:75
Carvalho JC. Caries process on occlusal surfaces:Evolving evidence and understanding. Caries Res 2014;48:339–46.
Wang MC, Marshman Z, Chen WH, Shih WY. A qualitative study of barriers and facilitators to the implementation of a pilot school-based, toothbrushing programme. BMC Oral Health 2022;22:451
Kashbour W, Gupta P, Worthington HV, Boyers D. Pit and fissure sealants versus fluoride varnishes for preventing dental decay in the permanent teeth of children and adolescents. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2020;11 CD003067.
Almahdy A, Al-Otaibi A, Binhamdan A, AlNatheer Y, Alqahtani N, Alrahlah A, et al. Using bonding agent prior to pits and fissure sealant application enhances the microtensile bond strength and the interface morphology. Saudi Dent J 2021;33:487–94.
Mattar RE, Sulimany AM, Binsaleh SS, Al-Majed IM. Comparison of fissure sealant chair time and patients'preference using three different isolation techniques. Children (Basel) 2021;8:444
Wang Y, Li C, Yuan H, Wong MC, Zou J, Shi Z, et al. Rubber dam isolation for restorative treatment in dental patients. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2016;9:CD009858
Behuria PN. Isolation of teeth in children:A review. Indian J Forensic Med Toxicol 2020;14:9091–4.
Afshari E, Sabbagh S, Khorakian F, Sarraf Shirazi A, Akbarzadeh Baghban A. Reducing pain and discomfort associated with rubber dam clamp placement in children and adolescents:A systematic review and meta-analysis of effectiveness. BMC Oral Health 2023;23:398
Cochran MA, Miller CH, Sheldrake MA. The efficacy of the rubber dam as a barrier to the spread of microorganisms during dental treatment. J Am Dent Assoc 1989;119:141–4.
Schill H, Graeser P, Bücher K, Pfisterer J, Khazaei Y, Enggist L, et al. Clinical performance of a new fissure sealant-results from a 2-year randomized clinical trial. Clin Oral Investig 2022;26:5471–80.
Raskin A, Setcos JC, Vreven J, Wilson NH. Influence of the isolation method on the 10-year clinical behaviour of posterior resin composite restorations. Clin Oral Investig 2000;4:148–52.
Kapitan M, Hodacova L, Jagelska J, Kaplan J, Ivancakova R, Sustova Z. The attitude of Czech dental patients to the use of rubber dam. Health Expect 2015;18:1282–90.
Miao C, Yang X, Wong MC, Zou J, Zhou X, Li C, et al. Rubber dam isolation for restorative treatment in dental patients. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2021;5:CD009858
Bargale S, Ardeshana A, Dave B, Deshpande A, Karri A, Patel N. Dimensional comparison of rubber dam clamp prongs with cervical mesiodistal dimension of primary second molar. Adv Hum Biol 2017;7:80–4.
Priyanka R, Sehgal P, Dixit U. Use of minidam for isolation in restoration of proximal carious lesion. Acta Sci Dent Sci 2019;3:105–9.
Jamir Y, Rao D, Panwar S, Samaddar K, Remi RV. Isolation in paediatric dentistry:Recent advances. Int J Appl Dent Sci 2023;9:518–24.
Frankl SN, Shiere FR, Fogels HR. Should the parent remain with the child in the dental operatory?J Dent Child 1962;29:150–63.
Venham LL, Gaulin-Kremer E. A self-report measure of situational anxiety for young children. Pediatr Dent 1979;1:91–6.
Saikiran KV, Elicherla SR, Mounika SV, Hemanth Kumar R, Kolavali PS, Nuvvula S. Memojis pain scale:A novel pain assessment tool. Int J Paediatr Dent 2023;33:364–71.
Wright JT, Crall JJ, Fontana M, Gillette EJ, Nový BB, Dhar V, et al. Evidence-based clinical practice guideline for the use of pit-and-fissure sealants:A report of the American Dental Association and the American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry. J Am Dent Assoc 2016;147:672–82.e12.
Soldani F, Foley J. An assessment of rubber dam usage amongst specialists in paediatric dentistry practising within the UK. Int J Paediatr Dent 2007;17:50–6.
Slawinski D, Wilson S. Rubber dam use:A survey of pediatric dentistry training programs and private practitioners. Pediatr Dent 2010;32:64–8.
Varughese RE, Andrews P, Sigal MJ, Azarpazhooh A. An assessment of direct restorative material use in posterior teeth by American and Canadian Pediatric Dentists:II. Rubber dam isolation. Pediatr Dent 2016;38:497–501.
Wambier LM, de Geus JL, Boing TF, Brancher JA, Chibinski AC, Wambier DS, et al. Arandomized clinical trial evaluating rubber dam clamp pain reduction from a new topical liposomal anesthetic gel. Pediatr Dent 2018;40:190–4.
Vanhée T, Tassignon C, Porta P, Bottenberg P, Charles T, Vanden Abbeele A. Behavior of children during dental care with rubber dam isolation:A randomized controlled study. Dent J (Basel) 2021;9:89
Ammann P, Kolb A, Lussi A, Seemann R. Influence of rubber dam on objective and subjective parameters of stress during dental treatment of children and adolescents –A randomized controlled clinical pilot study. Int J Paediatr Dent 2013;23:110–5.
Olegário IC, Moro BL, Tedesco TK, Freitas RD, Pássaro AL, Garbim JR, et al. Use of rubber dam versus cotton roll isolation on composite resin restorations'survival in primary molars:2-year results from a non-inferiority clinical trial. BMC Oral Health 2022;22:440
Pol S, Katge F, Krishna V, Balgi P, Pradhan D. Effect of rubber dam on objective and subjective parameters of stress during dental treatment of children. Indian J Oral Health Res 2018;4:16
Dhamne S, Ram SM, Thakkar VP, Dharadhar SS, Upadhyay RG, Patel TA. Assessment of awareness and use of rubber dam among dental practitioners in Navi Mumbai, Maharashtra, India. J Contemp Dent 2020;10:1–5.