Minimally invasive tools are necessary for the modern practice of liver surgery.


Journal

Journal of minimal access surgery
ISSN: 0972-9941
Titre abrégé: J Minim Access Surg
Pays: India
ID NLM: 101228183

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
01 Jul 2024
Historique:
received: 04 12 2023
accepted: 15 04 2024
medline: 3 7 2024
pubmed: 3 7 2024
entrez: 3 7 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

Minimally invasive liver resection (MILR) is performed for other gastrointestinal applications. At our centre, all liver resections are systematically performed using a minimally invasive approach. This study aimed to describe our experience in minimising open surgery and emphasised the importance of minimally invasive surgery. We retrospectively reviewed 260 patients who underwent liver surgery and compared the surgical outcomes between the open and MILR groups. A total of 154 patients (68%) underwent MILR. The proportion of patients who underwent prior abdominal surgery and resection was higher in the open surgery group. However, the proportion of patients with liver cirrhosis was similar between the two groups. The MILR group was superior in terms of operative time, blood loss, Pringle manoeuvre rate and mean hospital stay. In addition, major complication and bile leak rates were lower in the MILR group. No significant differences in the tumour size, number of lesions or underlying liver pathology were observed between the two groups. Acceptable outcomes can be achieved even when the minimally invasive approach is considered the primary option for all patients who require liver resection. Minimally invasive tools are necessary for the modern practice of liver surgery; therefore, laparoscopic or robotic surgery should be included in the armamentarium of liver surgeons.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38958005
doi: 10.4103/jmas.jmas_377_23
pii: 01413045-990000000-00059
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2024 Copyright: © 2024 Journal of Minimal Access Surgery.

Références

Ciria R, Cherqui D, Geller DA, Briceno J, Wakabayashi G. Comparative short-term benefits of laparoscopic liver resection:9000 cases and climbing. Ann Surg 2016;263:761–77.
Idrees K, Bartlett DL. Robotic liver surgery. Surg Clin North Am 2010;90:761–74.
Nguyen KT, Gamblin TC, Geller DA. World review of laparoscopic liver resection-2,804 patients. Ann Surg 2009;250:831–41.
Yin Z, Fan X, Ye H, Yin D, Wang J. Short- and long-term outcomes after laparoscopic and open hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma: A global systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Surg Oncol 2013;20:1203–15.
Yu YD, Kim KH, Jung DH, Namkoong JM, Yoon SY, Jung SW, et al. Robotic versus laparoscopic liver resection: A comparative study from a single center. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2014;399:1039–45.
Giulianotti PC, Coratti A, Sbrana F, Addeo P, Bianco FM, Buchs NC, et al. Robotic liver surgery: Results for 70 resections. Surgery 2011;149:29–39.
Ji WB, Wang HG, Zhao ZM, Duan WD, Lu F, Dong JH. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic anatomic hepatectomy in China: Initial experience. Ann Surg 2011;253:342–8.
Chan OC, Tang CN, Lai EC, Yang GP, Li MK. Robotic hepatobiliary and pancreatic surgery: A cohort study. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 2011;18:471–80.
Nota CL, Rinkes IHB, Hagendoorn J. Setting up a robotic hepatectomy program: A Western-European experience and perspective. Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr 2017;6:239–45.
Aldrighetti L, Belli G, Boni L, Cillo U, Ettorre G, De Carlis L, et al. Italian experience in minimally invasive liver surgery: A national survey. Updates Surg 2015;67:129–40.
de Rooij T, van Hilst J, Boerma D, Bonsing BA, Daams F, van Dam RM, et al. Impact of a nationwide training program in minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy (LAELAPS). Ann Surg 2016;264:754–62.
Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA. Classification of surgical complications: A new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 2004;240:205–13.
Samstein B, Griesemer A, Halazun K, Kato T, Guarrera JV, Cherqui D, et al. Pure laparoscopic donor hepatectomies: Ready for widespread adoption?. Ann Surg 2018;268:602–9.
Hibi T, Cherqui D, Geller DA, Itano O, Kitagawa Y, Wakabayashi G. Expanding indications and regional diversity in laparoscopic liver resection unveiled by the International Survey on Technical Aspects of Laparoscopic Liver Resection (INSTALL) study. Surg Endosc 2016;30:2975–83.
Lee JJ, Conneely JB, Smoot RL, Gallinger S, Greig PD, Moulton CA, et al. Laparoscopic versus open liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma at a North-American Centre: A 2-to-1 matched pair analysis. HPB (Oxford) 2015;17:304–10.
Takahara T, Wakabayashi G, Beppu T, Aihara A, Hasegawa K, Gotohda N, et al. Long-term and perioperative outcomes of laparoscopic versus open liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma with propensity score matching: A multi-institutional Japanese study. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 2015;22:721–7.
Gagner M, Rheault M, Dubuc J. Laparoscopic partial hepatectomy for liver tumor. Surg Endosc 1992;6:99.
Cherqui D, Husson E, Hammoud R, Malassagne B, Stéphan F, Bensaid S, et al. Laparoscopic liver resections: A feasibility study in 30 patients. Ann Surg 2000;232:753–62.
Wakabayashi G, Cherqui D, Geller DA, Buell JF, Kaneko H, Han HS, et al. Recommendations for laparoscopic liver resection: A report from the second international consensus conference held in Morioka. Ann Surg 2015;261:619–29.
Varley PR, Tohme ST, Chidi AP, Goswami J, van der Windt D, Geller DA, et al. Dissemination of minimally invasive liver resection for primary malignancy: Reevaluating effectiveness. Ann Surg Oncol 2018;25:808–17.
Vigano L, Laurent A, Tayar C, Tomatis M, Ponti A, Cherqui D. The learning curve in laparoscopic liver resection: Improved feasibility and reproducibility. Ann Surg 2009;250:772–82.
Berardi G, Van Cleven S, Fretland ÅA, Barkhatov L, Halls M, Cipriani F, et al. Evolution of laparoscopic liver surgery from innovation to implementation to mastery: Perioperative and oncologic outcomes of 2,238 patients from 4 European Specialized Centers. J Am Coll Surg 2017;225:639–49.
de Wilde RF, Besselink MG, van der Tweel I, de Hingh IH, van Eijck CH, Dejong CH, et al. Impact of nationwide centralization of pancreaticoduodenectomy on hospital mortality. Br J Surg 2012;99:404–10.
Hogg ME, Besselink MG, Clavien PA, Fingerhut A, Jeyarajah DR, Kooby DA, et al. Training in minimally invasive pancreatic resections: A paradigm shift away from “See one, Do one, Teach one”. HPB (Oxford) 2017;19:234–45.
Reich H, McGlynn F, DeCaprio J, Budin R. Laparoscopic excision of benign liver lesions. Obstet Gynecol 1991;78:956–8.
Fretland ÅA, Dagenborg VJ, Bjørnelv GMW, Kazaryan AM, Kristiansen R, Fagerland MW, et al. Laparoscopic versus open resection for colorectal liver metastases: The OSLO-COMET randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg 2018;267:199–207.
Americas Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Association (AHPBA). Hepato- Pancreato-Biliary Fellowships. Available from: http://ahpba.org/education/hpb-fellowships.phtml. [Last accessed on 2022 Mar 10].

Auteurs

Young-Dong Yu (YD)

Department of Surgery, Division of Liver Transplantation and Hepatobiliary Surgery, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA.
Department of Surgery, Division of HBP Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.

Karim J Halazun (KJ)

Department of Surgery, Division Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, NYU Langone Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.

Rohit Chandwani (R)

Department of Surgery, Division of Liver Transplantation and Hepatobiliary Surgery, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA.

Benjamin Samstein (B)

Department of Surgery, Division of Liver Transplantation and Hepatobiliary Surgery, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA.

Classifications MeSH