Advances in Three-Dimensional Printing for Craniomaxillofacial Trauma Reconstruction: A Systematic Review.
Journal
The Journal of craniofacial surgery
ISSN: 1536-3732
Titre abrégé: J Craniofac Surg
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9010410
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
03 Jul 2024
03 Jul 2024
Historique:
received:
29
04
2024
accepted:
01
06
2024
medline:
3
7
2024
pubmed:
3
7
2024
entrez:
3
7
2024
Statut:
aheadofprint
Résumé
Craniomaxillofacial (CMF) fractures present significant challenges for plastic surgeons due to their intricate nature. Conventional methods such as autologous bone grafts have limitations, necessitating advancements in reconstructive surgery techniques. This study reviewed the use of three-dimensional printing for CMF trauma reconstruction using human studies. A systematic search of PubMed, EMBASE, and Google Scholar was conducted in February 2024 for case reports, case series, and clinical trials related to CMF trauma reconstruction using three-dimensional printing technology. The authors' systematic review included 20 studies and a total of 170 participants with CMF bone defects. In general, the authors observed low bias risk in analyzed case reports and series, serious bias risk in nonrandomized controlled trials, and moderate bias risk in randomized controlled trials. The printed objects included CMF structure model prototypes, patient-specific implants, and other custom surgical devices. Studies reveal successful outcomes, including restored facial symmetry and function, restored orbital occlusion, resolved enophthalmos and diplopia, achieved cosmetically symmetrical lower face reconstruction, and precise fitting of surgical devices, enhancing patient and surgeon comfort. However, complications such as local infection, implant exposure, and persistent diplopia were reported. Three-dimensional printed devices reduced surgery time but increased preparation time and production costs. In-house production options could mitigate these time and cost expenditures. Three-dimensional printing holds potential in CMF trauma reconstruction, addressing both functional and esthetic restoration. Nevertheless, challenges persist in implementing this advanced technology in resource-limited environments.
Identifiants
pubmed: 38958985
doi: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000010451
pii: 00001665-990000000-01748
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2024 by Mutaz B. Habal, MD.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors report no conflicts of interest.
Références
Taylor CA, Bell JM, Breiding MJ, et al. Traumatic brain injury–related emergency department visits, hospitalizations, and deaths—United States, 2007 and 2013. MMWR Surveillance Summaries 2017;66:1–16
Lalloo R, Lucchesi LR, Bisignano C, et al. Epidemiology of facial fractures: incidence, prevalence and years lived with disability estimates from the Global Burden of Disease 2017 study. Inj Prev 2020;26(Suppl 2):i27–i35
Parthasarathy J. 3D modeling, custom implants and its future perspectives in craniofacial surgery. Ann Maxillofac Surg 2014;4:9
Schmidt AH. Autologous bone graft: is it still the gold standard? Injury 2021;52:S18–S22
Matheus HR, Hadad H, Guastaldi FPS. The state of 3D printing of bioengineered customized maxillofacial bone scaffolds: a narrative review. Front Oral Maxillofac Med 2024;6:5–5
Lee SH, Yoo CJ, Lee U, et al. Resorption of autogenous bone graft in cranioplasty: resorption and reintegration failure. Korean J Neurotrauma 2014;10:10
Bici A, Yunitsyna A. Analysis of 3D printing techniques for building construction: a review. Springer; 2023;7:107–123
Bagaria V, Bhansali R, Pawar P. 3D printing- creating a blueprint for the future of orthopedics: Current concept review and the road ahead!. J Clinl Orth Trauma 2018;9:P207–212
Savini A, Savini GG. A short history of 3D printing, a technological revolution just started. 2015 ICOHTEC/IEEE International History of High-Technologies and Their Socio-Cultural Contexts Conference (HISTELCON). IEEE; 2015:1–8. doi:10.1109/HISTELCON.2015.7307314
Prihantono, Rahman A, Faruk M, et al. Hemimaxillectomy defect reconstruction with a maxillary obturator prosthesis using a 3D-model stereolithography: a case report. Int J Surg Case Rep 2023;108:108431
Brix F, Hebbinghaus D, Meyer W. Verfahren und Vorrichtung für den Modellbau im Rahmen der orthopädischen und traumatologischen Operationsplanung. Rötgen Praxis 1985;38:290–2
Javaid M, Haleem A, Singh RP, et al. 3D printing applications for healthcare research and development. Global Health J 2022;6:217–226
Mankovich NJ, Cheeseman AM, Stoker NG. The display of three-dimensional anatomy with stereolithographic models. Springer; 1990;3:200–203
Salah M, Tayebi L, Moharamzadeh K, et al. Three-dimensional bio-printing and bone tissue engineering: technical innovations and potential applications in maxillofacial reconstructive surgery. Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg 2020;42:18
Kim JY, Lee YC, Kim SG, et al. Advancements in oral maxillofacial surgery: a comprehensive review on 3D printing and virtual surgical planning. Appl Sci 2023;13:9907
Smoczok M, Starszak K, Starszak W. 3D printing as a significant achievement for application in posttraumatic surgeries—a literature review. Curr Med Imaging 2021;17:814–819
Hoang D, Perrault D, Stevanovic M, et al. Surgical applications of three-dimensional printing: a review of the current literature & how to get started. Ann Transl Med 2016;4:456–456
Chamo D, Msallem B, Sharma N, et al. Accuracy assessment of molded, patient-specific polymethylmethacrylate craniofacial implants compared to their 3d printed originals. J Clin Med 2020;9:832
Lynn AQ, Pflibsen LR, Smith AA, et al. Three-dimensional printing in plastic surgery: current applications, future directions, and ethical implications. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 2021;9:e3465
Moola S, Munn Z, Tufanaru C, et al. Chapter 7: Systematic reviews of etiology and risk. JBI Manual for Evidence Synthesis. JBI; 2020. doi:10.46658/JBIMES-20-08
Sterne JA, Hernán MA, Reeves BC, et al. ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions. BMJ 2016;12:i4919
Higgins J, Green S. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 510 [updated March 2011]. The Cochrane Collaboration; 2024. Published 2011. Accessed April 6: www.handbook.cochrane.org
Rosa ELS, da, Oleskovicz CF, Aragão BN. Rapid prototyping in maxillofacial surgery and traumatology. Braz Dent J 2004;15:243–247
Williams JV, Revington PJ. Novel use of an aerospace selective laser sintering machine for rapid prototyping of an orbital blowout fracture. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2010;39:182–184
Li P, Tang W, Li J, et al. Preliminary application of virtual simulation and reposition template for zygomatico-orbitomaxillary complex fracture. J CraniofacmSurg 2012;23:1436–1439
Li WZ, Zhang MC, Li SP, et al. Application of computer‐aided three‐dimensional skull model with rapid prototyping technique in repair of zygomatico‐orbito‐maxillary complex fracture. Int J Med Robot 2009;5:158–163
Lassausaie A, Sesqué A, Barthélémy I, et al. Virtual surgery planning and three-dimensional printing template for osteotomy of the zygoma to correct untreated zygomaticomaxillary complex fracture. J Craniofac Surg 2020;31:1142–1145
Marschall JS, Dutra V, Flint RL, et al. In-house digital workflow for the management of acute mandible fractures. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2019;77:2084.e1–2084.e9
Lim CGT, Campbell DI, Clucas DM. Rapid prototyping technology in orbital floor reconstruction: application in three patients. Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr 2014;7:143–146
Feng F, Wang H, Guan X, et al. Mirror imaging and preshaped titanium plates in the treatment of unilateral malar and zygomatic arch fractures. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endodontol 2011;112:188–194
Bergeron L, Bonapace-Potvin M, Bergeron F. In-house 3D model printing for acute cranio-maxillo-facial trauma surgery: process, time, and costs. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 2021;9:e3804
Benateau H, Chatellier A, Caillot A, et al. Computer-assisted planning of distraction osteogenesis for lower face reconstruction in gunshot traumas. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 2016;44:1583–1591
Kozakiewicz M, Elgalal M, Loba P, et al. Clinical application of 3D pre-bent titanium implants for orbital floor fractures. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 2009;37:229–234
Gander T, Essig H, Metzler P, et al. Patient-specific implants (PSI) in reconstruction of orbital floor and wall fractures. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 2015;43:126–130
Pedemonte C, Sáez F, Vargas I, et al. Can customized implants correct enophthalmos and delayed diplopia in post-traumatic orbital deformities? A volumetric analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2016;45:1086–1094
Cui J, Chen L, Guan X, et al. Surgical planning, three-dimensional model surgery and preshaped implants in treatment of bilateral craniomaxillofacial post-traumatic deformities. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2014;72:1138.e1–1138.e14
Li J, Li P, Lu H, et al. Digital design and individually fabricated titanium implants for the reconstruction of traumatic zygomatico-orbital defects. J Craniofac Surg 2013;24:363–368
Lieger O, Richards R, Liu M, et al. Computer-assisted design and manufacture of implants in the late reconstruction of extensive orbital fractures. Arch Facial Plast Surg 2010;12:186–191
Sigron GR, Rüedi N, Chammartin F, et al. Three-dimensional analysis of isolated orbital floor fractures pre- and post-reconstruction with standard titanium meshes and “hybrid” patient-specific implants. J Clin Med 2020;9:1579
Longeac M, Depeyre A, Pereira B, et al. Virtual surgical planning and three-dimensional printing for the treatment of comminuted zygomaticomaxillary complex fracture. J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg 2021;122:386–390
Pavlychuk T, Chernogorskyi D, Chepurnyi Y, et al. Application of CAD/CAM technology for surgical treatment of condylar head fractures: a preliminary study. J Oral Biol Craniofac Res 2020;10:608–614
Ramanathan M, Panneerselvam E, Krishna Kumar Raja VB. 3D planning in mandibular fractures using CAD/CAM surgical splints—a prospective randomized controlled clinical trial. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 2020;48:405–412
Aimar A, Palermo A, Innocenti B. The role of 3D printing in medical applications: a state of the art. J Healthc Eng 2019;2019:1–10
Meyer-Szary J, Luis MS, Mikulski S, et al. The role of 3D Printing in planning complex medical procedures and training of medical professionals—cross-sectional multispecialty review. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2022;19:3331
Segaran N, Saini G, Mayer JL, et al. Application of 3D printing in preoperative planning. J Clin Med 2021;10:917
Dvoracek LA, Lee JY, Unadkat JV, et al. Low-cost, three-dimensionally–printed, anatomical models for optimization of orbital wall reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2021;147:162–166
Ostas D, Almăsan O, Ilesan RR, et al. Point-of-care virtual surgical planning and 3D printing in oral and cranio-maxillofacial surgery: a narrative review. J Clin Med 2022;11:6625
Kokosis G, Davidson EH, Pedreira R, et al. The use of computer-aided design and manufacturing in acute mandibular trauma reconstruction. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2018;76:1036–1043
Oh TS, Jeong WS, Chang TJ, et al. Customized orbital wall reconstruction using three-dimensionally printed rapid prototype model in patients with orbital wall fracture. J Craniofac Surg 2016;27:2020–2024
Sinha P, Skolnick G, Patel KB, et al. A 3-dimensional–printed short-segment template prototype for mandibular fracture repair. JAMA Facial Plast Surg 2018;20:373–380
Food and Drug Administration. Technical Considerations for Additive Manufactured Medical Devices Guidance for Industry and Food and Drug Administration Staff. Accessed May 16, 2024. https://www.fda.gov/regulatory-information/search-fda-guidance-documents/technical-considerations-additive-manufactured-medical-devices
Center for Devices and Radiological Health (CDRH). 3D Printing Medical Devices at the Point of Care: Discussion Paper. Accessed May 16, 2024: https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/3d-printing-medical-devices/3d-printing-medical-devices-point-care-discussion-paper