The Influence of the Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Circuit and Components on Anticoagulation Management: The Pediatric Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Anticoagulation CollaborativE Consensus Conference.


Journal

Pediatric critical care medicine : a journal of the Society of Critical Care Medicine and the World Federation of Pediatric Intensive and Critical Care Societies
ISSN: 1529-7535
Titre abrégé: Pediatr Crit Care Med
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 100954653

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
01 Jul 2024
Historique:
medline: 3 7 2024
pubmed: 3 7 2024
entrez: 3 7 2024
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

To derive systematic-review informed, modified Delphi consensus regarding the influence of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) circuit components on anticoagulation practices for pediatric ECMO for the Pediatric ECMO Anticoagulation CollaborativE. A structured literature search was performed using PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library (CENTRAL) databases from January 1988 to May 2021. Management of ECMO anticoagulation in the setting of different ECMO circuit components. Two authors reviewed all citations independently, with a third independent reviewer resolving conflicts. Twenty-nine references were used for data extraction and informed recommendations, evidence-based consensus statements, and good practice statements. Evidence tables were constructed using a standardized data extraction form. Risk of bias was assessed using the Quality in Prognosis Studies tool. The evidence was evaluated using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation system. Forty-eight experts met over 2 years to develop evidence-based recommendations and, when evidence was lacking, expert-based consensus statements or good practice statements for the influence of ECMO circuit and components on anticoagulation management. A web-based modified Delphi process was used to build consensus via the Research And Development/University of California Appropriateness Method. Consensus was defined as greater than 80% agreement. One good practice statement, 2 weak recommendations, and 2 consensus statements are presented. The incorporation of new component technologies into clinical practice has outpaced clinical investigations of anticoagulation strategies for pediatric ECMO. Future investigations should leverage academic and industrial collaborations, translational platforms, and modern biostatistical methods to improve patient outcomes.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38959354
doi: 10.1097/PCC.0000000000003496
pii: 00130478-202407001-00001
doi:

Substances chimiques

Anticoagulants 0

Types de publication

Journal Article Consensus Development Conference Systematic Review

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

e1-e6

Investigateurs

Peta M A Alexander (PMA)
Melania M Bembea (MM)
Katherine Cashen (K)
Ira M Cheifetz (IM)
Heidi J Dalton (HJ)
Adam S Himebauch (AS)
Oliver Karam (O)
Katie M Moynihan (KM)
Marianne E Nellis (ME)
Caroline Ozment (C)
Lakshmi Raman (L)
Natalie E Rintoul (NE)
Ahmed S Said (AS)
Arun Saini (A)
Marie E Steiner (ME)
Ravi R Thiagarajan (RR)
Kevin Watt (K)
Ariane Willems (A)
Nicole D Zantek (ND)
Ryan P Barbaro (RP)
Katherine Steffen (K)
Adam M Vogel (AM)
Christopher Almond (C)
Marc M Anders (MM)
Gail M Annich (GM)
Leonardo R Brandão (LR)
Wayne Chandler (W)
Megan Delaney (M)
Robert DiGeronimo (R)
Sitaram Emani (S)
Samir K Gadepalli (SK)
Alejandro V Garcia (AV)
Bereketeab Haileselassie (B)
Adam S Himebauch (AS)
Robert Hyslop (R)
Martin C J Kneyber (MCJ)
Lisa Baumann Kreuziger (L)
Jennifer Le (J)
Laura Loftis (L)
Ali B V McMichael (ABV)
D Michael McMullan (DM)
Paul Monagle (P)
Kathleen Nicol (K)
Matthew L Paden (ML)
Jason Patregnani (J)
John R Priest (JR)
Leslie Raffini (L)
Lindsay M Ryerson (LM)
Steven R Sloan (SR)
Jun Teruya (J)
Andrew R Yates (AR)
Alison Gehred (A)
Elizabeth Lyman (E)
Jennifer A Muszynski (JA)

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the Society of Critical Care Medicine and the World Federation of Pediatric Intensive and Critical Care Societies.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Dr. Himebauch receives support from the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute of the National Institutes of Health (NIH) under award number K23HL153759. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the NIH. Dr. Said acknowledges research support from the Children’s Discovery Institute Faculty Development Award at Washington University in St. Louis. Dr. Turner is used by the American Board of Pediatrics, and the content of this article is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the American Board of Pediatrics. Drs. Muszynski, and Alexander received support for article research from the NIH. Dr. Alexander’s institution received funding from the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (1R13HD104432), Extracorporeal Life Support Organization (ELSO), and Novartis. Dr. Paden received funding from ELSO, he disclosed that he is past president and board member of ELSO, and he disclosed the off-label product use of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. The remaining authors have disclosed that they do not have any potential conflicts of interest.

Références

Niebler RA, Parker H, Hoffman GM: Impact of anticoagulation and circuit technology on complications during extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. ASAIO J. 2019; 65:270–276
Alexander PMA, Bembea M, Cashen K, et al.; Pediatric Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation (ECMO) Anticoagulation CollaborativE (PEACE), in collaboration with the Pediatric Acute Lung Injury and Sepsis Investigators (PALISI) Network, the Pediatric Critical Care Blood Research Network (BloodNet), and the Pediatric ECMO subgroup of PALISI and the Extracorporeal Life Support Organization (PediECMO): Executive summary: Pediatric Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Anticoagulation CollaborativE Consensus Conference. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2024; 25:643-675
Sterne JAC, Savović J, Page MJ, et al.: RoB 2: A revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ. 2019; 366:l4898
Higgins JPT, Sterne JAC, J S, et al.: A revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomized trials. Cochrane Methods. Chandler J, McKenzie J, Boutron I, et al (Eds). Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2016; 10(Suppl 1)
Hayden JA, van der Windt DA, Cartwright JL, et al.: Assessing bias in studies of prognostic factors. Ann Intern Med. 2013; 158:280–286
Balshem H, Helfand M, Schunemann HJ, et al.: GRADE guidelines: 3. Rating the quality of evidence. J Clin Epidemiol. 2011; 64:401–406
Neumann I, Santesso N, Akl EA, et al.: A guide for health professionals to interpret and use recommendations in guidelines developed with the GRADE approach. J Clin Epidemiol. 2016; 72:45–55
Alonso-Coello P, Oxman AD, Moberg J, et al.; GRADE Working Group: GRADE Evidence to Decision (EtD) frameworks: A systematic and transparent approach to making well informed healthcare choices. 2: Clinical practice guidelines. BMJ. 2016; 353:i2089
Neumann I, Brignardello-Petersen R, Wiercioch W, et al.: The GRADE evidence-to-decision framework: A report of its testing and application in 15 international guideline panels. Implement Sci. 2016; 11:93
Alonso-Coello P, Schunemann HJ, Moberg J, et al.; GRADE Working Group: GRADE Evidence to Decision (EtD) frameworks: A systematic and transparent approach to making well informed healthcare choices. 1: Introduction. BMJ. 2016; 353:i2016
Fitch K, Bernstein SJ, Aguilar MD, et al.: The RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method User’s Manual. Santa Monica, CA, RAND, 2001
Diamond IR, Grant RC, Feldman BM, et al.: Defining consensus: A systematic review recommends methodologic criteria for reporting of Delphi studies. J Clin Epidemiol. 2014; 67:401–409
Dalton HJ, Reeder R, Garcia-Filion P, et al.; Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Collaborative Pediatric Critical Care Research Network: Factors associated with bleeding and thrombosis in children receiving extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2017; 196:762–771
Barrett CS, Jaggers JJ, Cook EF, et al.: Outcomes of neonates undergoing extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support using centrifugal versus roller blood pumps. Ann Thorac Surg. 2012; 94:1635–1641
Barrett CS, Jaggers JJ, Cook EF, et al.: Pediatric ECMO outcomes: Comparison of centrifugal versus roller blood pumps using propensity score matching. ASAIO J. 2013; 59:145–151
Byrnes J, McKamie W, Swearingen C, et al.: Hemolysis during cardiac extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: A case-control comparison of roller pumps and centrifugal pumps in a pediatric population. ASAIO J. 2011; 57:456–461
Cornelius AM, Riley JB, Schears GJ, et al.: Plasma-free hemoglobin levels in advanced vs. conventional infant and pediatric extracorporeal life support circuits. J Extra Corpor Technol. 2013; 45:21–25
Dalton HJ, Cashen K, Reeder RW, et al.; Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Collaborative Pediatric Critical Care Research Network (CPCCRN): Hemolysis during pediatric extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: Associations with circuitry, complications, and mortality. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2018; 19:1067–1076
Hastings SM, Ku DN, Wagoner S, et al.: Sources of circuit thrombosis in pediatric extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. ASAIO J. 2017; 63:86–92
Jenks CL, Zia A, Venkataraman R, et al.: High hemoglobin is an independent risk factor for the development of hemolysis during pediatric extracorporeal life support. J Intensive Care Med. 2019; 34:259–264
Masalunga C, Cruz M, Porter B, et al.: Increased hemolysis from saline pre-washing RBCs or centrifugal pumps in neonatal ECMO. J Perinatol. 2007; 27:380–384
Maul TM, Aspenleiter M, Palmer D, et al.: Impact of circuit size on coagulation and hemolysis complications in pediatric extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. ASAIO J. 2020; 66:1048–1053
McMullan DM, Emmert JA, Permut LC, et al.: Minimizing bleeding associated with mechanical circulatory support following pediatric heart surgery. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2011; 39:392–397
O’Brien C, Monteagudo J, Schad C, et al.: Centrifugal pumps and hemolysis in pediatric extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) patients: An analysis of Extracorporeal Life Support Organization (ELSO) Registry data. J Pediatr Surg. 2017; 52:975–978
O’Halloran CP, Thiagarajan RR, Yarlagadda VV, et al.: Outcomes of infants supported with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation using centrifugal versus roller pumps: An analysis from the extracorporeal life support organization registry. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2019; 20:1177–1184
Johnson KN, Carr B, Mychaliska GB, et al.: Switching to centrifugal pumps may decrease hemolysis rates among pediatric ECMO patients. Perfusion. 2022; 37:123–127
Guner YS, Delaplain PT, Schomberg J, et al.; ELSO CDH Interest Group: Risk factors for hemolysis during extracorporeal life support for congenital diaphragmatic hernia. J Surg Res. 2021; 263:14–23
Erdem O, Kuiper JW, Houmes RJ, et al.: Coagulation complications after conversion from roller to centrifugal pump in neonatal and pediatric extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. J Pediatr Surg. 2021; 56:1378–1385
Muszynski JA, Bembea MM, Gehred A, et al.; Pediatric Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation (ECMO) Anticoagulation CollaborativE (PEACE), in collaboration with the Pediatric Acute Lung Injury and Sepsis Investigators (PALISI) Network, the Pediatric Critical Care Blood Research Network (BloodNet), and the Pediatric ECMO subgroup of PALISI and the Extracorporeal Life Support Organization (PediECMO): Priorities for clinical research in pediatric extracorporeal membrane oxygenation anticoagulation from the Pediatric Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Anticoagulation CollaborativE Consensus Conference. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2024; 25 (Suppl 1):e78–e89
Hastings SM, Deshpande SR, Wagoner S, et al.: Thrombosis in centrifugal pumps: Location and composition in clinical and in vitro circuits. Int J Artif Organs. 2016; 39:200–204
Betrus C, Remenapp R, Charpie J, et al.: Enhanced hemolysis in pediatric patients requiring extracorporeal membrane oxygenation and continuous renal replacement therapy. Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2007; 13:378–383
Granegger M, Thamsen B, Schloglhofer T, et al.: Blood trauma potential of the HeartWare Ventricular Assist Device in pediatric patients. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2020; 159:1519–1527.e1
McDonald JV, Green TP, Steinhorn RH: The role of the centrifugal pump in hemolysis during neonatal extracorporeal support. ASAIO J. 1997; 43:35–38
Thiara AP, Hoel TN, Kristiansen F, et al.: Evaluation of oxygenators and centrifugal pumps for long-term pediatric extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Perfusion. 2007; 22:323–326
Yu K, Long C, Hei F, et al.: Clinical evaluation of two different extracorporeal membrane oxygenation systems: A single center report. Artif Organs. 2011; 35:733–737
Extracorporeal Life Support Organization: ELSO Registry Data Definitions. Ann Arbor, MI, Extracorporeal Life Support Organization; 2022. Available at: https://www.elso.org/Portals/0/Files/PDF/ELSO%20Registry%20Data%20Definitions%2005_17_22.pdf. Accessed January 10, 2024
Stiller B, Lemmer J, Merkle F, et al.: Consumption of blood products during mechanical circulatory support in children: Comparison between ECMO and a pulsatile ventricular assist device. Intensive Care Med. 2004; 30:1814–1820
Monge MC, Kulat BT, Eltayeb O, et al.: Novel modifications of a ventricular assist device for infants and children. Ann Thorac Surg. 2016; 102:147–153
Copeland H, Nolan PE, Covington D, et al.: A method for anticoagulation of children on mechanical circulatory support. Artif Organs. 2011; 35:1018–1023

Auteurs

Adam S Himebauch (AS)

Division of Critical Care Medicine, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA.

John R Priest (JR)

Department of Respiratory Care, ECMO Program, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA.

Gail M Annich (GM)

Department of Critical Care Medicine, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON, Canada.

D Michael McMullan (DM)

Department of Surgery, Seattle Children's Hospital, Seattle, WA.

David A Turner (DA)

American Board of Pediatrics, Chapel Hill, NC.
Division of Pediatric Critical Care, Department of Pediatrics, Duke Children's Hospital, Durham, NC.

Jennifer A Muszynski (JA)

Division of Critical Care Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Nationwide Children's Hospital, Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, OH.

Peta M A Alexander (PMA)

Department of Cardiology, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA.
Department of Pediatrics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.

Matthew L Paden (ML)

Division of Pediatric Critical Care, Emory University/Children's Healthcare of Atlanta, Atlanta, GA.

Alison Gehred (A)

Grant Morrow III MD Medical Library, Nationwide Children's Hospital Columbus, OH.

Elizabeth Lyman (E)

Grant Morrow III MD Medical Library, Nationwide Children's Hospital Columbus, OH.

Ahmed S Said (AS)

Division of Pediatric Critical Care, St. Louis Children's Hospital, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH