Measurement properties of the Regular Physical Exercise Adherence Scale (REPEAS) in individuals with chronic pain.
Humans
Chronic Pain
/ psychology
Adult
Female
Male
Middle Aged
Exercise
/ psychology
Brazil
Cross-Sectional Studies
Adolescent
Young Adult
Reproducibility of Results
Surveys and Questionnaires
/ standards
Longitudinal Studies
Patient Compliance
/ statistics & numerical data
Pain Measurement
Psychometrics
Factor Analysis, Statistical
Chonic pain
Exercise
Public health
Sedentary behavior
Journal
BMC public health
ISSN: 1471-2458
Titre abrégé: BMC Public Health
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100968562
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
03 Jul 2024
03 Jul 2024
Historique:
received:
29
02
2024
accepted:
27
06
2024
medline:
4
7
2024
pubmed:
4
7
2024
entrez:
3
7
2024
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
To examine the measurement properties of the Regular Physical Exercise Adherence Scale (REPEAS) in Brazilians with chronic pain. Cross-sectional and longitudinal design (washout period for reliability). The study was conducted in two Brazilian states, Maranhão and São Paulo, and included Brazilian adults, irregular exercisers, former exercisers or non-exercise practitioners, aged 18 to 59 years and with chronic pain. The instruments used in this study were: the REPEAS, the Numerical Pain Rating Scale (NPRS), the Baecke Habitual Physical Activity Questionnaire (BHPAQ), the Pain Self-Efficacy Questionnaire (PSEQ), and the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire for general pain (RMDQ-g). The evaluation focused on structural validity, construct validity, reliability (with standard error of measurement and minimum detectable change), internal consistency, and floor and ceiling effects. The two-dimensional structure was tested through confirmatory factor analysis, which resulted in adequate fit indeces: chi-square values/degrees of freedom = 1.541, Tucker-Lewis Index = 0.966, comparative fit index = 0.974, root mean square error of approximation = 0.074, and standardized root mean square residual = 0.068. Additionally, satisfactory factor loadings (> 0.40) were obtained. Test-retest reliability and internal consistency were adequate for the environmental factors domain (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC] = 0.79, Cronbach's alpha = 0.88) and the personal factors domain (ICC = 0.97, Cronbach's alpha = 0.93). In hypothesis testing for construct validity, we observed a significant correlation with magnitude below 0.30 of the environmental factors domain of the REPEAS with RMDQ-g, PSEQ and sport domain of the BHPAQ. For the personal factors domain, we observed a significant correlation with a magnitude of 0.30 to 0.50 with RMDQ-g, PSEQ, and sport domain of the BHPAQ, and below 0.30 with leisure domain of the BHPAQ. No floor or ceiling effects were found for the REPEAS domains. The REPEAS is a valid instrument with a two-dimensional internal structure consisting of 12 items. It has a reliable construct and is suitable for use in the clinical and epidemiological context for adults with chronic pain in Brazil.
Identifiants
pubmed: 38961346
doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-19297-w
pii: 10.1186/s12889-024-19297-w
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1776Informations de copyright
© 2024. The Author(s).
Références
Geneen LJ, Moore RA, Clarke C, Martin D, Colvin LA, Smith BH. Physical activity and exercise for chronic pain in adults: an overview of Cochrane Reviews. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017.
Borisovskaya A, Chmelik E, Karnik A. Exercise and chronic pain. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2020;1228:233–53.
doi: 10.1007/978-981-15-1792-1_16
pubmed: 32342462
Hayden JA, Ellis J, Ogilvie R, Stewart SA, Bagg MK, Stanojevic S, et al. Some types of exercise are more effective than others in people with chronic low back pain: a network meta-analysis. J Physiother. 2021;67:252–62.
doi: 10.1016/j.jphys.2021.09.004
pubmed: 34538747
ACSM. American College of Sports Medicine position stand. Progression models in resistance training for healthy adults. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2009;41:687–708.
doi: 10.1249/MSS.0b013e3181915670
Kanaley JA, Colberg SR, Corcoran MH, Malin SK, Rodriguez NR, Crespo CJ, et al. Exercise/Physical activity in individuals with type 2 diabetes: a Consensus Statement from the American College of Sports Medicine. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2022;54:353–68.
doi: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000002800
pubmed: 35029593
pmcid: 8802999
Guthold R, Stevens GA, Riley LM, Bull FC. Worldwide trends in insufficient physical activity from 2001 to 2016: a pooled analysis of 358 population-based surveys with 1· 9 million participants. Lancet Glob Heal. 2018;6:e1077–86.
doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(18)30357-7
Hallal PC, Andersen LB, Bull FC, Guthold R, Haskell W, Ekelund U, et al. Global physical activity levels: Surveillance progress, pitfalls, and prospects. Lancet. 2012;380:247–57.
doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60646-1
pubmed: 22818937
Tremblay MS, Aubert S, Barnes JD, Saunders TJ, Carson V, Latimer-Cheung AE, et al. Sedentary behavior research network (SBRN)–terminology consensus project process and outcome. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2017;14:1–17.
doi: 10.1186/s12966-017-0525-8
Maciel EdaS, Silva BKR, Figueiredo FWDS, Pontes-Silva A, Quaresma FRP, Adami F, et al. Physical inactivity level and lipid profile in traditional communities in the Legal Amazon: a cross-sectional study: physical inactivity level in the Legal Amazon. BMC Public Health. 2022;22:542.
doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-12973-9
pubmed: 35303858
pmcid: 8932679
Garcia-Hermoso A, López-Gil JF, Ramírez-Vélez R, Alonso-Martínez AM, Izquierdo M, Ezzatvar Y. Adherence to aerobic and muscle-strengthening activities guidelines: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 3.3 million participants across 32 countries. Br J Sports Med. 2023;57:225–9.
doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2022-106189
pubmed: 36418149
Chimenti RL, Frey-Law LA, Sluka KA. A mechanism-based approach to physical therapist management of pain. Phys Ther. 2018;98:302–14.
doi: 10.1093/ptj/pzy030
pubmed: 29669091
pmcid: 6256939
Tan L, Cicuttini FM, Fairley J, Romero L, Estee M, Hussain SM, et al. Does aerobic exercise effect pain sensitisation in individuals with musculoskeletal pain? A systematic review. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2022;23:1–21.
doi: 10.1186/s12891-022-05047-9
Weng Q, Goh S-L, Wu J, Persson MSM, Wei J, Sarmanova A et al. Comparative efficacy of exercise therapy and oral non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and Paracetamol for knee or hip osteoarthritis: a network meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Br J Sports Med. 2023.
De Lira MR, de Oliveira AS, França RA, Pereira AC, Godfrey EL, Chaves TC. The Brazilian Portuguese version of the Exercise Adherence Rating Scale (EARS-Br) showed acceptable reliability, validity and responsiveness in chronic low back pain. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2020;21:1–13.
Pereira FHF, Santos-de-Araújo AD, Pontes-Silva A, Marinho RS, Garcia-Araújo AS, Borghi-Silva A, et al. Regular physical Exercise Adherence Scale (REPEAS): a new instrument to measure environmental and personal barriers to adherence to regular physical exercise. BMC Public Health. 2023;23:2491.
doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-17438-1
pubmed: 38093228
pmcid: 10717144
Mokkink LB, Prinsen CA, de Patrick DLJALMBHC. VCB. COSMIN Study Design checklist for patient-reported outcome measurement instruments. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Medical Centers; 2019.
Prinsen CAC, Mokkink LB, Bouter LM, Alonso J, Patrick DL, de Vet HCW, et al. COSMIN guideline for systematic reviews of patient-reported outcome measures. Qual life Res Int J Qual life Asp Treat care Rehabil. 2018;27:1147–57.
doi: 10.1007/s11136-018-1798-3
Ferreira-Valente MA, Pais-Ribeiro JL, Jensen MP. Validity of four pain intensity rating scales. Pain. 2011;152:2399–404.
doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2011.07.005
pubmed: 21856077
Pontes-Silva A, Avila MA, de Araujo Ada, Penha S, Takahasi TFC, Bassi-Dibai HY. Assessment of the reliability of the Leg lateral Reach Test to measure Thoraco-Lumbo-pelvic rotation in individuals with chronic low back Pain. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2021;44:566–72.
doi: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2021.12.001
pubmed: 35282857
Pontes-Silva A, Bassi-Dibai D, Fidelis-de-Paula-Gomes CA, Souza CdaS, Pires F, de Mostarda O. Comparison of the autonomic nervous system dysfunction between different chronic spine disorders: neck pain versus low back pain. Rev Assoc Med Bras. 2022;68:1288–96.
doi: 10.1590/1806-9282.20220406
pubmed: 36228260
pmcid: 9575013
Florindo AA, Latorre M. Do RD De O. Validação E reprodutibilidade do questionário de baecke de avaliação da atividade física habitual em homens adultos. Rev Bras Med do Esporte. 2003;9:121–35.
Nicholas MK. The pain self-efficacy questionnaire: taking pain into account. Eur J Pain. 2007;11:153–63.
doi: 10.1016/j.ejpain.2005.12.008
pubmed: 16446108
Sardá Júnior JJ, Nicholas MK, Pimenta CA, de Asghari M, Thieme A. AL. Validação do Questionário De Incapacidade Roland Morris para dor em geral. Rev Dor. 2010.
Júnior FBdaS, Dibai-Filho AV, Brito Pinheiro CA, Fidelis-de-Paula-Gomes CA, Pinheiro JS, Girasol CE, et al. 15-item Roland-Morris disability questionnaire for general pain (RMDQ-g): structural validity and criterion validity on Brazilian patients with chronic pain. Musculoskelet Sci Pract. 2023;66:102823.
doi: 10.1016/j.msksp.2023.102823
pubmed: 37421760
Brown T. Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research. 2nd edition. New York: Guilford Publications; 2006.
Schermelleh-Engel K, Moosbrugger H, Müller H. Evaluating the fit of structural equation models: tests of significance and descriptive goodness-of-fit measures. MPR-online. 2003;8:23–74.
Enderlein G, Fleiss JL. The Design and Analysis of Clinical Experiments. Wiley, New York – Chichester – Brislane – Toronto – Singapore 1986, 432 S., £38.35. Biometrical J. 1988;30:304–304.
Terwee CB, Mokkink LB, Knol DL, Ostelo RWJG, Bouter LM, De Vet HCW. Rating the methodological quality in systematic reviews of studies on measurement properties: a scoring system for the COSMIN checklist. Qual Life Res. 2012;21:651–7.
doi: 10.1007/s11136-011-9960-1
pubmed: 21732199
Pontes-Silva A, Avila MA, Fidelis-de-Paula-Gomes CA, Dibai-Filho AV. The short-form Neck Disability index has adequate measurement properties in chronic neck pain patients. Eur Spine J off Publ Eur Spine Soc Eur Spinal Deform Soc Eur Sect Cerv Spine Res Soc. 2021;30:3593–9.
doi: 10.1007/s00586-021-07019-4
Newman-Beinart NA, Norton S, Dowling D, Gavriloff D, Vari C, Weinman JA, et al. The development and initial psychometric evaluation of a measure assessing adherence to prescribed exercise: the Exercise Adherence Rating Scale (EARS). Physiotherapy. 2017;103:180–5.
doi: 10.1016/j.physio.2016.11.001
pubmed: 27913064
Bailey DL, Bishop A, McCray G, Foster NE, Holden MA. A new measure of exercise adherence: the ATEMPT (adherence to Exercise for Musculoskeletal Pain Tool). Br J Sports Med. 2024;58:73–80.
doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2022-106347
pubmed: 37945324