Application of the radial artery after angiography in patients undergoing total arterial coronary revascularization.
Coronary artery bypass grafting surgery
Radial artery
Ultrasound test
Journal
Journal of cardiothoracic surgery
ISSN: 1749-8090
Titre abrégé: J Cardiothorac Surg
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101265113
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
03 Jul 2024
03 Jul 2024
Historique:
received:
09
03
2024
accepted:
15
06
2024
medline:
4
7
2024
pubmed:
4
7
2024
entrez:
3
7
2024
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
There is growing evidence supporting the utilization of the radial artery as a secondary arterial graft in coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) surgery. However, debates continue over the recovery period of the radial artery following angiography. This study aims to evaluate the clinical outcomes and experiences related to the use of the radial artery post-angiography in total arterial coronary revascularization. A retrospective analysis was performed on data from patients who underwent total arterial CABG surgery at the University of Hong Kong Shenzhen Hospital from July 1, 2020, to September 30, 2022. Preoperative assessments included ultrasound evaluations of radial artery blood flow, diameter, intimal integrity, and the Allen test. Additionally, pathological examinations of the distal radial artery and coronary artery CT angiography were conducted, along with postoperative follow-up to assess the safety and efficacy of using the radial artery in patients undergoing total arterial CABG. A total of 117 patients, compromising 102 males and 15 females with an average age of 60.0 ± 10.0 years, underwent total arterial CABG. The internal mammary artery was used in situ in 108 cases, while in 4 cases, it was grafted to the ascending aorta due to length limitations. Bilateral radial arteries were utilized in 88 patients, and bilateral internal mammary arteries in 4 patients. Anastomoses of the proximal radial arteries to the proximal ascending aorta included 42 cases using distal T-anastomosis and 4 using sequential grafts. The interval between bypass surgery and coronary angiography ranged from 7 to 14 days. Pathological examination revealed intact intima and continuous elastic membranes with no significant inflammatory infiltration or hyperplastic lumen stenosis in the radial arteries. There were no hospital deaths, 3 cases of perioperative cerebral infarction, 1 secondary thoracotomy for hemorrhage control, 21 instances of intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) assistance, and 2 cases of poor wound healing that improved following debridement. CT angiography performed 2 weeks post-surgery showed no internal mammary artery occlusions, but 4 radial artery occlusions were noted. Ultrasound may be used within 2 weeks post-angiography to assess the recovery of the radial artery in some patients. Radial arteries with intact intima may be considered in conjunction with the internal mammary artery for total arterial coronary CABG. However, long-term outcomes of these grafts require further validation through larger prospective studies.
Identifiants
pubmed: 38961485
doi: 10.1186/s13019-024-02893-7
pii: 10.1186/s13019-024-02893-7
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
417Informations de copyright
© 2024. The Author(s).
Références
Gaudino M, Benedetto U, Fremes SE et al. Angiographic outcome of coronary artery bypass grafts: the Radial Artery Database International Alliance[J]. Ann Thorac Surg 2020;109(3):688–94.
Qiao E, Wang Y, Yu J, et al. Short-term assessment of radial artery grafts with multidetector computed tomography[J]. J Cardiothorac Surg. 2021;16(1):93.
doi: 10.1186/s13019-021-01465-3
pubmed: 33865411
pmcid: 8052742
Tatoulis J, Buxton BF, Fuller JA. The right internal thoracic artery: is it underutilized?[J]. Curr Opin Cardiol. 2011;26(6):528–35.
doi: 10.1097/HCO.0b013e32834b9f87
pubmed: 21918432
Carpentier A, Guermonprez JL, Deloche A et al. The aorta-to-coronary radial artery bypass graft. A technique avoiding pathological changes in grafts[J]. Ann Thorac Surg 1973;16(2):111–21.
Khan MZ, Patel K, Franklin S, Faruqi A, Ahmad W, Saeed J. Radial artery spasm: reviews and updates. Ir J Med Sci. 2020;189(4):1253–8.
doi: 10.1007/s11845-020-02203-9
pubmed: 32185750
Urso S, Sadaba R, Gonzalez JM et al. Total arterial revascularization strategies: a meta-analysis of propensity score-matched observational studies[J]. J Card Surg 2019;34(9):837–45.
Rayol SC, Van den Eynde J, Cavalcanti L, et al. Total arterial coronary bypass graft surgery is Associated with Better Long-Term Survival in patients with Multivessel Coronary Artery Disease: a systematic review with Meta-Analysis[J]. Braz J Cardiovasc Surg. 2021;36(1):78–85.
doi: 10.21470/1678-9741-2020-0653
pubmed: 33594864
pmcid: 7918394
Gaudino M, Tondi P, Benedetto U et al. Radial artery as a coronary artery bypass conduit: 20-Year Results[J]. J Am Coll Cardiol 2016;68(6):603–10.
Ognerubov DV, Sedaghat A, Provatorov SI, Tereshchenko AS, Bertrand OF, Bernat I, Arutyunyan GK, Pogorelova OA, Tripoten MI, Balakhonova TV, Samko AN, Merkulov EV. A randomized trial comparing short versus prolonged hemostasis with rescue recanalization by Ipsilateral Ulnar Artery Compression: impact on radial artery occlusion-the RESCUE-RAO trial. J Interv Cardiol. 2020;2020:7928961.
doi: 10.1155/2020/7928961
pubmed: 33149729
pmcid: 7603610
Zhao Y, Zhang X, Song Y, Xia Y, Huang D, Zhang J, Liu D, Zhang D. A retrospective study of the No-Contact technique to obtain radial arteries for coronary artery bypass grafting. Heart Surg Forum. 2023;26(4):E358–62.
doi: 10.59958/hsf.5531
pubmed: 37679089
Gaudino M, Benedetto U, Fremes S et al. Radial-artery or saphenous-vein grafts in coronary-artery bypass Surgery[J]. N Engl J Med 2018;378(22):2069–77.
Royse A, Pamment W, Pawanis Z, Clarke-Errey S, Eccleston D, Ajani A, Wilson W, Canty D, Royse C. Patency of conduits in patients who received internal mammary artery, radial artery and saphenous vein grafts. BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2020;20(1):148.
doi: 10.1186/s12872-020-01433-0
pubmed: 32204693
pmcid: 7092416
Gaudino M, Benedetto U, Fremes S, Ballman K, Biondi-Zoccai G, Sedrakyan A, Nasso G, Raman J, Buxton B, Hayward PA, Moat N, Collins P, Webb C, Peric M, Petrovic I, Yoo KJ, Hameed I, Di Franco A, Moscarelli M, Speziale G, Puskas JD, Girardi LN, Hare DL, Taggart DP. RADIAL investigators. Association of Radial Artery Graft vs Saphenous Vein Graft with Long-Term Cardiovascular outcomes among patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting: a systematic review and Meta-analysis. JAMA. 2020;324(2):179–87.
doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.8228
pubmed: 32662861
pmcid: 7361649
Eid-Lidt G, Rivera RodríguezA, Jimenez Castellanos J, Farjat Pasos JI, Estrada López KE, Gaspar J. Distal Radial Artery Approach to prevent radial artery occlusion trial. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2021;14(4):378–85.
doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2020.10.013
pubmed: 33602433
Chardigny C, Jebara VA, Acar C, Descombes JJ, Verbeuren TJ, Carpentier A, Fabiani JN. Vasoreactivity of the radial artery. Comparison with the internal mammary and gastroepiploic arteries with implications for coronary artery surgery. Circulation. 1993;88(5 Pt 2):II115–27.
pubmed: 8222146
Tu L, Jin Y, Li S, Yu Q, Lu Y. Distal transradial access decreases radial artery occlusion rate in percutaneous coronary interventions. Am J Transl Res. 2023;15(4):2802–10.
pubmed: 37193144
pmcid: 10182503
He GW, Taggart DP. Antispastic Management in arterial grafts in coronary artery bypass grafting Surgery[J]. Ann Thorac Surg 2016;102(2):659–68.
Gaudino M, Crea F, Cammertoni F et al. Technical issues in the use of the radial artery as a coronary artery bypass conduit[J]. Ann Thorac Surg 2014;98(6):2247–54.
Sousa-Uva M, Gaudino M, Schwann T, et al. Radial artery as a conduit for coronary artery bypass grafting: a state-of-the-art primer[J]. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2018;54(6):971–6.
doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezy335
pubmed: 30376067
Loh SH, Chang CY, Huang SF, Chao SC, Lin WK, Huang EY, Tsai CS, Tsai YT. Functional effects of urotensin-II on intracellular pH regulators in human radial artery smooth muscle cells. Peptides. 2020;126:170236.
doi: 10.1016/j.peptides.2019.170236
pubmed: 31874233