Estimating survival scenarios in advanced or metastatic gastric and oesophageal adenocarcinoma: a systematic review of randomized-controlled trials.

Prognosis advanced communication gastric adenocarcinoma metastatic

Journal

Current medical research and opinion
ISSN: 1473-4877
Titre abrégé: Curr Med Res Opin
Pays: England
ID NLM: 0351014

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
13 Jul 2024
Historique:
pubmed: 4 7 2024
medline: 4 7 2024
entrez: 4 7 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

We aimed to summarize survival data from RCTs in patients with GO adenocarcinoma; estimate and explain worst-, typical-, and best-case-scenarios of survival time; and determine if simple multiples of median overall survival (mOS) could estimate these percentiles. We systematically searched RCTs of systemic therapies for GO adenocarcinoma published 2000-2022. The following key percentiles were extracted from overall survival curves: 90th (worst-case), 75th (lower-typical), 25th (upper-typical), and 10th (best-case). We tested if these percentiles could be estimated by simple multiples of mOS: 0.25 of the median for the 90 We identified 44 trials (22,447 participants). For first line chemotherapy and immunotherapy combined (CI) trials ( We provide realistic, evidence-based prognostic information as scenarios for survival time which can inform clinical decision-making. Simple multiples of the mOS accurately estimated the percentiles for most groups.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND UNASSIGNED
We aimed to summarize survival data from RCTs in patients with GO adenocarcinoma; estimate and explain worst-, typical-, and best-case-scenarios of survival time; and determine if simple multiples of median overall survival (mOS) could estimate these percentiles.
METHODS UNASSIGNED
We systematically searched RCTs of systemic therapies for GO adenocarcinoma published 2000-2022. The following key percentiles were extracted from overall survival curves: 90th (worst-case), 75th (lower-typical), 25th (upper-typical), and 10th (best-case). We tested if these percentiles could be estimated by simple multiples of mOS: 0.25 of the median for the 90
RESULTS UNASSIGNED
We identified 44 trials (22,447 participants). For first line chemotherapy and immunotherapy combined (CI) trials (
CONCLUSION UNASSIGNED
We provide realistic, evidence-based prognostic information as scenarios for survival time which can inform clinical decision-making. Simple multiples of the mOS accurately estimated the percentiles for most groups.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38961804
doi: 10.1080/03007995.2024.2376129
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Review

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

1-11

Auteurs

Sayeda K Naher (SK)

National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) Clinical Trials Centre (CTC), University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW, Australia.
Illawarra and Shoalhaven Local Health District, Warrawong, NSW, Australia.

Rebecca Mercieca-Bebber (R)

National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) Clinical Trials Centre (CTC), University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW, Australia.

Derrick Siu (D)

National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) Clinical Trials Centre (CTC), University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW, Australia.

Martin R Stockler (MR)

National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) Clinical Trials Centre (CTC), University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW, Australia.

Belinda E Kiely (BE)

National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) Clinical Trials Centre (CTC), University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW, Australia.

Peter Grimison (P)

Chris O'Brien Lifehouse, Camperdown, NSW, Australia.

Classifications MeSH