Drug-Drug Interactions Involving High-Alert Medications that Lead to Interaction-Associated Symptoms in Pediatric Intensive Care Patients: A Retrospective Study.


Journal

Paediatric drugs
ISSN: 1179-2019
Titre abrégé: Paediatr Drugs
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 100883685

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
04 Jul 2024
Historique:
accepted: 16 06 2024
medline: 4 7 2024
pubmed: 4 7 2024
entrez: 4 7 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

Children treated in a pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) often receive several drugs together, among them drugs defined as high-alert medications (HAMs). Those drugs carry a high risk of causing patient harm, for example, due to a higher potential for interactions. HAMs should therefore be administered with caution, especially in a PICU. The objective of the current study was to identify drug-drug interactions involving HAMs that increase the risk of interaction-associated symptoms in pediatric intensive care. In a retrospective study, we analyzed the electronic documentation of patients hospitalized for at least 48 h in a general PICU who received at least two different drugs within a 24-h interval. We assessed potential drug-drug interactions involving HAM on the basis of the two drug information databases UpToDate and drugs.com. Furthermore, we analyzed whether symptoms were observed after the administration of drug pairs that could lead to interaction-associated symptoms. For drug pairs involving HAM administered on at least 2% of patient days, and symptoms observed at least ten times after a respective drug pair, we calculated odds ratios, 95% confidence intervals, and p-values by using a univariate binary logistic regression. Among 315 analyzed patients, 81.3% (256/315) received drugs defined as high-alert medication for pediatric patients. Those high-alert medications were involved in 20,150 potential drug-drug interactions. In 14.0% (2830/20,150) of these, one or more symptoms were observed that could be a possible consequence of the interaction, resulting in 3203 observed symptoms affecting 56.3% (144/256) of patients receiving high-alert medication. The odds ratios for symptoms observed after a drug-drug interaction were increased for eight specific symptoms (each p ≤ 0.05), especially hemodynamic alterations and disturbances of electrolyte and fluid balance. The odds ratio was highest for decreased blood pressure observed after the administration of the drug pair fentanyl and furosemide (OR 5.06; 95% confidence interval 3.5-7.4; p < 0.001). Increased odds ratios for specific symptoms observed after drug-drug interactions resulted from eight combinations composed of eight different drugs: digoxin, fentanyl, midazolam, phenobarbital, potassium salts and vancomycin (high-alert medications), and the diuretics furosemide and hydrochlorothiazide (non-high-alert medications). The resulting drug pairs were: potassium salts-furosemide, fentanyl-furosemide, vancomycin-furosemide, digoxin-furosemide, digoxin-hydrochlorothiazide, fentanyl-phenobarbital, potassium salts-hydrochlorothiazide, and midazolam-hydrochlorothiazide. In a cohort of PICU patients, this study identified eight specific drug pairs involving high-alert medications that may increase the risk of interaction-associated symptoms, mainly hemodynamic alterations and electrolyte/fluid balance disturbances. If the administration of those drug pairs is unavoidable, patients should be closely monitored.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Children treated in a pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) often receive several drugs together, among them drugs defined as high-alert medications (HAMs). Those drugs carry a high risk of causing patient harm, for example, due to a higher potential for interactions. HAMs should therefore be administered with caution, especially in a PICU.
OBJECTIVES OBJECTIVE
The objective of the current study was to identify drug-drug interactions involving HAMs that increase the risk of interaction-associated symptoms in pediatric intensive care.
METHODS METHODS
In a retrospective study, we analyzed the electronic documentation of patients hospitalized for at least 48 h in a general PICU who received at least two different drugs within a 24-h interval. We assessed potential drug-drug interactions involving HAM on the basis of the two drug information databases UpToDate and drugs.com. Furthermore, we analyzed whether symptoms were observed after the administration of drug pairs that could lead to interaction-associated symptoms. For drug pairs involving HAM administered on at least 2% of patient days, and symptoms observed at least ten times after a respective drug pair, we calculated odds ratios, 95% confidence intervals, and p-values by using a univariate binary logistic regression.
RESULTS RESULTS
Among 315 analyzed patients, 81.3% (256/315) received drugs defined as high-alert medication for pediatric patients. Those high-alert medications were involved in 20,150 potential drug-drug interactions. In 14.0% (2830/20,150) of these, one or more symptoms were observed that could be a possible consequence of the interaction, resulting in 3203 observed symptoms affecting 56.3% (144/256) of patients receiving high-alert medication. The odds ratios for symptoms observed after a drug-drug interaction were increased for eight specific symptoms (each p ≤ 0.05), especially hemodynamic alterations and disturbances of electrolyte and fluid balance. The odds ratio was highest for decreased blood pressure observed after the administration of the drug pair fentanyl and furosemide (OR 5.06; 95% confidence interval 3.5-7.4; p < 0.001). Increased odds ratios for specific symptoms observed after drug-drug interactions resulted from eight combinations composed of eight different drugs: digoxin, fentanyl, midazolam, phenobarbital, potassium salts and vancomycin (high-alert medications), and the diuretics furosemide and hydrochlorothiazide (non-high-alert medications). The resulting drug pairs were: potassium salts-furosemide, fentanyl-furosemide, vancomycin-furosemide, digoxin-furosemide, digoxin-hydrochlorothiazide, fentanyl-phenobarbital, potassium salts-hydrochlorothiazide, and midazolam-hydrochlorothiazide.
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
In a cohort of PICU patients, this study identified eight specific drug pairs involving high-alert medications that may increase the risk of interaction-associated symptoms, mainly hemodynamic alterations and electrolyte/fluid balance disturbances. If the administration of those drug pairs is unavoidable, patients should be closely monitored.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38963501
doi: 10.1007/s40272-024-00641-x
pii: 10.1007/s40272-024-00641-x
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Informations de copyright

© 2024. The Author(s).

Références

Marquez C, Thompson R, Feinstein JA, et al. Identifying opportunities for pediatric medication therapy management in children with medical complexity. J Am Pharm Assoc. 2003;2022(62):1587–95.
Feinstein J, Dai D, Zhong W, et al. Potential drug-drug interactions in infant, child, and adolescent patients in children’s hospitals. Pediatrics. 2015;135:e99-108.
doi: 10.1542/peds.2014-2015 pubmed: 25511114
Kiesel LM, Bertsche A, Kiess W, et al. Intensive care drug therapy and its potential adverse effects on blood pressure and heart rate in critically ill children. World J Pediatr. 2023;19:902–11.
doi: 10.1007/s12519-023-00683-0 pubmed: 36854951 pmcid: 10423157
Dai D, Feinstein JA, Morrison W, et al. Epidemiology of polypharmacy and potential drug–drug interactions among pediatric patients in ICUs of US children’s hospitals. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2016;17:e218–28.
doi: 10.1097/PCC.0000000000000684 pubmed: 26959349 pmcid: 5243142
He M, Huang Q, Lu H, et al. Call for decision support for high-alert medication administration among pediatric nurses: findings from a large, multicenter, cross-sectional survey in China. Front Pharmacol. 2022;13: 860438.
doi: 10.3389/fphar.2022.860438 pubmed: 35928259 pmcid: 9343802
Schilling S, Koeck JA, Kontny U, et al. High-alert medications for hospitalised paediatric patients - a two-step survey among paediatric clinical expert pharmacists in Germany. Pharmazie. 2022;77:207–15.
pubmed: 35751160
Institute for Safe Medication Practices: High-alert medications in acute care settings. 2018. https://www.ismp.org/sites/default/files/attachments/2018-08/highAlert2018-Acute-Final.pdf . Accessed 08 Dec 2023.
Franke HA, Woods DM, Holl JL. High-alert medications in the pediatric intensive care unit. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2019;10:85–90.
doi: 10.1097/PCC.0b013e3181936ff8
Maaskant JM, Eskes A, van Rijn-Bikker P, et al. High-alert medications for pediatric patients: an international modified Delphi study. Expert Opin Drug Saf. 2013;12:805–14.
doi: 10.1517/14740338.2013.825247 pubmed: 23931332
Bataille J, Prot-Labarthe S, Bourdon O, et al. Highalert medications in a French paediatric university hospital. J Eval Clin Pract. 2015;21:262–70.
doi: 10.1111/jep.12302 pubmed: 25560989
Loria G. Reduction of harm from high risk medications. Apollo Med. 2012;9:160–5.
doi: 10.1016/j.apme.2012.05.001
Melo VV, Costa MS, Soares AQ. Quality of prescription of high-alert medication and patient safety in pediatric emergency. Farm Hosp. 2014;38:9–17.
pubmed: 24483854
Rao C, Shenoy V, Udaykumar P. Potential drug–drug interactions in the pediatric intensive care unit of a tertiary care hospital. J Pharmacol Pharmacother. 2019;10:63–8.
doi: 10.4103/jpp.JPP_27_19
Choi YH, Lee IH, Yang M, et al. Clinical significance of potential drug-drug interactions in a pediatric intensive care unit: a single-center retrospective study. PLoS ONE. 2021;16: e0246754.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0246754 pubmed: 33556128 pmcid: 7870058
Cortes ALB, Silvino ZR. Factors associated to potential drug interactions in one Intensive Care Unit: a cross-sectional study. Esc Anna Nery. 2019;23: e20180326.
doi: 10.1590/2177-9465-ean-2018-0326
Hassanzad M, Arenas-Lopez S, Baniasadi S. Potential drug-drug interactions among critically ill pediatric patients in a tertiary pulmonary center. J Clin Pharmacol. 2018;58:221–7.
doi: 10.1002/jcph.996 pubmed: 28834562
Suriyapakorn B, Chairat P, Boonyoprakarn S, et al. Comparison of potential drug-drug interactions with metabolic syndrome medications detected by two databases. PLoS ONE. 2019;14: e0225239.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0225239 pubmed: 31725785 pmcid: 6855424
Alkhalid ZN, Birand N. Determination and comparison of potential drug–drug interactions using three different databases in northern cyprus community pharmacies. Niger J Clin Pract. 2022;25:2005–9.
doi: 10.4103/njcp.njcp_448_22 pubmed: 36537458
Günay A, Demirpolat E, Ünal A, et al. A comparison of four drug-drug interaction databases for patients undergoing haematopoietic stem cell transplantation. J Clin Pharm Ther. 2022;47:1711–9.
doi: 10.1111/jcpt.13728 pubmed: 35777071
Vanham D, Spinewine A, Hantson P, et al. Drug-drug interactions in the intensive care unit: do they really matter? J Crit Care. 2017;38:97–103.
doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2016.09.014 pubmed: 27883969
Bakker T, Dongelmans DA, Nabovati E, et al. Heterogeneity in the identification of potential drug-drug interactions in the intensive care unit: a systematic review, critical appraisal, and reporting recommendations. J Clin Pharmacol. 2022;62:706–20.
doi: 10.1002/jcph.2020 pubmed: 34957573 pmcid: 9303874
Naseem F, Saleem A, Mahar IA, et al. Electrolyte imbalance in critically ill paediatric patients. Pak J Med Sci. 2019;35:1093–8.
doi: 10.12669/pjms.35.4.286 pubmed: 31372149 pmcid: 6659045
Wati DK. Measuring and managing fluid overload in pediatric intensive care unit. In: Erbay RH, editor. Current topics in intensive care medicine. 1st ed. London: IntechOpen; 2018. p. 3–12.
Buckley MS, Leblanc JM, Cawley MJ. Electrolyte disturbances associated with commonly prescribed medications in the intensive care unit. Crit Care Med. 2010;38:253–64.
doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3181dda0be
Li T, Hu B, Ye L, et al. Clinically significant cytochrome P450-mediated drug-drug interactions in children admitted to intensive care units. Int J Clin Pract. 2022;2022:2786914.
doi: 10.1155/2022/2786914 pubmed: 36081809 pmcid: 9427250
Ismail M, Aziz S, Noor S, et al. Potential drug-drug interactions in pediatric patients admitted to intensive care unit of Khyber Teaching Hospital, Peshawar, Pakistan: a cross-sectional study. J Crit Care. 2017;40:243–50.
doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2017.04.028 pubmed: 28458171
Mlambo VC, Algaze CA, Mak K, et al. Impact of abnormal potassium on arrhythmia risk during pediatric digoxin therapy. Pediatr Cardiol. 2024;45:901–8.
doi: 10.1007/s00246-022-03051-3 pubmed: 36403164
Katz DT, Torres NS, Chatani B, et al. Care of pediatric solid organ transplant recipients: an overview for primary care providers. Pediatrics. 2020;146: e20200696.
doi: 10.1542/peds.2020-0696 pubmed: 33208494
Kleiber N, van Rosmalen J, Tibboel D, et al. Hemodynamic tolerance to IV clonidine infusion in the PICU. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2018;19:e409–16.
doi: 10.1097/PCC.0000000000001602 pubmed: 29912068
Schindler E, Yamamoto T. New drugs for old problems: which inotropes for critically ill children? Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2018;19:674–5.
doi: 10.1097/PCC.0000000000001559 pubmed: 29985286
Groll AH, Tragiannidis A. Update on antifungal agents for paediatric patients. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2010;16:1343–53.
doi: 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2010.03334.x pubmed: 20678177
Salem F, Rostami-Hodjegan A, Johnson TN. Do children have the same vulnerability to metabolic drug–drug interactions as adults? A critical analysis of the literature. J Clin Pharmacol. 2013;53:559–66.
doi: 10.1002/jcph.13 pubmed: 23724424
Gonzalez D, Sinha J. Pediatric drug-drug interaction evaluation: drug, patient population, and methodological considerations. J Clin Pharmacol. 2021;61:S175–87.
doi: 10.1002/jcph.1881 pubmed: 34185913 pmcid: 8500325
Salerno SN, Burckart GJ, Huang SM, et al. Pediatric drug-drug interaction studies: barriers and opportunities. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2019;105:1067–70.
doi: 10.1002/cpt.1234 pubmed: 30362111
Kearns GL. Impact of developmental pharmacology on pediatric study design: overcoming the challenges. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2000;106:S128–38.
doi: 10.1067/mai.2000.109419 pubmed: 10984393
Levy G. Pharmacokinetics in renal disease. Am J Med. 1977;62:461–5.
doi: 10.1016/0002-9343(77)90397-7 pubmed: 851113

Auteurs

Lisa Marie Kiesel (LM)

Clinical Pharmacy, Institute of Pharmacy, Medical Faculty, Leipzig University, and Drug Safety Center, Leipzig University and Leipzig University Hospital, Leipzig, Germany.

Astrid Bertsche (A)

Division of Neuropediatrics, University Hospital for Children and Adolescents, Greifswald, Germany.
Center for Pediatric Research, University Hospital for Children and Adolescents, Leipzig, Germany.

Wieland Kiess (W)

Center for Pediatric Research, University Hospital for Children and Adolescents, Leipzig, Germany.

Manuela Siekmeyer (M)

Center for Pediatric Research, University Hospital for Children and Adolescents, Leipzig, Germany.

Thilo Bertsche (T)

Clinical Pharmacy, Institute of Pharmacy, Medical Faculty, Leipzig University, and Drug Safety Center, Leipzig University and Leipzig University Hospital, Leipzig, Germany. thilo.bertsche@uni-leipzig.de.

Martina Patrizia Neininger (MP)

Clinical Pharmacy, Institute of Pharmacy, Medical Faculty, Leipzig University, and Drug Safety Center, Leipzig University and Leipzig University Hospital, Leipzig, Germany.

Classifications MeSH